osprey_archer: (Default)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

“We’re not programmed to register more than a hundred corpses. In heaps they simply become a landscape feature.”

I finished Margaret Atwood’s The Tent, a book of short stories - flash fiction, really, in many cases, some of them are barely more than a page. I must admit that I often wanted them to be longer, for there to be more to sink my teeth into - but they do share with Atwood’s novels that razor-edged humor, the wry dark way of looking at the world.

I was hoping that Deborah Yaffe’s Among the Janeites: A Journey through the World of Jane Austen Fandom would be something along the lines of a detailed fandom wank guide: allll about the Fanny Price wars! Not to mention a more critical attitude toward Arnie Perlstein, whom she notes is such an obnoxious commentator that message board moderators have been forced to warn each other about him, but this is mentioned almost as an aside. Instead it’s more of a general tour of the many different types of Austen fandom, dipping a toe into the worlds of Austen cosplay, Austen fanfic, Austen profic etc, without getting very detailed about any of it.

However, I did like Yaffe’s summation of Austen’s widespread appeal. “The rich diversity of responses to Austen captures something real about her - the depth and complexity of her writings, which, like diamonds held up to sunlight, reflect something different from every angle. Her stories are not blank canvases onto which we project ourselves; they are complicated, ambiguous pictures of lived reality. We all find ourselves in her because, in a sense, she contains us all.”

I’ve returned to the Eleanor Estes’ Moffat books, continuing the series with Rufus M.It’s poignant to realize that Estes was writing this retrospective about the end of World War I while the world was still in the thick of World War II.

“Look!” he exclaimed in excitement. And all the Moffats drew around the stove and looked in. They looked at the word that stood out on the burnt sheet of newspaper. In tremulous, glowing letters lit by the last glow from that burning paper, as though it were seen through the water of an ocean, was the one word PEACE, the headline of Joey’s newspaper.

Mama looked at the word and the children looked too, silently. Then Mama said again, “Yes, you know what that means, don’t you? It means better times are coming now, for all the people.”

And she took the poker and gently scattered the charred fragments of the newspaper and of the papers on which the children had written, so that all the dreams and wishes and plans of the Moffats were gathered in a little pile in the middle of the stove where they soon were wafted up the chimney and became part of the air.


What I’m Reading Now

Nathalia Holt’s The Queens of Animation: The Untold Story of the Women Who Transformed the World of Disney and Made Cinematic History languished on my to-read pile for ages, but I’ve finally begun it and I’ve learned so much not only about Disney’s female animators, but also about the sheer process of animation, which I must confess I always vaguely envisioned working like one of those flip books where you turn the pages real fast and the sketches appear to move.

(Also, there were at least two different female Disney animators in the 1930s & 40s with powerful interests in aviation. Someone ought to inform Elizabeth Wein.)

I’ve also begun Mary Norris’s Between You & Me: Confessions of a Comma Queen, a memoir about Norris’s time as copy-editor at the New Yorker and also general musings about grammar. “Sing to me, o Muse, of that small minority of men who are secure enough in their masculinity to use the feminine third-person singular!”

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve been beavering away at the story I mentioned last week, the one with the boarding school friends who reconnect after much suffering in World War I, and I have decided that in this pursuit I obviously must read the sequel to David Blaize (although apparently David Blaize and the Blue Door is in fact a prequel and also a fantasy novel even though David Blaize had no fantasy elements? Weird flex, but okay), and also I have REALIZED that this is the perfect opportunity for me to read all sorts of books that I’ve meant to read for ages because they influenced Tolkien and/or C. S. Lewis. Obviously what the readers of m/m romances want is for the characters to have vociferous opinions about William Morris’s The House of the Wolfings.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Buckle up, buttercups, because this week I finished MANY books. I had a number of books that were almost done and I thought… might as well knock them all out this week.

First, I finished Kate Douglas Wiggin’s Polly Oliver’s Problem, which despite the title does not feature any cross-dressing. Yes, I know. I was disappointed too.

In fact, Polly Oliver’s problem is how to support herself and her mother now that her mother’s failing health makes it impossible for her to continue taking boarders. Polly starts the book with a plan: she will become a kindergarten teacher. She then… makes no progress toward this plan whatsoever, ends up accidentally taking another boarder when her friend’s older brother falls in with a bad crowd at college and needs to be reformed, and then accidentally makes the acquaintance of Mrs. Bird, a character from Wiggin’s previous novel The Birds’ Christmas Carol (in which Mrs. Bird’s daughter Carol dies a tragic and angelic death), who takes Polly in after her mother dies and sets her up as a professional storyteller.

The book was enjoyable as I read (Wiggin also wrote Rebecca of Sunnybrook Farm; she knows how to entertain a reader), but looking at it as a whole - what odd plotting. The reformation of the college student in particular gets dropped like a hot potato; it looks like the book’s setting the chap up as Polly’s love interest, but then Polly's mother dies and he writes Polly a nice letter about how much the Olivers helped him and he’d like to help her in return… and that’s the end of it.

I also limped to the end of Kathi Appelt’s The Underneath, a Newbery Honor book from 2009, which is about two kittens who are born underneath a battered house in the Louisiana bayou, where they must stay because otherwise the house’s owner Gar Face would use them as alligator bait… but of course one of them disobeys.

I found this hard to get through, not because of the story, but because of the style. “Soon this storm would blow through these piney woods,” it tells you. “And it would pack a punch. Batten your hatches. Close your doors. Do not go out into that stormy night.” And it does this sort of thing quite a lot, and it always jarred me out of the story.

On a brighter note, I read The Moffats and The Middle Moffat, the first two books in Eleanor Estes’ Moffat quartet, which I’ve meant to read for ages. These books were published in the 1940s and set around the time of World War I, which makes for a double dose of nostalgia. Despite being set during the war, these are emphatically not war books: it’s just a quiet affectionate picture of American small town life during the 1910s.

And last! But assuredly not least! I finished Margaret Atwood’s The Penelopiad, which surprised me by being quite a funny book, which is perhaps surprising when you consider that it’s telling Penelope’s side of the Odyssey, with particular attention to the twelve maids who are killed at the end of that epic. But much of this book is set in the underworld, after the characters are already dead, and Atwood draws a lot of dark humor for the Greek underworld and Greek mythology in general.

I picture the gods, diddling around on Olympus, wallowing in the nectar and ambrosia and the aroma of burning bones and fat, mischievous as a pack of ten-year-olds with a sick cat to play with and a lot of time on their hands. ‘Which prayer shall we answer today?’ they ask one another. ‘Let’s cast dice! Hope for this one, despair for that one, and while we’re at it, let’s destroy the life of that woman over there by having sex with her in the form of a crayfish!’


What I’m Reading Now

[personal profile] holyschist clued me in that Gerald Durrell in fact wrote THREE memoirs about his family’s time on Corfu, so I have happily flung myself into the second one, Birds, Beasts, and Relatives, which kicks off with Gerry’s family berating him for their portrayal in his first memoir, till his mother pipes up, “The only thing I thought [was wrong with the book] was that he hadn’t used all the best stories.”

His mother is absolutely right! It turns out that the TV show The Durrells in Corfu drew almost all its first season stories from this book. You wonder why Gerald Durrell saved them for the second book in his trilogy of family memoirs.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve got Emily Nagoski’s Burnout: The Secret to Unlocking the Stress Cycle, which will be either the perfect book for 2020 or completely useless for 2020. I’m not sure how you get off the stress cycle when the stressor is “the president would sit cheerfully on top of a pile of our corpses.”
osprey_archer: (books)
More Newbery medal books! In case you don’t want to wade through it all, this entry contains: Marguerite De Angeli’s The Door in the Wall, medieval historical fiction novel about a youth who loses the use of his legs, Kate Seredy’s Hun epic The White Stag, and Eleanor Estes’s family adventure with dog, Ginger Pye (with bonus discussion of Estes’s The Hundred Dresses).

Marguerite De Angeli’s medieval historical fiction novel The Door in the Wall features Robin, who awakens one morning mysteriously unable to walk. Robin learns to lope around on crutches, to swim, to play the harp and write and whittle wonderful things; the door in the wall is a metaphor for finding another way forward when one’s original plans, like Robin’s plan to be a knight, are blocked by unexpected barriers. He can’t be a knight if he can’t walk; but he finds other talents he can use.

I am almost positive that long ago I read, or had read to me, the first chapter or two. I suspect we stopped reading because I was terrified by the idea that you could go to bed one night, just as usual, and wake up unable to walk. (We also stopped reading Susan Fletcher’s Dragon’s Milk because I found Lyf’s plague too upsetting - though I did get back to that series while I was still a child. I am not a fan of books about sudden and terrible diseases.)

Second, Kate Seredy’s The White Stag, which is not a novel. Oh, it has many of the accoutrements of a novel, chapters and illustrations (and lovely illustrations they are, too); but it is in fact an epic.

It spans generations, larger-than-life hero succeeding larger-than-life hero, all of them referred to not by name but by epithet: Nimrod, Mighty Hunter before the Lord; Magyar and Hunor, Twin Eagles of Hadur; Bendeguz, White Eagle of the Moon; ending, at last, with Attila the Conqueror. And the narration sustains the elevated, mythic tone set up in these names.

Personally I find mythic diction - indeed, epics in general - airless and dull. So I didn’t enjoy the book very much, but it’s well-done for what it is, and I suspect children who have a taste for the epic find this a soul-stirring introduction to the genre.

And finally, Eleanor Estes’ Ginger Pye, an engaging comfort read about featuring Rachel and Jerry Pye, who adopt a dog (Ginger Pye, naturally), only to have their dog stolen. The stolen dog storyline provides a light framework for the book, which is mostly a digression-laden meander through their small town and Pye family stories. It reminds me of a much lighter and more New England To Kill a Mockingbird.

I think this is a case where the right author won, but for the wrong book. I enjoyed Ginger Pye, but Estes clearly should have gotten the medal for The Hundred Dresses, a gentle and sensitive story about bullying. Maddie disapproves but does not try to stop her friends’ teasing of a classmate named Wanda, only to realize too late just how badly that teasing hurt Wanda.

What I like particularly like about this book is that Maddie’s realization comes only after Wanda has moved away, when it’s too late to make amends. Realizing that you have done wrong and can’t right it except by doing better towards others in the future is an uncommon literary theme: it’s melancholy (because the harm is irrevocable) without being hopeless (because Maddie will try to do better). It’s a difficult mood to capture.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Elizabeth George Speare’s The Bronze Bow. I loved The Witch of Blackbird Pond so much as a child, why did I fail to read all the rest of Speare’s work? But perhaps it’s as well that I didn’t. The Bronze Bow is about Judaea in the first century AD and therefore unavoidably about Jesus.

Our hero is a young fellow named Daniel, who hates Romans so much (for reasons that are slowly revealed and suitable devastating) that he spits whenever he sees a Roman soldier, and dreams of the day when he can take part in a rebellion to drive the Roman usurpers into the sea. Naturally he is pretty much horrified when he realizes that Jesus is not going to lead an armed rebellion of any kind.

Also naturally - and this is a spoiler, although if you’ve read anything ever I bet you can see it coming from a mile away - In the end )

A fanciful corner of my mind is convinced that Elizabeth George Speare, Elizabeth Marie Pope, and Rosemary Sutcliff have a weekly tea party in the Great Reading Room in the sky, where all good authors go after death. They are all three children’s historical fiction writers with a slight mystical bent who wrote between 1950 and 1980, clearly that is enough to be getting on with! I bet they come up with five amazing book ideas per tea party.

What I’m Reading Now

Louisa May Alcott’s Under the Lilacs. I’ve always thought it was kind of embarrassing that I wrote my senior thesis about nineteenth century literature for American girls without having read Alcott’s entire oeuvre.

What I Plan to Read Next

My bookshelf tells me Eleaner Estes’s Ginger Pye and Katherine Applegate’s The One and Only Ivan. Yes! The author of the Animorphs and Everworld series (serieses? serii?) won a Newbery medal just this year! Maybe this means we’ll finally get an ending for Everworld...

I’ve always thought it was odd that Applegate, having set up a golden opportunity for the quartet to return permanently to Earth (and thus have a conclusion that actually concluded), proceeded to leave them in Everworld at the end of the last book. Maybe she wanted to leave it open to our imagination that our intrepid young explorers were traipsing around Everworld having adventures?

But frankly, staying in Everworld forever seemed totally unappealing - it was so bloody and dangerous and full of mean hyper-powered beings! So the ending seemed inconclusive and untidy to me.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

June 2025

S M T W T F S
1 2 34567
891011121314
15161718192021
22232425262728
2930     

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jun. 3rd, 2025 09:05 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios