osprey_archer: (kitty)
I've been reading John Green and David Levithan's Will Grayson, Will Grayson, which is really two books smushed together. Specifically, it is one book that I like and one book that makes me want to stab somebody with a spoon, and that somebody is definitely, definitely, definitely the main character.

Will Grayson #1 is a reasonably entertaining John Green book about Will Grayson, who is laid-back to the point of passivity. This sounds like an irritating character trait, but I actually find it rather fascinating, simply because I’ve met people like this but haven’t seen this trait reflected in many characters. He's not really sure what he wants, and mostly thinks he wants to be left alone. He has two rules for achieving this: "shut up" and "don't care."

But at the same time, it's clear that he does care. He loves music, he looks after his friends, and he has a ridiculous tiny crush on Jane, whom he definitely doesn't want to date ever because it's really safer to admire from afar. Not actually dating her is almost the same as not caring, right? Right?

But at the same time, he's mostly willing to go along with it when other people drag him into things. He has awesome friends, so mostly they're dragging him into awesome things that he kind of secretly wants to do anyway. I strongly suspect that as the story progresses, Will is going to start going after things he wants without his buddy Tiny Cooper throwing him at opportunities.

Will Grayson #2 is about another boy named Will Grayson, who has joined House, Professor Higgins, and Lila West (from season 2 of Dexter) on the short list of characters who I would happily see strangled with their own socks. He’s basically a gay male Bella Swan, except infinitely worse than Bella because all the flaws people accuse Bella of having are literally true and dialed up to eleven for Will Grayson.

1. Bella's interests in cooking and Jane Austen and Jacob may feel a little tacked on, but at least the narrative gestures toward the fact that she has interests outside of Edward. Meanwhile, Will's boyfriend is honest to God the only thing he cares about in the world. Will's only hobby is mockery. He treats his friend Maura like shit and mocks her emo goth poetry (internally, of course, because he's too much of a coward to actually express the depths of his assholish nature), but at least the poor girl actually does something sometimes, even if she does it badly.

(I am rooting for Maura to punch Will in the face. Hopefully repeatedly. Possibly with an implement.)

2. Bella is indifferent and verging on vaguely disdainful to most people: there are multiple scenes where people (particularly Jessica) talk to her and Bella just tunes them out. But Will actively despises everyone in the world who is not his boyfriend. He goes on for pages and pages and pages about how boring and normal and mediocre everyone else in the whole entire world is, and how dull their lives are, and how ridiculous it is for them to yearn for love and connection.

Will Grayson is a huge, huge hypocrite. He's the dullest, most mediocre person in the book, and I can't stand the way he sneers at other people's desire for love even while he carries on an affair of gag-worthy soppiness with his internet boyfriend. They spend ten minutes saying goodbye to each other at the end of every conversation. Whenever there's a lull in their conversation, they just text "I'm here" back and forth at each other. I think that absolutely destroys his cred for mocking anyone else for sappiness ever again.

Bella, whatever her flaws, doesn’t hypocritically mock the idea of other people finding love even as she writes sappy IMs to Edward. One of the few nice things she does for her friends is encourage their romances.

I've reached the part of the book where Will Grayson has made plans to meet up with his internet boyfriend, whom he's never actually met before. I hope that the internet boyfriend turns out to be a serial killer, and the way the two books are going to intertwine is that Tiny Cooper will drag the other Will Grayson into a murder investigation.
osprey_archer: (kitty)
Since reading Ernest Hemingway’s A Farewell to Arms, I’ve been pondering how such a stale romance became a classic. If a woman had written it (she says bitterly) it would probably be as maligned as Twilight, because the relationship is even duller than Bella & Edward’s and the heroine yet more self-abnegating.

Yes! Yet more! People like to slam Bella for having no interests, but she does have at least one overriding interests: she thinks Edward is really, really hot. She wants to have sex with him; she positively pesters him about it. Now, pestering is not a very mature way to get what you want. But at least Bella, unlike - just a second, I need to look up her name; I can’t remember any of the characters’ names from A Farewell to Arms -

See, this is another good thing about Twilight. The characters tend to be rather one-note, but most of those single notes are memorable: I don’t go “Wait, who are you again?” when they show up. It’s rather like Gordon Korman’s MacDonald Hall books: most of the characters have one trait (Elmer is nerdy, Sidney Rampulsky is clumsy, Dave Jackson is American...), but they’re rather endearing with it.

Catherine Barkley. That’s the love interest’s name in A Farewell to Arms. Unlike Catherine Barkley, Bella Swan does not pride herself on having no desires in the world but to please her beloved. She wants to have sex with him, she wants to be made a vampire: she and Edward occasionally leave off their rounds of “I love yous” in order to argue about whether or when or how she will get what she wants.

Catherine and the narrator of The Sun Also Rises never argue. Their conversations are all a sort of “I love you so much! No, I love you so much!” feedback loop.

To be compelling, a relationship has to be about something other than itself: that is, the characters can’t just talk about their feelings about each other all the time. We need to see why these characters love each other so much. What do they have in common? Do they talk about books, politics, the nature of Good and Evil? Or, say, what the fuck the point of World War I is, given that they’re smack dab in the middle of it?

I have no idea why Hemingway’s prose style is so lauded. It’s main point seems to be to iron the emotion and the intellectual content out of his work. He’s writing about a war. A war in Italy. The main characters have nothing to say to each other about politics, warfare, art, the meaning of life, religion?

Of course actual conversation is harder to write than “I love you more than a million sunbeams!” dialogue, and may seem less to the point, if the point is to show that these people looooove each other. The thing to remember is that discussing the plot twists in Twelfth Night or arguing about the nature of Good and Evil is also, in its way, a negotiation of the relationship.
osprey_archer: (Default)
My aunt is a Twilight aficionado, so we've had a movie marathon which ended this weekend with Breaking Dawn, Part 1.

I think Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows has started a terrible, terrible trend. I'm pretty sure they could have fit all of Breaking Dawn into one movie if they really tried.

Although they might have had to leave out Charlie's wedding speech. "This marriage will be a success. I know this, because I'm a cop, and cops knows things. Like how to lead a manhunt to the ends of the earth." Oh Charlie. You're my favorite! He's comic relief, but not in the way where it feels like the movie is making fun of him.

On the other hand, they might also have cut short the endless birthing/"Bella is dead!" scene, and I would have been TOTALLY FINE WITH THAT. Seriously, what is wrong with Edward? His child rips its way out of Bella's stomach and rather than INSTANTANEOUSLY bite her, he just stands there smiling dopily at the baby while BELLA'S HEART STOPS. Idiot!

Also, fun though it is to watch Edward loathe himself, fifteen minutes of resuscitation scene are really twelve minutes more than necessary.

A few other notes.

• Man, the sparkly skin thing doesn't animate well at all. Edward looks totally pixillated.
• Casting Dakota Fanning as Jane-the-Evil-Pain-Vampire? GENIUS. She is soooo creepy.
• Have I mentioned before how much I want to read The Madcap Adventures of Alice and Jasper? Because that would be amazing. I imagine it would be like a cross between an interior decorating show and the sword-fight wedding in the third Pirates of the Caribbean movie.
• The scene where Bella comes up with the worst baby names ever and Edward is all "Worst names EVER! But I'm going to BE SUPPORTIVE!" and Jacob is like, "Damn it, if he's being supportive I can't tell her they're terrible"? Kind of adorable. (Also, the boy baby name totes should have been Edcob.)
osprey_archer: (thinking)
Twilight's Bella Swan is a much maligned character. While her critics' claim that she has no personality is not quite true, what personality she has is nevertheless stunted. She apparently had no friends in Arizona, and she couldn't care less about her "friends" in Forks. She has no hobbies except cooking, and that doesn't seem to give her any joy. Her time is taken up almost entirely in griping about her miserable lot in life and mooning about Edward - the only thing she does with any real passion.

Can we tie together these seemingly disparate facts?

I submit that we can. I submit that when we meet Miss Swan in Twilight, she is in the throes of a deep depression - and has been for years.

She had no friends in her hometown, which suggests she lacked the energy to meet people. She lacked the energy even to care that she had no friends. In Forks, she is forcibly befriended by a group of high school students, but she never makes the slightest effort to return their affection. (One wonders why said high school students went to such lengths to befriend her. I submit that they realized Bella was struggling and, in a commendable if ultimately useless burst of kindness, banded together to help her.)

She cooks because the momentary release of endorphins caused by eating is one of the few things that makes her feel good.

She hates Forks. She takes no pleasure in anything in her life. She has no plans for the future, and is willing to sacrifice everything and everyone she has ever known in order to be together with her "One True Love": Edward.

At this point, Edward's role in this psychodrama must be obvious to all. His super-special vampire pheromones act on Bella as a marvelously effective anti-depressant - when he's around. The effect evanesces as soon as she is not in his direct presence.

Bella thinks they're in love. We know that she's trapped in the throes of chemical dependency.

Hence the fact that she is not at all concerned by his stalking behavior of climbing into her room at night to watch her sleep.

Hence the fact that, when he kisses her, her heart literally stops: the transfer of bodily fluids ups the effectiveness of the anti-depressant to the point that her system can't take it. Her heart stopped because she OD'ed.

Hence Edward's insistence that they get hitched before they have sex, and the fact that they proceed to argue about it for over a year before the fatal day arrives. He's stalling for time so she gains enough tolerance that having sex with him won't kill her from overdose.

Despite his caution, on their wedding night Bella goes into an ecstatic trance in which she doesn't notice that Edward, despite his attempts to be gentle, has left bruises all over her body. Some of those bruises - although Edward would never tell her this - come from his desperate attempts to awaken her after she went into a drug-induced coma.

Hence, finally, the fact that when Edward abandoned her for a time in New Moon, Bella became nearly catatonic from grief: she was going through withdrawal. Edward was trying to wean her off her chemical dependency on him, but alas for them both, the attempt failed.

So don't let's be too hard on the poor girl. The addictive properties of vampires weren't covered in her anti-drug classes.
osprey_archer: (books)
First: what was up with the second Scrubs episode tonight? Why were all the lights off, and where was the rest of the cast? Not that I have anything against JD and Turk, but I missed everyone else. And it was depressing, and not the bittersweet kind of depressing that Scrubs sometimes has, but just straight up depressing.

Also, I had to leave for work before the episode ended. So if anyone watched until the end…what happened?

The first episode was excellent, though. But they've just got to find a way to bring the Janitor back; how can Scrubs be Scrubs with only Dr. Cox to torment JD.

I've never quite understood Cox/JD shippers. Yes, JD has a mancrush, but I can't see Cox ever getting over his dislike of JD - certainly not to the extent of liking JD back.

***

I finally finished the Twilight series. (I refuse to call it “saga”. It isn’t as horrible as people make out, but there’s just no way it counts as a saga, not with a happy ending like that.)

More! )
osprey_archer: (books)
I've been ill the last couple of days (a mild flu, nothing major) so I've been catching up on reading.

Mini book reviews, which melt in your mouth like mini doughnuts )

Why isn't college a more popular setting for novels? Because college students don't have time to read? Because high school students, unlike middle/elementary school students, don't want to read about the probable contents of the next few years of their lives?

Or have I just missed all the college novels? I stopped reading school novels midway through high school, because the high school books, unlike the elementary school books, usually bore no resemblance to my life. But still, I think I would have noticed college novels on the bookstore shelves.
osprey_archer: (books)
I finally finished the second Twilight book (I got bogged down in the Slough of Despond there for a while) and I have these observations:

1. I've heard that the third book gets even angstier. I don't think that's humanly impossible, but I'm feeling trepidation nonetheless.

2. Twilights should become a measurement of angst. "Did you see the latest episode of Doctor Who? It was, like, five Twilights. My brain nearly exploded."

3. I have no plans to write Twilight fic, but if I did it would totally be Bella/Alice. You know in your heart that they're a better pairing than Edward and Bella. Alice would never let Bella get away with that crazy emo.

On the other hand, Alice is really awesome and I would feel pangs of guilt if I inflicted Bella on her.

But making shippers' heads explode might be worth a bad conscience. Hmmm.
osprey_archer: (books)
You know what would make the world a better place? If books had more illustrations. I’ve been looking at books from the 1920s and earlier (because it grieves me to think of all the years they’ve languished unloved on the library shelves) and they all have illustrations. So does The Perilous Gard (which also has fairies and Tam Lin and a love story and Elizabethan England and is made of awesome. Has anyone else read it?), but it’s at the tail end of the illustration boom; after about 1970 only kids’ books have pictures.

I’m not sure if illustrations disappeared because they add to the production costs (and as publishers became more commercial they weren’t willing to eat the loss) or if they were just a fad to begin with, and faded as fads do. Either way it’s tragic.

Perhaps I should start drawing again. I could illustrate my fanfic. It would be like Shoebox!

***

Also, links to stuff on Youtube. Trajan is the Movie Font is a rant about how the movie business is addicted to the font Trajan

This Twlight movie trailer spoof is made of hilarious. Also, the actors here are better-looking than the actors in the movie. Especially the guy playing Laurent, who spends his screen time here exposing his abdominal muscles. They’re impressive.

I think Twilight’s main contribution to the world is the excellent parody it spawns, because God knows that the mire of angst and pain that is the second book doesn’t count. Bella needs to stop leading Jacob on. It’s very unkind of her, even if she does have a hole in her chest where her heart ought to be.

Two Links

May. 19th, 2008 08:51 am
osprey_archer: (Default)
I’ve never actually read Twilight (teen romance and vampires are two of my least favorite things) but this parody is beyond hilarious.

Edward removed his shoes and rolled up the cuffs of his jeans, and I gasped at the sight of his white, smooth ankles. Sunlight reflected off his toenails, each an ivory glint of perfection.

This just made my week.

Also: I’m fond of male a cappella groups. There’s an episode in the West Wing where the Whiffenpoofs come to the White House, and Donna and CJ and most of the female staff go to gawp. I would be so there.

(Side note: how the heck did the Whiffenpoofs get their name?)

Anyway. This video is of an a cappella group from Northwestern, the Klein Four, singing a mathematical love song: Finite Simple Group (of Order Two). Wow. Just wow.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 7th, 2026 01:50 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios