osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

For whatever reason, my favorite pastime right now is reading novels on ebook while simultaneously playing my favorite silly Facebook game, so I have been knocking out many of the Newbery Honor books of the 2000s.

- Joan Bauer’s Hope Was Here, which was depressing, not because of the leukemia or the absentee parents (both surprisingly less depressing than you’d expect!) or any factor under the author’s control, really, because the part that I found depressing was the part where the town got together to elect a candidate to fight political corruption and won and he actually got the local corrupt company to pay its back taxes. From the vantage point of 2020 it felt almost unreal.

However, the food descriptions are quite good, and I liked Hope’s musings on her job as a waitress, and in general the fact that the book focused so thoughtfully on her work.

- Jennifer L. Holm’s Our Only May Amelia, which I can’t believe I didn’t read as a child, because it was everywhere with its cover of a scowling tomboy girl in overalls with a fishing rod and I loved tomboy books and I remember considering it at many book fairs and yet for whatever reason I never read it. Anyway, perfectly cromulent nineties tomboy book, not sure my younger self would have gotten on with Holm’s inexplicable decision not to use quotation marks when the characters are talking, nonetheless wish I had read it when I was younger because I devoured so many tomboy books at the time that I eventually got sick of them and even now when I see one I sigh inside and go “Not another.”

- Sharon Creech’s The Wanderer, which I dreaded because I read Creech’s Bloomability and Walk Two Moons as a child and I found them confusing and sad and just didn’t get them or enjoy them at all.

As it turns out, I loved The Wanderer! But I strongly suspect that I wouldn’t have understood it when I was a child, anymore than I understood Bloomability or Walk Two Moons; I think Creech writes adult books about children, rather than children’s books, and they get marketed as children’s books because the publishing industry has forgotten that adult books with child main characters are a thing that you can do. And then these books keep winning children’s book awards because the writing is beautiful and adult judges love it.

And still the sea called, come out, come out, and in boats I went - in rowboats and dinghies and motorboats, and after I learned to sail, I flew over the water, with only the sounds of the wind and the water and the birds, all of them calling, Sail on, sail on.


AND FINALLY (deep breath), Alan Armstrong’s Whittington, which tells the story of Dick Whittington; the story of a cat named Whittington, the many-greats descendent of Dick Whittington’s cat, who is telling Dick Whittington’s story as he adjusts to life in the Barn of Misfit Animals; and the story of a boy named Ben, who is inspired by Whittington’s retelling of Dick Whittington’s story to accept help for his reading difficulties instead of throwing the book across the room whenever anyone tries to help him.

I also finished a non-Newbery-Honor book, Jaclyn Moriarty’s Gravity Is the Thing, which may end up getting its own post, because this post has gotten quite long.

What I’m Reading Now

Continuing the Newbery Honor theme, I’ve just begun Gary D. Schmidt’s Lizzie Bright and the Buckminster Boy. It is a children’s historical fiction book about the evils of racism written during the early 2000s, and to tell you the truth I feel that I already served my time with that genre, but perhaps it will surprise me.

What I Plan to Read Next

Back when I first started the Newbery Honor project, [personal profile] evelyn_b and I had a chat about how far back I would be able to go before I hit a book the library didn’t have. The answer turns out to be the year 1999... sort of. The library itself doesn’t own a copy of Audrey Couloumbis’s Getting Near to Baby, but some of the schools in the library consortium do.

However, the books in those school libraries won’t be available till the schools reopen. (Of course, the physical library books won’t be available till the library reopens either, but the library will almost certainly reopen long before the schools.) Normally I would wait patiently for the school reopening (even in normal times, these shared system books aren’t available over the summer), but this time I went ahead and bought a copy. I figure that if I don’t patronize independent bookstores now, they won’t be there to patronize later.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

DID YOU KNOW that right after World War II, John Steinbeck and Robert Capa (an acclaimed war photographer) traveled around the USSR like some kind of reverse-image Ilf and Petrov? WHY DIDN’T I KNOW THIS. Fortunately I found it while still I’m still working on Honeytrap edits… although honestly if it appears, it will be only briefly, when Gennady explains Ilf & Petrov and Daniel says, “Oh! Like Steinbeck’s A Russian Journal!”

Steinbeck and Capa went in with the avowed goal of making no big political pronouncements, but just seeing how the ordinary people of the USSR lived. In the first they succeeded - it’s actually quite refreshing the way that Steinbeck acknowledges that his view of the Soviet Union is of necessity limited (neither of them spoke a word of Russian!), and refuses to pronounce either for or against the country as a whole.

In the second, their success is more partial, not least because he and Capa spent so much time traveling that the strongest impression one gets is of the state of Soviet air travel at the time: stuffy, uncomfortable, and smelled strongly of the black bread that travelers carried with them, as there were no refreshments in any airports.

Steinbeck was actually rather famous in the USSR at this point - a translation of The Grapes of Wrath was published in 1939 to some fanfare - so it’s a bit startling that they didn’t do a better job rolling out the red carpet for him, especially given the USSR’s obsessive interest in controlling the impressions of visitors from abroad. In fact, one of Steinbeck’s most interesting observations is the basic counterproductivity of the Soviet approach to that goal: the micromanaging bureaucracy made it so impossible for journalists to function that even correspondents who came to the country well-disposed toward the Soviet system tended to leave with a very negative impression, which Steinbeck and Capa avoided only because they managed to escape being classified as foreign correspondents.

I also finished Sarah Orne Jewett’s The Country of the Pointed Firs, which reminds me in a way of Elizabeth Gaskell’s Cranford: both books are gentle portraits of particular communities, centered on people who are rarely the focal points of novels: older people who have made the great decisions of their lives and are now living out their time, rooted in a place and a community… or, in the case of some of Jewett’s more eccentric characters, sometimes on the edges of that community, like Joanna who retreated to Shellheap Island after her fiance jilted her just before her wedding day.

What I’m Reading Now

Caitlin Fitz’s Our Sister Republics: The United States in an Age of American Revolutions, which is about reactions in the United States to the various wars of independence in South America during the early nineteenth century. Right now, I’m in the part where US Americans are cheering these revolutions as the spiritual brothers of the revolution of 1776, but in about 1830 or so, the southerners are going to start really noticing that these South American revolutions tended to be accompanied by legal reforms leading to the gradual abolition of slavery, and go “WAIT JUST ONE SECOND.”

I’ve also begun reading Jaclyn Moriarty’s Gravity is the Thing. My feelings about it so far are mixed, but I’m going to wait to write about it till I’m done, because a lot of Moriarty’s books have a twist that changes the shape of the whole story… which is sometimes amazing and sometimes “Actually the twist really undermines everything the story was doing well and we would have been better off without it.”

What I Plan to Read Next

I’m getting down to my last few library books. (Physical books, I mean. The ebook selection is functionally endless.) I’m keeping Eva Ibbotson in reserve for now. Should I go for Ingrid Law’s children’s fantasy Savvy, or Nadezhda Mandelstam’s memoir Hope Against Hope, about her husband (Soviet poet Osip Mandelstam), life under Stalin, and possibly the gulag?
osprey_archer: (writing)
More meme answers! [personal profile] ancientreader asked:

4. What’s better (or the least bad): character over plot or plot over character?

I have been known to complain vociferously about the primacy of plot in modern Western thought about How Stories Work (and I mean modern in the most recent possible sense: the older Disney films don’t suffer from this relentless drive to advance the plot all the time. Sometimes they stop dead so you can admire the beautifully animated cuckoo clocks) and the tragic fact that this has trained readers to expect plot instead of an endless succession of picnics.

So definitely character over plot. There are a few books I really love where the plot goes completely off the rails near the end, but I love the character work so much that it’s just like, eh, it would be nice if the ending was better, but it doesn’t really matter. (This is assuming that the ending isn’t bad in a character-assassinating kind of way, of course, but that’s a different problem than “the plot fell apart.”)

5. Do you think stories can change lives? Is there a story that has changed yours?

I do, although now that I’ve written it I can think of a time when a story qua story changed my life; rather, my life has been shaped by the friendships that I’ve made through stories, like the way Emma and I bonded in sixth grade over our loathing of Cleon-as-love-interest in Squire and it ended up leading indirectly to most of my high school friend group. Or the various fandom friends I’ve made over the years. Also the “we don’t share a specific fandom but we all love books” friends.

I did decide against studying English in college directly as a result of Madeleine L’Engle’s A Ring of Endless Light, in which one of the characters warns Vicky Austen to major in something else because focusing on another subject will give her a wider understanding of the world and thus enrich her writing. As it happens I feel that this was a good choice, but all the same it seems like a somewhat flimsy basis on which to make a decision of that magnitude.

21. Would you like to write an alternative ending for any of your favorite shows/books/etc?

If I had to pick one, it would probably be Jaclyn Moriarty’s The Murder of Bindy Mackenzie. The first four hundred pages or so are a beautiful exploration of one high school girl’s loneliness and difficulty making friends (and I really liked the fact that this difficulty arises from genuine aspects of her personality; it’s not a “she’s perfect and no one appreciates her” story), and then suddenly as we close in on the end spoilers )
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I read Mary Boewe’s Beyond the Cabbage Patch: The Literary World of Alice Hegan Rice as research for the blog post I’m writing about Annie Fellows Johnston and her writing group (the Authors Club), and it was perfect, exactly the kind of information that I wanted about the interconnections within the group.

And also - although this is beyond the scope of the post - Rice’s connections with the wider writing world: she corresponded with Ida Tarbell the muckraking journalist and Kate Douglas Wiggin (the two writers were often confused, as Rice’s most famous book was Mrs. Wiggs of the Cabbage Patch) and even Mary Mapes Dodge, the editor of St. Nicholas Magazine, a grand doyenne of the American literary world. I love this kind of tracing of social & professional connections - like a literary family tree.

Alice’s husband Cale Young Rice was also a writer, a poet, of the insufferable not-very-talented “my poetry isn’t popular because the masses only want dreck!” kind. He sent a lengthy letter to Harriet Monroe of Poetry magazine to demand to know why she didn’t publish more of his work or review his books and Harriet Monroe - presumably driven beyond endurance by his endless stream of poems - she responded that she found his work derivative and dull and didn’t publish it because she didn’t want to, and I feel a little bad for him because that would be crushing, but at the same time - I can’t feel too bad when he literally asked for it. WHY, CALE.

I also read Jaclyn Moriarty’s The Extremely Inconvenient Adventures of Bronte Mettlestone, which I think suffers somewhat from a surfeit of characters - I was having some trouble keeping track of who’s who - but the world-building is as charmingly whimsical as in the A Corner of White trilogy, and I’m looking forward to the sequel. Which probably will not be published in the US for ages.

What I’m Reading Now

Winifred Holtby’s South Riding has arrived at last! It’s still early days (which in a book of this size means I’m over a hundred pages in) but so far I’m impressed by Holtby’s ability to introduce a vast cast of characters so vividly that I haven’t had any trouble keeping track of them. (Of course it helps that a few years ago I saw a miniseries based on the book - so far as I can tell, pretty faithfully.)

I am a little put out that we haven’t gotten to spend more time with my favorites, though. But I’m sure Midge and Sarah Burton will show up again soon.

I’ve begun Henry Williamson’s Tarka the Otter, His Joyful Water-life and Death in the Country of the Two Rivers, which is approximately 75% landscape description, and unfortunately landscape description is one of those things where I’ll suddenly realize that I’ve reached the bottom of the page and have no idea what I just read. But I’m persevering: a chapter a night.

What I Plan to Read Next

I wanted to continue with the Lord Peter books, only to discover that the library only has The Unpleasantness at the Bellona Club on audiobook, but I listened to Whose Body on audiobook and hated the narrator so much that it almost put me off Sayers for life - he just made Peter sound so insufferable! So I’ll have to find another way to get this book.

In the meantime I’ve got The Nine Tailors on hold; I don’t suppose (outside of the Harriet books) that it matters too much which order I read the books in.
osprey_archer: (books)
I finished Jacqueline Moriarty's A Tangle of Gold, which I enjoyed very much! It's the third book in her Colors of Madeleine trilogy, and a fitting conclusion for this strange, whimsical ride.

The writing is excellent, as Moriarty's writing always is. She's always had a bright, light-hearted voice, funny and full of whimsical imagery - I particularly like her dialogue; her teenagers sound like teenagers, not so much in that they mimic specific slang (which dates quickly anyway), but in their intensity and passion and occasional goofiness.

But I think her ability to fold pathos effectively into that framework has grown tremendously through her books. I felt the melding didn't quite work in her first book, Feeling Sorry for Celia, but by A Tangle of Gold she's mastered it: there's a moment about halfway through the book (I won't say what it is so as to avoid spoilers; that is the one problem with discussing the third book in a trilogy) where the emotional tension is so great that it was hard to read through it.

At this point, a character works magic through the sheer intensity of her emotions, which I usually feel is a cop-out - but this time I really believed it. The emotional atmosphere was that strong.

Moriarty also pulled off a Big Reveal which was both totally unexpected and yet also made perfect sense; I don't think I've seen that done so well since Sarah Rees Brennan's The Demon's Lexicon.

It's not a perfect trilogy. The world-building is frustrating if you approach it with the idea that it should all hang together sensibly - for instance, how the hell do you farm in a world where seasons blow in and out like rain? Summer one day, winter for the next two weeks, and then a spot of spring! But it's rather charming if you let go and just go with the flow.

Moreover, it's very much infested with Moriarty's greatest flaw as a writer: she seems to be unable to resist a good conspiracy theory. Or a bad conspiracy theory. Or a so-so to middling conspiracy theory. The result is that the actual power in the Kingdom of Cello ends up lying three conspiracies behind the throne, each conspiracy more secret, shadowy, and weird than the last.

The end result of this is that the royal family of Cello is fascinating as a picture of a dysfunctional family, but never quite convincing as part of the power structure of the country. In fact the political plot never did take off for me, which made the book less powerful than it might have been. But it's still more than worth reading for the personal relationships between the characters.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Frances M. Wood’s When Molly Was a Harvey Girl, which is cute but not as excellent as Becoming Rosemary. I’m starting to think Wood, like Patrice Kindl, might be a one hit wonder for me: they both have one book I adored, and all their other books are underwhelming.

What I’m Reading Now

Still The Cracks in the Kingdom. I haven’t been reading very much because I’ve been so busy writing.

I’ve also been listening to Sarah Orne Jewett’s A Country Doctor, which I expected to love because it’s about a young woman becoming a doctor in the late 19th century. Doesn’t that sound like the perfect book for me? But I can’t get into it, and I’ve figured out why: it’s all narration, or almost all of it, almost all telling and very little showing.

I actually enjoy that sort of thing in moderation - I love the beginnings of Jane Austen’s books, say, where she spends a chapter introducing the cast of characters and telling you what they’re like. But the key words here are “in moderation.”

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve got Eva Ibbotson’s A Countess Below Stairs on my to-read shelf. I’m also planning to read the next Benjamin January book.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Barbara Hambly’s Fever Season, the second of the Benjamin January books.

What I’m Reading Now

Lots of things! Notably Pamela Dean’s Juniper, Gentian, and Rosemary, which I’m loving so far. I like Gentian and her passion for astronomy; I like her group of friends, who are all good at different things but support each other in their goals and push each other to be better. They are possibly the first group in the history of fiction to have even a passing resemblance to my high school friends.

One of the things Dean is really good at, I think, is showing all the permutations of friendship. The friends you madly adore, the friends you adore but find exasperating, the friends you would never have sought out on your own but have grown to love as a part of the friend group, and the people in the friend group that you tolerate because everyone else seems to like them.

So far my feeling is that Dominic is super creepy. Also possibly an automaton. I know Dean likes quotes, but so far Dominic talks in nothing but quotes. It’s like he inputs the things other people say, processes the key words through a database of literary quotations, and spits out a couple lines of poetry that are vaguely related.

I’m also reading Jaclyn Moriarty’s The Cracks in the Kingdom, which I feel dubious about at present. However, I felt dubious about the first hundred pages or so of A Corner of White, too, so hopefully The Cracks in the Kingdom will pull together in the end in the same manner.

I’m nearly done with Anna Sewell’s Black Beauty. I have the strong impression that Sewell read Uncle Tom’s Cabin fifteen times, then said, “I want to write something like this, BUT FOR HORSES.” They have the compulsively readable quality, despite being about as subtle as jackhammers. Sewell hasn’t managed to make me cry yet, but perhaps she’s saving the tear-wringing scenes at the knacker’s for the end of the book.

And finally Frances M. Wood’s When Molly Was a Harvey Girl. I will forever grieve the fact that Wood’s writing career never really took off, because When Molly Was a Harvey Girl shows that Becoming Rosemary was not a fluke. I like Wood’s heroines, in all their stubborn and occasionally bratty glory; I like their older sisters, with their various but always vibrant personalities; and I like Wood’s light hand with historical fiction.

What I Plan to Read Next

Sarah Orne Jewett’s A Country Doctor. Also, Eva Ibbotson’s A Countess Below Stairs has finally (finally!) come in at the library, so at last I’ll get to read it.
osprey_archer: (downton abbey)
I loathed Jaclyn Moriarty’s I Have a Bed Made of Buttermilk Pancakes. I despised all the characters except for Listen Taylor, and I wouldn’t say that I actually liked Listen, it’s just that she never does much aside from mope.

Admittedly, most of the characters spend much of the book moping, but Listen at least has a good reason - a reason, moreover, which is not of her own making. All the other characters mope because they keep spoiling their lives with their own wretched self-centeredness.

Marbie Zing: cheats on her boyfriend because she is afraid that things are too perfect and can’t stand the pressure. Then she leaves tragic little messages on the answering machine and sends him tragic little notes and cries all the time until finally the chump takes her back.

Said chump is Listen’s older brother, who raised Listen after they were orphaned. Marbie tries to be a mother figure to Listen, which would probably work better if Marbie didn’t have the emotional maturity of a dachshund.

Admittedly, it is not entirely Marbie’s fault, because all the Zings seem to be exactly that immature and awful, so clearly she was just emulating her older sister and her mother.

Fancy Zing: imagines that her husband is having an affair, only to realize that he’s not but she wishes he is because she’s tired of the marriage. I think we’re supposed to think that he’s annoying and only loves her because of the Zing Family Secret, but mostly I got the impression that Fancy is a petty idiot who can’t get over small annoyances and is too chicken to communicate honestly with her husband.

The narrative rewards her by suggesting that she’s going to get together with her Canadian neighbor - he never gets a name, he’s just “the Canadian” - but I know that five years down the line, she’s going to be moping into her coffee writing lists of “tiny things that annoy me about the Canadian” on her napkin. If you want your husband to help with the dishes, Fancy, you should ask him to help with the fucking dishes.

They even go to couple’s counseling, and the counselor asks them to share honestly what annoys them about each other, and instead Fancy writes hers in code. Fuck you, Fancy. I bet her husband will find someone better than her. Maybe Fancy’s daughter will team up with Listen Taylor to run away and find adults who are actually grown-up to bring them up.

Cath Murphy: has an affair with a man who is married to someone else, then spends the rest of the book moping about how, horrors, he goes back to his wife. Am I supposed to enjoy her misery as karmic comeuppance for her selfishness? Or am I meant to feel sorry for her? Because I felt the first, but I’m pretty sure the book meant me to feel the second.

Also, the book revolves around the “Zing Family Secret.” It isn’t revealed until the last few chapters, when is is simultaneously so ludicrous and so unbelievably creepy that I almost threw the book across the room.

The Zing Family Secret, so you don’t have to read the whole book to find out )

I paid money for this book! I feel cheated, cheated, cheated!

Which, let’s face it, is probably thematically appropriate.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Susan Cooper’s Over Sea, Under Stone, the first book in the Dark is Rising sequence, which I actually quite enjoyed. I went into it with such low expectations that I was pleasantly surprised to find it a family adventure story, a la Narnia or Swallows and Amazons or even the Boxcar Children. And with a magical twist, to boot!

I am very fond of this sort of story, although it seems to have fallen out of fashion in recent years. There are Hilary McKay’s books - I adored The Amber Cat, though for whatever reason I’ve had trouble getting into her other books - and Jeanne Birdsall’s Penderwick series, which is absolutely charming. The fourth book should be coming out next year, I hope...they seem to come out at three-year intervals.

What I’m Reading Now

Alexandre Dumas’s The Count of Monte Cristo, because I was feeling gigantic French novel withdrawal. So far, everyone is jealous of Dantes and scheming against him and he has just been taken to the police station (gendarmerie?) on suspicion of being a Bonapartist agent.

Also Jaclyn Moriarty’s I Had a Bed Made of Buttermilk Pancakes, which I am struggling with, because I want to smack so many of the characters. Of the three main adult characters, one just embarked on an affair with a married man, one schemes vaguely about cheating on her boyfriend - even though she’s happy with him! - and one is pettily unhappy about little things her husband does.

I have to keep checking the cover to convince myself that this really is a Moriarty book. The characters in her teen novels are so much more grown up than this.

What I’m Reading Next

The rest of the Dark is Rising sequence.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I Just Finished Reading

Katherine Applegate’s The One and Only Ivan, which I found unexpectedly compelling. Ivan is a gorilla who lives in a little cage in a mall circus that is slowly going bankrupt. The keeper decides to bring in a new attraction: a baby elephant, Ruby, to join Ivan’s ailing elephant friend Stella in an elephant act.

”A good zoo,” Stella says, “is a large domain. A wild cage. A safe place to be. It has room to roam and humans who don’t hurt.” She pauses, considering her words. “A good zoo is how humans make amends.”

A good zoo is their goal: they want to save Ruby from living this tiny cage life. It’s an economical book. Ivan writes short sentences and leaves a lot of white space on the page, but there’s a lot of story packed in those few sentences.

Humans waste words. They toss them like banana peels and leave them to rot.

Everyone knows the peels are the best part.


What I’m Reading Now

Back to Les Mis! Houston, we have an Eponine!

Also we have creepy stalker Marius. He doesn’t know Cosette’s name yet, but he stands under her apartment window at night and swoons when he sees a shadow on the wall that might be hers. Also he sees her in the park every day, and gets mad when the wind blows up her skirt. The hussy! How dare she stand in the wind so anyone could see her legs!

I just finished up with the scene where Grantaire goes to a tavern to Talk Revolution, and Enjolras walks by later and discovers that Grantaire is playing dominoes and not talking revolution at all. [livejournal.com profile] carmarthen, did you ever write that story where Grantaire (presumably after Enjolras drags him out of the tavern by his ear) waxes eloquent about the noble history of strip domino?

I’m also reading Jaclyn Moriarty’s I Have a Bed Made of Buttermilk Pancakes. Despite my devotion to Moriarty’s work I hadn’t heard of this book till recently, and I am beginning to suspect this was for good reason. Also, it seems to be the same book as The Spell Book of Listen Taylor? Like, parts of it were adapted to make Listen Taylor.

What I’m Reading Next

I am hoping to settle in and steamroll through the rest of Les Miserables, because I have only six more weeks of French class and one measly book is not a very good summer overview of French literature.

Plus of course I have more Newbery books. Except I forgot to bring Susan Cooper's The Dark is Rising sequence with me when I visited my parent's house! Noooo, those were totally going to be my early morning tea books.

It is ridiculous that I have not read The Dark is Rising yet, I know. I did read Cooper's King of Shadows and The Boggart - I loved The Boggart ridiculously and rather turned up my nose at the inferior boggarts in Harry Potter.

King of Shadows and The Shakespeare Stealer are probably responsible for the fact that I automatically assume all things Shakespeare are cool. Also Becoming Rosemary, which quotes him liberally. I think possibly there is a children's book conspiracy to acclimate the young into an appreciation of Shakespeare - and a longstanding conspiracy, at that, stretching back to Laura Elizabeth Howe Richard's 1892 Captain January.
osprey_archer: (books)
There is but one problem with Jaclyn Moriarty’s A Corner of White: the sequel is not out yet.

Actually this is not entirely true. A Corner of White does have an actual defect. While it eventually becomes quite engrossing, it takes an awfully long time to get rolling: while the book is never a slog, it remains eminently put-down-able until the two protagonists finally come into contact, and that’s about a hundred pages in.

I say “come in contact” rather than “meet” because, of course, Madeleine and Elliot do not and cannot meet, on account of living in different universes. (In consequence Elliot and Madeleine show no signs of falling in love with each other, which is quite refreshing. Although I suppose if it becomes possible for them to meet in a future book that may change.)

They become penpals by sending letters to each other through a crack between worlds. A broken parking meter in Cambridge, where Madeleine came to roost after she ran away from home for the thirteenth time and her mother followed her (what is it with Moriarty’s characters and running away from home?), connects up to a broken TV in the Elliot’s hometown of Bonfire in the Kingdom of Cello, where colors occasionally attack people.

Red comes in waves that make people either intensely busy or intensely angry, purple slashes people to death or occasionally picks them up and spirits them away to its lair - colors live in lairs, of course - and yellow - but we won’t even talk about yellow.

And also sometimes towns register themselves as Hostile, which means they are seceding from the Kingdom of Cello - except recently towns have started becoming Hostile without bothering to register. I mean really, how rude.

Okay, the world-building is a bit bizarre, which probably contributed to the fact that I found A Corner of White hard to get into at first. The bizarre is something of a wildcard quality in Moriarty’s work: her best characters, IMO, her Emily Thompsons and Bindy Mackenzies, are also the strangest, because their eccentricities make them seem the most individual and most fully human.

But I think sometimes her willingness to throw herself into zany plot twists or world-building weakens her stories by taking the focus away from the character interactions, which are what she does best.

However, ultimately the gamble pays off with the Kingdom of Cello. It starts out seeming quaint and unreal, but eventually, unevenly, fleshes itself out to seem like a real place. And there are things people don’t know, which I found excellent: I think often fantasy authors want to explain too much. It is perhaps important to know how magic works, and what it can do - but it can get pretty boring if you also know why. Leave unanswered questions!

And then write the rest of the trilogy! Because I want to know what happens next.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Jaclyn Moriarty’s A Corner of White, but I have a proper review in the works for that, so I shall not detain us here any longer than to note that I quite liked the book.

Also L. M. Boston’s The Children of Green Knowe, which is the first of her Green Knowe series. I don’t know if the rest of the series is like this, but the first book is great as long as you’re cool with the fact that it is not so much a novel as a long, atmospheric, lovingly detailed description of a slightly magical country house full of History and of ghosts. But, like, nice ghosts, so it’s not like they contribute suspense.

I found it deliciously soothing, but I suspect if it’s not your cuppa then it’s deadly dull.

What I’m Reading Now

More Les Mis. Infinite Les Mis. I’m kind of stalling on it because we’re going to meet the Amis soon, and I suspect that once I read about the book canon Enjolras and Grantaire, I will be way too embarrassed to finish/continue my fic, and that would be a mean thing to do to my readers, whom I have already dragged through seven chapters of poor life choices and philosophical rambling.

HOWEVER possibly it will simply inspire me to finish the story, so I should really get on that.

What I Plan to Read Next

I have Grace Lin’s Starry River of the Sky, which I am saving for my visit home over Memorial Day weekend. Chinese folktale remix! With illustrations! I am excited!

Also Maureen Johnson’s 13 Little Blue Envelopes, because I have heard Maureen Johnson’s work mentioned hither and thither AND ALSO the book features European travel, so. Clearly a win-win.

Plus if I like her work, she has a ton of books, so I am clearly set for the rest of the summer. Except there are SO MANY BOOKS I want to read, you guys, how will I ever be able to prioritize???
osprey_archer: (musing)
[livejournal.com profile] goldjadeocean linked an excellent article about feminist characters (summary: Strong Female Characters (tm) are a good starting point, but we need lots of different kinds of female characters in fiction); and within that article there's a link to a topic that is, if possible, even closer to my heart: Feminist SFF: Female Friendship.

Which argues that, yo, SFF novels need more female friendship. To which I would add, most kinds of novels need more female friendship! The only novels that have anything like a sufficiency are children's novels.

Specifically children's. YA novels, in contrast, tend to suck at female friendship.

Although there are some good ones. Jaclyn Moriarty's Year of Secret Assignments is particularly awesome in this regard - all of her books are, but Secret Assignments especially so. Also Michelle Cooper's Montmaray Journals: the most important relationship is Sophie's friendship with her cousin, Veronica. And - maybe I should make this a separate post.

But its worth noting that when I wanted to read books that had tons of female friendship, I turned to girls' literature from a hundred years ago. A century past, people! We should be able to do at least as well!
osprey_archer: (books)
I'm going to post about something other than books at some point, I swear, but I just keep READING things and then I have stuff to SAY about it and, well. Here be reviews!

First, E. Lockhart's Fly on the Wall, a slim novel about a girl who is transformed into a fly on the wall of the boy's locker room at her school.

Let us begin by admiring the brilliance of this premise. It makes absolutely no sense (and no explanation is ever offered), but it allows Lockhart to write a hundred pages thinly plotted pages about boys being naked. I bet this book enjoys a lot of covert popularity among junior high girls.

Unfortunately… )

On a slightly different but still disappointed note, a review of Jaclyn Moriarty's The Ghosts of Ashbury High, the fourth of her Ashbury High companion novels.

I loved the earlier novels - especially The Murder of Bindi Mackenzie - and therefore approached this latest effort in a pitch of anticipation so fevered as to be deleterious to anything short of a tour de force. And, though Moriarty's characters are buoyant and beautifully realized as ever, The Ghosts of Ashbury High is hardly a tour de force.

For one thing: not nearly enough Bindi Mackenzie.

More seriously, though, The Ghosts of Ashbury High has pretty epic pacing issues.

More )
osprey_archer: (books)
Continuing my binge on Australian YA lit, I read Melina Marchetta's Saving Francesca, which is - very good but not quite to my taste. The first half of the book is so difficult to get through; it's not boring, but it feels like a gray miasma is roiling off the page, lingering in the air, bleaching color and deadening emotion even after the book is closed.

This gives the second half of the book, when Francesca reengages with the world, a feeling of fragile luminosity, but I'm not sure the joy of the second half is worth the misery of the first.

However! All is not drear in my reading world. I read Jaclyn Moriarty's Feeling Sorry for Celia. (I should have a Jaclyn Moriarty tag.) WHY ARE YOU NOT READING JACLYN MORIARTY. Seriously. Why are you wasting time on this post? IT IS TIME YOU COULD SPEND READING JACLYN MORIARTY.

What I particularly love about Moriarty's work is the richness of her characters - there's a certain density to their lives, a feeling that they are enmeshed in a web of people: friends, classmates, family, boyfriend (sometimes), schoolwork, work work... and even the characters who we barely see seem individual. We may not know their story, but you can tell they have one.

And being surrounded by so many three-dimensional characters makes the main characters stronger and more interesting. The individuality of the secondary characters brings out unexpected facets of the main characters, perfectly in character but also surprising.

Moreover, it gives the reader perspective on Moriarty's characters which is hard to achieve with Marchetta's, whose book is more tightly focused. (It helps, too, that Moriarty writes epistolary novels, while Marchetta writes in first person). This makes it easier to love and sympathize with her characters: the reader doesn't have to feel every iota of their pain.

Also, I love Moriarty's sense of humor. She can be serious, and she doesn't shy away from painful topics, but she writes with a firm grip on her sense of the ridiculous and an exquisite grasp of amusing turns of phrase. She makes me love her characters and laugh out loud, and I can't think what more I would ask from an author.
osprey_archer: (books)
The Year of Secret Assignments has a companion novel (actually, it has a number of them) called The Murder of Bindi Mackenzie (or The Betrayal of Bindi Mackenzie, outside of the US), which I got out of the library this afternoon and churned through.

There's this weird genre switch about four fifths of the way through the book. Like, until then it's a realistic fiction book, and then suddenly there are conspiracy theories and international crime organizations? I still have whiplash.

I'm not a big fan of conspiracy theories in the first place, and in this case I'm extra put out because I feel that I've been cheated out of the conclusion of the story I was reading - the naturalistic story about bright, high-strung, socially inept Bindi Mackenzie's life reeling out of control. The sudden introduction of thriller elements cuts that story off, so we don't get to see Bindi come to terms with the fact that her dad actually kind of sucks, or stumble through making friends with her classmates - we see the beginning of her friendship with them but then it's artificially sped up by, you know, the MORTAL PERIL.

That being said, the first four-fifths of the book are brilliant. Bindi herself is a brilliantly realized character: certain of her superiority to her classmates but painfully aware of her social inferiority, extremely bright, terribly lonely, and socially inept both through ignorance and through malice. You can sympathize wholly with her classmates' hatred of her, and at the same time love her yourself.

And I probably identify with Bindi more than is strictly necessary. I kept recognizing snippets of her behavior so intensely that I had to put the book down and walk away. It's not so much that I, personally, am just like Bindi; more that my friend group in high school were a sort of corporate Bindi Mackenzie, except untouched by Bindi's sense of social inferiority (as there were nine of us) and therefore less cruel, if only because we could afford to ignore everyone else.

You know, I love many of my high school friends; but I don't think that group dynamic is actually very healthy. Is it bad that it took me four years of college, five hundred miles away from all of them, to figure that out?
osprey_archer: (books)
I started reading The Year of Secret Assignments this morning, sitting on the edge of the couch waiting for my toast to pop. Half the book later, I lifted my head and looked about in puzzlement, wondering why I was sitting in such an uncomfortable position and hadn't there been plans for breakfast?

That, my friends, is how engrossing Jaclyn Moriarty's The Year of Secret Assignments is. Unless you have a deep-seated revulsion to literature about high school students, you should read it.

(I note that Moriarty is Australian. All the best writers are Australian these days: Isobelle Carmody, Garth Nix, Michelle Cooper who wrote the Montmaray books. Possibly I should consider emigrating.)

The Year of Secret Assignments is a bit like I hoped John Tucker Must Die would be, if John Tucker Must Die wasn't a misogynistic piece of crap, as both of them involve taking vengeance on a sleazy jackass who jerks girls around for his own entertainment. But beyond that there's little point of comparison, as The Year of Secret Assignments has things like "female characters who actually like each other and have lives outside of their slowly burgeoning romances with their pen pals at the neighboring high school."

The story is told through the letters flying back and forth between pen pals, which means that Moriarty juggles six different first-person narrators. It's a bit confusing at first, but they differentiate eventually: Lydia is the crazy fun daredevil, Cassie is quiet and still trying to get over her father's death, and Emily is...Emily. And they have fun times together! They paint murals on the walls of Lydia's rooms and sneak out of school to watch a movie every Thursday and are generally awesome.

Emily is my favorite. She writes long letters sprinkled with malapropisms and peculiar grammatical constructions; one gets the feeling that, a) she wants to be smarter than she thinks she is, and b) she hasn't quite gotten the hang of written English yet. That this is charming rather than maddening is testament to Moriarty's skill.

Emily also has the most interesting and individual romance, which felt specific to these people, in this place, at this time. Her eventual boyfriend, Charley, is well-meaning but deeply awkward: geeky in a way that is light years removed from anything geek-chic.

(However, I suspect that the other boyfriend in the book is more popular with readers: he has most the stigmata of an appropriate book crush.)

Also, there's a sequel. It's called The Murder of Bindy Mackenzie (Bindy, a highly strung nerd, being my favorite secondary character - did I mention all the fun secondary characters? There are fun secondary characters. Given how many primary characters there are it's amazing there's room for anyone else) and I mean to get it out of the library tomorrow.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
111213 14151617
18 19 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 23rd, 2025 12:49 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios