osprey_archer: (Default)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

It was curious, but the smell of coffee made me more cheerful. I knew that from the war; it was never the big things that consoled one - it was always the unimportant, the little things.

This is an unusually consoling quote for Erich Maria Remarque’s Three Comrades, which is mostly a chronicle of despair: our hero Robert starts the book on his thirtieth birthday totting up the dead-end jobs he’s held since the end of the Great War, and ends spoilers )

I FINALLY read Nora Ellen Groce’s Everyone Here Spoke Sign Language: Hereditary Deafness on Martha’s Vineyard, which I’ve meant to read ever since high school because my biology textbook included an excerpt. It was worth the wait: this is a short, engrossing book, which discusses both the likely hereditary pattern behind the high incidence of deafness on Martha’s Vineyard in the 18th and 19th centuries (a recessive gene) and the social consequences of its common occurrence, which was that, well, everyone on Martha’s Vineyard spoke sign language.

The result was that deaf Vineyarders were fully integrated into the community, both socially and economically. Groce’s interlocutors often had difficulty remembering who was deaf, in the way that someone in a modern-day community might have trouble remembering precisely who wore glasses: it’s a fact about someone, but not as important or memorable as “He had that really great fishing boat!”

Deaf Vineyarders married at the same rates as hearing islanders (often to hearing partners), earned their living at the same trades (except whaling, possibly because whaling ships tended to get a large proportion of their crews off-Island?), and had similar economic fates: a few earned their fortunes, most got by, and some sunk into penury, just like their hearing counterparts.

I also read Ruth Stiles Gannett’s My Father’s Dragon, but I didn’t particularly like it. Perhaps the whimsicality of it would have appealed to me more if I’d read it as a youngster?

What I’m Reading Now

I have the horrible feeling that Leo in Mary Renault’s The Friendly Young Ladies is going to end up paired off with Peter, who is the most obnoxious of the available candidates. He makes a habit of pretending to fall in love with his lonely female patients, on the theory that this will cheer them up and speed their recovery; Leo objects (but thinks, as she does so, “he’s a far better human being than I am,” which could only possibly be true if Leo is a serial killer) that women “don’t really enjoy being helped and done good to,” as if Peter is in fact helping and doing good, rather than essentially lying to and misleading these poor women out of, at best, pity, and at worst as a way of amusing himself (Peter would strenuously deny that characterization but it’s absolutely visible in the way he thinks). As if a man would enjoy it if a pretty lady doctor felt so sorry for him that she pretended to fall in love with him till his vital signs bucked up?

What I Plan to Read Next

Is it time for Wilkie Collins’ Armadale? It might be time for Armadale.
osprey_archer: (books)
A rare edition of Books I’ve Abandoned. Possibly two weeks ago I would have enjoyed Douglas Boin’s Alaric the Goth: An Outsider’s History of the Fall of Rome, but I just can’t with a sympathetic account of a nation’s capital being sacked right now. (Probably the book’s pervasive presentism would still have annoyed me two weeks ago, though.)

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finished A. J. Pearce’s Dear Mrs. Bird, a novel set during the London Blitz about a young woman who becomes a stealth advice columnist when her magazine’s actual advice columnist refuses to answer letters containing Unpleasantness. This book is a delight, albeit the kind of delight that nearly made me cry at one point because Emmy is such a good friend to her best friend Bunty, even when she thinks she’s a bad friend. The book comes to a satisfying but fairly open end, so I was thrilled to learn that there’s going to be a sequel. A chance to spend more time with Emmy and Bunty and Emmy’s coworker Kathleen and her boss Mr. Collins!

I also read Anne Bogel’s Don’t Overthink It: Make Easier Decisions, Stop Second-Guessing, and Bring More Joy to Your Life. I often read self-help books when I already know basically what I need to do, but need a little more nudging to push me to actually do it, and as my reason for not doing things often is that I’m thinking… and thinking… and thinking about it, this book was quite helpful in that regard.

I also really liked the chapter about incorporating little rituals into your life, not least because it sparked an idea for what to do with all these candles we’ve got lying around: why not light a candle while I’m writing letters? I’m more likely to remember to actually use the darn things if I associate them with a specific activity, and letter-writing (unlike, say, watching a movie) involves a certain amount of staring into space thinking “What should I write next?”, during which time a flickering candle flame is a pleasant companion.

What I’m Reading Now

It was the melancholy secret that reality can arouse desires but never satisfy them; that love begins with a human being but does not end in him; and that everything can be there: a human being, love, happiness, life - and that yet in some terrible way it is always too little, and grows ever less the more it seems.

Erich Maria Remarque’s Three Comrades continues its exploration of low-key despair. Our narrator, Robert, has been drifting through life in the years since the Great War. When the book begins, he has just met a girl, Pat, with whom he briefly finds love and purpose and happiness. However, it turns out she has consumption (don’t they always?), and although I’ve only gotten up to the part where Pat goes away to a sanatorium, I strongly suspect she’s going to kick the bucket before the book is out. It would be out of keeping with the general mood of the book for her to live.

What I Plan to Read Next

[personal profile] rachelmanija’s review of Waubgeshig Rice’s Moon of the Crusted Snow so intrigued me that I put a hold on the book at the library.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Priya Parker’s The Art of Gathering: How We Meet and Why It Matters was perhaps not the best book to read while still in the throes of the pandemic, as it has filled me with thoughts about how to create richer and more vibrant parties (although perhaps I could use some of the book’s suggestions at my next Zoom gathering?). The thing that stuck with me most is Parker’s idea that a gathering is a kind of art - and, as with any piece of art, you want a bang-up beginning and ending, because those have an outsized effect on what people remember and take away from your piece.

Gerald Durrell’s How to Shoot an Amateur Naturalist, in contrast, is an excellent book to read during a pandemic, as reading the book feels a bit like taking a trip round the world with Durrell as he shoots a television program called, of course, The Amateur Naturalist. Durrell visits all sorts of lovely locations (there’s a gorgeous description of the northern lights; I so want to see them some day), but I think my favorite section was the chapter describing the rich biodiversity of the humble English hedgerow.

What I’m Reading Now

I was desperate to learn how to be a reporter. The sort of person who always had a notebook in hand, ready to sniff out Political Intrigue, launch Difficult Questions at Governmental Representatives, or, best of all, leap onto the last plane to a far-off country in order to send back Vital Reports of resistance and war.

I picked up A. J. Pearce’s Dear Mrs. Bird because of [personal profile] ladyherenya’s review (and because I’m weak for any and all books set in London-in-the-Blitz), and fell in love with the narrator Emmy’s voice within the first few pages. Perhaps this is a weakness on my part, but I can’t resist Capitalization for Emphasis. Currently zipping through this and loving it; Emmy is a delight and so is her best friend Bunty.

I’ve meant to read Erich Maria Remarque’s Three Comrades ever since learning from Eleonory Gilburd’s To See Paris and Die: The Soviet Lives of Western Culture that the book was wildly popular (in translation) in the USSR. The book is set in 1930; our hero, a veteran of the First World War, has just met a girl, which has briefly jolted him out of his usual mist of ennui. Will this effect last or will he sink again into the alcohol-fueled mists of despair? Probably the latter, but we’ll see.

What I Plan to Read Next

Out of deference to my fellow library patrons who have it on hold, I ought to read Douglas Boin’s Alaric the Goth: An Outsider’s History of the Fall of Rome… but I may be seduced by Mary Renault’s The Friendly Young Ladies instead.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I really thought I was done with E. Lockhart after Genuine Fraud, in which the heroine rebels against patriarchy by… killing two teenage girls?... but I couldn’t resist Lockhart’s latest, Again Again, and it’s actually really lovely, a sort of fractal story about Adelaide’s summer at the Alabaster Academy, in which she pines for her ex-boyfriend… or falls for a new boy, Jack… unless she actually falls for Oscar…

It’s like Lockhart is exploring a series of different scenarios about Adelaide’s summer: you have the main story, and then you have different possibilities branching off, some of which become ongoing threads throughout the book, some lasting just the length of a vignette. It’s a fascinating structure, an interesting meditation on the fragility and contingency of love - the way that little happenstances either draw people together or keep them apart.

Last week, I was so charmed by George MacDonald’s The Light Princess that I instantly acquired his fairy tale The Golden Key after [personal profile] rachelmanija recommended it. The two fairy tales are actually in quite different registers: The Light Princess is light and pun-filled (it reminded me rather of A. A. Milne’s Once on a Time), while The Golden Key has a more serious, mythical tone, especially once the characters leave the borders of fairyland and plunge into a series of semi-allegorical meetings with the Old Man of the Sea, and the Earth, and Fire.

The edition I read had luscious black-and-white illustrations by Ruth Sanderson. Black and white is perhaps an odd choice for a story that begins with a golden key found literally at the base of a rainbow, and yet the dramatic contrast really seems to suit the mythical nature of the story.

I also finished Anne C. Voerhoeve’s My Family for the War, a novel about a young Jewish girl who escaped Germany on a kindertransport not long before World War II, and her life with a family in England. This book was perfectly fine without at any point taking wing and soaring for me, although I’m not sure if that was the book itself or the translation.

And finally - last but not least! - I read Tamar Adler’s Something Old, Something New: Classic Recipes Revisited. Adler wrote what is probably my very favorite cooking book, An Everlasting Meal, which does include some actual recipes but is an exploration of a philosophy of how to cook and eat both frugally (in terms of time as well as money) and well.

Something Old, Something New is less philosophically ambitious, but just as beautifully written, and I marked down a few recipes I’d like to try (particularly intrigued by the inside-out chicken Kiev). Here’s Adler’s description of a recipe for crepes Suzette: “Here is a no-nonsense version to which nonsense should be added at will.”

What I’m Reading Now

Sally Belfrage’s A Room in Moscow. Why didn’t I get this from interlibrary loan sooner? I could have used so much of the info in this book in Honeytrap! That’s fine, though: I can just save it up and use it if/when I write another Soviet themed novel.

Seriously, though, it kills me that during the ice rink scene Gennady could have bragged to Daniel, “In Moscow we flood an entire park (Belfrage doesn’t say WHICH park, just “the largest.” Gorky Park??) for skating.” Such a missed opportunity!

What I Plan to Read Next

[personal profile] ladyherenya posted about The Wizard’s Guide to Defensive Baking on the exact same day my RL friend Emma recommended it to me over Zoom, so clearly I have to give the book a try!
osprey_archer: (books)
For many reasons, (mainly slothfulness), I didn’t get the Wednesday Reading Meme done in a timely manner this week, so here it is on Saturday again.

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

[personal profile] evelyn_b raved about Goethe’s The Sorrows of Young Werther earlier this year, so I read it for my reading challenge “a book recommended by someone with great taste,” and it was An Experience.

My previous experience with Werther consisted of Thackeray’s poem, Sorrows of Werther, which while funny is not really accurate: it makes Charlotte sound insensitive, but actually she’s quite distressed by Werther’s agonizingly intense feeligns for her and his suicide at the end of the book, not least because he arranged it so that he shot himself with Charlotte’s husband’s pistols. Werther WHY. Not in a “trying to make this look like murder” way, more of a “the existence of your husband has destroyed my life” symbolism, but actually that might make it worse for Charlotte. At least if Werther was trying to frame her husband she could be mad at him for acting with such venom and malice, you know?

I also read Sam Eastland’s Red Icon, which involves art theft AND religious cults, which are two of my favorite things, especially in a murder mystery. (If art theft mystery without murder was its own genre, I would totally read that too. One of the most disappointing reads of my life was a nonfiction book about a rare book thief, which I would have thought couldn’t help being good, and YET.)

What I’m Reading Now

I’ve become unexpectedly enthralled by a subplot in E. M. Delafield’s Gay Life. Private secretary and general sadsack Denis has fallen in love with the young novelist Charlotte Challoner. I was briefly afraid that Charlotte might be studying him to create a shy, lonely, self-conscious nobody for some future novel, but in fact she seems to be just as keen on him as he is on her and I’m really hoping that having met with sympathy and companionship for the first time in his life, Denis will blossom - if not like a rose than at least like some country wildflower growing up by the roadside.

I’ve begun Susanna Kearsley’s The Shadowy Horses, which has a Mary Stewart-ish charm so far: a plucky heroine far from home (in Scotland, this time) becomes embroiled in a mystery. There begin to be suggestions of ghosts and I will be thrilled if this comes to fruition.

I’m keeping on with Annie Dillard’s Pilgrim at Tinker Creek. This week she comments, “In my life I’ve seen one million pictures of a duck that has adopted a kitten, or a cat that has adopted a ducklings, or a sow and a puppy, a mare and a muskrat. And for the one millionth time I’m fascinated.”

I had thought this “unusual animal friends” trend began with the internet, but evidently some human fascinations are perennial.

What I Plan to Read Next

Sam Eastland’s Berlin Red, which I was bereft - BEREFT - to learn is the final Inspector Pekkala book. What mystery series will I read now???

Actually, I’ve had my eye on Sarah Caudwell’s Hilary Tamar quartet for some time, so probably I should take this opportunity to give it a try.
osprey_archer: (books)
I quite enjoyed Triumph and Disaster, which is a collection of - historical sketches, I guess you could call them, by Stefan Zweig, each on the theme of a great turning point in history and the small "for want of a nail..." details that led events to turn out the way they did.

Waterloo - which Napoleon lost because Marshall Grouchy followed his orders and continued to pursue the Prussians, rather than realize that he must disobey and turn back. The fall of Constantinople - which might have been avoided, except that a postern gate had been forgotten, and left open in the wall. Wilson - giving in to pressure to compromise on a realistic peace treaty, rather than holding firm in his dedication to the Fourteen Points.

I do wonder a bit if this last sketch doesn't suffer from wishful thinking on Zweig's part. He was writing a Jewish writer in interwar Austria, and I think must have yearned achingly for the Treaty of Versailles to turn out differently - for Wilson's dreams of endless peace to come true, rather than World War I slipping ineluctable toward World War II. I am not at all sure I share his belief that Wilson could have created a more lasting peace if he had refused to compromise. Might he not simply have ended up sidelined? The wider structural forces against a lasting peace may simply have been too strong for any one man to overcome.

But even if I don't agree with his historical conclusions - and even in translation, which I know probably mutes his voice - Zweig's writing is beautiful. As Wilson sails away, he says, concluding his sketch, he "will not let his eyes look back on our unfortunate continent, which has been longing for peace and unity for thousands of years and has never achieved it. And once again the eternal vision of a humane world recedes into mist and into the distance."
osprey_archer: (books)
I finished Stefan Zweig's Beware of Pity, which fulfills my first challenge for the 2017 Reading Challenge! *pause for cheering and kazoos* This book has been on my TBR list since 2008, so I'm glad I finally read it, but I have mixed feelings about it as a book; it spends more time musing philosophically than I think any novel that is not Sophie's World ought to do, and quite a bit of that philosophical musing is about the Nature of the Invalid, which gets tiresome. "Can the healthy and the sick ever bridge the chasm between them? PROBABLY NOT."

It's a bit like an A Passage to India of illness, now that I think about it.

The characters are finely enough observed that I think they would have stood the test of time much better if the narrative left more room for interpretation. Too finely observed to be sympathetic in some ways; I understood and even empathized with Hofmiller's bad decisions, because he makes them entirely - as the title suggests - out of pity (I think a modern Hofmiller would call his feeling sympathy; it's not as condescending as pity implies) - and yet some of them are horrible decisions, like the time that he wildly exaggerates the likelihood that a new treatment will help Edith, a young woman partially paralyzed by I think polio, although the book never specifies the disease.

Well, he wants to make her happy, which is understandable and yet so terribly, terribly, wickedly short-sighted. And having set himself on this path, he's too weak to pull himself out of it; he begs Edith's doctor not to tell her that Hofmiller exaggerated (even though the doctor intends to do this in the gentlest way possible: Hofmiller is a layman, didn't understand the technicalities, certainly no suggestion that he was exaggerating on purpose because it was just so pleasant to be the bearer of good news, etc. etc.). Hofmiller promises that he'll tell her himself when the time comes, and I guess the doctor must be taken in by Hofmiller's cavalry uniform and the honor and backbone it seems to promise he possesses, because he agrees to this dubious plan.

In the event, Hofmiller is never put into a position where he has to confess, but I don't believe he ever would have managed it. The keystone of his character seems to be that he does whatever he thinks will be most approved by the people he's with at the time; and at no point would Edith or her father ever want to hear that this new treatment is in fact totally unsuitable for Edith's condition.

What I liked about this book - and also what made it painful to read - is that the Hofmiller's flaws are so small and common and in ordinary circumstances would probably cause only small problems, but he finds himself in a situation where they end up leading to tragedy. It's a sort of small-scale Greek tragedy - a small and sordid tragic flaw, leading despite Hofmiller's good intentions to a bitter ending.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I’ve already reviewed it all!

What I’m Reading Now

Erich Maria Remarque’s All Quiet on the Western Front, which has just about broken me; it’s so sad I can’t even cry over it. Paul Baumer is an infantry soldier in the German army in World War II, who goes to the front, gets sent back from the front, loses this friend and that friend and a new recruit (the new recruits go down like mayflies), moves through the world like an exhausted ghost. It’s shell shock in novel form and I can only read a chapter at a time because it clings to me afterward.

I’ve also started reading Caroline Winterer’s American Enlightenments: Pursuing Happiness in the Age of Reason, which is about the various iterations of enlightenment in eighteenth-century America (and I think also by extension in Europe; the book is about the cross-pollination of ideas between the two continents). So far she has written about eighteenth-century library travelogues - surely the best kind of a travelogue - and learned letter-writing networks, which filled me with a certain epistolary covetousness.

What I Plan to Read Next

One of my friends from Captain America fandom sent me Norman Lindsay’s The Magic Pudding! Which is apparently quite famous in Australia. So probably that; anything called The Magic Pudding has to be a good antidote to All Quiet on the Western Front.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I've Just Finished Reading

Rainer Maria Rilke's Letters to a Young Poet, which... I don't know. He goes on and on about how some things are simple impossible to communicate in words, and I agree with this to some extent, but at the same time, I feel like he could probably communicate a lot more with words if he were just a bit more precise and concrete and not so airy-fairy.

Possibly this as as much a problem with the translation as Rilke himself, though.

Even if I found the book as a whole rather underwhelming, some of his observations were food for thought. Like this one: "Works of art are of an infinite solitude, and no means of approach is so useless as criticism. Only love can touch and hold them and be fair to them."

I wouldn't go so far as to say that criticism is useless - but I think there's also something to be said for just being with a work of art, and just being with it and not reflexively picking it to pieces. And, also, to understand a work of art, I think one has to be in some sympathy with its basic project: someone who thinks fantasy or YA or romance or literary fiction is by its very nature worthless tripe is not going to have anything very useful or interesting to say about it.

Or this quote: "Perhaps all the dragons in our lives are princesses who are only waiting to see us act, just once, with beauty and courage. Perhaps everything that frightens us is, in its deepest essence, something helpless that wants our love."

I can't decide if this is beautiful and inspiring, or hopeless tripe. Or somehow both at once. I think it's more true (to the extent that it is true) about the things that frighten us in ourselves, that we believe to be our flaws and weaknesses.

What I'm Reading Now

Black Dove, White Raven, which is not grabbing me like the other Elizabeth Wein books I've read. It's interesting, but there's no feeling of urgency to it, despite the fact that the prefatory letters make it clear that Teo is in dire straits. But it's hard to remember that while reading memories about Em and Teo's childhood.

What I Plan to Read Next

I have a small stack of books from the university library: Eugenia Ginzburg's Within the Whirlwind and A. R. Luria's The Making of Mind and The Man with the Shattered World. It's hard to choose from such an embarrassment of riches!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
8 910 11 121314
15 1617 18 192021
222324 25 26 2728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 30th, 2025 12:20 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios