osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Rebecca Romney’s Jane Austen’s Bookshelf: A Rare Book Collector’s Quest to Find the Women Writers Who Shaped a Legend, in which Romney tracks down many of the books Jane Austen admired (often as ebooks, which I must admit takes much of the romance out of the rare book hunt) and discovers many lost gems of literary excellence. (And also Hannah More, whom she did not take to.) An engrossing read.

D. E. Stevenson’s Mrs. Tim Gets a Job. Like all of D. E. Stevenson’s novels, this is cozy like sitting curled up in an armchair by the fire with a cup of cocoa while a thunderstorm beats against the window in the night. It’s not that she’s writing in a world where bad things don’t happen, or even where bad things don’t happen to our heroes, but by the end of the book it will all turn out right.

Amerika: Russian Writers View the United States, edited by Mikail Iossel and Jeff Parker. An essay collection published not long after 9/11, although only a few of the essays actually touch on that event. Many of them include potshots at American political correctness (hard to embrace the concept if you come from the country where you could literally be sent to a gulag for “political incorrectness”), as well as lists of American books the authors read at a formative age.

I thank my lucky stars that I didn’t read this before Honeytrap, as the book might have been delayed indefinitely while I tried to work my way through the works of Kurt Vonnegut, Ray Bradbury, Ursula K. Le Guin, Isaac Asimov, as well as some other authors I’ve never even heard of. With truth the author of this essay notes “the average Soviet person probably knew [American science fiction] better than the average American.”

What I’m Reading Now

Virginia Woolf’s To the Lighthouse. Sadly suspicious that none of these characters are ever going to make it to the lighthouse.

What I Plan to Read Next

Does my lightning zoom through Jane Austen’s Bookshelf mean that I will at last read an eighteenth century novel? MAYBE. The library boasts Fanny Burney’s Evelina, Ann Radcliffe’s The Mysteries of Udolpho and The Romance of the Forest, Charlotte Lennox’s The Female Quixote, and Maria Edgeworth’s Belinda. Any recommendations among those works?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

If I didn’t actually believe in my responsibility to tell Americans the truth about Turkey, nevertheless I did feel it was somehow wasteful of me to study Russian literature instead of Turkish literature. I had repeatedly been told in linguistics classes that all languages were universally complex, to a biologically determined degree. Didn’t that mean all languages were, objectively speaking, equally interesting? And I already knew Turkish; it had happened without any work, like a gift, and here I was tossing it away to break my head on a bunch of declensions that came effortlessly to anyone who happened to grow up in Russia.

Today, this strikes me as terrible reasoning. I now understand that love is a rare and valuable thing, and you don’t get to choose its object. You just go around getting hung up on all the least convenient things - and if the only obstacle in your way is a little extra work, then that’s the wonderful gift right there.


Elif Batuman’s The Possessed: Adventures with Russian Books and the People Who Read Them spends less time on Russian literature than the title might lead you to expect, but as a memoir it’s wonderful. Whether she’s studying Uzbek in Samarkand or attending a Tolstoy conference as Yasnaya Polyana, she has a gift for meeting oddballs and delighting in absurdities, which makes for a fascinating, digressive, arrestingly peculiar book.

I also finished Carroll Watson Rankin’s Dandelion Cottage. I turned out to be quite wrong in my matchmaking prognostication: it turns out that Spoilers )

I discovered through Wikipedia that Dandelion Cottage is based on a real house, which does indeed look delightfully cozy, and is a lovely sunshiny yellow as any house called Dandelion Cottage ought to be.

And speaking of cozy house books, I also finished D. E. Stevenson’s Vittoria Cottage, which was a delight. I sometimes think it’s too bad that Miss Buncle’s Book tends to be most people’s entry to Stevenson these days - it’s a delightful book too but much frothier than many of her other books, which are still light in atmosphere but have a bit more heft to them.

This one, for instance - a romance between a mother with grown children and a man rebuilding a life after years away in the war - has a very gentle atmosphere, but the losses and hardships of the war hang in the background. It’s a book about adjusting to a new normal as it becomes clear that the old normal, although it may be approximated in some ways, is never coming back, and as such felt very topical right now, and it was such a pleasure to see the characters trying their best to capture joy.

What I’m Reading Now

I’m about a quarter of the way through Amor Towles’ The Lincoln Highway, a road trip novel set not long after World War II. Spoilers )

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve somehow ended up with THREE trilogies that I’ll need to order through interlibrary loan to complete: D. E. Stevenson’s Vittoria Cottage trilogy, Mary Bard’s Best Friends series, and of course D. K. Broster’s Jacobite Trilogy. (I realize the last is available online, but there are some books that simply demand to be read on paper.) Well, it should keep the interlibrary loan office busy!
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

GUESS WHO FINISHED MARY RENAULT’S FIRE FROM HEAVEN, IT’S ME, A REVIEW WILL BE FORTHCOMING BUT FOR NOW *SPIKES FOOTBALL*

Otherwise! This week I read Viv Groskop’s The Anna Karenina Fix: Life Lessons from Russian Literature, which reminds me of a blog in the best possible way: informal yet erudite, hilarious and yet hitting notes of poignancy, as when she muses on unrequited love in Turgenev’s life and work, as well as her own unrequited passion for a certain Bogdan Bogdanovich, which translates as “God’s Gift, Son of God’s Gift.” (She muses on an oversize sweater she liked to wear the year that she knew him: “it made me look like a bag lady. You can see now why the passion of God’s Gift, Son of Gift’s Gift, was not ignited.”)

This book also absolutely exploded my reading list, adding not only many of the Russian classics that it discussed, but also J. A. E. Curtis’s biography Manuscripts Don’t Burn: Mikhail Bulgakov, A Life in Letters and Diaries, and...

Alex Beam’s The Feud: Vladimir Nabokov, Edmund Wilson and the End of a Beautiful Friendship, a book about Nabokov and Wilson’s friendship-ending quarrel over Nabokov’s translation of Eugene Onegin. Wilson wrote a 6,000 word essay panning the translation, and then he and Nabokov argued about it across at least three different literary magazines, with articles on either side contributed by such luminaries as Robert Graves, Paul Fussell, and the Harvard professor Alexander Gerschenkron, who panned Nabokov’s translation so eruditely that Nabokov, who usually sailed into battle with each and every critic, ignored the letter completely, presumably because he couldn’t refute it. (Then he meekly incorporated most of Gerschenkron’s suggestions into the next edition.)

In short, this is an account of an incredibly highbrow fandom wank in the pre-internet age, and I ate it up with a spoon. An absolute delight.

What I’m Reading Now

Another Alex Beam book, of course: A Great Idea at the Time: The Rise, Fall, and Curious Afterlife of the Great Books, which unexpectedly, like The Feud, turns out to center on a friendship, although in this case the friendship does not turn sour, as only one of the friends (Mortimer Adler) is impossible. The other, Robert Hutchins, Boy Wonder, dean of the Yale Law School at the age of 27, was beloved by all who knew him: “Hutchins ‘made homosexuals of us all’ was his friend Scott Buchanan’s memorable comment,” Beam notes, after quoting a different friend who raves that Hutchins was “humorous, ironic, brave, beautiful, unflappable, dismissive of cant…” and then runs out of adjectives, not because there are no more adjectives but because no mere word can capture the glory and the wonder that is Robert Hutchins.

Beam includes a photo of Hutchins, and the man looks like an Arrow Collar ad. A 1935 Time magazine story gushed that Hutchins, “once the youngest and handsomest big-university president in the land, is now only the handsomest.” Hutchins teased Adler about teaching too much Thomas Aquinas, “lest auld Aquinas be forgot.” I’m thinking about falling in love with Hutchins myself.

What I Plan to Read Next

I have one last Newbery Honor book from the 1980s! It’s Robin McKinley’s The Blue Sword, which I tried valiantly to read in my youth (one of my friends really liked it) and bounced off of repeatedly. Perhaps the third time’s the charm?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finished Svetlana Alexievich’s Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets. At some point I’ll read The Unwomanly Face of War: An Oral History of Women in World War II, but first I need some emotional recovery time. (She also has a book called Last Witnesses: An Oral History of the Children of World War II. Had I known it existed, I could have used the material to make Gennady’s childhood even more heartbreaking, so possibly it’s just as well for everyone that I didn’t.)

I also got back in the saddle with Newbery Honor books with Jane Leslie Conly’s Crazy Lady!, which I thought was going to be a story about a misunderstood zany neighbor, but in fact turned out to be a story about junior high student Veronon’s wildly alcoholic neighbor, Maxine. Maxine tries to control her drinking in order to care for her disabled son Ronald, whom she loves deeply, but neither her love for her son nor the support of her neighbors (one of whom takes Ronald in for two weeks while Maxine is in jail on drunk and disorderly charges) are enough. In the end, she sends Ronald away to live with a kindly aunt and uncle.

It’s a well-written and well-observed book, but bleak - bleak - bleak; the tragedy of watching someone try as hard as they can, and fail.

Nadia Bolz-Weber’s Shameless: A Sexual Reformation is an argument against American Evangelical Christian beliefs about sexual purity: purity rings and pledges not to even kiss until one’s wedding day and so on and so forth. Eh, it’s fine. There’s nothing particularly new here, and also nothing that seems likely to convince a reader who isn’t already on board with the book’s basic message.

What I’m Reading Now

Keeping on keeping on with Nadezhda Mandelstam’s Hope against Hope. Another quote:

What we wanted was for the course of history to be made smooth, all the ruts and potholes to be removed, so there should never again be any unforeseen events and everything should flow along evenly and according to plan. This longing prepared us, psychologically, for the appearance of the Wise Leaders who would tell us where we were going. And once they were there, we no longer ventured to act without their guidance and looked to them for direct instructions and foolproof prescriptions.


Food for thought in a time when many of us (myself very much included) would like nothing more than for the course of history to be made smooth.

What I Plan to Read Next

DID YOU KNOW that there’s a new American Girl? She is a 1980s girl and I suspect her books are horrible because all the books have been horrible since American Girl got too cheap to pay for illustrations… but I’ll probably read them anyway because I have an American Girl problem.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I read Gerald Durrell’s The Drunken Forest, about his collecting trip in South America which was cut unfortunately short by a revolution in Paraguay. Durrell seems to be one of those people who lives more in six months than many people do in their entire lives: he’s just gotten together a good collection when the revolution makes it impossible to get most of his specimens out of the country, so he has to release the animals and leave on a rickety little plane… but within a few days he throws himself into collecting rheas (ostrich-like birds) on the pampas in Argentina. I aspire to react to setbacks with such sangfroid.

I also zoomed through Gale Galligan’s graphic novel adaptation of the Babysitters Club book Logan Likes Mary Anne!, which I don’t think I ever read in novel form. In fact, I’m not sure I ever read any of the first ten or so books in the Babysitters Club series, which is weird because I read so many of the others. Why, younger self??

I don’t know if M. F. K. Fisher herself revised How to Cook a Wolf, or if some later editor got a hold of her marginal notes and then inserted them into the main text, always [closed off with brackets] to show where the edits have been made. This makes for an annoyingly choppy reading experience, especially as the effect of the notes is almost always to diffuse the power of the original passage.

Otherwise I enjoyed the book, but boy do I wish I had a copy with the original unrevised text, or at very least a less disruptive way of adding in the revisions.

And finally, I galloped through Elizabeth Warnock Fernea’s A View of the Nile, about the years that she and her family spent in Egypt in the early 60s. The book is a bit slow to get started (I galloped partly because it’s an interlibrary loan with a tight turnaround time), but it hits its stride once Fernea and her husband leave Cairo for Nubia to complete an anthropological study before the Aswan Dam floods all the traditional Nubian villages.

I knew almost nothing about Nubia before reading this book, and Fernea paints such a fascinating picture of the Nubian community where she lives with her husband and two young children that I was left rather sorry that the book didn’t include an epilogue; I would have loved it if the book checked back in to see how the community fared after the Egyptian government transplanted it above the Aswan Dam.

What I’m Reading Now

I’m back in the saddle with Svetlana Aleksievich’s Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets, although I have to take it slow: too much at once and you drown. The mother of a girl who was badly injured in a terrorist bombing on the Moscow Metro tells Aleksievich, “You’re a writer, you’ll understand what I mean: Words have very little in common with what goes on inside of you.” And yet she keeps talking, and Aleksievich keeps recording: words are insufficient, but they are all we have.

Also, a quote from Nadezhda Mandelstam’s Hope against Hope, her memoir about her husband (the poet Osip Mandelstam)’s arrest and the Stalinist era more generally. She’s musing, here, about a fellow that she thinks might have informed on Mandelstam: “But he scarcely matters. He was just a poor wretch who happened to live in terrible times. Can a man really be held accountable for his own actions? His behavior, even his character, is always in the merciless grip of the age, which squeezes out of him the drop of good or evil that it needs from him.”

What I Plan to Read Next

I’m pining away for Alex Halberstadt’s Young Heroes of the Soviet Union: A Memoir and a Reckoning. I’m first in line on the holds list! Hurry up and read the book, person who has it checked out!!!
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

As a birthday present to myself I read Elizabeth Wein’s White Eagles, a short novel about a young woman flying with the Polish army at the beginning of World War II. If you know anything about the invasion of Poland, you’ll be able to guess that this has some dark moments, but overall it’s about our heroine flying away from Poland (with a stowaway!) so the grimness-to-adventure ratio ultimately tilts toward adventure.

As a further birthday present to myself (White Eagles is QUITE short), I read Francesca Forrest’s new short story Duplication, which takes place in a world a little slantwise from ours: sometimes people, especially children, will duplicate for a few hours, a day or two at most, so that there are two of the same person running around for a while till they merge back into one.

The story is concerned with the everyday experience of a mother whose daughter suddenly becomes two daughters, and the philosophical question - although with a certain lived urgency that philosophical questions often lack - of what it means for one person to become two. To what extent are the duplicates two separate entities? What does it mean - what is lost - what the duplicates merge back into one?

I also finished Margaret Atwood’s Alias Grace, which I read because I enjoyed the miniseries adaptation so much. (Well, enjoyed seems like the wrong word for such a bleak story, but you know what I mean.) It turns out that the adaptation was extraordinarily faithful, to the point that Grace tells her story in the exact words she uses in the book (I often had the eerie sense of hearing the words in the actress’s voice as I read), which, well, if you’ve got Margaret Atwood’s words at your disposal, why wouldn’t you?

The main difference is that the book includes a subplot in which Dr. Jordan, the doctor interviewing Grace Marks to try to prove her innocence, becomes sexually entangled with his landlady. In general I found Dr. Jordan’s POV unpleasant to read: he has such an instrumental view of people, always with an eye for how they can be of service to him (sexually, for women, and in his career, for men), and few signs of actual affection for anyone. Thus, the book induces an even stronger feeling of “WHY ARE MEN” than the miniseries, which also didn’t skimp in this regard.

What I’m Reading Now

I finished part one of Svetlana Alexievich’s Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets, and I’m taking a break before I read part two because it’s such a dense, intensely emotional book.

Thus, I’m treating myself to Mrs. Pollifax and the Hong Kong Buddha. Following series order, I should have read Mrs. Pollifax on the China Station, but the ebook was checked out and I figured, “There’s not super a lot of continuity in this series, it will be fine if I skip it for now!”

Reader, it turns out that Mrs. Pollifax and the Hong Kong Buddha builds heavily on Mrs. Pollifax on the China Station. So I’m kicking myself, although honestly it doesn’t matter all that much: the books are clearly interrelated, but not so much that I’m finding anything in Mrs. Pollifax and the Hong Kong Buddha hard to follow. Anyway one doesn’t read the Mrs. Pollifax books expecting surprises, but because it’s such a pleasure to spend time with Mrs. Pollifax and whoever she has befriended in the course of this book’s spying mission.

A quote I noted down, as exemplary of Mrs. Pollifax’s character: “Mrs. Pollifax measured intelligence by curiosity, rueing people who never asked questions, never asked why, or what happened next or how.”

What I Plan to Read Next

I intend to continue my Margaret Atwood journey with The Penelopiad, but before that, I really MUST attend to this stack of library books that has been moldering patiently on my bookshelf. (I’ve been clinging to them in the superstitious sense that we might go back on lockdown at any time, but I am coming to the conclusion that this would be MUCH too sensible for the government to ever actually do it.) First up: James Baldwin’s Go Tell It on the Mountain.
osprey_archer: (Default)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finally finished Donna Tartt’s The Little Stranger! But my thoughts upon it grew very long, so I’ve separated them out to be their own post.

Marian Hurd McNeely’s The Jumping-Off Place is a Newbery Honor book from 1930, about four children, recently orphaned by the death of their uncle, who fulfill their uncle’s dying wish by heading out to Dakota to settle a homestead that he had meant to claim before he was felled by a stroke. The book’s portrayal of grief distinguishes it from other homesteading books (this seems to have been its own genre in the 1920s and 30s, if not for longer): although mostly the children are carrying on with life, planting a garden, admiring the beautiful prairie, bemoaning the drought that kills their crops, every once in a while grief sneaks up and catches them, even as the months pass by.

Margarita Engle’s The Surrender Tree: Poems of Cuba’s Struggle for Freedom, similarly, is a Newbery Honor book from the 2000s, which does what it says on the tin. Only two books left from the 2000s! Which means I’ve hit the books I had no particular desire to read earlier, which makes for somewhat slow going.

What I’m Reading Now

[personal profile] troisoiseaux mentioned Svetlana Alexievich’s Secondhand Time: The Last of the Soviets, a collection of oral histories about the transition from the USSR to post-Soviet Russia, which as you can imagine I was all over like white on rice. So far the keynote of the collection is a sense of disillusionment. Many of the interviewees had high hopes for democracy originally (although some still believed in communism and deplored the whole reform process from start to finish), but now it’s come to nothing but stores stocked with salami no one can afford, which is perhaps worse than stores with no salami in the first place.

Other consistent themes: a sense of shame about the enormous loss of prestige on the international stage (from superpower to third-world country), a sense that the world no longer makes sense - that the fall of the Soviet Union destroyed the structures that gave life meaning. A lot of people comment on the war orientation of communism, that they were raised to die for their country, and now that country has fallen without a war, without a single shot, and they’ve been cast adrift.

I’ve also begun Onoto Watanna’s Miss Nume of Japan, which has developed into a complicated love quadrangle. Miss Nume is in love with her betrothed. Takashima, who has been sent to the United States to study. After finishing his studies, on the very steamer back to Japan, Takashima falls in love with Cleo, an American coquette… who is on the way to Japan to reunite with her betrothed, Sinclair, who Cleo loves because he is the only man who has ever seemed immune to her charms. And, in fact, aside from that one night when the moonlight drove Sinclair to ask Cleo to marry him, Sinclair remains immune! But he is showing signs of susceptibility to Nume…

Now in a way this seems like an easy knot to untie: just switch fiances! Takashmia + Cleo, Sinclair + Nume! But will a book written in 1899 allow a white American girl to marry a Japanese man? We shall see!

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve really got to get a move on Alicia Williams’ Genesis Begins Again if I’m going to get that finished before it’s due back. (Someone’s got a hold on it, so I can’t renew it.) I’ve read all the other 2020 Newbery books, so as soon as I knock this one off I can put up my post about that.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I started watching Netflix’s The Last Czars because I’m a sucker for royalty and Russia, and the first episode was going fairly well in a cut-rate episode of the The Crown kind of way -

When all of a sudden the show stops dead and there’s a talking head academic type explaining something or other about the Romanovs, as if this were a documentary and not a drama at all.

In fact, the show is some unholy hybrid of the two. The dramatized scenes are much longer than you’d normally get in a documentary (and include Nicky and Alix fucking on a bearskin rug in Nicky’s opulent office while praising God in the hopes that this will help them conceive a son, I’ll take “things I never wanted to see” for ten thousand, Alex), but juuuuust when you’re relaxing into the show and getting into the story, all of a sudden Simon Sebag Montefiore is on screen explaining to you about Khlysti, an orgiastic Russian Orthodox sect with whom Rasputin had ties.

This is particularly maddening because it seems so unnecessary. They don’t need talking heads, and a voiceover, and other characters within the storyline (usually Nicky’s brother, who seems to be the only sensible Romanov) explaining “This latest mistake will haunt your reign, Nicky!” to handhold viewers in what is ultimately a quite simple storyline: “Tsar Nicholas II makes a series of mistakes that lead to his downfall.”

...However, it’s been so long since there’s been a new season of The Crown that I’ve gone into royalty-withdrawal, so I’m still watching. (Maybe I should try to forestall this in the future by watching one of the many - many! - productions about Victoria.) It’s only six episodes long, and I’m already halfway through, and I want to know if they are in fact going to have M. Gilliard decide that this poor girl in a madhouse in Berlin is Anastasia after all.
osprey_archer: (books)
I liked Shaun Walker’s The Long Hangover: Putin’s New Russia and the Ghosts of the Past, but in a mild sort of way: I finished it over a week ago and it’s already fading out of my mind.

Two things that stuck with me. First, there’s a part where Walker is talking about Chechnya, and comments in amazement on the number of Chechens who serve in the Russian armed forced - even though Stalin deported the entire Chechen nation during World War II, even though Russia has leveled Grozny twice since the end of the Soviet Union.

When you put it that way it does sound surprising. But then, Native Americans serve in the US military in high numbers (I just learned this in Onigamiising), despite having a similarly harrowing history with that institution - and it struck me that perhaps these things seems baffling only if you look at them from a certain angle, if you assume that joining the military is a reflection of burning patriotism or at least some enthusiasm for a country, when really sometimes it’s just a job, an opportunity, maybe the only opportunity for someone living in a marginalized community.

No one thinks you have to have a burning love of McDonalds to start flipping burgers, after all.

The other thing that struck me is the total failure of empathy in the West vis-a-vis the collapse of the Soviet Union. My impression is that the American assumption was that everyone in the USSR would react about the same way as, say, Poland, where the Soviets were viewed as an invading power and their withdrawal caused celebration.

But outside of eastern Europe (which only came into the Soviet sphere post-World War II in any case), most people didn’t see it that way: they saw their own government and way of life collapsing, national purpose and identity crushed, with nothing to replace it but a kleptocratic oligarchy, and meanwhile the West looked on in bafflement and said “You’ve got democracy now! Why aren’t you rejoicing?”
osprey_archer: (books)
I have long meant to read a book by Arthur Ransome (most famous for his Swallows and Amazons series, which I always expected would be the book that I read) - so imagine my surprise to found a book he wrote on the Caldecott winner list!

It's an adaptation of a Russian folk tale, and - further surprise - I discovered upon reading the back cover that Ransome actually spent quite a bit of time in Russia; he was there as a reporter when the Russian Revolution broke out in 1917. Who knew he had such an interesting life?

I actually have a book from Netgalley now about the Russian Revolution through the eyes of Western reporters who were there, and now I'm terribly curious to see if Arthur Ransome is in it. We'll see!

But to get back to the supposed topic of this post: the illustrations! They are charming. I particularly like the panoramic views looking down from the flying ship (which is a real sailing ship, with sails and everything) as it drifts above the landscape.

Also! This year's Caldecott and Newbery Awards will be announced next Monday. I'm feeling quite excited about it!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 3 4 5 67
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 6th, 2025 03:38 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios