osprey_archer: (books)
I'm racing toward the end of The Count of Monte Cristo! Only about a dozen chapters left now - and so many threads to wrap up!!!

How will the Count manage it all??? )
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

May Gibbs’ The Complete Adventures of Snugglepot and Cuddlepie, which I didn’t like nearly as much as The Magic Pudding, unfortunately. I think perhaps you need to be introduced to Snugglepot and Cuddlepie at a tender age to appreciate them properly?

What I’m Reading Now

G. A. Bradshaw’s Carnivore Minds: Who These Fearsome Animals Really Are, which starts with an impassioned plea for humans to treat animals better. If you ever want to confirm your suspicions that humanity is actually kind of awful, read a book about animal intelligence.

What I Plan to Read Next

My first reading challenge for 2017 is “a book in translation,” and I spent some time whiffling between possibilities (more Zola? Dosteovsky? Perhaps I should try Balzac?) before realizing in a blaze of light that I have the perfect book already on my shelf: Stefan Zweig’s Beware of Pity, which I have intended to read for nearly a decade now without ever buckling down to it. The time has come!
osprey_archer: (Agents of SHIELD)
I found John Kim's The Angry Therapist: A No BS Guide to Finding and Living Your Own Truth super frustrating, possibly because I took the title too literally and believed that he was going to be angry about something. The growing trend toward giving patients medication without therapy? The high cost of mental health care? The fact that American prisons are stuffed with mentally ill people who really ought to be in treatment, not incarcerated? The difficulties of getting insurance companies to pay for mental health care? Stigma around mental health problems?

I mean really, there are a lot of things a therapist could be angry about. But as far as I can tell, the thing that most grates Kim's cheese is the fact that sometimes the strict guidelines of therapeutic practice where he works make him feel stifled, which is... well, I'm sure it's frustrating, but it seems like a weirdly self-centered reason to call himself "The Angry Therapist."

This is in fact something I felt about the book in general: it's weirdly self-centered. Kim wants to help you find your best self, but he also wants you to know that he used to be a screenwriter - a successful screenwriter! He didn't become a therapist because the whole screenwriting thing didn't work out for him. He just realized that being a screenwriter wasn't fulfilling his true self, so he went back to school to study psychology.

And also he ran a high-end nightclub where he rubbed elbows with film stars. And also he created a start-up company called ModelInABottle.com which was staffed with models who were friends of his girlfriend at the time. Who was a model. Just FYI.

Holy humblebragging, Batman.

He also has a deeply aggravating imagined scene where he creates a Genuine Emotional Connection (tm) with a waitress by breaking free of the chains of phatic discourse. She asks how he's doing and instead of saying "Fine" like a normal person, he's all - I have to transcribe this, I'm sorry -

JOHN
You know what?

She instantly looks nervous.

JOHN
You've been asking people that all day. So, maybe I should ask you how you're doing?

She looks a bit shocked, confused, taken aback. She fumbles her words.

WAITRESS
Um...fine, tired. Been here since 10 AM. I can't wait to get home.


PROBABLY BECAUSE SHE WANTS TO GET AWAY FROM NOSY CUSTOMERS PRYING INTO THINGS THAT AREN'T THEIR BUSINESS. If you make your waitstaff look nervous, shocked, confused, and taken aback, that is probably a sign that you are doing something wrong.

(But of course the scene ends with the waitress smiling and grateful that someone has taken the time to treat her like a human being instead of just handing her the credit card for the check. "Thank you," she says, and John replies, "You're welcome.")

Do you know what I dread at work? People trying to create genuine emotional connections with me when all I want to do is take their coffee order and then finish filling the caramel bottles, or emptying the trash, or doing literally anything else because everything in the world is less taxing than having an emotionally meaningful conversation with a total stranger. I get paid $10 an hour! That buys you phatic discourse and an empty smile! There's a reason therapists charge $100 an hour for this shit!

...Having said this, I have friends who work retail who love it when people treat them like a human being rather than a coffee dispenser, so who knows, maybe your friendly local barista is just dying for a chance to tell a customer her feet hurt.

Otherwise, it's basically a bog-standard self-help book (live in the now, surround yourself with people who support the real you, etc. etc.). There are probably five dozen books at your local Barnes and Noble that will give you the same advice. Read one of them.
osprey_archer: (books)
I hope everyone had a merry Christmas! Or a happy Sunday for non-Christmas-celebrators.

I got (among other loot) a gigantic Cooks Illustrated cookbook, which I have been flipping through lovingly and with glee. One of my New Year's Resolutions for 2017 is to practice cooking meat (I'm thinking one new recipe a month?), and this book will clearly aid me in my quest.

Also it has a beautiful crepes recipe with a lot of suggested fillings and I so want to have a crepe smorgasbord.

In any case! Today is Monday, which of course means it is Caldecott day, and this week's book is Always Room for One More! Which is an illustrated Scottish folk song about a man who invites every passerby into his house, where they all dance together with him and his wife and ten children, until alas! the house falls down. But then all the visitors band together and rebuild it, twice as big as before.

There are great washes of pink across the bottom of the page, to represent the heather I suppose, and the people are drawn with tight little crosshatching, so all the characterization has to come through using their gestures, because they don't have faces. It is not my favorite illustration style, but I did quite enjoy the song.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
After a string of subpar books, I was beginning to lose faith in Netgalley - is a title and a couple of short descriptive paragraphs truly enough information to make an informed reading decision? - but Joe Moran’s Shrinking Violets: The Secret Life of Shyness restored it. The book is a melange of anecdotes from the lives of famous shy people (lots of authors, artists, singers), various theories both ancient and modern about the nature of shyness, and a light sprinkling of philosophizing on Moran’s part.

He promises at the outset that this book is not going to turn into a sideways biography of his own history of shyness, which I appreciated, and I think the fact that he doesn’t discuss his own shyness directly allows him to dig deeper into the nature of shyness as a whole. He’s interested in the amorphous nature of shyness, the way that it waxes and wanes in a life, and affects some people almost totally and other people only in small parts of their lives; the fact that it can coexist with other personality traits that might seem quite antithetical to it. “It is so dirt-common that no especially disagreeable or virtuous human attributes can be extrapolated from it,” he notes. “It cohabits with egotism and self-pity as readily as with modesty and thoughtfulness.”

He notes also that people are often paradoxically proud of their shyness, that we tend to believe that it makes us unique and perhaps deeper than other people - the irony being that many people consider themselves shy, that perhaps most people suffer at least occasionally from the feeling that they don’t belong, that there are few things in the world less unique than suffering from embarrassment and anxiety.

This quote struck me, although unfortunately it’s too long to stick on an inspirational post-it note somewhere:

Eventually most of us come to see that our feelings of unbelonging are unexpectional and that the truly heroic act is to carry on trying to connect with others, even if it can be dispiriting to keep doing something you are not very good at.

Also it’s not exactly inspirational. But it struck a chord with me.
osprey_archer: (books)
THE MOMENT WE HAVE ALL BEEN WAITING FOR HAS ARRIVED!!!

SPOILERS OBVIOUSLY )

We are racing swiftly toward the end! It's been so hard to limit myself to one chapter a day this week, what with the whole story coming together the way it is.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I've Just Finished Reading

Nothing. :(

What I'm Reading Now

I'm about halfway through Pam Munoz Ryan's Echo, which is annoying me by piling cliffhanger on cliffhanger. We have one story thread which ends with the hero being arrested by the Gestapo, and then another which ends with a different hero falling out of a tree and I'm going to guess fainting, but it sure sounds like he might be dead, and now we're heading into story thread three without any resolution for the first two in sight.

I'm also about halfway done with The Angry Therapist, which I still am finding disappointing. He just seems... so much less angry than I expected. No rants about health insurance/stigmas surrounding mental health issues/antidepressants (everyone has a rant about antidepressants, either pro or con)/the tragic state of psychologist training/something?

What I Plan to Read Next

I was alllllmost caught up on Netgalley books... and then I checked out the recently added books, and they had one about the history of shyness and another about the minds and social lives of carnivorous animals and another one about Abraham Lincoln (and also one about the resurgence of the Russian Orthodox church which I just barely managed to resist), so. Piles of books to read again!
osprey_archer: (books)
Lenore Newman’s Speaking in Cod Tongues: A Canadian Culinary Journey suffers from the same problem as Kelsey Osgood’s How to Disappear Completely: On Modern Anorexia: both books have theses that undermine their own existences. How to Disappear Completely is an eating disorder memoir that hypothesizes that eating disorder memoirs actually help spread eating disorders (because girls who are already sad read them and go “Hey, this is a culturally acceptable way to express my sadness! And meet unrealistic standards of feminine beauty and self control! AND possibly get a book deal! SCORE.”), while Speaking in Cod Tongues is an attempt to construct a theory of Canada’s national cuisine while simultaneously contemplating the fact that the very idea of a national cuisine is a hegemonic nationalist construction.

And in both cases I found the authors’ theories convincing and went “Hey! Yeah! ...but if your thesis is correct, doesn’t this mean that your book is part of the problem and shouldn’t exist?”, which makes for a weird reading experience.

In Newman’s case, this is especially sad because it seems so unnecessary. She has the makings of an interesting food history/memoir about Stuff We Eat in Canada, and if she weren’t so determined to make a national cuisine of it she could have focused more on the areas where she had plenty of information and not tossed in the obligatory (surfacey and dull, although mercifully short) sections about provinces where she’s clearly spent less time.

Also Newman is not that good at describing the way food tastes - she seems averse to saying she dislikes anything, presumably because saying something tastes bad is an expression of hegemonic domination - okay, honestly, I think this is the core flaw of the book. Newman is so afraid of saying something problematic that she often shies away from saying much of anything.

But despite these rather core flaws, I did enjoy the book. She’s got a wonderful set of food facts to share, especially if like me you know very little about Canadian cuisine. The titular cod tongues, for instance, aren’t tongues at all, but one of three fatty pieces of meat in a cod’s head (the other two are called cod cheeks). It's too bad you have to wade through all the theorizing to get there.
osprey_archer: (books)
This week's Caldecott winner is May I Bring a Friend?, but before we discuss it, a pause for Caldecott related business. The Museum of Fine Arts in Boston is having an exhibit called Make Way for Ducklings: The Art of Robert McCloskey, an artist who won the Caldecott twice (most notably for, well, Make Way for Ducklings.

If only I had a teleportation device! I'd love to see the exhibition. There's a slideshow of some of the highlights on the website, but it only whetted my appetite.

***

In any case! This week's book is Beatrice Schenk de Regniers' May I Bring a Friend? (illustrated by Beni Montresor), which I felt a bit dubious about - it's one of those books with black line drawings filled in with colors like a coloring book, and I wasn't feeling the color palette chosen. (Pink, orange, yellow, and red, with splashes of olive green.)

However, the story is totally charming. The king and queen invite a young boy to tea, and in response he asks, "May I bring a friend?" Well, the king and queen have excellent manners, so of course they say yes, and the little fellow brings... a giraffe.

One might expect this to put them off further invitations, but in fact they keep inviting him, and he brings a a hippo, an elephant, a troop of monkeys, and a pride of lions in quick succession. Cute and funny.

But I think my very favorite thing are the little vignette illustrations of the king and queen when they're alone together: picking flowers, dancing, fishing, catching butterflies, rolling a ball of yarn together. (The king holds a great bundle of yarn on his outstretched arms as the queen rolls it up.) Now there's a happy couple.
osprey_archer: (books)
I finished Debbie Corso's Stronger Than BPD: The Girl's Guide to Taking Control of Intense Emotions, Drama, and Chaos Using DBT, which I thought was very useful. I wanted to gain a greater understanding of how DBT works, and indeed, it gives a thorough, accessible, and entertainingly written introduction to that, so if you're looking for an introductory book about Dialectical Behavioral Therapy look no further.

(If I wanted to get a greater understanding of Borderline Personality Disorder, though, I would have been out of luck. This book assumes that you already have the symptom list at your fingertips.)

Corso does have one slightly annoying tic, which is that she constantly uses the word "skillful" to describe the use of the techniques that the book outlines. (For instance, if you're stuck in traffic behind a slow driver, you could either melt down and start honking and tailgating them... or you could skillfully distract yourself from the situation by, say, turning on the radio.) Not that I have anything against the word skillful, it's just on practically every page.

But the repetition of the word did make me notice the extent to which DBT and CBT both position certain mental illness - depression, anxiety, in this book borderline personality disorder - not so much as illnesses but as skill deficits. Why are you unhappy? Because you haven't learned how to happy yet. Here are some happiness skills you can practice, like musical scales but for joy.
osprey_archer: (books)
OH MY GOD THE COUNT OF MONTE CRISTO IS GOING TO KILL ME WITH SUSPENSE AND FEELS AND ALL I WANT IS MORE. All of the Count's plans are coming together ALL AT ONCE and it's so exciting and also MERCEDES.

MERCEDES OH MY GOD )
osprey_archer: (books)
What I Just Finished Reading

Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, which I nearly gave up on twice because November was not a great month for reading a harrowing book about wartime, death, dark humor and hopeless moral quandaries, but I persevered and I’m glad I did. It’s well-written and thought-provoking (and emotion-provoking) book, and worth reading.

Also, now that I’ve read it I never have to read it again. Also a good feeling.

What I’m Reading Now

I’m allllllmost done with Pamela Dean’s The Whim of the Dragon, the final book in the Secret Country trilogy. I really wanted to finish it last night, but there is only so much Pamela Dean I can read at once before my brain becomes saturated and ceases to take in any more information, so I didn’t. But maybe today!

I intend to do a longer post about the trilogy once I’m done reading. Has anyone else read these books?

I’m also reading a couple of books from Netgalley. One is about Canadian cuisine, about which more anon, although I wish to note right now that doughnuts are at least as American as they are Canadian, I am just saying, they are so American that we sometimes use them as hamburger buns like the culinary monsters that we are.

The other one is a book about DBT (dialectical behavioral therapy), which I picked up because one of my friends has been thinking about trying it out. I wanted to be supportive and also I wanted to know the difference between DBT and CBT, because they seemed (from reading the Wikipedia page) pretty similar except that it’s a hell of a lot harder to find a DBT practitioner.

I’m halfway through the book, and philosophically they do seem pretty similar. My impression is that the main difference is that the difference is that DBT is a more back-to-the-basics version of CBT - that it assumes a lower starting level of emotional skills. It’s like CBT is an emotional high school equivalency degree, whereas DBT is like, “Okay, we’ll go back to the alphabet if that’s what you need.”

What I Plan to Read Next

Pam Munoz Ryan’s Echo, which is the last of the 2016 Newbery Honor books, and which will I think conclude all of the reading that I planned to get done this year. Possibly I set myself a few too many reading goals this year? But then I don’t regret any of them, so maybe not.
osprey_archer: (books)
When I was a child, I didn't like Where the Wild Things Are. Max was exactly the sort of boy I didn't like in real life, the kind who is always being loud and causing trouble and generally disrupting everything, and I didn't like the illustration style either. Too dark, too cross-hatched, and the Wild Things with their claws and horns and big teeth and giant mouths frightened me.

Looking at them now, the Wild Things seem weirdly cuddly despite their toothiness - they're all pudgy and soft and furry - but the world looks different when you're five years old.

I'm still not in love with the illustration style on a personal level, but I can appreciate the amount of skill that went into, say, crosshatching every single little leaf on each tree in the land where the Wild Things are. And - I just noticed this - Maurice Sendak uses quite a different style to illustrate the water in the ocean Max crosses in his boat, much more impressionist with great blobs of olive green and dark teal and white for foam.
osprey_archer: (books)
We're moving right along in The Count of Monte Cristo! I'm about two thirds of the way through the book, and the plot-nooses are tightening around the necks of Dantes' enemies...

Spoilers! )
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Grace Lin’s When the Sea Turned to Silver, which was delightful, although it made me realize how vague are my memories of the earlier two books in the series. There are a lot of bits that I thought were probably callbacks to the other books (and is Pinmei’s Amah supposed to be Minli from Where the Mountain Meets the Moon?), but I don’t recall any of the details, only the general sense of enchantment and delight.

What I’m Reading Now

Lenore Newman’s Speaking in Cod Tongues: A Canadian Culinary Journey, which sadly I think is going to have less luscious food description than that title implies. Although maybe I’m wrong? Prove me wrong, book! Scale back the academic theorizing about the symbolic nation-building nature of constructing a cuisine and invest in food description instead!

What I Plan to Read Next

Netgalley has at last come through with a copy of Helen Rappaport’s Caught in the Revolution: Petrograd, Russia, 1917 - A World on the Edge. Will it be packed brimful with fascinating Russian Revolution anecdotes? I can only hope!
osprey_archer: (books)
I had high hopes for the hilarity of JP Sears How to Be Ultra Spiritual, because the cover on Netgalley amused me so much, but unfortunately the rest of the book was never as funny as the cover; I didn't laugh out loud once. Possibly I haven't read enough fatuous New Age-y self-help manuals for a satire of them to really speak to me?

Although I think it's also an issue that Sears is trying to skewer everything at once - spirituality as a status symbol ("I meditate for three hours every morning"), the social media dance of looking for attention without trying to look like you're looking for attention, modern Western society's whole weirdly diseased relationship with the need for attention ("Begging people to notice you is the biggest character defect this side of killing baby dolphins"). So his satire is biting but also somewhat scattershot.

Actually, I've been thinking about this recently, the fact that almost everyone wants and needs attention and yet one of the nastiest things you can say to someone is "You're only doing X for attention." It doesn't even matter which X you're doing. Putting on make-up? Exercising an artistic talent? Displaying a symptom of mental illness? God help you if it's not 100% internally directed.

And of course almost nothing that anyone does is 100% internally directed (especially not things we take the trouble of posting on the internet), so this is an insult that always hits its mark.

Anyway, the book. It's not a very funny book, which is kind of a fatal defect in a humor book.
osprey_archer: (books)
Today's Caldecott book is most weather appropriate: Ezra Jack Keats' The Snowy Day, which is about, well, a snowy day. (The Caldecott committee seems peculiarly besotted by snow. This is the third or fourth book that is all snow all the time, and I know there are at least two more coming down the list. Here is my advice for aspiring Caldecott illustrators: snow. Lots of snow)

We had this book when I was a child, and read it occasionally, although it was never a big favorite: I preferred illustrations with lots of lovely fiddly detail, like Jan Brett or Brambly Hedge. Can you look at the picture for at least an hour and still find new bits in it? Clearly a sign of A++ illustration.

The Snowy Day also has lovely illustrations, but in the opposite direction: all big simply blocks of color. In a touch that I find particularly delightful, almost all the colors are plain blocks - red for Peter's snowsuit, brown for his face (The Snowy Day is the first Caldecott book with an African-American protagonist) - except for the snow, which is white with a watercolor wash of purple and pink and blue. It's quite lovely.
osprey_archer: (books)
I need to be pickier in the books I get from Netgalley; I've hit a whole string of duds in a row. The latest one is Debra A. Shattuck's Bloomer Girls: Women Baseball Pioneers, which is both boring and unconvincing. How do you write a boring book about early women baseball players?

It's possible that Shattuck just doesn't have the sources to write an interesting ones. Most of what she's got seems to be newspaper mentions of either women's baseball pick-up games, or the occasional touring women's baseball team, which is interesting in the limited sense that it shows that some women did play baseball, but doesn't give much insight into how they thought about it themselves.

It might, in different hands, give quite a bit of insight into what nineteenth century white American culture thought about women baseball players, but it certainly doesn't in Shattuck's, because she's intent on proving that baseball wasn't seen as a "men's game" until around 1900.

That would be super interesting if it were true, but Shattuck's own evidence totally disproves this. The newspaper articles she quotes make it very clear that baseball was seen as a masculine pursuit (possibly a masculine pursuit more suited to boys than grown-up men - this seems to be the loophole that Shattuck is hoping to shove her argument through - but still masculine). Many of them heap scorn or condescending amusement on women and girls playing baseball, and the ones that favor it do so with an argumentative air: they know very well that they're going against the tide of public opinion.

The fact that many women did play baseball doesn't mean that it wasn't considered masculine. You wouldn't have tomboy stories if women doing something automatically meant society considered it feminine!

Did Shattuck come up with her thesis and then run with it, actual evidence be damned? It's really too bad, because I think someone without that axe to grind probably could write an interesting book about women baseball pioneers - but this is not that book.
osprey_archer: (books)
I'm about two thirds of the way through this book, and at last the Count's carefully laid plans are beginning to bear fruit! At least, his plans against Villefort and Danglars are; I'm not sure what his plan against Fernand is, and it's making me nervous.

And CLEARLY Spoilers! )

Still no word from Caderrouse, but given how tightly everyone in this novel seems to be bound together, I'm sure he'll show up again sometime.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I’ve finished the first two books in Pamela Dean’s Secret Country trilogy, The Secret Country and The Hidden Land, and these books, you guys, these books are so damn weird. Actually I think you could say this about all of Dean’s books - they are shaped differently from the usual run of books, which is one of the reasons I love them but also means that I spend a lot of time going “Wait, wait, what just happened? What is happening? What even is the nature of this magical land and why is it full of people quoting Shakespeare?”

I am partway through the third book, The Whim of the Dragon, but dragging my feet on it because the death of one of my favorites has been not so much foreshadowed as fated, but in such a way that I keep hoping against hope that it won’t happen and am going to be terribly upset when it does. A VERSION OF HIS DEATH IS DESCRIBED IN LITERALLY THE FIRST CHAPTER OF THE FIRST BOOK, WHY DID I GET SO ATTACHED.

What I’m Reading Now

God, so many things. Too many things, which is honestly part of the problem: I need to buckle down and finish a few because I’m beginning to feel overwhelmed by my partly read pile. Aside from The Whim of the Dragon, I’m also reading Tim O’Brien’s The Things They Carried, which I’m also dragging my feet on because it’s about the Vietnam War and nothing good ever happens in Vietnam War books.

And I have two books from NetGalley. First is Debra A. Shattuck’s Bloomer Girls, which is about the history of American women in baseball in the 19th century and so far mostly seems to consist of iterations of the fact that women played baseball. The second is John Kim’s The Angry Therapist, which I think I would enjoy more if Kim didn’t strike me as super full of himself and yet also bizarrely insecure. He keeps saying things like, “When I began my blog, where I talk about therapy and also my motorcycle and my tattoos because I am just that cool, I had no idea that it would one day have a million zillion bazillion hits and also revolutionize therapy” (I’m paraphrasing, he’s probably not actually this bad), and it’s like, c’mon dude, there’s no need to be so modest; you’re not that great.

Maybe once I’m past the introduction he’ll start talking more about his theories and less about himself.

What I Plan to Read Next

I found a book on NetGalley called Speaking in Cod Tongues, which is about Canadian cuisine. How could I say no to a food memoir/possibly road trip book? NetGalley speaks to all my worst impulses.

And then NetGalley had a book called How to Be Ultra Spiritual, which is about… the commercialization of spiritual stuff I think… anyway it looks hilarious, of course I had to request it.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
67 8 9101112
13 1415 16 17 1819
20 21 22 23242526
27 28 293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 30th, 2025 02:05 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios