osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Carol Ryrie Brink’s Winter Cottage, a wonderful book! Near the beginning of the Great Depression, Minty and Eggs are on the road with their sweet but feckless father when their car breaks down… right next to someone’s charming isolated lakeshore summer cottage. As their current destination is the back bedroom of an aunt who emphatically does not want to put them up, they make only some half-hearted attempts to fix the car before settling into the cottage for the winter. (Conveniently, they arrive with a winter’s worth of provisions, left over from their father’s latest failed business venture: a grocery store.) Exactly as cozy as a book with such a premise should be.

I also read Gerald Durrell’s Catch Me a Colobus, because I realized that the local library has a few of his books I hadn’t read and instantly could not survive another moment with a fresh Gerald Durrell book in my life. This one is a bit of a hodgepodge, I suspect because Durrell wrote it swiftly to get funds to shore up his zoo, which is mostly what the first third of the book is about, as he returned from a collecting trip to find the zoo hovering on the edge of bankruptcy. We continue on a trip to Sierra Leone for his first BBC series (this is the bit that the title comes from, as colobus monkeys are high on his list for the collecting trip), and end with a trip to Mexico to collect the rare Teporingo, a volcano-dwelling rabbit in danger of extinction.

Although hopping from continent to continent like this makes the book a bit formless, Durrell’s prose is a delight as always. I love his metaphors, perfectly apt and entirely unexpected: the “slight squeak” of a Teporingo, “like somebody rubbing a damp thumb over a balloon,” or the experience of walking through a forest of massive bamboo stalks, which “creak and groan musically” in the slightest wind; “It must have sounded like that rounding the Horn in an old sailing ship in high wind.”

What I’m Reading Now

Traipsing along in Women’s Weird. In any anthology, the quality is inevitably a bit uneven, but overall it’s quite high. The scariest story so far is May Sinclair’s “Where Their Fire Is Not Quenched” (a pair of lovers stuck together in Hell for all eternity, even though in life they deeply bored each other); Edith Wharton’s “Kerfol” is a classic spooky ghost story, while my favorite for sheer strength of voice is Edith Nesbit’s “The Shadow.” Oh, props to Margery Lawrence for making a saucepan deeply ominous in “The Haunted Saucepan.” The way it just sits there, boiling, on a cold stove…

I should be hitting D. K. Broster’s story (“Couching at the Door”) next week. Excited to report back!

What I Plan to Read Next

An account of getting distracted by Winter Cottage and Catch Me a Colobus, I have made almost no progress on the books I earnestly desired to make progress on last week. Well, such is the reading life. Sometimes a book comes along that you want to read more than anything else, and it’s best to strike while the iron is hot.
osprey_archer: (books)
I just finished Edith Wharton's House of Mirth. I think there is only one way to express the range and depths of my feelings about this book, and that is to scream, "What the fuck, Edith Wharton! What the fuck?"

So our heroine - I use this word loosely - our heroine is Lily Bart, scion of Old New York, whose chief object in life is to marry a rich husband and live in luxury. But! She is tragically incapable of fulfilling this goal, because her immense sensitivity makes it impossible for her to marry a man she does not love: she keeps coming to the cusp of a proposal, then sabotaging herself.

This would be an infinitely more sympathetic story if Lily's sensitivity did not seem to consist chiefly of an exquisite scorn for everyone who is not exactly to her taste. This means everyone in the world except for Lawrence Selden, the man she loves but will not marry because...because...it's never quite explained. Selden's part of high society, so it's not his position, and he seems to have a reasonable amount of money.

It's not just that I think her goals are unlikely to bring her happiness (though I do), and therefore find it frustrating that she clings to them. Not is it solely that I think she's a shallow, petty person, far less sympathetic than Wharton seems to believe (though I think that too).

She's so bloody helpless. The narrative offers her dozens of ways out of her predicament. She gets marriage offers, both from her beloved Selden and from sundry other rich men; she gets a legacy from her aunt; she has it in her power to blackmail her enemies; she has a friend who would be happy to let her move in till she gets back on her feet.

But no! None of these are acceptable to Lily! They all somehow offend her scruples - we get dragged through every vicissitude of her scruples. Her scruples are exactly nice enough to make it impossible for her to extricate herself from her difficulties, though not fine enough to prevent any of them.

spoilers )
osprey_archer: (kitty)
Packing up my apartment. Also cleaning it. My winter of dedicated tea-drinking has left an apparently indelible ring around the drain of the sink. >.<

Also listening to Edith Wharton The Age of Innocence. (I've just discovered the joy of listening to audio books while I drive. Why didn't I realize this earlier? Think of all the books I could have ingested during my commute!) Has anyone else read this? Did you feel a deep and compelling urge to throttle Newland Archer?

He gets engaged to May, who seems like a perfectly charming person, only to immediately fall in love with her beautiful and exotic cousin Madame Olenska - but despite realizing that his feelings for Madame Olenska will poison his marriage with May, he goes ahead with his engagement anyway even though May offers to release him. Because...because...it's never explained exactly why it would be too much effort to extract himself from a marriage that's preordained to be unhappy, but clearly it is.

This preordination, let me add, is entirely of Newland's making: he could be happy with Mary if he was willing to try, but no. Newland Archer would much rather wallow in his adoration of Madame Olenska (and assume that she's fated to be with him, no matter how clearly she says WE CAN NEVER BE TOGETHER), sneer at May for being shallow and insufficiently artistic (never mind Newland also lacks depth, compassion, and artistic talent himself), and luxuriate in his own exquisite misery than make an effort to be a good husband and a good man.

...I hope the books ends with May and Madame Olenska running away to Monte Carlo together. They both deserve someone so much better than Newland Archer.
osprey_archer: (books)
I am so sorry that I didn't bring A Room with a View with me. It was the first grown-up classic I ever read, a gift from my seventh-grade English teacher (he was totally amazing), and for these reasons as well as its intrinsic merit I am devoted to the book. Lucy Honeychurch is a wonderful heroine, ordinary in a way that is heroic, and Forster has such wonderful insight into people; Lucy's long-suffering cousin Charlotte is a masterpiece.

I think George Emerson is rather flat, though. He's a bit too perfect a romantic hero, angsty as Rochester but without the rough edges that make him interesting.

Instead I'm stuck with George Eliot's Middlemarch, which is not an acceptable substitute. She keeps pausing to explain to us why we should feel sympathy for odious people, which slows her pacing to a glacial speed and, more crucially, backfires. I might have sympathized for Casaubon for being so pathetically insecure, but five pages telling me why I ought to feel bad for him...? I refuse to have my sympathies dictated! Revolt! Vive la France!

Eliot displays this bizarre mixture of grimness and sentimentality that I find particularly hard to take. It's most obvious in Silas Marner (I've read three of Eliot's books. Whyyyyyyyy do I keep doing this to myself?), where miserly Silas is Saved by the Love of a Golden-Haired Child, who is the product of a grim subplot about either bigamy or illegitimacy and dying in quarries.

And! And! As I'm ranting about Eliot already! The way she handles female characters bugs me. She seems dedicated to a peculiarly conservative model of gender relations - more so than Austen or the sisters Bronte, so you can't just blame it on the times.

But she's still not as irritating as Edith Wharton, so I suppose it could be worse.

ETA: And by Edith Wharton I definitely mean Willa Cather, because I haven't read any Wharton except Ethan Frome.

ETA, a year after the fact: And now that I have read some Edith Wharton, I apologize to her unreservedly. Her female characters are delightful. It's the male characters I sometimes want to strangle.

ETA, after reading House of Mirth: Actually, I don't want to apologize to Edith Wharton, because Lily Bart is so irritating in every conceivable way.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
111213 14151617
18 19 20 21 22 2324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 24th, 2025 08:15 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios