osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Who just finished Kristin Lavransdatter? ME! *spikes football* It wasn’t always an enjoyable reading experience as I read, but I’m glad to have read it now that it’s done: it gives such a rich vision of medieval Norwegian society that you could almost step into the page and drink ale in the hearth house.

This is not to say that I would go around recommending it willy-nilly, because there are also times when it is a slog (Kristin and Erlend have many variations on the same problem - and you have to give Sigrid Undset this, she comes up with MANY new variations - but it’s always the same basic problem. Erlend is reckless and irresponsible, and Kristin can neither forgive him nor break from him.

I was so close to finishing William Dean Howells’ My Literary Passions last week that it only took me about fifteen minutes to wrap it up, but I’m still sad that it’s over. His musings about the book-reading life are just so relatable! Like this comment, after he confesses to a fondness to some long-forgotten trashy novel:

“Perhaps I shall be able to whisper the readers behind my hand that I have never yet read the Aeneid of Virgil; the Georgics, yes; but the Aeneid, no. Some time, however, I expect to read it and to like it immensely. That is often the case with things that I have held aloof from indefinitely.”

Who among us doesn’t have such a book floating somewhere in our life-time reading plans?

I also finished Paul Watkins’ Stand before Your God: An American Schoolboy in England, and my days of thinking that the English boarding school system sounds like one of the worst things that people have ever voluntarily inflicted on their children are certainly coming to a middle.

What I’m Reading Now

In 1903, Jean Webster visited Italy, and like many Anglophone writers found it impossible to resist setting a novel there. (I can throw no shade; I’ve done it myself.) Webster wrote two: Jerry Junior, a light comic novel, and The Wheat Princess, which is the last book I need to read before I’ve encompassed Webster’s entire oeuvre.

So far it seems pretty solidly second-tier Webster; on par with Jerry Junior, certainly not reaching the heights of Daddy-Long-Legs or When Patty Went to College. But perhaps because it’s her final book for me, reading it has made me sad that she died so young: she has a fairly varied output (which is part of the reason the quality is so varied, probably) and who knows what new and interesting things she would have tried if she got the chance?

I’ve also begun Edward L. Ayers’ The Thin Light of Freedom: The Civil War and Emancipation in the Heart of America, which starts with Gettysburg and will stretch, presumably, through Reconstruction. I’m still in the Gettysburg part, and so far I’m really appreciating the way that Ayers makes battles make sense - not in the sense that he gives you a blow-by-blow of who is charging where, but as an overall part of the war, how battles are shaped not only by generals but by the sheer physical facts of the terrain and equipment and the available amount of food.

In a way it reminds me of Tolstoy in War and Peace (exasperating though it is to praise Tolstoy’s Theory of History in War and Peace) - of his emphasis on the physical limitations of armies. It’s easy to say, in hindsight, that Meade ought to have cut off Lee’s retreat (just as Kutuzov ought to have cut off Napoleon’s), but the fact that this would have been militarily advantageous doesn’t change the fact that an army can reach a stage of such exhaustion that neither its horses or its men are physically capable of going fast enough to cut off another army’s retreat.

What I Plan to Read Next

It’s October, which makes it the right book to read Shirley Jackson, am I right? (All months are the right months to read Shirley Jackson, but October is even more right than most.) The Road through the Wall is the only novel of hers I haven’t read, so I’ve put a hold on it at the library.

I probably ought to read some of her short stories too (at very least “The Lottery”!), but - confession time - I very rarely read short stories. It’s funny, because I love short books (this is one of the reasons I continue to read lots of children’s books), but somehow this has not translated into an interest in short stories.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finished Ella Cheever Thayer’s Wired Love: A Romance of Dots and Dashes, which is a delight from start to finish. I love the telegraphic romance, I love the part where a clumsy fellow accidentally proposes to the wrong girl and then just… doesn’t break the engagement (peak nineteenth century moment right there), I love the bohemian dinner that Cyn and Nattie throw using every single dish they can find in their apartments including the soap dish.

However, the book also broke my heart Spoilers )

What I’m Reading Now

I’ve begun Elizabeth Gilbert’s City of Girls as my third stab at “a book outside my genre comfort zone,” and I feel tentatively positive about this one! I’m three chapters in and no one has stumbled on a dead body or been raped. Moreover, the main character is an old lady looking back on her youth and telling her life story with wit, occasional sarcasm, and pleasure in both the happiness and the foibles of her youth, so no matter what happens I think it is clear that she will come out all right in the end.

I’ve also been zooming through Cokie Roberts’ Founding Mothers: The Women Who Raised Our Nation, which pairs interestingly with another book that I've been dipping into, Mary Beth Norton's Liberty's Daughters: The Revolutionary Experience of American Women, 1750-1800. Norton argues that, contrary to popular belief (I'm not sure if this was popular in general or just among historians), women in the eighteenth century in fact rarely acted as their husbands' full partners in business. They often had little idea about their husbands' business affairs at all.

It's clear from Roberts' book, however, that many prominent men of the time (Ben Franklin, John Adams) relied heavily on their wives to run their business affairs, which (1) may explain why the popular view is that women took an active role in their husbands' work; the prominent examples are what stuck in people's minds, and (2) probably is what freed up those men to be prominent statesmen in the first place. They didn't just rely on their wives to run the house and take care of the children; their wives were also taking care of the business affairs that were normally the province of the husband, which freed up their men for the full-time job of statesmanship.

And I’ve finally gotten back into gear on Kristin Lavransdatter! I finished part one of book three, which might be called The Misery of Simon Darre. ”spoilers” )

What I Plan to Read Next

The library finally got The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club! I’ll be going away this weekend for yet another wedding, which has been expanded into a short trip (we’ll be staying a state park close to Bloomington, in order to efficaciously combine hiking and seeing movies at the IU cinema: Agnes Varda’s La Pointe Courte AND Dorothy Arzner’s Christopher Strong). I’m saving this latest installment of Peter Wimsey for the trip.
osprey_archer: (books)
Life has gotten away from me this week and I'm not making very good time in Kristin Lavransdattar (sorry, [personal profile] evelyn_b!). But I have managed to make my way to chapter 5, and I am happy to report that Kristin does sort of apprentice herself to the witch, although sadly it's a very informal apprenticeship and the book seems set to move away from Possible Witchy Happenings to Kristin's impending marriage to a dude who seems perfectly fine BUT is not her childhood friend who just declared his love for her even though he's nowhere near rich enough for her parents to let him marry her.

Why would you do that, childhood friend? You're just making Kristin's life way more complicated for no reason.

Kristin has also mooted the possibility of entering a convent, which I don't think will happen, although I for one would enjoy 1,000 pages about life in a medieval Norwegian convent. But we'll see! It's hard to know anything about a book this size when you're only five chapters in.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Andrea Cheng’s The Year of the Garden, which unfortunately I think was a little weaker than the other books in the Anna Wang series - although it looks like Andrea Cheng died before this book was published, so quite possibly she didn’t have the chance to finish it as she would have liked. I still recommend the first four books in the series, though; as this one is a prequel, it doesn’t matter so much whether you read it or not.

Jacqueline Woodson’s Another Brooklyn, which is gorgeous, a prose-poem of a book. But so sad. There’s a sense of omnipresent sexual menace about the 1970s Brooklyn setting - the heroine and her three friends Gigi and Angela and Sylvia always aware that they’re being stared at and judged in public, watched, perhaps touched, which never rises to an actual assault but also never goes away.

And I gave up on Annie Barrows’ Nothing because I was a third of the way into the book and couldn’t tell the two leads apart, let alone any of the supporting characters, and life is just too short. Question for keepers of reading logs: do you add a book you abandoned to your log?

What I’m Reading Now

Guess who finally got Alicia Malone’s The Female Gaze: Essential Movies Made by Women? Me! I’ve only been waiting for this book for, oh, six months or so. It’s a collection of movie reviews, many written by different people, so I expect it will be uneven as anthologies often are, but I’m hoping to come out of it with recommendations for new movies to watch.

I’m also still working on Kay Armitage’s The Girl from God’s Country: Nell Shipman and the Silent Cinema, which I’m really enjoying. I particularly like the way that Armitage situates Nell Shipman as one of many women directors in the silent era, because it’s accurate, it highlights a piece of film history that is largely forgotten (even the introduction to The Female Gaze blithely asserts that there were few women directors till the 1970s), and Armitage uses it to explicitly challenge the way that historical women who achieved anything are often portrayed as Lone Geniuses.

As Armitage points out, the Lone Genius construction is pretty limiting. It often requires ignoring the other women who were present, either by not mentioning them or by dismissing them as non-geniuses. It means that anyone who wants to dismiss a woman creator from attention can do so by arguing that she, too, is a non-genius. It drags people into circular arguments about the genius or lack thereof of particular creators (how do you prove that someone is a genius, after all?) rather than letting them say, “Nell Shipman was an interesting person who made interesting movies and her work is worth discussing whether or not she was an innovative genius.”

I was also VERY interested to discover that female-driven car chase movies were a big thing in the 1910s & 20s. (Shipman’s Something New is an extant example.) Audiences loved them and there were dozens going around.

I’ve also started Sigrid Undset’s Kristin Lavransdattar, but I think I’ll do a separate post for it every week, lest it take over the Wednesday Reading Meme for months on end.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’m contemplating what to read for the reading challenge “a book you chose for the cover.” Top contenders right now: Katrina Leno’s Summer of Salt or Amor Towles Rules of Civility.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 8th, 2025 10:33 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios