osprey_archer: (Default)
While I was in Boston I forced [personal profile] skygiants and [personal profile] genarti to watch the first episode of Cheburashka, which led to a discussion of Soviet animation, which led to an admission that I’ve been meaning to read more about the topic for years and never have… which ended in putting a hold on Maya Balakirsky Katz’s Drawing the Iron Curtain: Jews and the Golden Age of Soviet Animation, as it’s the only Soviet animation book my library owns.

The prose is very readable (not always a given in film or literary criticism), although when I was familiar with the animation in question I often had doubts about Katz’s interpretations. For instance, in discussing the Cheburashka series (produced by a mostly Jewish creative team), Katz suggests that Cheburashka’s best friend Crocodile Gena “is a sell-out: an old Party Jew who walks around with a pipe dangling from his mouth but without a pair of pants to show for all his compromises.”

I mean, sure, MAYBE Gena’s red coat is a sign that he’s an old Bolshevik, and MAYBE “Crocodile Gena’s African roots speak to his status as a member of the ancient Hebrew race,” and MAYBE when Gena offers to make of list of all the lonely people who want to make friends this is a reference to KGB references making up lists of all the people who visit Jewish gathering places…

Or MAYBE Crocodile Gena is simply Cheburashka’s best friend, a kind-hearted crocodile who works at a zoo! Just perhaps.

However, the book did furnish an excellent list of films to watch, many of which are available on Youtube. I watched:

Dziga Vertov’s Soviet Toys, the first Soviet animated film, from 1924. (Vertov is best known for the documentary Man with a Movie Camera.) It really feels like a Soviet political cartoon brought to life: a worker and a farmer meld together into one terrifying Janus-faced creature and defeat a bourgeois capitalist who looks like the Monopoly man!

Ivan Ivanov-Vano’s Black and White, a 1932 animated short that was the only remnant of a larger project to make a film about American race relations. There were so few Black actors in the Soviet Union that a delegation of twenty-two Harlem Renaissance intellectuals crossed the sea to star in the film, including Langston Hughes, who cried when he read the script, because “the writer meant well, but knew so little about his subject, and the result was a pathetic hodgepodge of good intentions and faulty facts…”

Hughes informed the Soviets they would need to start over and write a new script, which scuppered the project, except for this animated short. Most of Hughes’ criticisms of the full-length film script seem to apply to the short, too.

Boris Stepantsev’s The Pioneer’s Violin, a wordless seven-minute short in which a grinning Nazi tank driver demands that a Young Pioneer play a German folksong on his violin… and the Young Pioneer responds by playing the Internationale, for which he is gunned down. The film is inspired by a true story of a Jewish boy, Avram “Musya” Pinkenzon, who really was a Pioneer and whose defiance was celebrated as a Pioneer story. (Pioneer Heroes were a whole Soviet genre.) The screenwriter was Jewish, and Katz argues that Stepantsev (although probably not Jewish) directed the short in ways that suggest the nameless Pioneer’s Jewish identity. This is a stronger argument than Crocodile Gena, Old Bolshevik, although it may be one of those things that you only see if you are looking for it?

The film is stunning: an incredible depiction of the shift from abject terror to enraged defiance. I’ve included a link in case anyone wants to watch it.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I’ve always had a weakness for the Hans Christian Anderson story “The Wild Swans,” so when I learned there was an animated Soviet version, directed by husband and wife team Mikhail Tsekhanovsky and Vera Tsekhanovskaya (and conveniently available on Youtube!) of course I had to watch it.

I loved the animation in this film - particularly the spare backgrounds, so that you have the king’s hunting party galloping across a grassland represented by a few tufts of grass on a white background. It gives a sort of medieval tapestry effect that suited the story.

One slight disappointment: the film did away with my favorite bit at the end of the story. In the original, the princess can’t finish the sleeves on the final magical nettle-cloth sweater because she’s been locked up on suspicion of witchcraft, so when her brothers show up in swan form and she throws the sweaters to turn them back into humans, her youngest brother’s arms remain wings - and as he stands there in human form, wings spread, the onlookers cry out, “An angel!”

It’s such a beautiful image (although I’ve always worried how the youngest brother coped with having wings for arms for the rest of his life…) and I was really looking forward to it in the animation. But it didn’t happen! All the brothers get full sweaters and have all their human limbs. Much more convenient than being stuck with swan wings, but not as visually striking.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Lotte Reiniger was a German animator who invented silhouette animation, in which intricate cut-paper figures cavort across a multiplane camera (with Reiniger also invented, ten years before Walt Disney). Reiniger is most famous for her full-length film The Adventures of Prince Achmed, but she also made lots of short films adapted from fairy tales or opera scores. Kanopy has three of them: “Papageno,” “Harlequin,” and “The Stolen Heart.”

Reiniger’s skills with her scissors are visible in all these films, but her work is most jaw-dropping in “Papageno” (a short featuring the character from the opera The Magic Flute), which features not only intricately cut feathers, both on the birds that Papageno catches and on Papageno’s own feathery skirt and head dress, but also a plethora of lovely delicate birdcages. Really lovely. This was my favorite part of The Magic Flute (I must confess that Papageno and his girlfriend Pagagena chirruping their names at each other is the only part of the opera I remember…) and it was fun to revisit it.

“Harlequin” is also a short based around a piece of classical music. According to Kanopy, is “a love story,” which is quite a description for a movie where the hero seduces three women, marries two, and then is executed by firing squad… for bigamy, I guess? Then his true love does battle with the devil over his corpse (the devil has long curly horns, and is defeated when the girl thwacks him with the ball and chain the hero wore on his way to the firing range), at which point the hero is resuscitated by a cupid. I guess a story that ends with love triumphing over death and damnation is a love story, in its way, but three seductions in thirty minutes is not what you’d usually expect from that description!

Finally, “The Stolen Heart” is about a monstrous giant who steals all the musical instruments in a town, only for the instruments to come to life and free themselves from his spiderweb and fly back to their owners, playing themselves for dear life all the way. According to Kanopy, scholars argue that this is an anti-Nazi allegory. I sometimes feel that scholars are a little too ready to say this about anything created in Germany in the interwar years, but in this case they probably have a point.
osprey_archer: (Default)
You can only watch The Fox and the Hound for the first time once in your life, and that's probably a good thing, because I remember it being a crushing experience. So crushing, in fact, that I never rewatched the movie until today.

I have to admit, I had built up its crushing capacities to such an extent that I was actually a little disappointed not to be emotionally flattened by the movie. Of course, to a large extent this is because I knew what was coming: I went into it knowing that the cute friendship scenes at the beginning were only there to set us up for heartbreak in the end, when Tod and Copper would not be able to continue their friendship.

In fact, the ending is more conciliatory than I remembered: after Tod falls off a waterfall, Copper actually shields Tod with his body so Copper's owner the hunter can't shoot Tod. Shades of Anna sheltering Elsa from Hans's sword in Frozen! And if, like Anna and Elsa, Tod and Copper actually got to reconcile afterward, I might very well have loved the movie when I was a tiny child, but instead they just exchange a smile and then Copper ambles off after his owner, and it seems probably that Tod and Copper shall ne'er meet again.

Tiny!me felt that this was tragic. Tiny!me did not understand why they couldn't continue to be friends - secret friends if necessary! but friends nonetheless! - and found the whole thing heartbreaking.

I have since learned that the whole thing is an allegory for what had been (perhaps still was? the movie was made in 1981) a common situation in the south, where white and black children played together happily when they were small, only for the weight of racist social structures to crush their friendships as they grew up. You have to wonder why anyone thought, "That sounds utterly soul-searing! Let's make it into a children's movie." WHY.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I know that I saw The Rescuers when I was a child, because my brother and I enjoyed Albatross Airlines so much that we insisted our father incorporate an albatross airplane service into the Sam and Beulah stories, an ongoing bedtime story saga about the gerbils Sam, Beulah, and their sons Roscoe and Tommy Boy, plus an ever-growing list of younger gerbil siblings who existed mostly because my brother and I liked to name baby gerbils.

(Our albatross was named Albert.)

However, it's been so long since I've seen the movie that the only part I really remembered was the sardine can airplane seat, with the little key in the side so that Bianca and Bernard could roll up the metal lid to keep themselves snugly inside. (In general, I've found that I have a very good memory for scenes that play on tiny creatures retooling everyday objects into tiny pieces of furniture or crockery. Clearly I had my priorities when I was five.)

So revisiting the movie was an unexpected delight. I loved fearless Miss Bianca, who cheerfully choses the janitor Bernard as her co-rescuer (also loved the part where Bernard climbs a comb to retrieve a message from a bottle), and of course Penny - I'd completely forgotten the existence of Penny, the bayou, basically the entire plot - plucky but frightened, and deeply attached to her teddy bear. The moment when Medusa rips Teddy from Penny's hands - ! True evil, right there.

I think possibly we watched The Rescuers Down Under more often, but honestly I don't remember that movie too well either. I was amused to discover, however, that it came out thirteen years after the original Rescuers - given Bernard's ongoing anxious encounters with the number thirteen (thirteen rungs on the comb! Thirteen steps on the staircase up to the albatross's back!), it's funny that the gap between movies should be exactly that.

I'm also curious why Disney made a sequel to The Rescuers, given that they made no sequels for decades - and when they did get in the sequel game in the nineties, it was mostly straight to DVD, or maybe to the Disney channel. Maybe The Rescuers Down Under caused a power struggle? It came out in 1990, which is the year that Disney's Disneytoon Studios (which produced most of the direct-to-video sequels) started releasing movies...

I should look into this in more detail as we get closer to The Rescuers Down Under. (Once the library reopens, I hope to take out some books about the history of Disney animation in general.) But first... well, next up is The Fox and the Hound. I've already laid in a supply of tissues.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Although as a small child I was devoted to the Disney channel Winnie the Pooh TV show (to the point that I found the original E. H. Shepard illustrations quite disorienting the first time I saw them: where was Winnie's shirt? why were his arms and legs so stubby? he was shaped all wrong and I did not approve), I never actually saw the 1977 movie The Many Adventures of Winnie the Pooh till a few years ago... and then I found it rather dull.

Well, we came up to it in the Disney rewatch, and I watched it full of hope that I would find new joys in it, and... well, honestly, I still found it rather dull. The conceit that the narrator is reading the story allows for some fun visual effects, like the scene where the water overflows and illustration and washes the words right off the page, but mostly it just prevented me from immersing myself in the story, because whenever an adventure really properly got going, there was the narrator reminding us that it's all just a story in a book again.

Also, the Disney Winnie the Pooh properties gave me a very misleading idea about the properties of honey.

Robin Hood

Apr. 25th, 2020 06:34 pm
osprey_archer: (cheers)
We have reached Robin Hood, a.k.a. one of the most perfect movies of all time. Robin Hood and Little John running through the forest! The "alms, alms for the poor" scene! The perfidious sheriff, taking away Skippy's birthday present ("A whole farthing!" Skippy cries, overjoyed, before the horrible sheriff takes it), but then he gets Robin Hood's hat and a bow and arrow instead, and accidentally shoots over the wall into the garden where Maid Marian and Lady Cluck are playing badminton, and the whole argument where the children are discussing whether Skippy should sneak into the garden to retrieve the arrow is just a perfect childhood argument, and Lady Cluck pretending to be Prince John...!

I see that I'm just listing all the scenes in the movie. But honestly, so many of them are great! The entire archery tournament is A++ (again an able assist by Lady Cluck, charging Prince John's rhinos like a linebacker!). And the whole scene where the Sheriff has locked away most of the inhabitants of Nottingham, including the little mice who are all attached to the same gigantic ball and chain... and poor Skippy and his friends are sitting beneath the leak in the wall, in such despair that they don't even try to move away as the water drips down...

That was absolutely my preferred brand of angst when I was a wee munchkin, and it remains just as delightful today. The tragedy! The despair. And then, of course, the glorious rescue, and Robin Hood sneaking into Prince John's own bedroom to steal away the bags and bags of money, because of course Prince John surrounds himself with all his money at all times.

(Also, I am fairly sure that Prince John's scenes with Sir Hiss - particularly the one where Sir Hiss lards on the flattery, and then Prince John knocks him on the head - are just verbatim descriptions from the White House right now.)

Not only is the movie as a whole delightful, but there are so many delightful little touches, like the bit at the end where the mice are throwing rice that is of course very large in their little mouse hands (for some reason this always enchanted me), or Robin and Marian's moonlit walk. Generally as a child I did not have much patience with romance, but I had patience for Robin and Marian - they're both so amazing, obviously they love each other - and the glowing lights in the forest are just so lovely.

And then, of course, the wonderful raucous dance, with Little John and Lady Cluck dancing together. In general, Lady Cluck was my great new discovery on this rewatch. When I was a child I never really paid attention to her - my heart was given to Robin Hood and Marian and also Skippy and friends, particularly his little sister in purple, does she ever get a name? - but this time, man. She's an unsung hero! Alan-a-Dale the rooster minstrel should get on that.
osprey_archer: (Default)
We're reaching the peak nostalgia section of the Disney rewatch! 101 Dalmatians, Robin Hood, The Rescuers... and also some other movies that I did not watch a hundred times as a small child, possibly just because we didn't own them, it seems unlikely that I could have resisted five hundred rewatches of The Aristocats if we'd had it on VHS.

This section kicks off with 101 Dalmatians, which in my youth was one of my very favorite movies. (I love it so much that I once wrote a Yuletide fic for it. Cruella's obsession with fur coats is prefigured by an obsession with Anita's hair (and also possibly Anita generally, although Anita is generally oblivious to any crushes going on): Covetous.)

As a child I adored the movie for the many, many puppies; I had Patch and Rolly plushies, and maybe also Lucky? Other highlights included the part where the puppies are crawling through the hole in the wall of the creepy old de Vil mansion (which is called Hell House! Oh my God), such tension, the bad guys Jasper and Horace might wake up and catch them at any moment. Also the bit where the Dalmatians all cover themselves in soot to pretend to be labradors, and then just when it seems they'll all be safely stowed away in the moving truck to London, melting snow falls on their noses and reveals them as Dalmatians right before Cruella's eyes. A madcap chase ensues! One of many madcap chases! Seriously, this movie has intense madcap chase game.

Rewatching it, I also got a kick out of the adult characters, particularly Nanny. She's such an echo of Flora and Fauna and Meriwether in Sleeping Beauty! Except a regular human instead of a fairy. In general I think Disney is quite good at these feisty older woman characters, actually, Grandmother Fa in Mulan comes to mind as another example.

Also props to the Colonel (a sheepdog) and Sergeant Tibbs (a cat). Sergeant Tibbs, Julie and I agreed, does not get paid enough. The real hero of the movie! Sneaking all 99 puppies out of that drawing room! Also keeping them quiet the whole time, a true hero, an expert puppy wrangler, give that cat a medal.

***

A few years ago, I tried to read the Dodie Smith book on which the movie is based, but I didn't get very far with it. In general, I haven't really gotten on with any of Smith's books except I Capture the Castle, which is so odd because I LOVE I Capture the Castle... but it's like Smith had one serious book in her, and everything else she wrote after was weightless fluff. I don't understand it.
osprey_archer: (Default)
What is there to say about Lady and the Tramp? The original 2-D animation version, not the quote unquote “live action” version, which I have not seen but could say a great deal about because why would you call it live action when it’s actually CGI dogs?

All the Disney “live action” remakes of the animal movies all look like blatant and embarrassing cash grabs. Ugh. They have so much money and they could be doing so much cool shit with it (a revival of 2-D animation, for starters!) and this is what they’ve decided to do?? Ugh.

Anyway! I had no strong feelings about this movie either way, which is perhaps the hardest kind of movie to write about. It’s pleasant, it’s enjoyable, it was interesting to see these dogs who are allowed to roam around their neighborhood at will and have their own little dog society (VERY different from American dog ownership today), but it was not a movie that I really glommed onto as a child and didn’t deeply move me as an adult, either.
osprey_archer: (Default)
We have reached the last of Disney’s anthology films! I thought Melody Time was the last, but it turns out that The Adventures of Ichabod and Mr. Toad is actually two separate short films, which actually makes a lot more sense than trying to mash up “The Headless Horseman” and The Wind in the Willows into one story so maybe I should have guessed beforehand.

Silly complaint time, but the title mentions Ichabod Crane first and Mr. Toad second, but in the movie itself the order is reversed and this really bothers me because it seems so untidy. Why would Disney title it like that???

Generally, though, I enjoyed both shorts. I would not recommend the Mr. Toad short for anyone who is deeply attached to The Wind in the Willows because it is only distantly related to that book, but if you go into it accepting that it’s a completely different thing that happens to share a few names, there’s some entertaining mayhem going on.

And the Ichabod Crane short actually hews pretty close to Irving’s “The Legend of Sleepy Hollow,” with the added amusing quality that Ichabod’s rival for Katrina van Tassel’s affections is basically a proto-Gaston. Bluff! Hearty! Annoyingly manly! But certainly more cunning than Gaston: he goes after his rival with a ghost story rather than a pitchfork, which while more indirect is also far more effective.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Back on the Disney train! This time, we watched Melody Time, another anthology film. I was surprised to discover that I was familiar with some of the shorts in this one, including “The Legend of Johnny Appleseed,” which a weary social studies teacher once popped in to keep us all quiet for a while, and “Little Toot,” which I’m familiar with in book form. That scene where Little Toot’s father gets demoted to hauling garbage barges because of Little Toot’s antics… tragic stuff.

On the whole I thought this was a strong collection. In addition to the shorts mentioned above, I particularly enjoyed “Trees,” which is an artistic rendering of the poem “Trees” (which, I must say, I’ve never really cared for as a poem), because the animation is so stylish - almost Art Deco; you’ve got crisp clear lines and bright colors that all work together to make a harmonious whole. And there’s something particularly impressive about the way that one scene melds into the next: you’ll have a close-up of a leaf, for instance, and the camera seems to pull back and suddenly you’re looking at a sunset, or whatever.

And I enjoyed “Blame It on the Samba,” just because it was fun to see Jose Carioca and Donald Duck sambaing while the Aracuan bird gleefully plays tricks on them. (“If I were going to ship cartoon birds,” Julie commented, “I would ship Jose Carioca and Donald Duck.”)

There are jarring moments of racism in a couple of the shorts: “Johnny Appleseed” (and really the whole premise of the story is predicated on just kind of ignoring Native Americans) and “The Legend of Pecos Bill,” and it made me wonder about Song of the South, the movie that Disney has famously repressed for racism. If they’re willing to release this on DVD, just how bad must Song of the South be?
osprey_archer: (Default)
On my trip I managed to watch a number of movies that I’ve been vaguely meaning to see for a while, so I thought I’d toss out a few quick reviews.

Moonstruck first came to my attention on a list of movies for Mother’s Day, which frankly shows the paucity of movies about mother and child relationships: the mother in Moonstruck is a great character, but the movie’s not really about motherhood at all. Rather, it’s about love! passion! Italian-American identity! and Nicholas Cage chewing the scenery like nobody’s business. Everything is purposefully over-the-top, and I really enjoyed it.

I came into The Guernsey Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society with low expectations, because one of my friends told me she didn’t like it (although another told me she loved it, so go figure), which is probably the right way to approach it. It’s a solidly enjoyable period piece that doesn’t quite capture the charm or the voice of the book, although to be fair it probably would be difficult to capture the voice of an epistolary novel in a visual adaptation.

Also, I super got the impression from the movie that Dawsey was in love with Elizabeth, which I don’t remember being the case in the book. This is not a problem (in fact I think it adds a certain verisimilitude: why shouldn’t Dawsey have a romantic past?), but it did strike me as different.

I’ve been eyeing Mary and the Witch’s Flower ever since it came on Netflix streaming, intrigued by its Ghibli-esque aesthetic (the director actually got his start at Ghibli, where he directed Arrietty; Mary and the Witch’s Flower is the first film from his new studio). But in fact neither Paula or I really liked it: it’s scary, but without emotional depth, and the character development wasn’t as strong as it could have been.

This became especially surprising when I discovered that the story is based on Mary Stewart’s The Little Broomstick, because usually Mary Stewart’s books are good at that sort of thing. (It’s surprising that more of her books haven’t been made into movies: they’re so action-packed and picturesque that they ought to be easy to film.) Something must have been lost in the translation from book to screen.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Disney got weird in the 1940s. Maybe it was the success of Fantasia that did it: maybe they decided that they should try to shift permanently to this anthology format, because that’s what they did in Saludos Amigos and The Three Caballeros, and I’ve also got to get through Make Mine Music and Melody Time before they get back to regular movies with one big story.

As it turns out, Fantasia was a lightning-only-strikes-once moment, but it took them four films to figure it out.

Anyway, The Three Caballeros is a compilation of seven short films, all contained within a frame story: Donald Duck receives a birthday present from Latin America, a large box full of smaller boxes, each of which leads into a new animation. Along the way, he reunited with the Brazilian parrot Jose Carioca, and then the two of them meet up with the Mexican rooster Panchito, whereupon the three of them become The Three Caballeros, which unfortunately does not lead to them having adventures together.

Instead, Donald Duck dives into a photograph of a beach at Acapulco, whereupon the animation fuses with live action as Donald chases a bunch of amused bathing beauties around the beach. He is at last dragged away by Jose Carioca and Panchito, who only soothe his ruffled feathers by promising to show him the nightlife of Mexico City, which leads to a hallucinogenic sequence. “This is where the Dumbo animators got in on the act,” Julie said, and indeed, it is reminiscent of the pink elephants sequence in Dumbo, only this time rather than elephants, it’s Donald Duck multiplying himself in all directions as the screen flushes different colors and fireworks happen and God knows what else.

I’ve wondered in the past why there was such a big gap between Snow White and Cinderella - Snow White was made in 1937, Cinderella not till 1950 - and clearly it was because Disney had wandered away to chase a totally different vision of animation up the garden path. I guess all of us have false starts in life.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Disney’s Saludos Amigos is an odd little film. It came about (quoth Wikipedia) after the US State Department sent a plane full of Disney animators on a goodwill tour of South America, hoping that this would help in some small way to counteract the close ties that many South American countries had with Nazi Germany at the time.

The result is a film that is actually four separate animated shorts, stitched together with documentary footage with a voiceover that sounds like the voiceover from every educational documentary that I watched in elementary school, which made it a very welcome-back-to-fourth-grade experience.

The only short that is all original material is about a little airplane who flies over the treacherous pass through the Andes to deliver the mail (“Oh no,” said Julie. “It’s Cars.” We have discussed doing a Pixar rewatch once we’ve gotten through Disney, but Cars 2 and 3 may prove insuperable obstacles.)

The other three are about established Disney characters, but Latinized: cowboy goofy becomes gaucho Goofy, while Donald Duck rides a llama (largely unsuccessfully) and befriends a Brazilian parrot, Jose Carioca, who went on to become a minor but recurring character in the Disney pantheon: he reappears in Melody Time and also, apparently, Ducktales, which may explain the vague sense of familiarity I felt for him, having been a minor Ducktales afficionado in my youth - although really my heart was given to Chip and Dale: Rescue Rangers.

Otherwise, how is it? Honestly, I’m struggling to think of something to say about it. There’s a reason this movie has drifted out of the popular memory, and that’s because it’s just not super memorable.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Perhaps surprisingly, given how many Disney movies frightened me as a child, I always rather liked Bambi. Possibly the fact that Bambi’s mother died off screen made it less horrifying; or maybe the fact that Thumper was my favorite character distracted me from everything else.

I particularly liked Thumper’s line about the clover - when he tells Bambi just to eat the clover heads, and his mother admonishes him to repeat his father’s advice: “‘Eating greens is a special treat, It makes long ears and great big feet. But it sure is awful stuff to eat.’” Then Thumper confides to Bambi, “I made that last part up myself.”

What else to say about Bambi? The animation in this movie is just gorgeous. A lot of the changing seasons sequences provide showcases for virtuoso displays of animation skill: the colorful leaves swirling on the wind or the rain dripping off the leaves into the pool below. My favorite scene for purely beautiful animation is the part where Bambi and his mother go to the meadow, which is rendered in soft misty watercolors that make the meadow look vast and beautiful… and also just a little forbidding.

Next up: Saludos Amigos and The Three Caballeros, which my library has on a disc as a double feature… but there’s only one copy and someone else has it, so the Disney rewatch may be on hold for a while.

***

And now I'm off for a wedding, and then a few days to hike and read! I was hoping to finish Part 2 of Honeytrap before I go (I'll be leaving my computer behind and taking a break from writing) but it looks like that won't happen. I do have the next bit all ready to post when I get back on Tuesday, though. We'll be getting yet more Christmas (why is there so much Christmas? I don't know), with bonus discussion of Stalin.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I watched Fantasia right after attending a wedding and reception, and therefore ended up sleeping through, uh, a certain amount of the movie, but on the bright side! I slept through the parts that I always skipped anyway as a child! Apparently my Fantasia opinions have been extremely constant throughout my entire life.

So I missed the part at the beginning which is just sound pictures of the music. But I woke up in time for the Nutcracker Suite, A++ still love both of the flower dances (the Waltz of the Flowers AND the Cossack flowers!), although my beloved mushroom dance has been somewhat spoiled now that I can recognize the mushrooms as Chinese caricatures. (The littlest mushroom was probably my favorite character in all of Fantasia, unless it was maybe the little black pegasus, who was clearly the best of all the little pegasi.)

It was also great to see the fish doing their Dance of the Seven Veils to the coffee dance and realize that the goldfish in Pinocchio was basically a dry run for these fish with their ridiculously long and diaphonous yet gorgeous transparent fins.

Then I slept through the part that is showing the beginning of all life on earth with amoebas and I think some sort of proto-amphibian crawling onto the sand? But finally woke up for good in time for the dinosaurs, about which I have always had mixed opinions. On the one hand: dinosaurs. (Like any self-respecting five-year-old I loved dinosaurs.) But on the other hand, these dinosaurs are kind of slow and lumbering and, as I knew because I watched the dinosaur documentary with Bob Bakker and Jack Horner 500 times, scientifically inaccurate (although possibly accurate to 1940s understandings?), and also all they do is suffer. First the T. Rex kills the poor stupid stegosaur, ruining my opinions of stegosaurs forever, and then they all die a slow lingering death under a broiling sun because the Chicxulub incident was not yet a twinkling in anyone’s eye.

(Is the asteroid that created the Chicxulub crater still considered the likeliest culprit in the dinosaurs’ extinction? I haven’t updated my dinosaur knowledge in ~25 years.)

Then there is the best part! A.K.A. the Greek mythology horsies! Unicorns, pegasi (this is where the little black pegasi comes into his own), AND centaurs, although I did not find the centaurs as interesting in my youth because all they did was court each other which took away time during which the pegasi could have been cavorting. (I found Bacchus baffling, and frankly still find him baffling today. Why does he look like a giant baby in a onesie?)

Then the ballet-dancing animals! I enjoyed these as a child, but always with some nervous tension, because the dance gets super out of control by the end (I absolutely did not understand that there was a courtship thing going on; as far as I could tell it was just all chaos and animals chasing each other), but also because if you don’t stop the VCR fast enough once the animals destroy the balance, then you might be forced to watch a three whole seconds of “The Night at Bald Mountain,” which will ruin your day, or at least the next half hour, which is basically the same thing to a preschooler.

Which leads us to… THE NIGHT ON BALD MOUNTAIN. It is no longer as horrifying as I remember it, possibly because no film sequence of this earth is as horrifying to an adult as “Night at Bald Mountain” is to a four-year-old, but all the poor writhing demons and the misty skeletons being summoned from their graves remain pretty appalling. (There are lust demons who are maybe precursors to “Hellfire” in The Hunchback of Notre Dame?) The “Ave Maria” sequence at the end - which I never watched as a child, we never made it that far - does not make things better even a little bit; it’s much too static to wash away the impression of GIANT MOUNTAIN SATAN.

All in all, Fantasia is a bizarre film experiment, and I applaud it for being so weird and yet (mostly) so entertaining. How often does such an ambitiously bonkers film turn out so well?
osprey_archer: (cheers)
My biggest show this summer has been Miraculous Ladybug, which wasn’t a new show to me - I watched season one this year - but this summer we watched all of season 2 and have started season 3 (or rather the first half of season three, which Netflix is streaming under the name season 4, WHY NETFLIX) and season 2 was the one that got my super INVESTED.

See, season one is a fairly standard monser-of-the-week magical girl/superhero show, except that it’s set in France (I can’t tell you how many times they destroy the Eiffel Tower) and one of the girls is a boy, who is in love with his superhero partner Ladybug, only he doesn’t realize that Ladybug is actually his classmate Marinette who, in turn, is in love with her classmate Adrian… who is secretly her superhero partner, Chat Noir. OMG.

Neither young love nor secret identities are usually my thing, which is why I didn’t get super into the show in season one, but season two totally won me over because (1) the show’s mythology levels waaay up (new superhero powers! New superhero buddies! MARINETTE’S BEST FRIEND BECOMES A SUPERHERO AND IT’S AMAZING. Also way more backstory on the big bad), but even more importantly, the characterization gets way more complex.

I could point to a number of examples of this, but I think the character who most encapsulates the change is Chloe Bourgeois, who for most of season one is a pretty standard mean girl with a rich daddy: her only interesting quality is that she sometimes like to dress up like Ladybug and pretend to be a superhero herself. She’s so mean that she’s responsible for about half the akumatizations in the city (the big bad turns people into supervillains-for-a-day by sending an evil butterfly called an akuma to use their negative emotions to give them a supervillain persona).

But in season two Chloe’s (extremely) nascent yearning to become a superhero herself begins to blossom. She has character growth! Tiny baby steps of character growth! Tiny baby steps of character growth often followed by serious backsliding, but SUCH IS LIFE. However, my very favorite thing is that Marinette accidentally superheroizes Chloe Bourgeois too, and Chloe is just as bad at it as you might imagine, but she actually realizes she messed up and also manages to pull her superheroine skills together enough to join the big superhero team-up at the end of the season.

Also, I love Chloe’s magical girl transformation sequence. In fact I love ALL the transformation sequences, including the big bad’s. Every single time we got a new transformation sequence I shrieked, and this included Ladybug and Chat Noir’s new transformation sequences when they had to use their power level-ups to turn into fishpeople.

And it looks like we’re going to get more new superheroes in season three AND there are still four or five levels of powers that Ladybug and Chat Noir haven’t used. SO MANY NEW TRANSFORMATION SEQUENCES TO DISCOVER.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I haven’t seen Pinocchio for years because the whale scene scared me when I was small. Rewatching it, I was amazed that I got as far as the whale scene: the evil fox and cat who sell Pinocchio to the evil theater manager who locks him in a bird cage didn’t get me? And neither did the island where the bad boys got turned into jackasses after drinking, smoking, and playing pool?

Actually, that may have appealed to my sense of vengeance at the time. The bad boys brought it on themselves! Now the donkey who can still talk and begs to be sent home to his mother just strikes me as tragic.

The animation in this film is gorgeous: the early scenes especially show it off when we see ALL of Gepetto’s fancy novelty clocks and music boxes, as if the animators were having a competition to see who could come up with the funniest and most intricate clock. Actually, I really appreciate the willingness in these early Disney films to stop the action dead just to appreciate the fancy clocks, or to have Figaro the kitten climb up to open the window, which is irrelevant to the plot but cute as the dickens. It gives the story room to breathe, it enriches the world, and the pacing doesn’t suffer at all. I was in fact surprised when we got to the whale, because I knew that meant we were near the end, and it really didn’t feel like we’d been watching that long at all.

It also struck me, not so much in a Disney-specific way but as a side-note, how many folk tale versions there are of the story about an old person (an old man, or an old woman, or a little old man and a little old woman) who make a person out of wood or clay or snow or whatever and some power brings it to life. A common human fantasy? At least at some point in time.

Next up! Fantasia. I’m super looking forward to this: it’s a chance to revisit a lot of old favorites (the fairies! the mushrooms! the waltz of the flowers!) and also to see if the final sequence with the giant Satan looming over the mountain is really as terrifying as I remember.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Julie and I have been talking for ages about doing a Disney animated movie rewatch, and this week we finally bit the bullet and started off with Snow White and the Seven Dwarves, Disney’s first feature-length film and in fact the first animated feature film ever.

I’m pretty sure I only watched this movie once as a child: the scene where the forest itself turns against Snow White and started grabbing at her with its horrible twiggy hands terrified me. (This will be an oft-repeated refrain as I write about these films. Many, many Disney movies frightened me. The Fox and the Hound baffled me and broke my heart because I couldn’t understand why the fox and the hound couldn’t be friends when they wanted to so much.)

Anyway! Back to Snow White. It’s fascinating to see how assured the animation was right out of the gate (of course Disney had been doing shorts for years at this point): you can see a direct line from the fawns here to Bambi, and I’m pretty sure that goofy turtle shows up again later too. And the vultures! The vultures are direct kin to the vultures in Jungle Book!

It also struck me that Disney, at least early Disney, shares one of the qualities that I find so charming in Studio Ghibli films: both studios are interested in work, particularly women’s work. Snow White’s task of cleaning the cottage looks way more involved than the dwarves’ mining: they’re plucking already-faceted gems from the ground, whereas Snow White needs the help of dozens of woodland creatures to get the house clean.

But it must be admitted that I’m a biased observer: I had an argument years ago in which I held that Disney was a more feminist studio than Pixar, on the grounds that it came right out of the gate with a female main character in its very first feature film, whereas Pixar took 17 years and twelve movies (including TWO Cars films!) before it managed the same thing.

I did not win the hearts and minds of my listeners, as you might guess by the fact that I’m still arguing it out in my head. But I still think I had a point.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I watched a lot of great short films this month! I tried to winnow it down to three recommendations, but once I saw Kitbull I simply had to include it (I've already sent links to it to like five of my IRL friends) so I’m sort of cheating by bundling two films together on the grounds that they have the same director.

1. There’s a genre of short film - I’m not sure if it’s widespread in short films in general or if there’s just someone at Short of the Week who really likes it - that might be described as “A Family Grieves.” Generally speaking I am not a fan.

But Pepe Le Morse, a French animated film about a family going to their grandfather’s favorite beach to mourn his recent death, won me over. The animation is beautiful (the beach grasses!), the emotional tone is understated, and the film develops in a magical realism direction as strange and potentially dangerous and beautiful as the sea.

2. When I saw Greta Nash’s film Locker Room (a teenage girl in Australia discovers her male friends’ creepy group chat rating their female classmates; a thoughtful, sensitive picture of how thoughtless and insensitive adolescents can be) I liked it so much that I searched out her website, where I found Happy Dance, a short documentary about groups in China - mostly older women, but also some young mothers, a few men, really anyone who wants to come join them - which meet daily in neighborhood squares to dance.

It really is happy - just unabashedly happy. It’s so rare to see anything that happy these days.

3. Last but certainly not least! - Kitbull, the cutest thing you will see all week, in which a feral kitten that is basically a soot sprite with eyes and a tail befriends an abused pitbull and it is SO CUTE, YOU GUYS. SO CUTE. SO MANY FEELS.

Also this is the third Pixar short within the last year that has been directed by a woman and I am HOPING that this means that Pixar will soon have more women directing feature films… although the next two films on their docket are both directed by men, so clearly I shouldn’t get my hopes up too high.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 3rd, 2026 05:49 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios