osprey_archer: (books)
I decided that I want to wrap up the Newbery Honor books of the 1940s before I leave Indianapolis, and in pursuit of this possibly deranged quest, I’ve been rocketing through books.

According to Wikipedia, Catherine Besterman’s The Quaint and Curious Quest of Johnny Longfoot is a retelling of a Polish folktale. It’s also a return of the Alice in Wonderland absurdism which always makes me crow with delight when I find it in a Newbery book, which is rather puzzling, because outside of Alice in Wonderland itself, this is almost never a literary mode I enjoy.

The Quaint and Curious Quest of Johnny Longfoot concerns Johnny Longfoot, son of a shoemaker, who goes to visit his incredibly miserly uncle, who insists that Johnny has to pay for touching his turf, breathing his air, etc. As Johnny is broke, he sets out on a quest to the King of Cats, who sends him to an island full of treasure to fetch a pair of seven-league boots and resize them to fit a cat. Johnny’s uncle, convinced that Johnny will cheat him, comes along for the ride, then fills the boat with treasure and sails off, leaving everyone else behind… only to realize that he forgot to bring any fresh water aboard, and his treasure will not save his life! So he gives up being a miser and starts giving everything away.

As with most absurdist books I felt fairly meh about this, but I do love the fact that the Newbery committee picked it. Before 1960, one of the Newbery award criteria appears to have been “will children enjoy this book?” which seems to have dropped out about the time that the awards committee got addicted to dead dogs, greatly to the detriment of the award.

However, some of the other 1960s changes were all to the good: the award became much more sensitive about racial issues later on. In the 1940s, by contrast, Mary Jane Carr’s Young Mac of Fort Vancouver features a mixed-race hero (half-Scottish and half-Cree) whose main conflict is deciding whether to be an Indian or a white man. This is kind of a stand-in for making a career choice (is he going to be a voyageur, or go to school to become a doctor?), but is always expressed in racial terms.

Also a medicine man spends most of the book trying to kill Young Mac, before deciding to try to recruit him as a new medicine man, and by recruit I definitely mean “hold him captive after Young Mac is injured falling off a horse.” But then the medicine man dies conveniently of fever, which has been cutting a swathe through the local tribe because of the medicine man’s ineffective cures, so… poetic justice, I guess?

Eva Roe Gaggin’s Down Ryton Water also has some issues on this front, but mostly it’s the story of how the Pilgrims emigrated from Scrooby (down the Ryton, hence the title) to Holland to America. I found this a bit of a slog, to be honest; one of those books that just never took off for me, though I’m not sure why. It’s not that I disliked any of the characters, but I also didn’t care about them deeply, and found it weirdly difficult to keep track of who was who.

Finally, I read Holling C. Holling’s Seabird, which I was dreading because I found Holling’s later Minn of the Mississippi an endless slog. But Seabird is a breeze! A whirlwind tour through a century of changing transportation technology: a whaling ship, a clipper, a steamboat, and a plane, all seen through the eyes of four generations of a family and a scrimshaw seabird carved by the patriarch when he was a cabin boy on the whaling vessel.
osprey_archer: (books)
Galloping through the Newbery books again! Today we start out with a couple of biographies. Quite unexpectedly, these biographies have become one of my favorite Newbery genres, possibly because I feel an illicit thrill every time the mid-twentieth century biographers shamelessly invent dialogue.

Clara Ingram Judson’s Theodore Roosevelt, Fighting Patriot is a particularly good example: when Judson wishes to illuminate the mood of the country, she writes a conversation such as you might hear from a bunch of old man loafing in front of the store, discussing the prospect of war or Teddy’s chances in the next election. (Side note: Teddy apparently hated the nickname Teddy.)

Theodore Roosevelt is one of those gob-smackingly energetic people who achieves more before breakfast than most of us do in a week: he buys a ranch, becomes the police commissioner of New York, leads a charge up San Juan Hill, raises six children (and while obviously he had a lot of help with that, he was also a very involved father!), becomes president of the United States, and also just occasionally tosses off a book as a little side project. SIR. HOW. I realize that he didn’t have the internet or the television to distract him but NONETHELESS.

In soothing contrast, Tom Paine emerges from Leo Gurko’s Tom Paine, Freedom’s Apostle as a far less energetic figure, a man who had failed at everything he tried before, in his late thirties, he washed up on the shores of the United States just at the right time to inflame pro-independence opinion in the colonies with his pamphlet Common Sense. He followed this up with thirteen more pamphlets, published at intervals throughout the Revolution (also in the interstices of Paine’s own service as a soldier: he loved to be near the front), then spent the rest of his life acting as a gadfly, suggesting such hare-brained schemes as old-age pensions, and nearly dying in the French Revolution once the Jacobins got wind of his notable lack of enthusiasm for executing the former King and Queen.

Also, delighted to learn that Tom Paine’s bones went missing after his death, which may explain the origin of the song “Tom Paine’s Bones.” Evidently a Paine disciple dug up Paine’s remains, shipped them back to England, and then lost track of them.

Holling C. Holling’s Minn of the Mississippi follows a three-legged snapping turtle, Minn, as she drifts down the full length of the Mississippi. (Evidently snapping turtles with the full complement of legs can drag themselves back upstream, which would of course spoil the conceit of the book.) We learn about the geology, zoology, botany, and anthropology of the river (anthropology including both the history of the river and what people are doing with it in the now of 1951). I love this as a conceit but struggled with the execution, which is often pretty dry.

Finally, back to fiction: Natalie Savage Carlson’s The Family Under the Bridge features three Parisian children who live under a bridge after their father dies. I had envisioned a Boxcar Children type story, but in fact that protagonist and main focus of the story is the cranky old tramp with a heart of gold who becomes their protector, allegedly against his will, although in fact within about two pages of meeting the children he is already ride-or-die for them.

It’s fine for what it is, but to be honest I was really looking forward to the Boxcar Children-type story I had imagined, so I was a little disappointed.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2345
6789101112
13141516171819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 3rd, 2025 12:57 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios