osprey_archer: (books)
The queen let out a piercing cry on seeing herself caught, for in her agitation she did not at first recognize the young woman who had been given her by La Porte.

"Oh, don't be afraid of anything, Madame!" said the young woman, pressing her hands together and weeping at the queen's distress herself. "I am Your Majesty's, body and soul, and far as I am from her, inferior as my position is, I believe I have found a way to save Your Majesty from grief."

"You? Oh, heavens! You?" cried the queen. "But come, look me in the face. I'm betrayed on all sides; can I trust you?"

"Oh, Madame!" cried the young woman, falling to her knees, "upon my soul, I am ready to die for Your Majesty!"


THANK YOU, DUMAS. THANK YOU FOR GIVING ME EVERYTHING I HAVE EVER WANTED. The loyalty! In the midst of betrayal! Falling to one's knees and pledging to die for your liege lord! And with girls, which is all that I want in life and something that I hardly ever get.

I may end up taking this back once we meet the Countess de Winter (...I can't quite see yet how to work a Rebecca crossover, but REST ASSURED it is on my mind), but so far in both The Three Musketeers and The Count of Monte Cristo I have really appreciated how much Dumas simply treats women as people. They get to drama llama just as much as his men, and he hasn't done any finger-wagging at either Anne of Austria or Constance Bonacieux (the young woman in the above quotation) who have both gotten entangled in extramarital affairs - but they're both married to total jerks anyway so Dumas is like, eh, so it goes.

Spoilers through Chapter 23 )
osprey_archer: (books)
Let The Three Musketeers commence! I am actually super enjoying it, partly because my expectations were set helpfully low by all the people who warned me it was awful and/or not as good as The Count of Monte Cristo, and also partly because it is just super well geared to my tastes. THE LOYALTY KINK OH MY GOD.

For instance, for instance. Athos' first appearance is the time that he walks into M. de Treville's office bleeding from a shoulder wound, pale from blood loss, and then keels over in a dead faint - but M. de Treville called him! And when a musketeer is called, he obeys!

And of course the musketeers are all ludicrously loyal to each other, which is also glorious, although it hasn't hit me where I live in quite the same way as Athos' fainting to prove his loyalty. Although I did love the way D'Artagnan befriends the three musketeers: he challenges each one to a duel, one after the other (without realizing they are bffs, of course) - only for the first duel to be interrupted by the Cardinal's spoilsport guards, on account of dueling is technically forbidden. D'Artagnan fights at the musketeers' side, and zing! They're all besties.

Still, I only just finished chapter 10, so there is time. One of them will surely get stabbed at least a little bit in defense of the others.

Some spoilery musings )
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

I finished Jane Langton’s The Fragile Flag, and aaaaaaaah, I really liked this book, you guys. Young Georgie (also the heroine of Langton’s The Fledgling) finds an old American flag in the attic, which gives people visions if it wraps around them; she decides to march on Washington with it, in hopes of convincing the President not to launch the Peace Missile (for which read Reagan’s Star Wars; the book was published in 1984).

Naturally the march swells to enormous size as it continues on, and George manages to meet the president in the end, etc. etc. Of course it’s escapism, but it’s really nice escapism in the current political climate. And the book is beautifully constructed, too, all the pieces of the plot (it’s more complicated than I’ve made it sound here) all come together like clockwork, and strike like midnight at just the climactic moment.

I also finished Warren Lewis’s The Splendid Century: Life in the France of Louis XIV, which I read because the Inklings book I read recently praised it (Warren Lewis is C. S. Lewis’s brother) and also because I’ve long meant to learn more about France, and indeed it is a pleasant and readable introductory work to seventeenth century France.

And, for the Unread Book Club: I reread William McCleery’s Wolf Story, which in our youth my brother and I liked so much that we importuned our father to read it multiple times. I think he got bored and started making up new twists in the story to amuse himself, although I can’t be sure because the father in the book (who is telling a story to his child in the book) also gets bored with the story he is telling and keeps trying to come up with twists to end it quickly. It’s very meta.

What I’m Reading Now

I’m slogging through Margaret Stohl’s Black Widow: Forever Red, which I am not liking nearly as much as I expected sadly. I think this is partly the fault of my own expectations - I thought this would be about Natasha’s childhood or at least give us large lumps of backstory, perhaps flashbacks!, but it really does not. But it’s also not very strongly written.

Really not feeling this one. Maybe I’ll just give it up.

I’m also working on Gary Paulsen’s The Island, which is an oddly poetic book - I mean, not odd really, or only because my main association with Paulsen is Hatchet which is more of a survival story. This one involves a lot of our hero sitting on the island, contemplating nature.

And I continue to chug along in Tolkien’s Sir Gawain and the Green Knight!

What I Plan to Read Next

Norah of Billabong is winging its way through the mail to me as we speak! So definitely that.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Finished Reading

William B. Irvine’s A Slap in the Face: Why Insults Hurt - And Why They Shouldn’t, which is about the history and social function of insults. It includes a chapter about friendly teasing & ambiguous insults, which I found especially interesting, and also a fair amount of space on how to respond to insults - one of the suggestions was to say “Thanks,” which I think is beautiful in its simplicity and ability to throw the insulter off their game. (Probably not for backhanded compliments, but otherwise.)

He also talks about the self-esteem movement a bit, the main point being that the movement saw the correlation between high self-esteem and achievement and got the causation backwards - probably, excuse my grumpiness, because cooing “You’re so special!” at everyone is so much easier than taking the time and effort to foster genuine achievement.

Irvine also makes the point - which ought to be obvious, but lots of commentators seem to miss it - that if the Millennial generation seems narcissistic, it’s because that’s the inevitable outcome of inflicting “You’re Thumbody special!” programs on a generation. You can’t din that in a generation’s ears for years and then act shocked, shocked! when they take narcissism tests and answer “Yes” to the question “Are you special?”

Unread Book Club progress: I finished Virginia Sorenson’s Miracles on Maple Hill, which has lots of delightful detail about tapping maples, wildflowers, the countryside, etc. It doesn’t go very in-depth about Marly’s father’s PTSD, but after all it’s a book about Marly, not her father, and I did think the author did a nice job showing how her father’s less-than-joyous return from a prisoner of war camp has affected Marly while balancing that with the more light-hearted “And then we met the resident mountain hermit!” bits.

What I’m Reading Now

Tolkien’s translation of Sir Gawain and the Green Knight. I must confess I had some concerns about it: I skipped a lot of Tolkien’s poetry when I read Lord of the Rings, and long-form poems in general are not my thing. But I’ve been pleasantly surprised by how much I’m liking it so far. (It helps of course that I already read & liked the story in prose.)

I’ve also started reading Margaret Stohl’s Black Widow: Forever Red, which suffers a bit from not being my Natasha headcanon, ha - but we’ll see if Stohl wins me over to hers as I keep reading. I’ve only just started, so she’s got plenty of time.

What I Plan to Read Next

Warren Lewis’s The Splendid Century: Life in the France of Lewis XIV is waiting for me at the library. Warren Lewis is C. S. Lewis’s brother and mainly remembered for that these days, although (according to The Company They Keep) his books about French history are well-researched and well-wrought reads in their own right. I have long meant to learn more about France and this seemed like a good spur to give that a go.
osprey_archer: (books)
After much waffling and repeated warnings not to do it, I have gone ahead and started reading The Count of Monte Cristo. Somehow none of the warnings were as powerful as the fact that I actually own the book and it has been sitting on my shelf, taking up space and waiting to be read.

And also I missed having a lengthy book project to post about every Thursday. This is probably an unfortunate sign of my long slow march toward reading Proust.

In any case! So far The Count of Monte Cristo is all right. Dantes started out on top of the world - about to be made captain of his own ship and marry the girl he loves - and in few short chapters, he has been cast down to the depths of despair, although I think he's still under the impression that he's going to get out of jail soon and go on with his life. Oh Dantes! As if accused Napoleonic conspirators get to go on with their lives.
osprey_archer: (books)
I finished reading Mary McAuliffe's When Paris Sizzled, which is about life in the art world of Paris between the Armistice and the Wall Street Crash, and which I enjoyed very much; I would recommend it to anyone with a prior interest in the time and place.

But I might not recommend it to someone who is just dipping their toe into these waters for the first time, because McAuliffe throws so many different names and relationships at the reader that I think it would be very difficult to keep up if you don't already have a working knowledge of at least some of their stories. I already knew quite a bit about some of the cast of characters - the Hemingways, the Fitzgeralds, Gertrude Stein, Jean Renoir (the famous painter's son and a famous film director in his own right, and also one of the main characters in the charming 2012 French film Renoir), which left a lot of space free to sort out all the others - but I still don't think I got a good grasp on who all the music composers were, for instance.

It's all interesting, mind, I'd be hard pressed to point to any particular strand and say "This. This could have been left out and nothing of value would be lost." The stuff about the rivalry between Citroen and Renault cars, say, seems in some ways out of place with the rest of the book -and yet cars are so central to modernity that they do fit, as well.

Or perhaps the sections about Marie Curie? But those are so small, and Marie Curie is one of the figures that a lot of readers will already have some familiarity with anyway...

So the breadth probably makes this book a bad introduction to the time period: there's simply too much to take in at once. But if you already know something about the era, enough to make your way through the sea of names, it's a fascinating and evocative look at an era.

The strict chronological ordering contributes to the confusion - each chapter consists of little snippets about what our many main characters were doing during that time - but it also gives the book a sense of atmosphere. Because it's all scrambled together like that, you can really feel what a frenetic and busy time this was, culturally speaking, with so many people making so much art and trying to stretch art in so many different directions.

There's not a lot of depth here, but if you have enough prior knowledge to orient yourself, the breadth is breath-taking.

Renoir

Feb. 18th, 2014 02:35 pm
osprey_archer: (window)
I just watched a beautiful French movie! I mean beautiful in the most literal of senses: Renoir is an exquisitely shot film of beautiful people in lovely countryside, as if the filmmakers tried to make the movie look as much like a Renoir painting as possible. It reminds me of Bright Star, which also seems infused with light; only the light in Renoir is more golden, more late afternoon, perhaps reflecting Renoir's advancing age.

I was briefly concerned that the film was going to tell the tale of the aged Renoir's seduction of his model, the nubile young Dedee. But in fact the romance is between Dedee and Renoir's son Jean, who is home on convalescent leave from the trenches. (Yes, Jean Renoir, whose 1937 The Grand Illusion is one of the classics of the French World War I film genre, is now a main character in a biopic set in France during World War I. It's kind of glorious.)

Jean and his crutches are as close as the film gets to the trenches. The golden glow of the late afternoon makes Renoir's bucolic estate seem ageless and timeless, but it slowly grows clear that the world has changed and will change more: Renoir and his garden are beautiful relicts.

It's a film about the end of an era, but not a tragedy, not least because of Renoir's earthy good humor. As his health slowly fails, he descends into occasional grouchiness but not despair. Renoir painted until the day he died - literally; he painted his final still life the morning of his death. It's a meditative film, a film about the fading of a life well-lived.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Rudyard Kipling’s Kim. This is such a weird book, you guys. Entertainingly so, but still. At first I just thought I found it strange because I was expecting more espionage and less coming of age and travelogue, but no, it’s just kind of strange. Kim is accidentally a spy on the side, but mostly he just wanders around India helping a lama search for a river that will wash away his sins, and then it just kind of ends.

It’s odd how different classic novels can be from what you expect when you finally read them, even when you thought you knew a lot about them beforehand. I knew The Old Curiosity Shop was all about Little Nell dying, but I didn’t expect it to be quite that much about Little Nell dying. I mean, it’s not just a major plot point, it is literally the point of the book.

What I’m Reading Now

Gaston Leroux’s The Phantom of the Opera, in some English translation, though the audiobook people did not mention which.

The framing story seems to make it impossible for Christine Daae to have get POV, but then again it would also seem to make it impossible for Raoul to have POV, and he’s having POV all over the place, so I’m hoping that Leroux will give her some anyway. Because otherwise how are we going to see the Phantom’s sub-operatic lair? The lair beneath the opera is the very best part of this story, please don’t tell me they just made it up for the various adaptations. I think Christine should murder the creepy stalker serial killing Phantom and take his lair for her own.

I’m also reading F. Scott Fitzgerald’s The Beautiful and the Damned, very slowly, when I am absolutely forced by exigencies to resort to my Kindle, because it exudes an ennui that sticks to me like ichor. My working theory is that Fitzgerald was depressed and resorted to massive amounts of alcohol for self-medication.

What I’m Going to Read Next

THE LIBRARY HAS ROSE UNDER FIRE ON HOLD FOR ME. SO EXCITED! So, uh, that.

I have the newest and final of Ally Carter’s Gallagher Girls series, United We Spy, on hold...but I’m fifth on the holds list so it may be some time before I get my grubby little hands on it.

I’ve enjoyed the Gallagher Girls so much, as a popcorn spy-schoolgirl story, that I’m thinking of trying out Ally Carter’s other series, Heist Society. Probably next summer, when I have time for popcorn reading. Has anyone read it? Is it just as good, or should I rest content with Gallagher Girls?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

The first five books of Ally Carter’s Gallagher Girl series, which is about a boarding school for spy girls. BOARDING SCHOOL FOR SPY GIRLS, you guys. So many of my favorite things packed in those five words!

It’s basically literary candy, but it is my kind of literary candy, and I enjoyed it immensely. The only problem is - the sixth and last book doesn’t come out till September! Ugh, waiting is so hard.

What I’m Reading Now

Susan Cooper’s The Grey King. I will probably have to hand in my geek card for saying this, but Will Stanton is powerfully boring.

Also, we’re reading Voltaire’s Candide for French class. There’s an annotated version here which makes reading it virtually painless if you have a little background in French.

Well, painless as far as the language part goes. The plot is full of pain. So far Candide has been chased from his home and ladylove, press-ganged into the army, beaten to death, narrowly escaped a battle and wandered through harrowingly destroyed villages, had a chamber pot dumped on his head, and met up with his old teacher who is covered with pulsating syphilitic sores.

And this is just the first four chapters!

Still better than the story about the horse being marched off to the abattoir, though. Or the one about the guy turning his head.

What I Plan to Read Next

For once I don't have any definite plans for this. I am getting a pile of academic books from the library today, and I really should make some headway on those...
osprey_archer: (Les Miz)
Lo, I stand before you a god among men! For I have finished reading Les Miserables!

Eventually I will have coherent thoughts about other things that happened in the book, specifically EPONINE, who remains my favorite, because she is so deliciously messed up, poor Eponine, I want to write all the AUs where she lives.

I think the simplest way is to have Marius get shot by the soldier that Eponine stops in the book. Thus Marius won't save the barricade; it will fall quite early on. Unlucky Enjolras will be deprived of his glorious last stand, but he will get to shoot Javert, as Valjean won't be there to save anyone...

BUT FIRST I HAVE TO VENT MY FEELINGS ABOUT THIS ENDING which will of course involve spoilers spoilers, all the spoilers, though probably unless you are living under a rock you know how Les Mis ends by now... )

IN CONCLUSION: I now need to decide which French classic to read next. Should I stick with Hugo, who (despite, or perhaps because of, the fact that he makes me write screeds about some of his decision) is clearly a winner, and read The Hunchback of Notre Dame? Or should I branch out into Dumas with The Count of Monte Cristo, and thus consider the "prisoner who escapes unjust imprisonment" genre from a different angle?
osprey_archer: (window)
Nineteenth century adventure fiction and I do not agree with each other. Now you might imagine that this is because nineteenth century adventure fiction overbrims with imperialistic projects and unexamined sexism and racism, and that certainly doesn't help, but in fact our disagreement is even more fundamental than that: I find it boring.

I was thinking about this as I slogged through Jules Verne's Around the World in Eighty Days, which features Phileas Fogg, the most boring hero in the history of stalwart and boring heroes. Verne makes a point of mentioning how utterly uninterested Phileas Fogg is in actually seeing the world; he's merely going around it to fulfill a bet, and steadfastly doesn't see anything anywhere. Why is this a selling point?

Therefore I spent a lot of the book thinking about how to make it more entertaining, and came to the inevitable answer: MUPPETS.

Kermit would play Phileas Fogg, obviously, and in his capable green hands would imbue him with way more warmth and feeling than Phileas-Fogg-he's-like-a-human-clock ever has in Verne's hands.

Fogg's French manservant, Passepartout, would clearly be played by Fozzie. Fozzie is a bear, and that gives him a naturally Gallic air. (Doesn't France have some symbolic thing going on with bears? Maybe I just made that up?)

Also, there is a scene were Detective Fix, the police inspector who is chasing Phileas Fogg around the world on the suspicion that he's a bank robber, gets Passepartout drunk, plies him with opium, and then leaves him zonked out in an opium den, thus throwing Fogg's plans into confusion because Passepartout doesn't show up with the tickets when he's supposed to. This is clearly something Fozzie would do.

(Gonzo and Rizzo will probably just tag along after Phileas Fogg and Passepartout, because we clearly want as much of them in the movie as possible. Unless we want to save Gonzo to be the guy that Fogg has a duel with in America?

This is the best scene ever, you guys, even Verne can't quite destroy the entertainment value. So Fogg and the American dude are going to have a duel, except, oh no! the train is late, so it's not going to make the scheduled stop. The conductor is so apologetic about the fact that they can't have their duel when they planned that he clears out a train car for them, so they can shoot each other on the moving train.

Detective Fix is like "WOE IF FOGG DIES THEN I WON'T BE ABLE TO MAKE AN ARREST. Also I am beginning to be concerned that someone so honorable that he would do something as stupid as fight a duel on a train would never rob a bank.")

Detective Fix! Detective Fix is my greatest achievement, the triumph of my casting. Because Fix will be played by...Miss Piggy!

Think about it. Chasing Kermit around the globe with the goal of karate chopping him at the end is totally something Miss Piggy would do.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Fellow fans of mid-twentieth-century British literature! I have a treat for you! I have just finished reading D. E. Stevenson’s Miss Buncle’s Book, which is about a sweet English spinster who writes a book about her fellow townsfolk and thus ignites scandal in her little country village.

If you’re a fan of Stella Gibbons’ books or Miss Pettigrew Lives for a Day - even some of Ngaio Marsh’s country village murder mysteries - this is an absolutely splendid book in much the same vein. It has wry humor and vivid characterization and that wonderful command of language that makes British books from the 1930s and 40s such a joy to read.

(A more modern book that captures a similar style - on account of being set in the period - is The Guernsy Literary and Potato Peel Pie Society, which I also love. My mother and I have very different tastes in books, but we both enjoyed this one.)

What I’m Reading Now

Jules Verne’s Around the World in Eighty Days. I was sitting around, going “What French books can I read that are not one thousand pages long?” - answer: NONE, all French novels worth their salt are that long; and then I remembered Jules Verne! He wrote perfectly respectable novels! I have been meaning to read some of his work!

In fact I attempted to read Journey to the Center of the Earth last spring, and didn’t even make it into the volcano. But doubtless the experiment will be more successful this time! I have just finished the first chapter, and Passepartout-the-new-manservant seems promising.

What I’m Reading Next

My parents are coming to visit this weekend, and Mom has promised to bring down the box set of Susan Cooper’s The Dark is Rising sequence, so I’m finally going to get around to that.
osprey_archer: (tea)
A thunderstorm at teatime! It cleared the air and cooled the world enough that I could in fact have tea, which was lovely. (I was organizing my tags last night, and you guys, I had not realized how much I post about tea. Which reminds me, assuming that no one falls deathly ill over night, tomorrow I am having an Oreo tea with Emma and Rick. Did you guys know there are watermelon Oreos? I wouldn't have believed it either, but I have photographic proof!

Watermelon Oreos ahoy! )

However, they will not be gracing tomorrow's tea. We got a bag yesterday, and they taste sort of like Jolly Ranchers or watermelon bubblegum, which makes them oddly refreshing...but mostly odd. We shall be having peanut butter Oreos instead.)

But back to my thunderstorm tea! Usually I read something with my tea, and I considered reading more Les Miserables. I have achieved page nine hundred! The end is in sight! Okay, three hundred pages away; but still, on the horizon.

Marius has dropped the creepy stalker baton, Eponine has picked it up, Marius finally went to see his grandfather, who offered him money, which Marius refused even though it would have allowed him to be happy with Cosette because Marius is just special like that -

- and now he is marching off to the barricades. Everyone is going to die there, and as such I find myself loathe to go on reading.

So instead I read Alexandre Dumas fils novel Camille (which is also called The Lady of the Camellias, which has the advantage of actually making sense), which at a mere two hundred pages seemed breathlessly svelte. Also, compared to Les Mis, rather slight: it tells the tragic tale of a young man who falls in love with a courtesan, believes himself betrayed by her, and realizes only too late how truly she loved him.

Naturally it was rather schlocky. But I was prepared for it to be failtastic (it's a French guy! Writing about women! Women who have sex! How many ways could this go wrong?), so schlocky was almost a relief.

It's had a ton of theatrical adaptations (including one with young Colin Firth), and I can see why. The outlines of the story overflow with feeling, and I suspect with good actors there's not a dry eye in the house by the end.

But the writing (or rather the translation): well, it's quite pacey, and I had a good time reading it - but that's just it; for a tragedy, I shouldn't be able to say "It's a fun book!", at least not without adding caveats of the "but in a soul-crushing way" variety. So it's a good read, but for me, at least, Dumas didn't quite accomplish what he meant to.
osprey_archer: (art)
“The food in those places wasn’t so much ‘rich’ as deep, dense. Each plat arrived looking mellow and varnished, like an old violin. Each mouthful registered like a fat organ chord in a tall church, hitting you hard and then echoing down the room.”

Adam Gopnik’s Paris to the Moon is a memoir and a travelogue, a mixture of two of my favorite genres; and it is one of the first books that I remember enjoying not only for its narrative pull or its quickly yet memorably sketched characters (although those are quite fine), but for the sheer lushness of the prose. Gopnik’s book, like the French food he describes, resounds like an organ chord.

It’s a hard book to quote. One can’t just pick out punchy one liners; many of the lines are lovely, but they draw their loveliness from the symphony of lines working together to build to something greater than themselves. It’s beautiful writing, but an old fashioned sort of beauty; I think often we don’t let our writing breathe that way anymore.

Of a taxidermist who bemoans the fact that they are no longer allowed to stuff big game animals, even if they die in zoos: “The government is worried, as governments will be, I suppose, that if fallen elephants are turned into merchandise, however lovely, then sooner or later elephants will not just be falling. Elephants will be nudged.”

Elephants will be nudged. The line is so striking to me: the juxtaposition of the enormous elephant and the miniscule force implied in nudged.

Or speaking of the Musee d’Orsay, where the grand, cold Academic paintings of the nineteenth century hang in the main hall, while the Impressionists are relegated to out-of-the-way rooms:

“It is a calculated, venom-filled insult on the part of French official culture against French civilization, revenge on the part of the academy and administration on everyone who escaped them. French official culture, having the upper hand, simply banishes French civilization to the garret, sends it to its room. What one feels, in that awful place, is violent indignation - and then an ever-increased sense of wonder that Manet and Degas and Monet, faced with the same stupidities of those same academic provocations in their own lifetimes, responded not with rage but with precision and grace and contemplative exactitude.”

Possibly Gopnik is the only person to ever accuse the Impressionists of precision. But it suits, in a way: they have precision of attitude, precision of mood. In any case, grace and contemplative exactitude (and, perhaps, a little rage) are the hallmarks of art; and Gopnik's book overflows with both.
osprey_archer: (castle)
Via [livejournal.com profile] sartorias: The Paris Time Capsule Apartment. (My friend Emma tells me that this whole website is full of secret Paris things and urban exploring in general. Clearly I should poke through its nooks and crannies.)

But this article in particular is so cool: an apartment in Paris, which the owner shut up when she fled at the beginning of World War II, was only recently reopened. Can you imagine how amazing it would be to walk into it? Like stepping into the past. I wonder why the owner never returned.

It’s like the beginning of a mystery novel, especially when you factor in the forgotten painting that they found! What kept her away? The owner paid the rent punctually till she died, so she hadn't forgotten about it... it haunted her, perhaps; it holds ghosts, literal or figurative.

If I had any gift for mystery plotting, I would try my hand at it.

French

Jun. 6th, 2013 10:43 pm
osprey_archer: (writing)
You can tell I’ve been studying French for too long, because I’ve started having ~feelings~ about the parts of speech. My favorite is nouns, because they tend to be like English, except pronounced with extra fervor and drama. Or - let's get the genealogy right here - English nouns tend to be like French, because they are the remains of our erstwhile Norman chains.

I am also fond of verbs, also they tend to be cognate with Spanish rather than English, which makes things trickier. HOWEVER, conjugation, which bedeviled my soul in Spanish, is basically a non-issue here because this is a readings class, and therefore I only need to be able to recognize conjugations, not produce them, which makes it one hundred times easier. Except when you have words that conjugate into things that look nothing like their original selves, but there aren’t very many of those.

Not a big fan of prepositions. Because it turns out that, at least in Indo-European languages, there are a lot of prepositions that are attached to verbs, which seems perfectly reasonable in one’s own language but becomes absolutely maddening when you start to learn other languages, because there is no logic behind it.

But my least favorite part of speech EVER? Conjunctions. I hate conjunctions with a fiery burning passion because they are completely impossible to memorize. And moreover, the French looooove conjunctions. It is like they think that no sentence is complete unless it is festooned with a “nevertheless” and an “in order that” and also a couple of particles that don’t, as far as I can tell, actually mean anything, but are only there to sound pretty.

Which, let's be real, they totally do. It is a lot easier to study languages when you aren't expected to be able to produce or pronounce anything - but it also means that I can't pronounce anything, and I totally want to. Everything just sounds so much more dramatic and exciting in French!
osprey_archer: (art)
Another poem from French class.

Tomorrow, at dawn
by Victor Hugo

Tomorrow, at dawn, at the hour when the countryside whitens
I will leave. You see, I know that you are waiting for me.
I will go through the forest, I will go by the mountain.
I cannot remain far from you any longer.

I will go, my eyes fixed on my thoughts,
without seeing anything outside of myself, without hearing any sound,
alone, unknown, my back bent, my hands crossed,
sad, and the day for me will be like the night.

I will look at neither the gold of the evening that falls,
nor the mist that descends toward Harfleur,
and when I will arrive, I will put on your tomb
a bouquet of green holly and heather in bloom.

The poem is not just a flight of fancy: Hugo wrote it when his daughter Leopoldine drowned with her husband in a boating accident, in 1847.
osprey_archer: (Les Miz)
First week of French class: successfully completed! Here, let me share with you a poem we translated in class. (Yes, we are already translating poems. No wasting time here!)

Chanson d'automne
Paul Verlaine (1866)

The long sobs
of the violins
of the autumn
wound my heart
with a dull
lethargy.

All suffocating
and pale, when
the hour sounds
I remember
the old days
and I weep.

And I depart
on the ill wind
which carries me
hither, thither
like a
dead leaf.

Ah, nineteenth century poetry, how I love you and your wallowing in emotion. I want to name a story after this poem now. Technically it is too late for a Les Mis story, but eh, minor difficulties.

It occurs to me that, though moderns tend to criticize people of the 19th century (although perhaps not so much the 19th century French) for being repressed - the main criticism of this sort of Romantic poem is that it's too much, too over-the-top, too unrestrained.

***

We've also started reading excerpts from Le Comte de Monte Cristo. I think they must be simplified, but I'm not sure...Does Monte Cristo have ridiculously short chapters?

And what is it with nineteenth century French authors and prisons, you guys? Is there any other literary tradition quite this obsessed with prisons?

***

Have not progressed on Les Mis since we last spoke. However, I do come bearing a pair of Eponine & Cosette stories (which might also be read as Eponine/Cosette, although I kind of think they're tagged that way because pairing stories get more readers. Certainly if I can possibly tag a story as a pairing story, I always do.)

Recs recs )
osprey_archer: (kitty)
Watching Les Miserables has put me irresistibly in mind of the other French novel I’ve read about tragic revolutions: Zola’s Germinal, which reads as if Zola read Les Miserable and said, “You know what is wrong with this book? Way too happy. Two whole characters end up happy, gross.”

I found Germinal so distressing the first time I read it - for class; I can’t imagine I would have finished it otherwise - that I sold it back to the bookstore thereafter, because I couldn’t stand to have it sharing my living space. I have since regretted this, because if you don’t mind having your soul crushed into tiny little pieces by Zola’s determinism, it’s a fascinating read. The characters are so human that you - don’t quite like them, for the most part - but they seem real to you; you worry about them, you hope they’ll do better.

Of course they do not. Literally everyone in this book, workers and bourgeois, ends up worse off, except Souvarine the crazy revolutionary. After his girlfriend died in Moscow - they stared into each other’s eyes the whole time while she was being hung, how’s that for traumatizing? - Souvarine destroyed all vestiges of human feeling in his soul and therefore cannot suffer anything but death. And of course, being a bad person, he doesn’t die.

No, wait, even Souvarine suffers! He loses his pet rabbit - indeed, his landlady feeds him his beloved pet rabbit! Apparently he didn’t quite manage to kill all his softer feelings in the service of the glorious socialist future that will bathe the earth in blood.

In Les Miserables, people talk about how Enjolras’ girlfriend is France. Well, Souvarine scorns to have a girlfriend as warm and touchy-feely as a nation-state. Souvarine’s girlfriend is the frickin’ apocalypse. Building a more just world would be nice, but if it’s not possible Souvarine is perfectly happy to tear down what we have and leave nothing but smoking blood-soaked ruins in its place.

The plot of the book concerns the miners going on strike. When the miners give up, Souvarine is so incensed that he sabotages the mine. And then he sees his friend Etienne about to go into the sabotaged mine, and Souvarine has one last burst of fellow feeling and is all “NO DON'T GO DOWN...oh, wait, you are with your girlfriend Catherine. Human feelings mean you are a failure as a revolutionary, and I will leave you both to your terrible mine cave-in death.”

(I occurs to me that Souvarine and Javert have a lot in common. Oh, Souvarine is a servant of Chaos while Javert is a servant of Order, but they share a black-and-white view of the world and a tremendously unforgiving attitude toward anyone who by their lights sins. I could totally see Souvarine killing himself if he realized that a) the world was more complicated than he had hitherto realized, and b) he therefore lost his nerve and fell short of what he considered his duty.)

Souvarine is my faaaaaaaavorite. In a “NO SOUVARINE DON’T DO IT” kind of way, but still, I’m pretty sure this means there’s something wrong with me.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
On one of her trips to France before I was born, my mother bought Gilbert Delahaye’s Martine Fait la Cuisine. I contracted rather an obsession with the book in first grade. Never mind I couldn’t read the French text - it’s not like I was reading much of anything at that point anyway - the rich, detailed pictures sufficed me.

My mother also filled two albums with photos from France: gold-crusted gates and marzipan shaped into little fruits. Between her photos and Martine, I thought it very likely that France was fairyland.

I didn’t see my mother as a particularly brave person as a child: to me she seemed quiet, reserved, a little old-fashioned. It didn’t occur to me that for her to be only a little old-fashioned signified a tremendous break from her childhood in rural southern Indiana in the fifties. When we went to Turkey last summer, she commented that when she was growing up, Turkey might as well have been the moon for all that it seemed possible that someone could visit it. A girl traveling on her own in a strange land was absolutely foreign to her upbringing.

I grew up traveling, and I love traveling, and I still have to screw up my courage to plunge into trips. My mother’s family never traveled; she didn’t even see the Great Lakes till she was in college. It must have taken tremendous courage for her to fly off to see England and France by herself.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
111213 14151617
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25 2627 28 293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 30th, 2025 04:17 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios