Book Review: The Robber Girl
Aug. 25th, 2024 02:52 pmAs
skygiants and
genarti and I are all fans of Franny Billingsley’s, we decided to read her most recent release The Robber Girl as a buddy read, which was both a good and a bad decision.
In some ways, this is the perfect book for a buddy read. It’s a book with lots of mysteries, big and small, starting with “Is this a Snow Queen retelling?” We established within a couple of chapters that indeed it is not.
Instead, it’s set in a version of the Wild West very slightly off-kilter from our own world. In some ways it clearly is our own world: they celebrate Valentine’s Day and get dolls from France and horses from Belgium. But it is also a world where, if you don’t give a penny in return for a knife, the knife will quite literally cut you of its own accord; where some people have Afflictions, like permanently bloody hands for killing a child, or our heroine’s inability to speak until spoken to, which is a punishment for…
Well, we don’t know. Her past is also a mystery, and like the worldbuilding, we had a great time trying to figure it out.
However, at the end we agreed that the book really wasn’t designed to be read this closely, and probably suffered from this level of scrutiny.
Some of the problems we knew from the beginning weren’t really problems, but a mismatch between the questions we wanted to ask and the answers the book was interested in offering. For instance, I wanted to know how the cult of the Blue Rose, the predominant religious organization in the territory, fit in with other nineteenth-century religious splinter movements, and wasn’t it odd that it didn’t seem to have any relationship at all with Christianity, not even an oppositional one? But I fully acknowledge that this is just me and my weird preoccupation with 19th century utopian communities, which 99% of Billingsley’s readers will not share.
However, I do think the last few chapters genuinely do go off. My impression is that Billingsley wrote herself a little bit into a corner: suddenly the book is almost over, almost none of the questions have been answered, and she needs to cram as many answers as possible into that last little bit of space, and some of the answers don’t make sense and the answers that DO make sense don’t have much room to breathe.
But, although the ending is unsatisfying, I don’t think it’s bad in a way that spoils what came before, and I really did enjoy reading it, and the way that Billingsley plays with language, like her heroine’s arguments with her dagger:
An imperfect but engrossing read.
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
In some ways, this is the perfect book for a buddy read. It’s a book with lots of mysteries, big and small, starting with “Is this a Snow Queen retelling?” We established within a couple of chapters that indeed it is not.
Instead, it’s set in a version of the Wild West very slightly off-kilter from our own world. In some ways it clearly is our own world: they celebrate Valentine’s Day and get dolls from France and horses from Belgium. But it is also a world where, if you don’t give a penny in return for a knife, the knife will quite literally cut you of its own accord; where some people have Afflictions, like permanently bloody hands for killing a child, or our heroine’s inability to speak until spoken to, which is a punishment for…
Well, we don’t know. Her past is also a mystery, and like the worldbuilding, we had a great time trying to figure it out.
However, at the end we agreed that the book really wasn’t designed to be read this closely, and probably suffered from this level of scrutiny.
Some of the problems we knew from the beginning weren’t really problems, but a mismatch between the questions we wanted to ask and the answers the book was interested in offering. For instance, I wanted to know how the cult of the Blue Rose, the predominant religious organization in the territory, fit in with other nineteenth-century religious splinter movements, and wasn’t it odd that it didn’t seem to have any relationship at all with Christianity, not even an oppositional one? But I fully acknowledge that this is just me and my weird preoccupation with 19th century utopian communities, which 99% of Billingsley’s readers will not share.
However, I do think the last few chapters genuinely do go off. My impression is that Billingsley wrote herself a little bit into a corner: suddenly the book is almost over, almost none of the questions have been answered, and she needs to cram as many answers as possible into that last little bit of space, and some of the answers don’t make sense and the answers that DO make sense don’t have much room to breathe.
But, although the ending is unsatisfying, I don’t think it’s bad in a way that spoils what came before, and I really did enjoy reading it, and the way that Billingsley plays with language, like her heroine’s arguments with her dagger:
No birds sang, no squirrels scrabbled in the indigo tree. The air held is breath, waiting for snow.
“Air can’t hold its breath,” said the dagger. “Air is breath.”
Bu the air was waiting for snow. I was waiting, too, and I was also waiting for morning, when I could go to the jail and tell Gentleman Jack I’d never betray him.
An imperfect but engrossing read.