osprey_archer: (books)
[personal profile] osprey_archer
I finished reading Mary McAuliffe's When Paris Sizzled, which is about life in the art world of Paris between the Armistice and the Wall Street Crash, and which I enjoyed very much; I would recommend it to anyone with a prior interest in the time and place.

But I might not recommend it to someone who is just dipping their toe into these waters for the first time, because McAuliffe throws so many different names and relationships at the reader that I think it would be very difficult to keep up if you don't already have a working knowledge of at least some of their stories. I already knew quite a bit about some of the cast of characters - the Hemingways, the Fitzgeralds, Gertrude Stein, Jean Renoir (the famous painter's son and a famous film director in his own right, and also one of the main characters in the charming 2012 French film Renoir), which left a lot of space free to sort out all the others - but I still don't think I got a good grasp on who all the music composers were, for instance.

It's all interesting, mind, I'd be hard pressed to point to any particular strand and say "This. This could have been left out and nothing of value would be lost." The stuff about the rivalry between Citroen and Renault cars, say, seems in some ways out of place with the rest of the book -and yet cars are so central to modernity that they do fit, as well.

Or perhaps the sections about Marie Curie? But those are so small, and Marie Curie is one of the figures that a lot of readers will already have some familiarity with anyway...

So the breadth probably makes this book a bad introduction to the time period: there's simply too much to take in at once. But if you already know something about the era, enough to make your way through the sea of names, it's a fascinating and evocative look at an era.

The strict chronological ordering contributes to the confusion - each chapter consists of little snippets about what our many main characters were doing during that time - but it also gives the book a sense of atmosphere. Because it's all scrambled together like that, you can really feel what a frenetic and busy time this was, culturally speaking, with so many people making so much art and trying to stretch art in so many different directions.

There's not a lot of depth here, but if you have enough prior knowledge to orient yourself, the breadth is breath-taking.

Date: 2016-09-23 01:15 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
Hmmm, I know a fair amount about the 1920s in the US, but not so much about it in France. I'll have to see how confused I end up being when I read this one! It does sound intriguing, though. I somehow associate Marie Curie with a much earlier period, for example.

Date: 2016-09-23 01:18 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com
So did I! But I have noticed in history that people often hang around much longer than I realized: they have a peak decade or two that everyone associates them with forever after, and then they hang around for a few more.

Date: 2016-09-23 03:38 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] wordsofastory.livejournal.com
Haha, yes, very important point.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

March 2026

S M T W T F S
123 4567
8 9 1011121314
1516171819 2021
22 23 24 25262728
293031    

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Mar. 26th, 2026 09:56 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios