osprey_archer: (books)
As a child, one often has one’s own names for favorite books and movies. In my mind, Barbara Cooney’s Miss Rumphius was The Lupine Lady, An American Tail was Fievel (and A Land Before Time was of course Littlefoot), and Jostein Gaarder’s The Christmas Mystery was The Magic Advent Calendar.

At the beginning of the book, young Joachim finds a handmade advent calendar in the bookstore. The owner lets him have it for free, and when Joachim opens the first door, a thin slip of paper falls out, beginning the story of a little girl named Elisabet who follows a stuffed lamb out of a department store because she wants to pet its fleece.

Thus Elisabet begins a pilgrimage: she is running backwards in time and southeast through space, picking up angels and shepherds and wise men along the way as they all travel, to quote the shepherd Joshua, “To Bethlehem! To Bethlehem!” They are going to witness the birth of the baby Jesus.

As Joachim reads each installment, he becomes convinced that the advent calendar is indeed enchanted: each time he opens a door and reads another installment, he finds new details in the picture on the advent calendar itself. Surely they’re appearing as he meets the characters in the story? As a child I believed this just as much as Joachim, and also loved the suggestion that the story in the advent calendar was true or at least built on truth—that not only John the in-book creator of the calendar, but Jostein Gaarder himself had discovered a series of unusually similar angel encounters throughout history and woven them into a story.

(This was around the same age I had a so-called nonfiction book called The Flight of the Reindeer, which had a serious science-y discussion of the aerodynamics of reindeer antlers which enabled them to fly. Did I believe this? No, not exactly, but the idea so enchanted me that I also didn’t exactly not believe.)

As an adult, I am fairly sure that the picture on the magic advent calendar is simply an example of the magic of art, where the longer you look at a picture the more details you see. I’ve also relinquished the idea that Gaarder built the story from a series of historical angel tales featuring angel processions that all mysteriously included sheep and Wise Men and a little blonde girl.

But in recompense, I’ve come to a greater appreciation of Gaarder’s artistry in constructing a story that functions so perfectly as an advent calendar: it’s exactly 24 chapters long and it really does work best if you read one chapter each day of advent, although it’s hard to stop at the end of each chapter! And I’ve learned a greater appreciation for Elizabeth Rokkan’s work as a translator. I often find books in translation a bit stiff, but this one is supple and fluid, and although I can’t compare it to the original Norwegian, Rokkan has created a lovely storybook rhythm with certain repeated phrases and ideas: Joshua’s aforementioned “To Bethlehem! To Bethlehem!”, or the idea that beautiful things like flowers are “part of the glory of heaven strayed down to earth.”

It also occurred to me for the first time on this reread that this book is extremely Christian. Since our heroes are literally going on pilgrimage to Bethlehem to see the birth of the baby Jesus, one might reasonably ask how I failed to notice. Some of this can probably be chalked up to the general dimness of childhood, but I think part of this also lies in the way the story is told: as a wonder-tale, a magical adventure, which offers postulates about how things work in its magical universe but doesn’t demand that you accept them as general truths in the workday world. It would like the reader to consider that perhaps we as a species should stop killing each other, but also it just wants to tell a fun story about a little girl chasing a runaway toy lamb back through time.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I was beginning to feel crushed beneath the gloom and doom of the books I’m reading. (A Place of Greater Safety: everyone’s gonna die. The Honourable Schoolboy: not everyone is going to die, but someone is sure going to die horribly. Simon Sort of Says: everyone already died in a school shooting. Okay, not actually, there are no literal ghosts in this book. The hero’s tragic backstory is that he’s the only child in his classroom who survived, though.)

So I picked up How Right You Are, Jeeves from the library. Important to introduce variety into one’s reading diet! This one had a bit less Jeeves than is perhaps ideal (he’s gone for at least half the book), but no one AT ANY POINT was in danger of death, dismemberment, total psychological dissolution, etc., and there was an extremely funny sequence where Bertie bonds with Sir Roderick Glossop, the eminent brain specialist.

I also reread Kate Seredy’s The Singing Tree, the sequel to The Good Master, which is less about the Problem of Tomboys (although there is a great scene where Kate beats all the boys in the horse race… having promised that she will give up riding astride thereafter) and more about the Problem of War, which is especially poignant when you realize it was published in 1938. The subplot about how the Jews are, in fact, very nice people! and an integral part of Hungary! (and, by extension, all of humanity!) feels depressingly relevant again today.

What I’m Reading Now

I’ve started my semi-annual reread of Jostein Gaarder’s The Christmas Mystery, a book about an advent calendar which unfolds in 24 chapters. I find this book-as-advent-calendar structure enchanting and long to emulate it, but have discovered it’s quite hard to do, actually, which makes me appreciate the book even more on this reread.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve been contemplating how many more Smiley books to read. The next one, Smiley’s People, is the final book of the Karla Trilogy, so of course I have to read that, and after that there are just two more (The Secret Pilgrim and A Legacy of Spies), but published long afterward which always makes me rather doubtful… Has anyone read them? What did you think?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Who just finished Kristin Lavransdatter? ME! *spikes football* It wasn’t always an enjoyable reading experience as I read, but I’m glad to have read it now that it’s done: it gives such a rich vision of medieval Norwegian society that you could almost step into the page and drink ale in the hearth house.

This is not to say that I would go around recommending it willy-nilly, because there are also times when it is a slog (Kristin and Erlend have many variations on the same problem - and you have to give Sigrid Undset this, she comes up with MANY new variations - but it’s always the same basic problem. Erlend is reckless and irresponsible, and Kristin can neither forgive him nor break from him.

I was so close to finishing William Dean Howells’ My Literary Passions last week that it only took me about fifteen minutes to wrap it up, but I’m still sad that it’s over. His musings about the book-reading life are just so relatable! Like this comment, after he confesses to a fondness to some long-forgotten trashy novel:

“Perhaps I shall be able to whisper the readers behind my hand that I have never yet read the Aeneid of Virgil; the Georgics, yes; but the Aeneid, no. Some time, however, I expect to read it and to like it immensely. That is often the case with things that I have held aloof from indefinitely.”

Who among us doesn’t have such a book floating somewhere in our life-time reading plans?

I also finished Paul Watkins’ Stand before Your God: An American Schoolboy in England, and my days of thinking that the English boarding school system sounds like one of the worst things that people have ever voluntarily inflicted on their children are certainly coming to a middle.

What I’m Reading Now

In 1903, Jean Webster visited Italy, and like many Anglophone writers found it impossible to resist setting a novel there. (I can throw no shade; I’ve done it myself.) Webster wrote two: Jerry Junior, a light comic novel, and The Wheat Princess, which is the last book I need to read before I’ve encompassed Webster’s entire oeuvre.

So far it seems pretty solidly second-tier Webster; on par with Jerry Junior, certainly not reaching the heights of Daddy-Long-Legs or When Patty Went to College. But perhaps because it’s her final book for me, reading it has made me sad that she died so young: she has a fairly varied output (which is part of the reason the quality is so varied, probably) and who knows what new and interesting things she would have tried if she got the chance?

I’ve also begun Edward L. Ayers’ The Thin Light of Freedom: The Civil War and Emancipation in the Heart of America, which starts with Gettysburg and will stretch, presumably, through Reconstruction. I’m still in the Gettysburg part, and so far I’m really appreciating the way that Ayers makes battles make sense - not in the sense that he gives you a blow-by-blow of who is charging where, but as an overall part of the war, how battles are shaped not only by generals but by the sheer physical facts of the terrain and equipment and the available amount of food.

In a way it reminds me of Tolstoy in War and Peace (exasperating though it is to praise Tolstoy’s Theory of History in War and Peace) - of his emphasis on the physical limitations of armies. It’s easy to say, in hindsight, that Meade ought to have cut off Lee’s retreat (just as Kutuzov ought to have cut off Napoleon’s), but the fact that this would have been militarily advantageous doesn’t change the fact that an army can reach a stage of such exhaustion that neither its horses or its men are physically capable of going fast enough to cut off another army’s retreat.

What I Plan to Read Next

It’s October, which makes it the right book to read Shirley Jackson, am I right? (All months are the right months to read Shirley Jackson, but October is even more right than most.) The Road through the Wall is the only novel of hers I haven’t read, so I’ve put a hold on it at the library.

I probably ought to read some of her short stories too (at very least “The Lottery”!), but - confession time - I very rarely read short stories. It’s funny, because I love short books (this is one of the reasons I continue to read lots of children’s books), but somehow this has not translated into an interest in short stories.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finished Ella Cheever Thayer’s Wired Love: A Romance of Dots and Dashes, which is a delight from start to finish. I love the telegraphic romance, I love the part where a clumsy fellow accidentally proposes to the wrong girl and then just… doesn’t break the engagement (peak nineteenth century moment right there), I love the bohemian dinner that Cyn and Nattie throw using every single dish they can find in their apartments including the soap dish.

However, the book also broke my heart Spoilers )

What I’m Reading Now

I’ve begun Elizabeth Gilbert’s City of Girls as my third stab at “a book outside my genre comfort zone,” and I feel tentatively positive about this one! I’m three chapters in and no one has stumbled on a dead body or been raped. Moreover, the main character is an old lady looking back on her youth and telling her life story with wit, occasional sarcasm, and pleasure in both the happiness and the foibles of her youth, so no matter what happens I think it is clear that she will come out all right in the end.

I’ve also been zooming through Cokie Roberts’ Founding Mothers: The Women Who Raised Our Nation, which pairs interestingly with another book that I've been dipping into, Mary Beth Norton's Liberty's Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 1750-1800. Norton argues that, contrary to popular belief (I'm not sure if this was popular in general or just among historians), women in the eighteenth century in fact rarely acted as their husbands' full partners in business. They often had little idea about their husbands' business affairs at all.

It's clear from Roberts' book, however, that many prominent men of the time (Ben Franklin, John Adams) relied heavily on their wives to run their business affairs, which (1) may explain why the popular view is that women took an active role in their husbands' work; the prominent examples are what stuck in people's minds, and (2) probably is what freed up those men to be prominent statesmen in the first place. They didn't just rely on their wives to run the house and take care of the children; their wives were also taking care of the business affairs that were normally the province of the husband, which freed up their men for the full-time job of statesmanship.

And I’ve finally gotten back into gear on Kristin Lavransdatter! I finished part one of book three, which might be called The Misery of Simon Darre. ”spoilers” )

What I Plan to Read Next

The library finally got The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club! I’ll be going away this weekend for yet another wedding, which has been expanded into a short trip (we’ll be staying a state park close to Bloomington, in order to efficaciously combine hiking and seeing movies at the IU cinema: Agnes Varda’s La Pointe Courte AND Dorothy Arzner’s Christopher Strong). I’m saving this latest installment of Peter Wimsey for the trip.
osprey_archer: (books)
Life has gotten away from me this week and I'm not making very good time in Kristin Lavransdattar (sorry, [personal profile] evelyn_b!). But I have managed to make my way to chapter 5, and I am happy to report that Kristin does sort of apprentice herself to the witch, although sadly it's a very informal apprenticeship and the book seems set to move away from Possible Witchy Happenings to Kristin's impending marriage to a dude who seems perfectly fine BUT is not her childhood friend who just declared his love for her even though he's nowhere near rich enough for her parents to let him marry her.

Why would you do that, childhood friend? You're just making Kristin's life way more complicated for no reason.

Kristin has also mooted the possibility of entering a convent, which I don't think will happen, although I for one would enjoy 1,000 pages about life in a medieval Norwegian convent. But we'll see! It's hard to know anything about a book this size when you're only five chapters in.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Andrea Cheng’s The Year of the Garden, which unfortunately I think was a little weaker than the other books in the Anna Wang series - although it looks like Andrea Cheng died before this book was published, so quite possibly she didn’t have the chance to finish it as she would have liked. I still recommend the first four books in the series, though; as this one is a prequel, it doesn’t matter so much whether you read it or not.

Jacqueline Woodson’s Another Brooklyn, which is gorgeous, a prose-poem of a book. But so sad. There’s a sense of omnipresent sexual menace about the 1970s Brooklyn setting - the heroine and her three friends Gigi and Angela and Sylvia always aware that they’re being stared at and judged in public, watched, perhaps touched, which never rises to an actual assault but also never goes away.

And I gave up on Annie Barrows’ Nothing because I was a third of the way into the book and couldn’t tell the two leads apart, let alone any of the supporting characters, and life is just too short. Question for keepers of reading logs: do you add a book you abandoned to your log?

What I’m Reading Now

Guess who finally got Alicia Malone’s The Female Gaze: Essential Movies Made by Women? Me! I’ve only been waiting for this book for, oh, six months or so. It’s a collection of movie reviews, many written by different people, so I expect it will be uneven as anthologies often are, but I’m hoping to come out of it with recommendations for new movies to watch.

I’m also still working on Kay Armitage’s The Girl from God’s Country: Nell Shipman and the Silent Cinema, which I’m really enjoying. I particularly like the way that Armitage situates Nell Shipman as one of many women directors in the silent era, because it’s accurate, it highlights a piece of film history that is largely forgotten (even the introduction to The Female Gaze blithely asserts that there were few women directors till the 1970s), and Armitage uses it to explicitly challenge the way that historical women who achieved anything are often portrayed as Lone Geniuses.

As Armitage points out, the Lone Genius construction is pretty limiting. It often requires ignoring the other women who were present, either by not mentioning them or by dismissing them as non-geniuses. It means that anyone who wants to dismiss a woman creator from attention can do so by arguing that she, too, is a non-genius. It drags people into circular arguments about the genius or lack thereof of particular creators (how do you prove that someone is a genius, after all?) rather than letting them say, “Nell Shipman was an interesting person who made interesting movies and her work is worth discussing whether or not she was an innovative genius.”

I was also VERY interested to discover that female-driven car chase movies were a big thing in the 1910s & 20s. (Shipman’s Something New is an extant example.) Audiences loved them and there were dozens going around.

I’ve also started Sigrid Undset’s Kristin Lavransdattar, but I think I’ll do a separate post for it every week, lest it take over the Wednesday Reading Meme for months on end.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’m contemplating what to read for the reading challenge “a book you chose for the cover.” Top contenders right now: Katrina Leno’s Summer of Salt or Amor Towles Rules of Civility.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
67 8 9101112
13 1415 16 17 1819
20 21 22 23242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 28th, 2025 06:39 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios