osprey_archer: (window)
I haven’t seen The Giver movie and don’t really intend to - the poster strongly suggests to me that its producers don’t actually understand the book - but its existence has gotten me thinking about The Giver again, so in that sense I’m rather beholden to it.

One of the things that makes the book so powerful, I think, is that - at least to me, at age twelve - the society it depicts seems very seductive at the start. Everyone has plenty to eat and a pleasant house to live in. All the children are wanted and well-cared for in stable family units, with a whole raft of thoughtful child-care professionals who work hard to discover their natural abilities. Gender roles are clearly quite forgotten: Jonas’s mother is a Judge and his father is a Nurturer (that is, he looks after babies), and no one thinks anything of it.

In many ways, Jonas’s society looks like a better version of our own. It positions the reader differently than many dystopian novels do. Rather than looking down on an obviously flawed society and waiting (im)patiently for the hero to get with the program and start learning life lessons about Freedom, the reader (at least the young reader who is not genre-savvy about how dystopian novels) just like Jonas, starts out charmed by this society and lives, with Jonas, the journey from enchantment to disillusionment.

In a way, the society in The Giver is a totalitarian’s realized vision: not as it looks from the outside, or in hindsight, when the terrible parts are all too clear, but as it looks from the inside, to believers. And it’s easy to see how a vision that seductive can go so horribly wrong. After all, what price isn’t worth paying for a world where all children are loved and wanted and well-fed? It’s easy to see why so many ordinary people would find that dream seductive.

An orderly society where everyone has a place and knows it - not, in The Giver, because of anything as reactionary as right of bloodline, but because everyone has been assigned a place based on their carefully observed merits. Who can argue that their place in society is too low, when they’ve been placed there by their own genes? Everyone is placed, and everyone is efficient, productive, well-behaved, and content.

And in the end, the world will be so orderly that even love and death will lose their terror: they will be organized in neat ritualized boxes, just like everything else. They will be under human control.

***

Also, the memory-transmitting power is just super cool. I mean really, it's like reading except made flesh. The scene where Jonas gets the transmitted sled memory and he's all WHAT IS EVERYTHING is one of my favorite scenes ever.
osprey_archer: (books)
One last Newbery post, and then I’m done posting about the Newbery Award - at least till they pick the 2014 winner. This time, my theme is “My Favorite Newbery Winners.”

...it turns out that I’ve already written reviews of all of these already. Still, it’s good to have them gathered in one place! Also I’ve tried to be selective, because if I listed everything (Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH! Dead End in Norvelt!) that I enjoyed (A Single Shard! Caddie Woodlawn! Ginger Pye!) then the list would be really quite long.

As a general rule, I’ve tended to enjoy the more recent books more. I don’t think this reflects a change in quality per se, just that writing styles change over time. Still, some of my favorites were older books...

First, the books that I read as a child.

The Witch of Blackbird Pond, by Elizabeth George Speare. Generally speaking, I was firmly anti-romance as a child, but Nat and Kit’s verbal sparring (and Kit’s general disastrous impulsiveness - yes, Kit, teach the Puritan children at your dame school to act out Bible stories! Bring the theater to New England!) was so charming that I loved them despite myself.

From the Mixed-Up Files of Mrs. Basil E. Frankweiler, by E. L. Konigsburg. Because who doesn’t want to run away and live in a museum for a week? That would be totally awesome.

Number the Stars, by Lois Lowry. I took a Spanish class the summer after second grade, and the teacher handed out copies of this book (in English) as prizes. I was the youngest student in the class and never won anything, so he invented a job for me reorganizing a bookshelf purely so he could give me a copy.

I proceeded to read it more or less to death. This book has everything: friendship, history, meditations on the nature of good and evil - even a fairy tale retelling.

And second, the books that I read as part of my project this summer.

Good Masters! Sweet Ladies!: Voices from a Medieval Village, by Laura Amy Schlitz. Have I plugged this book enough yet? It’s far and away my favorite of the Newbery books that I read this summer. The poems are spare and clear, each line packed with story and with history.

The One and Only Ivan, by Katherine Applegate. Because the narrator is a gorilla, and he has an elephant friend - in fact, two elephant friends! - and I love elephants. And, more generally, it’s an interesting meditation on the way that we treat animals.
osprey_archer: (books)
There are a few books in the world that strike me as being simply perfect. I’ve already written about one, The Perilous Gard; and Lois Lowry’s Number the Stars is another.

I adore everything about this book. Even the cover is beautiful (at least on my book: they seem to have made it less stark in newer version, which I don’t approve).

And I love the heroine, of course: Annemarie Johansen, who seems like such an ordinary girl, but shows such reserves of bravery when the Nazis threaten her best friend. The strength of that friendship, which reflects the love that inspired the Danish Gentiles to spirit their Jewish neighbors to safety. (Almost all the Jews in Denmark were saved: an honor shared in occupied Europe only by Bulgaria.)

The way Lowry folds history into the narrative, so that Denmark’s principled resistance of German occupation feels real and vital. Sinking their own Navy so the Nazis couldn’t use it. The Danish Resistance, flitting through the margins of the story. Denmark’s King Christian X, riding his horse through Copenhagen, a silent reminder to his people to stay strong and unbroken by the occupation.

The king on his horse (for all that Annemarie comments he’s “not like fairy tale kings”) adds to the subtle fairy tale motif woven through the book. Annemarie’s little sister likes to hear fairy stories; Annemarie tells herself Little Red Riding Hood to keep her spirits up when she’s on an urgent mission - and runs into the Nazis right as she comes to the wolf.

This was the first really serious book I read on my own. It’s about bravery, and pride - not vainglorious pride, but basic human dignity - and having the strength and courage to keep that pride even when outside forces try to destroy it. The Danes have been conquered, the Jews are being hunted, and the Rosens have had to abandon everything to escape with their lives -

But their shoulders were as straight as they had been in the past: in the classroom, on the stage, at the Sabbath table. So there were other sources, too, of pride, and they had not left everything behind.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
111213 14151617
18 19 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 04:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios