osprey_archer: (books)
There are few writers I would follow if they decided to write a history of the life and times of dust bunnies, but if Anne Fadiman decided to do so, I would not only read it, but consider myself honored to have the opportunity.

Therefore I leapt at the opportunity to read Fadiman’s memoir, The Wine-Lover’s Daughter, about her father the book critic, essayist, radio host, television guest, etc. etc. Clifton Fadiman.

Now, full disclosure: I read an introductory essay Clifton Fadiman wrote for a book - it was a manly Western of some variety; I forget exactly which because I didn’t end up reading it, because I found Fadiman’s jocular male chauvinism completely insufferable. He kept going on - in far more graceful prose than this; I take nothing away from him as a stylist - about how this was a MANLY book for MEN and if any little ladies happened to find themselves reading this, they might want to find something more suitable, but if they persevere they might find the book a refreshing delight from the effete tea party books they usually read, etc. etc.

Barf and gag me.

Fadiman fille acknowledges her father’s chauvinism, and notes the complicated way that his chauvinism interacted with raising an actual daughter. He supported not only her writing career but her growth and development as a person: the letters he wrote to her while she was in France on a class trip as a teenager are a delight to read.

(Although the book is mainly about Clifton Fadiman, there’s a good bit about the rest of the family as well. I feel that I got to know them all in Ex Libris and it’s nice to have, as it were, a reunion with them in this book.)

She also writes movingly about the inferiority complex that dogged Fadiman père’s life, which stemmed from growing up poor and Jewish in Brooklyn. There’s a sequence when Fadiman fille is writing magazine article about père and he asks her not to mention that he’s Jewish. If he were missing both legs, he argues, he wouldn’t want her to write about that either.

And I very much enjoyed the book’s discussion of wine and wine connoisseurship, not least because I, like Anne Fadiman, have always liked the idea of wine without being able to get into wine itself (although wine is not a family legacy so I was not nearly so heavily invested in the idea of one day learning to like it.) The discussion of the biology of taste is fascinating, as well as the meaning that we invest in certain tastes, and - in the context of her father’s wine cellar - the fact that there are some legacies that you can’t pass on.

It’s not a thick book but there’s quite a bit in it. Highly recommended, particularly for people who like memoirs.

***

A lagniappe: The Wine-Lover’s Daughter led me to look up Caroline Heilbrun, who - aside from a book in which she dissects Fadiman père’s sexism - wrote a study called Writing a Woman’s Life, in which Heilbrun “builds an eloquent argument demonstrating that writers conform all too often to society’s expectations of what women should be like at the expense of the truth of female experience.”

(So, for instance, a biography of a woman will often focus heavily on her relationships with men while all but ignoring her relationships with other women, because society deems relationships with men - familial as well as sexual - more important than relationships with women. I’m not sure if this is actually part of Heilbrun’s argument, actually, that’s just what came into my mind when I read the summary.)

This book was published in 1988, so I suspect a lot of its critique has entered into the mainstream, but I may read it anyway. It has a section on Sayers! How can I resist?

***

Heilbrun also wrote (under the pseudonym Amanda Cross) a series of mystery novels with a female English professor as the protagonist. (Death in a Tenured Position is evidently particularly scathing in its indictment of the way academia treats female professors.) I repeat: how can I resist!
osprey_archer: (books)
The first book I remember reading – not the content of what I read, but the experience of reading it – is The Berenstein Bears Count Their Blessings. It was Christmas break, first grade, (I learned to read fairly slowly), vacation at my grandmother’s house; I curled over the book in an armchair in the lanai, the room softly lit, the night black out of the cozy white window frames – the lulling sound of rain, and rumbling thunder…

But – here’s the thing – thunder terrified me; I wouldn’t have sat peacefully and read through a Florida thunderstorm. I think the thunderstorm was only in the book, and I was so absorbed that in my memory it’s grown out of the pages.

Memory plays tricks. And yet, I have such strong memories of the when and where of certain books. I remember, a little older, reading Megan Whelan Turner’s The Queen of Attolia, sitting outside a building daubed with a copy of Seurat’s Sunday Afternoon. Kneeling by the shelves in a bookstore, since closed, mainlining the first few pages of The Outsiders before I bought it. Riding a train across the Rockies, torn between the mountains and Crown Duel.

Sometimes I’ve even transported books somewhere memorable to read them, because I know I’m going to love the book and want to be able to remember that first experience. I took Anne Fadiman’s marvelous Ex Libris to the local park to read; I remember the sun on the long grass, the fountain, and Fadiman’s rich, beautifully balanced prose melding into a beautiful May afternoon.

Except it may have been Fadiman’s other essay book, At Large and At Small, that I read that afternoon. It’s the same size – has the same sweet, seamless prose… and memory plays tricks.
osprey_archer: (books)
Reading: Sense and Sensibility. I have a bad feeling about Willoughby.

Also reading: At Large and at Small, a collection of essays by Anne Fadiman. I have discovered that I have a weakness for familiar essays. I should try to write one. Hmm.

Planning to Read: Twice Upon a Marigold, by Jean Ferris. It's the sequel to Once Upon a Marigold, which is a funny book, so hopefully this will be too.

I can't decide if I think the title is cute or silly, but it's not as bad as the title to the sequel of I Know What You Did Last Summer, which is I Still Know What You Did Last Summer. That may have come all the way around bad and into good again.

Reviewing: Book Review: Sunshine

I like this book. I like the characters, both as characters and as people; I like the coffee shop, which deserves special mention for being awesome; and I very much like the worldbuilding.

Read more )

How long does a post need to be before it gets an lj-cut, anyway?
osprey_archer: (books)
Anne Fadiman’s Ex Libris is a book of essays about books—not reviews of books, or discussions of the ideas of books, but essays that are love letters to the hedonistic pleasures of books: the joy of possessing books and finding new books and housing and organizing never-ending stacks of books.

It’s like food writing, except about books. It has the same intense attention to sensual details and it made me want to hike half a mile to the nearest used bookstore, the equivalent of salivating over a well-described loaf of bread. (There actually is an essay about food writing. She quotes Keats’ description of a nectarine, which “melted down [his] throat like a large Beatified strawberry.” Beatified. What an adjective.)

It’s probably a book only a book-lover could love, if only for the frisson of recognition. This quote, for instance: “These beautiful volumes had been published in 1897, and not a single person had read them. I had the urge to lend them out to as many friends as possible in order to make up for al the caresses they had missed during their first century.”

I have so been there. Because a book, despite appearances, is not really an inanimate object. It’s a semi-sentient being, which will care about being unloved or abused. (Another quote: “George, if you ever break the spine of one of my books, I want you to know you might as well be breaking my own spine.”) I think this attitude is peculiar to book people; philatelists, for instance, don’t generally believe their stamps to be imbued with their own anima.

Also, how many books are there where you run into words like “concatenation?” For that alone, it’s worth reading.

Also, I found a book icon. There's an lj community called [livejournal.com profile] book_icons. Happiness!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
67 8 9101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 11th, 2025 08:43 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios