osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finally finished Eva Rice’s The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp. I liked it, but it’s a bit uneven: it has two stories and they sort of work against each other. There’s the story of Tara’s coming of age and her relationship with her sister Lucy (and Lucy’s relationship with her husband and her best friend), which is very well done, and then there’s the story of Tara’s rise to pop stardom, which seems a bit tacked on.

It seems like Rice is reluctant to let Tara’s growing fame change her relationships in any fundamental way. Tara comments repeatedly that her stardom will change her whole life, but it really never does, and therefore it never really feels real.

But I did enjoy the coming-of-age story a lot.

Also Sarah Addison Allen’s Lost Lake, which is my favorite book of hers since The Sugar Queen. It feels less self-consciously, quirkily southern than some of her intervening books, while retaining the strong sense of place that I really enjoy in her work. By the end of the book I wanted to visit Lost Lake and stay in one of the cabins.

And G. K. Chesterton’s The Man Who Was Thursday. This book’s subtitle is A Nightmare, and it makes sense: there is something odd and dreamlike about it, which made it interesting but insubstantial. I had a similar reaction to his collection of essays Tremendous Trifles: he seems addicted to contradictions, whether or not they actually have a deeper meaning or even actually exist.

Emma is a big fan of Chesterton. Maybe you have to be Catholic to really appreciate him.

What I’m Reading Now

Barbara Hambly’s A Free Man of Color. I am a bit in the soup about who all the characters are, but I’ve got the main ones straight and I’m having a good time reading it.

Also Brideshead Revisited, which is very well written and well-observed and extremely English. I’m enjoying all those parts. I don’t think I’m supposed to find Sebastian’s self-pitying decline into alcoholism quite as annoying as I do.

What I Plan to Read Next

Jaclyn Moriarty’s The Cracks in the Kingdom. Yes! It has arrived! I am trying not to get too excited about it, because it’s easier to enjoy things if you don’t pile too much anticipation on them.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Holly Black’s Doll Bones, which is technically quite good but didn’t resonate with me. And I felt like Black didn’t do quite as much with the doll/ghost as she perhaps should have: its early and occasionally sinister behavior is never quite explained.

I also finished The Beautiful Cigar Girl, the book that was half biography of Edgar Allan Poe and half true crime history about the murder of Mary Rogers. The Mary Rogers half suffers a bit because the crime was never solved and is probably not, at this distance in time, solvable; I don’t blame the author for the lack of resolution, but it does make for a slightly unsatisfying read.

The Edgar Allan Poe parts were fascinating, though. What a piece of work he was! And what a sad life he led.

What I’m Reading Now

Judith Flanders’ The Invention of Murder, which is a sort of book-form list of all the most popular murders in Victorian England, with bonus information about Victorian theater culture, broadsides, melodrama, puppetry, etc. Super interesting!

And of course The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp. I feel terribly, terribly bad for Matilda, although there is some truth to Lucy’s comment that Matilda brought all her troubles on herself. Then again, Lucy is trying to assuage her own guilt for her part in those troubles: it is not her fault Raoul fell for her rather than Matilda, but Lucy does cling to guilt for things that are not really her fault. And even if it wasn’t anyone’s fault, it did devastate Matilda.

What I Plan to Read Next

Edward Eager's Knight's Castle, because [livejournal.com profile] asakiyume tells me that it's hilarious in conjunction with Ivanhoe.

The audiobook of Brideshead Revisited. It’s read by Jeremy Irons, you guys! JEREMY IRONS.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

John Steinbeck’s ill-named The Red Pony. I can only assume he picked that title because he realized that the more accurate The Dead Horses might put people off. Yes, multiple dead horses! First the red pony catches the strangles and chokes to death on its own mucus, and then the ranch hand bashes a mare to death in order to extract her baby by Caesarean section.

Yeah. I think that tells you everything you need to know about this book.

What I’m Reading Now

Louisa May Alcott’s Jo’s Boys. There’s a whole chapter in this book about “how to behave around an author,” presumably because Alcott had no other platform on which to castigate her over-invested fans. Jo has become a famous author, and is beset on all sides by rapacious reporters and mooncalf fans. One girl flings herself into Jo’s arms, crying, “Darling, love me!” Oh, fans. Behaving badly since 1886!

I’ve also started Garth Nix’s A Confusion of Princes, which is a little too action-adventure for my taste. There are only so many times the hero can escape assassination before it starts to get repetitive. But perhaps soon he’ll start doing something else.

I haven’t gotten much farther in The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp, because I forgot to take it along when I visited my parents over the weekend. Tara and her sister Lucy have arrived in London! Tara has been swept off on a shopping trip by a woman named Clover.

Also, I feel that this book was not very well copy-edited, because I keep stumbling over small continuity errors.

What I Plan to Read Next

Charles Finch’s The Last Enchantments.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Finished Reading

Louisa May Alcott’s Little Men, which is reasonably entertaining but not one of her best. (Rose in Bloom will now and forever be my favorite Alcott book.) But it did do a good job showing Jo and Professor Bhaer as a well-suited match: I just can’t see Laurie running a school with Jo, or indeed living a life active and varied enough to suit her.

Also William Dean Howells’ The Rise of Silas Lapham. Howells is unusual among nineteenth century American writers in that he writes comedies of manners, like a male gaze-y version of Austen (which I suppose would make him an American Trollope…) I find his books mildly entertaining on the literary front, but fascinating for their vision of nineteenth-century American life among the settled middle classes: he’s like a grown-up and less blatantly moralizing version of Alcott.

What I’m Reading Now

Ernest Hemingway’s A Moveable Feast. I’ve wanted to read this since reading The Paris Wife, but put it off because another book - sadly, I can’t remember which - said that A Moveable Feast was vicious and score-settling, particularly with regard to Gertrude Stein.

So far, however, Hemingway’s tone toward Stein is if anything bemused. She was clearly a complicated and sometimes exasperating person, who did not so much talk as pontificate, even when she was talking about things she didn’t actually understand. It would be easy to write a vicious caricature, and instead Hemingway writes about her with affectionate amusement. It seems like he still doesn’t know quite what to make of her, forty years later.

(On the other hand, he also describes someone - I forget just who, but he does tell us the name - as having the eyes of a “failed rapist.” I can only assume the man was dead by the time the book was published, because talk about character assassination!)

I’m also reading Judith Flanders’ Circle of Sisters: Alice Kipling, Georgiana Burne-Jones, Agnes Poynter, and Louisa Baldwin, which is about the four MacDonald sisters and their illustrious marriages. I really enjoyed Flanders’ later book, Inside the Victorian Home: A Portrait of Domestic Life in Victorian England, but this is clearly more of a journeyman effort. It’s not precisely boring, but the prose (and the people) don’t come to life like they do in Inside the Victorian Home. I keep getting Agnes and Louisa (and their respective husbands) mixed up. They have no distinguishing features.

Also continuing in The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp. Tara has just met the boy she had a huge crush on when she was ten, only to discover that he doesn’t remember her and that he’s gotten kind of full of himself. WOE.

What I Plan to Read Next

Probably Garth Nix’s A Confusion of Princes. For years he never published anything I found interesting, and now he’s gone and put out not only A Confusion of Princes (space opera), Newt’s Emerald (magical mystery Regency romance), and Sir Hereward and Mister Fitz: Three Adventures (magical adventures, aimed at adults).

Oh, and! Rosemary Sutcliff’s The Witch’s Brat.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Finished Reading

Charles Finch’s An Old Betrayal, the latest of his Charles Lenox Victorian-era London mysteries, to which I am quietly devoted. This is one of the good ones: Finch wove all his subplots together nicely, and the mystery was beautifully twisty without ever feeling unnecessarily so. (I realize that mystery writers need twists, but sometimes I end up thinking “No one plots a murder this complicated, this is getting ridiculous.”)

Also Rumer Godden’s Miss Happiness and Miss Flower, about a little girl who makes a dollhouse for two Japanese dolls she receives. Or, actually, her cousin does most of the actual making, because he knows how to work wood; she just makes some pillows and things.

It’s a somewhat disappointing book, because most of the details of the actual making were moved to endnotes, as has most of the cultural information about Japan. It’s as if the book itself is simply a brisk summary, and all the meat of the story has been shuffled off to the back.

What I’m Reading Now

Still drifting through Eva Rice’s The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp. I’m really enjoying it so far; right now we’re still in Tara’s childhood in the English country, where Tara sings in the church choir and Tara’s sister Lucy has fallen in love with the great country houses of England.

Also Bill Bryson’s One Summer: America, 1927, which is about aviation, Calvin Coolidge, botched murders, Babe Ruth, Prohibition, Henry Ford, and all the other strange and fascinating things that were going on in America in the summer of 1927.

I think Bryson’s writing was fresher and funnier in his earlier books, but I should add that this is partly because he set himself a high bar in those earlier books: even with the drop-off in quality, this book has made me laugh out loud a number of times. And I find the organization interesting, too: it’s easy to follow and immensely readable, even though it’s basically just a hodgepodge of disparate things that happened around the same time. There’s a sense of how big the world is.

What I Plan to Read Next

Charles Finch has written his first non-Charles Lenox book, The Last Enchantments, which I have decided to read. It’s about, uh - maybe I should have checked what it was about before deciding to read it… it’s about a passionate love affair during a year’s study abroad at Oxford. Well, this could be awesome, as long as it’s not too painfully autobiographical. (We are talking about the man who gave his detective his own first name, after all.)

Also Jo Baker’s Longbourn, because [livejournal.com profile] ladyherenya wrote such a great review of it. I am way, way down on the holds list for this one, though.

I’m also contemplating whether I should try Ibbotson’s adult novels, particularly A Countess Below Stairs or A Song for Summer or A Morning Gift. Does anyone have an opinion about them?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Tony Horwitz’s Confederates in the Attic, which is about the memory of the Civil War in the South. It’s interesting, particularly the parts about Civil War reenactors and the lengths to which they’ll go for the hardcore experience - Horwitz falls in with a group that likes to do ten-mile marches at least partially barefoot - but rather shallow; Horwitz covers a lot of ground but doesn’t get very in-depth with it.

Also Kate DiCamillo’s Floyd and Ulysses, which won the 2014 Newbery Medal. I find this baffling. It’s not a bad book, but it’s awfully slight, and most of the characters are so broadly drawn as to feel slightly unreal.

And why does DiCamillo keep writing books about rodents who fall in love with humans? First the mouse in The Tale of Despereaux and now the squirrel in Floyd and Ulysses. It’s such an odd and specific theme.

What I’m Reading Now

Erin Morgenstern’s The Night Circus. The plot by itself probably wouldn’t grab me, but such plot as there is exists mostly as a hanger for the Night Circus itself, and given that I would happily wander around the Night Circus for hours, that’s just as well. It’s almost painful to realize that this place, described in all this loving and dreamlike detail, doesn’t actually exist and can’t be visited.

The Narrator from Pushing Daisies narrates the audiobook of The Night Circus, which is pretty perfect. The Night Circus doesn’t have the same aesthetic as Pushing Daisies, but it is similar in that it’s a strongly aestheticized story, where the aesthetic is at times purposefully at odds with the underlying grimness.

(I’m contemplating having a Night Circus tea. The aesthetic would make it easy to decorate for: black table cloth, white table runner, crimson cookie tin as a centerpiece…)

I’ve also started Eva Rice’s The Misinterpretation of Tara Jupp as my new book to read a chapter a night. So far, we’ve been introduced to Tara’s large family and Tara’s late childhood habit of sneaking into the neighboring estate to ride horses in the pre-dawn light. This seems most promising.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’m thinking about reading the rest of Pamela Dean’s books. She only wrote six, but getting my hands on them may be tricky. The local library has The Dubious Hills and Juniper, Gentian, and Rosemary, but not the Secret Country trilogy…

I need to stop picking up new authors whose work is hard to get a hold of. This is getting a little ridiculous.
osprey_archer: (books)
Recently [livejournal.com profile] ladyherenya and I have been chatting about “books like I Capture the Castle, because we both love books that could be so described and thought that, hey, it would be so much easier to find them if there were a master list somewhere.

But in making a list it became apparent that “books like I Capture the Castle” needed to be defined, so here’s an attempt at itemizing the necessary qualifications for a book to make the cut.

1. The voice. Cassandra’s voice is, for me, the heart of I Capture the Castle. She’s young and sheltered, but clever, inquisitive, funny; intoxicated with language and all its possibilities. She could natter on about dust bunnies and be brilliant.

I tend to lump everything that echoes Cassandra’s voice into the umbrella category, but there are other qualities that many of these stories share.

2. A eccentric family. The parent figures are loving but somehow deficient - either too distant or too immature to hold the family together - and the sibling bonds are tight, often acting as the support that parents can’t provide. There’s often a sense of isolation from the world, at least at the beginning.

3. The coming of age story. There are lots of kinds of coming of age stories, and this particular sort involves the heroine breaking free of the aforementioned isolation and stepping into the world - both socially and intellectually; and, in The Montmaray Journals, politically. There’s more to say about this, I think.

There’s often a lot of writing about books. I love books about books, and books about the intellect taking shape, and they’re so rare.

4. A peculiar house, preferably a castle, although a decrepit country house is also acceptable. I think this is as much for atmosphere as anything else - doubtless a Cassandra-ish story could be set in a split-level; but who doesn’t love atmosphere?

Those are the main qualities that I’ve thought of so far. Am I missing anything?

***

If you, too, wish to read more books like I Capture the Castle, so far our list contains:

1. Michelle Cooper’s brilliant Montmaray Journals - A Brief History of Montmaray and The FitzOsbornes in Exile, soon to be joined by The FitzOsbornes at War. I’M SO EXCITED. I WANT TO READ IT NOW.

2. Eva Rice’s The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets

3. Jean Webster’s Daddy-long-legs

With honorable mentions to:

1. Mary Ann Shaffer and Annie Barrows’ The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, because Juliet sounds like a grown-up Cassandra and because there’s lots of talking about books and ideas even if there’s no coming of age story - Juliet being already quite grown-up - and no castle, worse luck.

2. L. M. Montgomery’s Emily of New Moon trilogy. I’ve only read the first, but [livejournal.com profile] ladyherenya says the later ones follow a Cassandra-ish coming of age story.

It’s not a very long list. If you have any possible additions, please suggest them.
osprey_archer: (books)
And now for a review something I actually liked: Eva Rice’s The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets, which is like I Capture the Castle if I Capture the Castle took place in the mid-1950s and was not only an exquisite coming-of-age novel but also a perfect crystallization of an era.

The story kicks off when our heroine, Penelope, impulsively hops in a taxi with Charlotte - never mind she’s never met Charlotte before in her life. Their friendship becomes the heart of this lively, meandering story; Charlotte’s brash, impulsive, larger-than-life personality encourages Penelope to leave behind her retiring childhood and experience the world.

And what a world it is! It’s 1955, and in England rationing is only just ending; after decades of suffering life is becoming fun again, youth culture is blooming, there are grand parties and Johnnie Ray (a precursor to Elvis) and Americans, with their exotic American accents: the birth of a bright new modernity.

The Lost Art of Keeping Secrets captures this excitement beautifully. It’s not often that a book makes me want to visit the 1950s - but damn, this one does.

But, though main mood of the book is giddy excitement, all isn’t sunshine. This rush of newness swamps the old, and while the change may be necessary, letting go is painful. Penelope lives in a grand old house, Magna, which belonged to her father who died in the war. The house is an albatross around the family’s neck, a huge cash drain; yet it is also home.

The only problem with the book is that the ending is somewhat rushed, as is the romance. Rice makes the somewhat unusual choice to end with Penelope’s realization that she has feelings for the young man in question, rather than the two of them actually getting together; while on the one hand this keeps the focus of the book on Penelope and Charlotte’s friendship, which is as it should be, it’s not quite satisfying.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
8 910 11 121314
15 1617 18 192021
222324 25262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 25th, 2025 04:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios