osprey_archer: (the borgias)
Day 09 - Best scene ever.

So many shows, so many scenes! But I still have Desperate Romantics on my mind, so I’m going to have to say the scene where Fred tells William Holman Hunt off for the way that he’s been treating Annie. I love this scene because it’s a sort of apotheosis for Fred, who transcends his usual nebbishiness by telling Hunt the exact truth about himself, and because it’s so rare for people (particularly men) on TV shows to be truly called on the extent of their assholishness.

Oh, man. But there’s also that absolutely fabulous scene in the first series of The Borgias, where Lucrezia rides across the battlefield between the French and Papal armies, with her long pale blue cloak fluttering behind her, to parlay with her brother and hopefully stop the French from sacking Rome. Oh God, that is the loveliest scene, it makes me catch my breath just thinking of it.
osprey_archer: (Rosetti)
Day 08 - A show everyone should watch.

I yearn, yearn to convince more people to watch the mini-series Desperate Romantics, about which I wrote three whole posts - one post for every two episodes! - while I was watching, because I loved it so much and it was so good and there was so much to say about it.

The miniseries is not about the Romantic poets, as the title might lead you to believe, but about the pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood - specifically John Everett Millais, William Holman Hunt, Dante Gabriel Rosetti (with an able assist later in the series from Edward Burne-Jones and William Morris) and their respective ladyloves. It does play rather fast and loose with history - telescoping, for instance, decades of Millais’ career into the few years covered by the show. But it’s one of the best shows I know for exploring relationships - friendships, but also and particularly heterosexual romance.

I realize that one can scarcely turn on the TV without wallowing in heterosexual romance, but I haven’t seen many shows that explored the idea of what makes a good match quite like Desperate Romantics. It’s one of the few shows I’ve seen that definitively and for all time broke up one of the lead pairings. My jaw actually dropped. He apologizes, and she forgives him, but...they’re not getting back together. Ever. He blew it and it’s over.

Lest I give you the impression that it’s all misery all the time, one of the three romances is extraordinarily sweet - I mean that in the least syrupy way possible; it’s sweet in part because they have to overcome so many enormous and entirely real obstacles before they can be together.

And the show never wallows in misery: it’s frequently hilarious, although it’s hard to really capture that by quoting it, because so much lies in the delivery and the set-up. The performances are all first-rate (although I must note a special fondness for Rosetti, because he commits to the ridiculousness of his role so whole-heartedly); the show is just really, ridiculously well-made on every level, and I want everyone else in the world to see it so you all can discuss it with me.

(I have chosen this icon with the shameless hope of luring viewers. Look at Rosetti’s face. Don’t you want the chance to watch that ridiculous face for six hours?)
osprey_archer: (tea)
For my birthday, I acquired a copy of the miniseries about the pre-Raphaelites, Desperate Romantics, and at once came to three conclusions.

1. I must have my friends come over to watch this!

2. Clearly, these viewings must be accompanied by tea parties!

3. And said tea parties should be accompanied by pre-Raphaelite appreciation activities!

There are three disks, so I’m thinking three teas. For the first, clearly we will flip through a book of pre-Raphaelite paintings and admire them. I was stumped on the second, but Emma suggested a dramatic reading of Christina Rosetti’s “Goblin Market,” which is perfect.

But we don’t know what to do for the third.

Me: Is it bad that most of our party plans have an educational component?
Emma: Have you met us?

We have also been trying to plan a speakeasy party. We have all sorts of good ideas - secret password to get in! bottles of gin in the bathtub surrounded by ice! a cheat sheet full of twenties slang for everyone to employ! My life will not be complete until I call at least three people “the cat’s pajamas.”

But we keep getting bogged down on the recommended reading list. We are both agreed on The Great Gatsby - we may even agree on Tender Is the Night - but Emma thinks we have to include Hemingway, and I can’t stand Hemingway, and so.

Meanwhile, Caitlin and Rick swiveled their heads back and forth as they followed this argument. “You realize that you’re arguing about a reading list for a drunken bacchanalia?” said Rick.

“Drunk is the best way to read Hemingway!” Emma rejoined.

THOUGHT. We could have drunken readings of Hemingway short stories at the party! Hemingway drinking games! Take a shot every time Hemingway says something egregiously sexist!

Anyway, all this thinking has led me to my brilliant idea: POETRY TEAS.

So far, my best idea is for the William Blake tea. Apparently, he used to have tea with St. Peter occasionally; his wife would greet friends at the door with “I’m afraid he’s having tea with St. Peter right now,” and they would be all “Oh, all right, I’ll come back later.”

So clearly we would read William Blake poems - I call dibs on “The Tyger” - and leave a chair open for St. Peter.

Emily Dickinson tea! Everyone dresses in white and brings flowers - or leaves - or some other thing from nature - and of course, the invitations must have lots of dashes -

Haiku party. Rather than read haiku, we shall place a single flowering branch in a vase, and write poems about it.

These ideas seem much more doable than my excellent but nonetheless a trifle ambitious ideas for themed teas. (I still mean to have an Alice in Wonderland tea someday, though. Think of the tarts!) So watch this space! Things may be getting quite poetical.
osprey_archer: (art)
[livejournal.com profile] x_los linked me to the best webcomic ever: Pre-Raphernalia, which is sort of reminiscent of Kate Beaton except ALL ABOUT THE PRE-RAPHAELITES, who as we all know were the most ridiculous artistic brotherhood in nineteenth century England, which is saying something because, let's face it, nineteenth century English artists were pretty ridiculous.

Rosetti had a PET WOMBAT, you guys. (There is a cartoon of Rosetti with his wombat. It is adorable.) He named it Topsy, after his friend William Morris who everyone called Topsy because he had ridiculous hair.

Rosetti was having an affair with Morris's wife Jane Burden at the time. Rosetti seemed to be far angrier at Morris than Morris was with Rosetti. Morris buried himself in wallpaper design and socialist crusades, while Rosetti drew cartoons of Morris as a wombat.

I am just saying, if Desperate Romantics ever got a chance at another season, WHICH IT SHOULD because it is the best show EVERTY-EVER and you should all watch it, then Rosetti's wombat and his affair with Jane Burden would provide more than enough material for it. Also Ned Burne-Jones falling in love with a new girl every five minutes! And his steadfast wife Georgiana, who later teamed up with Morris to work for progressive causes! (They didn't have an affair. Probably. Although Morris did hand-letter illuminated manuscripts for Georgie as birthday presents, so...)

And maybe they could bring in Algernon Swinburne? OH AND ALSO THEY COULD FINALLY HAVE CHRISTINA ROSETTI YES YES YES.
osprey_archer: (art)
Have you guys read Christina Rosetti’s Goblin Market? I’ve been going through pre-Raphaelite withdrawal (I realize they packed pretty much everything exciting that happened to the pre-Raphaelites into the six episodes of Desperate Romantics, and that’s one of the reasons why the show is so good, because there’s so much going on - but damn, I still want more), so I was reading “Goblin Market,” and man, it is brilliant.

It’s hard to pick out quotes for you, because it’s a poem that works by excess. It’s not that any one line is so brilliant, but that all together they add up to something overwhelming.

Morning and evening
Maids heard the goblins cry:
“Come buy our orchard fruits,
Come buy, come buy:
Apples and quinces,
Lemons and oranges,
Plump unpeck’d cherries,
Melons and raspberries,
Bloom-down-cheek’d peaches,
Swart-headed mulberries,
Wild free-born cranberries,
Crab-apples, dewberries,
Pine-apples, blackberries,
Apricots, strawberries;—


Guillermo del Toro would be the perfect director for an adaptation: think of the portrayal of temptation when Ofelia sees the table laden with food, so much of it and so beautiful. And the faun shows that del Toro could capture the goblins’ macabre fascination.

One had a cat’s face,
One whisk’d a tail,
One tramp’d at a rat’s pace,
One crawl’d like a snail,
One like a wombat prowl’d obtuse and furry,
One like a ratel tumbled hurry skurry


English used to have a number of words for things that are terrifying but beautiful, or beautiful in part because terrifying: sublime, wonderful, even awful (as in full of awe). All of them have lost the connotations of terror, and the language is impoverished for the loss.

“Goblin Market” tells a story of two sisters, Lizzie and Laura, who see the goblin market. Lizzie leaves; but Laura stays, and eats of the goblin fruit, then begins to waste away for want of it. At last Lizzie goes to the goblin market to get fruit for Laura: she doesn’t eat it herself, but stands there while the goblins smash it all over her to try and make her eat. At last they give up, and Lizzie rushed back to Laura, and cries:

“Did you miss me?
Come and kiss me.
Never mind my bruises,
Hug me, kiss me, suck my juices
Squeez’d from goblin fruits for you,
Goblin pulp and goblin dew.
Eat me, drink me, love me;
Laura, make much of me.


...I might make them not sisters in a film adaptation, because really that sounds rather incestuous.

Anyway, it’s a splendid poem. A movie version is probably a pipe dream, but I figured I could share the poem with you, at least.
osprey_archer: (art)
The last two episodes of Desperate Romantics did not enthrall me quite as much as the others did. They're still quite splendid, mind (and they introduced William Morris and Edward Burne-Jones!!!! VICTORIAN ARTIST GEEKERY YAY) but they focus mostly on Dante Gabriel Rosetti and Elizabeth Siddal riding the True Love Train to destruction (hers), and that just doesn't enthrall me like "William Holman Hunt completely failing to treat Annie Miller like a real human being till she kicks him to the curb" or "John Ruskin and Effie Ruskin and John Everett Millais having the move awkward love triangle in the history of forever".

I mean, clearly the story does have to move on to someone else once the love triangle has been sorted and Millais and Effie have settled into marital bliss. They have the most adorable marriage ever. So Rosetti is having trouble with Lizzie Siddal, right - because Rosetti is pretty much the WORST husband ever; he's with someone else the night before their wedding - and Millais is trying to give him advice, and he says, "When Effie and I have a tiff, we make friends by devising new nicknames for each other. She likes to call me Mr. Crumpet..."

Oh, Millais. I have added you and Effie to the gallery of Married Couples Whose Relationship I Would Like to Emulate.

But marital bliss does not a story make, because a story needs conflict, so clearly Desperate Romantics had to focus its spotlight on someone else. But did it have to focus so intensely on Dante Gabriel "We don't have a love affair, we have an argument punctuated by sex!" Rosetti and Lizzie "Without your love I have nothing to live for!" Siddal?

She says this the first time she is dying of laudanum. Rosetti is like "I LOVE YOU LET'S GET MARRIED." I think he does sincerely love her in that moment. The problem is Rosetti's love like a puddle in July, shallow and swiftly evaporating; and Lizzie clearly needs something more than that.

It's just horrible watching Lizzie destroy herself over a man who isn't worth it.

I still highly, highly recommend the show. Trainwreck though Rosetti and Lizzie's marriage is, the show never bogs down in it: there's enough much going on with the other characters to buoy it up. But the last two episodes are definitely the weakest. Lizzie and Rosetti's relationship is far less interesting and unique than Hunt's Pygmalion project with Annie Miller, or the love triangle between Millais and the Ruskins, and of the three relationships, it is also the shallowest. Rosetti clearly can love no one but himself.

And I'm still sorry about the total lack of Christina Rosetti. She should get a movie of her own! It could be a deliciously gothic tale about her visit to the Goblin Market - I'm envisioning an aesthetic like Pan's Labyrinth, the same uneasy lovely terror, though like Rosetti's poem "Goblin Market," it would have a happy ending.
osprey_archer: (art)
YOU GUYS YOU GUYS. How is everyone else in the world not watching Desperate Romantics? It is amazing and full of art and Victorian England and beautiful redheads and cute guys and more art and EVERYTHING IN THE WORLD I WANT IN A SHOW. It is a show about terrible people, but it knows it's a show about terrible people and it calls them on their terribleness and it is so, so funny.

So many historical shows leap at the opportunity to indulge in sexism - and the Victorian art world in general and pre-Raphaelites in particular offer so many opportunities (I'm not sure Rosetti quite saw women as people) - and this show just avoids that so effortlessly.

I have even forgiven it for its lack of Christina Rosetti, that is how much I love this show.

And did I mention it's hilarious? Seriously. And it has the most complicated and convoluted and interestingly difficult take on heterosexual romance - and on friendships - and really just relationships in general - you can tell they thought about every single relationship in this show. What makes it go? Where are its weak points? How do these two people - these two particular people - fit together?

So there are three main pairings in Desperate Romantics. John Millais/Effie Ruskin (who is now Effie Millais), who are rather effaced in this episode, though Millais is enjoying married life so much that he enjoins all his friends to the joys of matrimony with the rapturous comment that "the course of our physical intimacy takes us daily through new and enchanting landscapes" - oh, Millais, ILU. I hope here is more Effie & Millais in the next episode.

Then, Dante Gabriel Rosetti/Elizabeth Siddal, who are riding the True Love Train straight to...well, presumably an early death from consumption on her apart, although I'm holding out hope they'll ignore that inconvenient bit of history.

(In this episode, Ruskin is all, "Miss Siddal, you are so talented! You are an untutored genius! I've decided to give you a stipend so you can devote yourself to your art. And Rosetti, you're clearly a great teacher, I've found you a teaching post!" Rosetti's look of horror, barely gilded with an attempt to look delighted and supportive - he's supposed to be the untutored genius, not her! - is priceless.)

But today! Today I'm going to talk about William Holman Hunt and his disastrous relationship with his protegee Annie Miller, a prostitute/model who he has decided to raise out of the gutter and turn into a lady because...well, he's not clear why he's doing this, which contributes to the terribleness of their relationship. Hunt is forever saying things like "I admire your working class spirit, but until we change your voice and your walk and everything about you really, I can't possibly introduce you to my mother."

Annie is torn between being gratified to get a chance in life she never expected to have, and being insulted by the fact that Hunt claims he's in love with her while not seeming to actually like anything about her. "I am sick to death of being your experiment," she snaps at him, when yet again he's broken off their relationship; and he's so infuriated that he tries to convince Annie to move out of London, because he can't stand to be in the same city as her anymore, apparently, and obviously that's her problem.

He sends Fred to take the message. Fred is the only one of them who isn't based on any particular historical person, and his main role is to provide a sort of buffer so it's not all pre-Raphaelites trying to steal each other's girlfriends all the time. Mostly he's pretty dull; not in a way that detracts from the story, but in a "someone needs to be boring around here to make everyone else stand out all the more brightly" kind of way.

But Fred - Fred reaches his apotheosis in this episode. He tears Hunt a new one - and it's not even because Fred's in love with Annie; he's not, but he recognizes that she deserves better. I nearly fell out of my chair.

"I will no longer carry messages to a woman you are not worthy of, carry messages to a woman who has done everything you have asked of her, yet whom you still reject. A woman who deserves to be loved, and if not by you then by some other manm who will not demand of her that she be anything other than her loving and lovable self.

"You wronged her. It is your pride, not hers, that is the issue here."

And Hunt runs off to apologize to her - finally finds her in a tea shop - rather fails to do justice to how sorry he is (he should have just quoted Fred, but he was still too proud, perhaps) - and she tells him, gently but firmly, that's it's over. Years from now, they'll see each other, and he'll be a great artist and she'll be a matron with seven children, and they'll look back at this and laugh.

And he loses her. He acted like a complete jerk to her - and she doesn't forgive him: she half wants to, but she can't, because he's betrayed her trust too many times. They cry over the tea table, and it's sad and necessary and beautiful.

(And then the episode finishes off with Millais unveiling his sketch for Bubbles, which sends the pre-Raphaelites into hysterics. Always leave 'em laughing.)

...everyone should watch this. I plan to buy a copy just to make all my RL friends watch it. Hopefully they won't be too alarmed by the amount of sex in it.
osprey_archer: (art)
I’ve been watching the most entertaining miniseries! It’s called Desperate Romantics and it’s about the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood, a group of painters in early Victorian England who decided that Raphael had totally RUINED ART and they were going to go back to their early Renaissance roots - this background is from my art history class; the show is a little obscure about their artistic theories. Pretty much the only thing that would make the show even more awesome would be if Millais and Hunt and Rosetti had arguments about Art, in fact.

Oh, and if they had Christina Rosetti, which so far they do not. Boo! I want “Goblin Market” shoutouts!

HOWEVER despite these flaws, the miniseries is nonetheless full of awesome. Each episode starts out with this epigraph:

“In the mid-nineteenth century, a group of young men challenged the artistic establishment of the day. The ‘Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood’ were inspired by the real world around them, yet took imaginative license in their art. This story, based on their lives and loves, follows in that inventive spirit.”

I like how they’re so upfront that sometimes they’re going to chuck history out the window.

So far, however, they seem to be following in the broad outlines of the pre-Raphaelite story. There is sooo much I could talk about here, and at some point I want to make a post about the models and how I love them (they are sassy redheads, of course I adore them. If they follow history and have Lizzie Siddal die of consumption there will be tears) -

But for now let’s talk about Millais, Ruskin, and Effie Ruskin, and the most dysfunctional love triangle in the history of forever!

John Ruskin and Effie have been married for five years, in which time Ruskin has not managed to consummate their marriage, a state of affairs that infuriates Effie. Ruskin, in an attempt to salvage his marriage by getting Effie the venereal gratification she desires from someone else, decides to set Effie up with Millais, by convincing Millais to use her as a model.

“I just hope the the three of us, you, myself, and Mrs. Ruskin, will be very happy together,” says Ruskin, handing Millais a wad of cash, at which point Millais, who is sweet and as dumb as a tree, begins to catch on that something is Not Quite Right here. Sadly, Millais does not say, “Mr. Ruskin, are you trying to seduce me?” but that’s basically the tenor of the scene.

So poor confused Millais goes to his pre-Raphaelite brothers and is all, “...so should I ask Ruskin if it’s okay if I sleep with his wife?”

(As a side note, I have no idea how Millais fell in with someone like Dante Gabriel Rosetti. He may have been so delighted to finally have friends, any friends - apparently the other academy students used to hang him off balconies by his ankles - that it overcame his nagging sense that Rosetti was a charming lazy pathological liar.)

Rosetti is like, “Of course not! Ruskin wants you to proceed on the basis of this gentlemanly understanding, which you will never explicitly discuss, because honestly talking things out like adults, GROSS. We’re early Victorians, Millais! Honest communication is clearly a no-no.”

As Effie and Millais are in love - it’s really rather sweet - they decide to sleep together anyway. Both of them are virgins. It is EXTREMELY AWKWARD. “I have found over the years of plentiful womanizing,” Millais stutters, “that it is better if the man undresses himself, thereby saving the woman the shock of freeing the member rampant.”

OH MILLAIS. And then, through the good sense of Annie Miller the model/prostitute, the other pre-Raphaelites realize that Ruskin is not trying to save his marriage but actually setting himself up to divorce Effie for adultery and embroil Millais in scandal (BOO RUSKIN) race to the house to stop their congress from occurring, and then hatch a counter-scheme: Effie will divorce Ruskin for non-consummation!

It would have been easy to make Ruskin a total monster, but they don’t go that route. While eminently less sympathetic than Effie, who is pretty much my favorite (Effie/Millais forever!), he’s not completely petty: even when he realizes Effie and Millais have end-run him, he continues to support Millais’s art, because where would we be if we only appreciated art from artists we liked?

The one thing this show does not have (aside from Christina Rosetti) is a lot of slash potential: the Pre-Raphaelite Brotherhood was basically the most heterosexual artistic brotherhood in the history of forever. They basically spend all their time scheming about how to steal their model-girlfriends from each other. Even Ruskin’s issues, whatever they are, don’t seem to include secret gayness. He has a secret stock of het pornography sketched by Turner, and he burns pieces of it whenever they turn him on too much. Ruskin, this porn thing: I think you’re doing it wrong...

In conclusion, I am totally looking forward to disk two, and I think everyone else in the world should watch this. Because sassy redheads! And pre-Raphaelites!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 13th, 2025 07:26 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios