osprey_archer: (books)
I am returned from Massachusetts! As I was busy visiting Louisa May Alcott’s house, eating lobster rolls, plundering the bookstore at the Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art etc., I didn’t do a whole lot of reading on the trip, but I thought I would go ahead and post about what reading I did.

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Delighted to inform you that in Concord (at Barrow Books, a delightful bookshop) I did indeed find one of Jane Langton’s Hall Family Chronicles - moreover, one I’ve never gotten my hands on before, The Swing in the Summerhouse! Happily I informed the bookseller that I had just that morning recreated Georgie’s walk from her house (based on an actual ornate Victorian house in Concord, 148 Walden Street!) to Walden Pond, (actually I did it backward, starting at Walden Pond and working my way in), and she gave me $10 off the purchase price and also a cup of tea.

This series is so variable. As a kid I loved and reread over and over The Diamond in the Window and The Fledgling, and although I didn’t find The Fragile Flag till after college, I remember it very well. Yet twice I’ve read books in this series and then entirely forgotten them: The Time Bike and The Astonishing Stereoscope (the book I was so pleased to find a few weeks ago!) completely slipped out of my head.

I suspect that The Swing in the Summerhouse might fall into this category, although on the other hand I may remember it because of the unforgettable tale of its acquisition.

I also listened to Ursula K. Le Guin’s Tehanu on audiobook! I understand that the main pairing in this book is controversial, but as [personal profile] littlerhymes can attest, I started calling Ged “dungeon boyfriend” the moment he showed up in The Tombs of Atuan, so all in all I was delighted by this turn of events.

Last but assuredly not least! My long Dracula journey is over, as Dracula Daily has come to an end. (It turns out that the ending is a trifle anticlimactic when you stretch it out over a week, but IIRC I found the ending abrupt in high school too, so perhaps it’s just like that always.) I am pining slightly, but I’ve signed up for Whale Weekly (a three-year odyssey through Moby-Dick) AND regular installments of Sherlock Holmes in 2023, so perhaps those will fill the Dracula Daily hole in my heart.

What I’m Reading Now

[personal profile] skygiants gave me Phyllis Ann Karr’s At Amberleaf Fair, and I’ve gotten just a few chapters into it, so I’m still sorting out the quirkily elaborate worldbuilding. Our hero has just had a chat with a toy that he accidentally brought to life, an incident that seems to encapsulate the atmosphere of the book in miniature.

And at Commonwealth Books, [personal profile] genarti recommended Ruth Goodman’s The Domestic Revolution: How the Introduction of Coal into Victorian Homes Changed Everything, one of those fascinating nonfiction books with a subtitle completely at odds with the book’s actual thesis! Goodman is in fact writing about the introduction of coal into homes in Elizabethan London, and her argument is that Londoners’ familiarity with coal as a domestic product helped kickstart the Industrial Revolution; coal did of course eventually reach the rest of England (and thence the world), but the part that changed everything is way before the Victorian era. I suppose the publishers couldn’t stand to put the word “Elizabethan” in the title of a book about coal.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve figured out how to get my paws on the final two books in the Hall Family Chronicles, The Mysterious Circus and The Dragon Tree, and I’ve decided I owe it to myself to finish up the series.
osprey_archer: (Default)
I’m leaving for my trip to Massachusetts tomorrow! So I’m posting my Wednesday Reading Meme today to sweep the decks clean before I go.

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

[personal profile] littlerhymes and I finished Mary Stewart’s The Last Enchantment, the final book of the original Merlin trilogy, although Stewart went ahead and published a fourth book a few years later. The Last Enchantment nonetheless feels like a conclusion - I’d be certainly very surprised if Merlin narrates the next book - for it takes us through the end of Merlin’s story, and indeed beyond the usual end: he’s buried alive in his crystal cave, as is his usual end, but here he’s rescued and at the end of the book is living in retirement, an old man tired yet content, frequently visited by the king.

We were particularly interested in the book’s ambiguous treatment of Nimue. Is she truly in love with Merlin? Pretending to love him to steal his power? Not stealing his power at all, but learning all his skills so she can take up his mantel as Arthur’s sorcerer, just as Merlin bade her?

Pat Barker’s The Ghost Road, the third book in the Regeneration trilogy, alternates between Billy Prior, who is headed back to the front now that he’s been released from Craiglockhart, and his counselor Rivers, who spends most of the book ill to the point of delirium, recollecting his fieldwork among the headhunters of Melanesia. The colonial rulers of Melanesia had forbidden headhunting, and because their entire culture had been organized around the headhunt, they were basically pining away in despair.

Rivers doesn’t draw a direct parallel, but there’s clearly a meditation here about war as a bearer of cultural meaning - whose cultural meaning is perhaps divorced from anything that a reasonable person might consider a “war aim.” The point of the headhunt is the headhunt. It’s not meant to win territory or settle a point of politics by other means or Defeat Autocracy; the point is to take heads. We’re here because we’re here because we’re here because we’re here.

Spoilers )

Nghi Vo’s When the Tiger Came Down the Mountain is a sequel to The Empress of Salt and Fortune, also featuring a cleric who travels the countryside collecting knowledge/stories, also very concerned with how stories change depending who tell them. In this case, Chih is telling the story of a human-tiger romance to a trio of tigers who may eat them… or might leave Chih alive to go home and correct the record with what the tigers consider the real version, although they are grumpily aware that Chih will probably just put it down as a competing version, equal in weight with the clearly incorrect human story!

Finally, there’s a new Baby-Sitters Club graphic novel out! Jessi’s Secret Language is one that I read as a kid (in general I read all the Very Special Episode books about disabilities), and it was fun to revisit it now, especially because I’ve actually seen a production of Coppelia, the ballet that Jessi stars in. In fact, I think my desire to see that ballet stems from this book! (Almost all my other ballet feelings come from Princess Tutu. Someday I WILL see Swan Lake and Giselle.)

What I’m Reading Now

In Dracula, Dracula has end-run our heroes! They have now split up to chase him, one team by land and one by waterway… Will they be able to kill him before he reaches his castle stronghold??

What I Plan to Read Next

To my distress, I have discovered that I weeded Jane Langton’s The Diamond in the Window from my collection! So I’ll only be taking The Fledgling and the recently-acquired The Astonishing Stereoscope to Massachusetts with me.
osprey_archer: (Default)
Three final Newbery Honor books from the 1930s, and then I am giving the project a rest! …Until my weeklong sojourn in my hometown just before Thanksgiving, at which point I will be plundering the Purdue Library’s Newbery holdings, because you have to get these things where you can get them.

Armstrong Sperry’s All Sail Set is a boy-meets-boat adventure. Our hero falls in love with the clipper ship Flying Cloud while it’s still a mere model on the shipbuilder’s desk, watches it built from his perch as shipbuilder’s apprentice, and then sails with it on its maiden voyage! This is his strongest relationship in the book; the human characterization is mostly forgettable. Sperry repeatedly references Richard Henry Dana’s Two Years Before the Mast, which perhaps I ought to read.

Cornelia Meigs’ Swift Rivers, on the other hand, is a boy-meets-raft adventure, in which young Chris floats a passel of logs down the Goose Wing River to the Mississippi, where they are bound into a raft and acquire a pilot. Wonderful detail about the craft of piloting on the Mississippi, further enlivened by Chris’s intense-friendship-at-first-sight with a passing stranger who initially mentions the possibility of floating trees down the Goose Wing in spring flood, then runs into Chris as Chris is putting this plan into action and of course joins in.

However, the racial attitudes that are unenlightened even by the low standards of the 1930s. “Indians are good haters,” Meigs informs us, and one important subplot involves a mixed-race character who has quarreled with his best friend and struggles to forgive him, a conflict which the other characters express in terms of whether his French or his Chippewa blood get the upper hand.

I’m not surprised that they published this in the 1930s, but I am startled that it was reprinted in 2004.

In comparison, Elizabeth Seeger’s The Pageant of Chinese History was a pleasant surprise. “Surely, though perhaps I speak with partiality, there is no history more thrilling and delightful than that of China,” Seeger writes in the introduction, which is exactly the attitude that I want from any writer of nonfiction: yes, please tell me about the country that you love with a swooning passion!

The version I read is an updated 1962 edition, which adds a couple of chapters at the end about World War II (in 1934, when the book was published, Japan had invaded Manchuria but not the rest of China), the following Communist revolution, and what happened after, bringing the text right up to the 1962 present with the comment, “Whatever the causes, there has been a lack of food; there has not been famine, as in the old days when millions of people died in one province while there was plenty of food in the others. This time the whole country has hungered, so we hear.”

This is a reference to the Great Leap Forward, which, as people in the west would later hear, caused one of the biggest man-made famines in human history. That “so we hear” suggests an awareness that we are not, in fact, hearing all there is to hear; that history cannot be properly told “until time has done its work and the shape is firm and clear.” And yet where do you stop a comprehensive history if not the present, even if you don't know what present events mean - even if you're not yet sure what those present events are?
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

“...they, too, are in love with what happened to them, because it is not only war, but also their youth. Their first love.”

Svetlana Aleksievich makes this comment near the beginning of The Unwomanly Face of War: An Oral History of Women in World War II, and I’ve chewed over it for a long time because left to my own devices I would not have gotten that out of the interviews that make up the backbone of this book. Maybe because I tend to think of “first love” through a romantic haze, as a positive force? When of course a first love can be destructive, albeit not often as brutally destructive as the Eastern Front of World War II.

Maybe “in love with” here means “obsessed with,” which is certainly true. Many of the women Aleksievich interviewed comment that to a great extent they still live in the war, that their memories feel more real than current reality - they can’t stand anything red because it reminds them of blood, they can’t cut up a chicken because it looks too much like human flesh. (One of them comments “maybe I should have had psychotherapy,” but that clearly was just not available at all.)

The story that haunts me is the partisan who was tortured by the Nazis, managed to escape back home, and then could only be soothed by her mother’s presence; she screamed and screamed in agony whenever her mother had to step away to, say, make dinner for the family. Most of the stories aren’t so severe in their outward manifestations, but just the unending agony…

After The Unwomanly Face of War I needed something lighter, and therefore fell on Emily Tesh’s Silver in the Wood, a romance between a man who has become a woodland spirit and a Victorian folklorist. Great forest atmosphere, but I wanted a deeper connection between Tobias and Henry Silver.

What I’m Reading Now

Last Wednesday, I wrote that I wanted to finish Pat Barker’s The Ghost Road, Elizabeth Seeger’s The Pageant of Chinese History, and Mary Renault’s North Face before my vacation begins November 1... and then neglected all three books disgracefully all week. I really ought to prioritize North Face, as it’s an interlibrary loan, but a female English tutor has just started flirting with a man with the coy observation, “We must admit the masterpieces are all by men,” and… must we? Even the Greeks acknowledged the genius of Sappho!

We’re entering the home stretch on Dracula! There are two action-packed weeks left to go, and I for one am I tenterhooks. Will they defeat the Count and save Mina? ONLY TIME WILL TELL.

What I Plan to Read Next

I will be traveling from November 1 - 10, so this is entirely up for grabs. Could be a little! Could be a lot! Who can say?
osprey_archer: (cheers)
I am delighted to inform you that D. K. Broster’s The Wounded Name continues extremely extra to the very end. After Aymar’s beloved Avoye rejects him! because he lied to her!! to spare her the pain of knowing that his seeming treachery came about as a ruse to protect her from being executed as a spy!!! when she was actually never in danger and it was actually a stupid Bonapartist prank…

Anyway, Aymar is SO distraught that he tears himself away from his natal home, leaving Laurent behind to explain to Avoye what really happened (Aymar as usual being too punctilious of his honor to ever explain the extenuating circumstances of any of his actions - AYMAR) and then sulk back to his own home, where Laurent’s various relations deduce that he must be in love. Why else should he be so withdrawn and sullen, when France has at long last been freed from that tyrant Napoleon? They are of course quite right! Wrong as to the object of his affections, but correct that he is in love.

Meanwhile, Aymar has realized that the only way to clear his name (and perhaps win back Avoye?) is to call for a military tribunal. He sends Laurent a letter, including a postscript in an unsteady hand: "I doubt if I can face it, when the time comes, without you, Laurent!" Laurent of course flies to his side.

When said tribunal finds him innocent of all changes, Aymar faints in Laurent’s arms. “Aymar's head lay against Laurent's shoulder, and Laurent, who rather thought he was crying himself, and didn't care, was battling with a most unseasonable desire to kiss it there, before everyone; and would very likely have succumbed only that he was sure Aymar had not quite lost consciousness.”

Just holding your buddy in front of a whole entire courtroom of cheering spectators, battling the desire to press kisses on his beautiful bracken-colored hair! Holding back ONLY because Aymar is still awake and might be displeased, as he is generally not quite so romantic about Laurent as Laurent is about him! And then Aymar leaves the court, and the whole town cheers for his acquittal, and a man who spat on him the day before comes up to kiss his hand…

Later on, Aymar comments that in all his bad luck, he has also had “a piece of such transcendent good fortune that I might well spend the rest of my life thanking God for it!”... and when Laurent is slow on the uptake, Aymar adds, “‘You don't know what I mean? Well, go and stand in front of your looking-glass, and perhaps it will dawn upon you!’

But it dawned then and there, for as he stared at him Laurent slowly began to turn crimson…”

CHAPTER END, presumably because Broster couldn’t include the part where they fall into each other’s arms immediately thereafter. And then there is a little tag chapter where Aymar reunites with Avoye, but this is definitely in the manner of a bonus extra: the heart of the book lies in clearing Aymar’s name and also Aymar coming to return Laurent’s friendship in its full blood-heat fever-heat intensity. SUCH INTENSITY. FULL BORE ALL THE WAY THROUGH. Truly a tour-de-force of slashy hurt/comfort!
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

This week’s Wednesday Reading Meme brought to you by [personal profile] littlerhymes! We have finished Mary Stewart’s The Hollow Hills! I enjoyed it more than The Crystal Cave: Merlin spends way less time getting kicked in the face by life, and everything bucks up once young Arthur appears on the scene. Love his friend Bedwyr with his little crush on Arthur! (You really don’t see much of Bedwyr in most recent adaptations. Is it because the name Bedwyr sounds goofy to modern ears?)

[personal profile] littlerhymes also sent me Christine Pullein-Thompson’s Stolen Ponies, a pony book from the 1970s in which the five children set out to find out who is stealing the ponies on the moors… only for one of the children to get dreadfully lost, which takes up most of the rest of the book, until he stumbles on the pony thief by accident! The plotting is odd and meandering and the characterization not very sharp - especially for the ponies, who are interchangeable as bicycles.

What I’m Reading Now

[personal profile] littlerhymes and I have begun The Last Enchantments! We have concluded that the entire fall of Camelot could have been avoided if Merlin had kidnapped Mordred and had him raised by some kindly country squire, rather like Arthur himself. Alas there is no way to communicate this conclusion to Merlin himself, so unfortunately he’s still on a collision course to maybe attempting to drown a baby.

In The Wounded Name, Aymar has been reunited with his cousin/ladylove, whom he insists on not explaining the true reason for his disgrace, as it occurred in part because he thought she was in danger of being executed as a spy! I’m sure this will not backfire on him in any way.

Things have been pretty quiet on the Dracula front - the calm before the storm, of course - which has given me time to reflect that when I first read this in high school I thought it was a typical Victorian novel. Reading it now, with greater understanding of Victorian literature, I can see that while none of the details specifically are atypical, the sheer density of Stalwart Manhood is a lot even by Victorian standards.

What I Plan to Read Next

I’ve been writing up a storm this month, which doesn’t leave much time for reading, so I’ve jettisoned my goal of clearing off my TBR shelf before I head to Massachusetts at the beginning of November. My new goal is to polish off the books I’ve got out from the library: Pat Barker’s The Ghost Road, Elizabeth Seeger’s The Pageant of Chinese History (last of the Newbery Honors for a while!), and Mary Renault’s North Face.
osprey_archer: (books)
I have been away these last few days on a camping trip to the Indiana Dunes with my father, during which it rained a good deal, so much reading has occurred!

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

W. E. Johns’s Biggles of 266, a set of short stories set in World War I. My favorite was the story where Biggles realizes that the higher-ups have sent them no turkey Christmas dinner, and decides that the obvious thing to do is to fly behind enemy lines and steal a turkey. This just seems peak Biggles.

Also E. W. Hornung’s Witching Hill, a series of interconnected short stories about odd happenings on the housing estate of Witching Hill! Our narrator Gillon works at the estate office; he befriends (or perhaps rather is befriended by) one of the tenants, Uvo Delavoye, a young man of lively imagination who believes or at least pretends to believe that his wicked ancestor, who once owned all the lands around, now haunts the residents and presses them to live out his own debaucheries.

Gillon is in the unenviable position of skeptic who refuses to believe Uvo’s theories even after the elderly spinster sister of the vicar somehow writes a story that reproduces exactly the wicked ancestor’s abduction of a virtuous milliner, despite never having heard the tale in her life. I might have become a bit less skeptical then! But nonetheless these are pleasant entertaining stories. Uvo and Gillon are not shippable like Raffles and Bunny but I did enjoy that the book ends with the two of them going away on holiday together, Uvo’s brief flirtation with heterosexuality routed (and perhaps only inspired by the Wicked Ancestor anyway).

Also Naomi Mitchison’s Travel Light, which I was looking forward to and then didn’t really enjoy. I think (perhaps led astray by the title) that I was expecting a lighter fantasy than it turned out to be, but fairly early on in the book our heroine Halla rushes out to protect her dragon guardian from a horde of evil heroes (Halla always uses the word “hero” as a negative descriptor: a nice touch), only to be summarily defeated and tied to a post by a hero who clearly intends to rape her, only she’s saved just in the nick of time by a dragon…

I mean I do enjoy the hero/dragon reversal. I just went into it expecting something light enough to have no attempted rape at all, whereas actually the book is a downbeat musing on the evils of empire and the unfortunate tendency of men to become dragonish and horde their gold.

Finally, Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Farthest Shore. In which young Arren falls in love with the Archmage Ged (literally this is how it is described) and follows him to the ends of Earthsea to discover the source of the malaise that is stealing the wizards’ spells and the singers’ songs and the dragons’ speech! Delightful. Still not Tenar though.

What I’m Reading Now

In D. K. Broster’s The Wounded Name, I’ve just finished the part where Aymar tells Laurent about the misadventure that ended with Aymar branded a traitor. Even though I went into this knowing the basic details about what happened (after Aymar’s men were routed in a battle, Aymar was somehow branded the traitor who gave away their position to the enemy), it was surprisingly painful to read about poor Aymar rushing as fast as he could to try to warn his men… I knew already that he would be too late! Yet even so I hoped against hope that he might make it just in time.

In Dracula, we are in the lull before the storm. Our intrepid heroes have set out to Varna in hopes of vanquishing their foe, and we will perhaps hear naught of them until they arrive!

What I Plan to Read Next

Emily Tesh’s Silver in the Wood. I meant to read this on my trip (where better to read it than in the wood, am I right?) but somehow failed to actually fully download it. Well, this error has been CORRECTED, and I stand prepared to read this book during the appropriate autumn season!
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

“Seems weird that we have this one random heterosexual in this book,” I said, eyeing Billy Prior doubtfully as I read Pat Barker’s Regeneration. Well, now I’ve read the sequel, The Eye in the Door, and it turns out Billy Prior is also as queer a nine-bob note, so balance has been restored to the universe.

Overall I feel that Billy Prior is not as compelling as Rivers or Sassoon or Wilfred Owen (who do have the incomparable advantage of being real people), and this book is therefore not quite as strong as the first - but maybe that’s an unfair thing to ask, anyway. My favorite character is Rivers: his cool, detached, analytical voice, even when he’s looking at his own emotions, not so much experiencing them as peering at them under a magnifying glass.

I loved the atmosphere of Elizabeth Brooks’ The Orphan of Salt Winds, which is set at the delicious gothic decaying house of Salt Winds, beside a treacherous marsh alongside the sea. But both of the dual timelines deflated at the end, which was a disappointment. Spoilers )

What I’m Reading Now

D. K. Broster clearly just decided to throw ALL her favorite hurt/comfort tropes in The Wounded Name and I am HERE for it. Since I last posted, Laurent has been taken captive, only to discover that Aymar has also been taken captive, and Aymar is TERRIBLY WOUNDED! SoLaurent volunteers to share Aymar’s cell, because only constant nursing can save Aymar from death, and no one else will take it on because Aymar stands accused of betraying his own men!!!

Yes, you heard that right. The wounds to Aymar’s body are as nothing to the wounds in his HEART. Of course Laurent is convinced to the bottom of his soul that Aymar couldn’t possibly be guilty… but Doubts are beginning to creep in.

In Dracula, the men have FINALLY realized that leaving Mina out of the loop is a TERRIBLE idea, but TOO LATE, Dracula has already begun to feed on Mina! It’s fine, though, because that means that now Mina has a psychic connection to Dracula, which will surely help them track him down and stake him?

What I Plan to Read Next

At the beginning of November I’m going on a trip to Massachusetts, and I’m contemplating what to bring along for a little You Are Here reading! A reread of The Witch of Blackbird Pond perhaps? Maybe I should take another crack at Walden?

The trip encompasses a visit to Orchard House, where Louisa May Alcott wrote Little Women, which is now a museum; I plan to at long last buy myself a copy. I KNOW, it’s shocking I don’t have one. Maybe I should also read a biography of LMA, or a critical analysis of her work, or something like that? Let me know if you have any recs.
osprey_archer: (books)
I read Pride and Prejudice for the first time in high school, and hadn’t reread it until now. However, I’ve seen a bunch of adaptations, not least my beloved Lizzie Bennet Diaries, the modern-day vlog retelling over which I obsessed for a year. So it’s interesting to see how both the passage of time and the new light shed on the story by adaptations has changed my opinions over time.

Of course in some cases, I mean that my opinion has come full circle. In high school, I shared Elizabeth’s horror when her friend Charlotte agreed to marry that rat Mr. Collins. Later on, I grew more sympathetic to Charlotte: surely marrying Collins would be better than being a spinster in Regency England! (My recollection is that the 2005 adaptation makes this point with particular force.)

Rereading it now, it occurred to me that Jane Austen, Regency Spinster, probably has a better idea than I do what fates would be worse than being a Regency spinster, and she is absolutely right that being married to Mr. Collins would be on the list, at least for sensible, level-headed Charlotte Lucas. Moralistic Mary Bennet and Mr. Collins might have been well-suited, although they would have encouraged each other’s worst tendencies and become utterly unbearable to everyone else. Compare their reactions to Lydia’s elopement: Mary reflects piously how easily a woman’s precious reputation can be stained, while Mr. Collins writes to the Bennets to state that he’s shocked, shocked that they received Lydia at their house after the way she behaved! A match made in heaven. Pity Mr. Collins didn’t think of it.

Speaking of Lydia. Modern adaptations often seem troubled by Austen’s unsparing portrayal: she is gleefully unrepentant when she returns from her elopement with Wickham which would have destroyed her own reputation and severely injured her sisters’ future prospects, and continues just as “untamed, unabashed, wild, noisy, and fearless” as ever.

The Lizzie Bennet Diaries, in particular, makes it one of its main projects to rehabilitate Lydia both with viewers and with her exasperated sister Lizzie. (And, let it be said, it succeeded, at least with me: Lydia is my favorite character in LBD, although it pains me to say so because I love them alllllll.) For the most part she displays that same noisy, unabashed character, although with a strain of vulnerability that Austen’s Lydia never shows… right up until the Wickham debacle, which in this version takes the form of a sex tape that Wickham intends to sell online for cash. LBD Lydia collapses like a house of cards.

Now of course this is an extremely understandable reaction, and given that aforementioned streak of vulnerability it follows naturally from Lydia’s character in the adaptation. But the adaptation would have been closer to the original if Lydia had yelled, “Woo hoo! If this sex tape goes well, I’m going to start a career as a camgirl, and then I’ll be financially independent LONG before Jane and Lizzie move out of the house!”

…actually that would be a fantastic adaptation choice, but it would definitely have alienated a lot of viewers (probably including my 2013 self) and therefore undermined LBD’s “reconcile the sisters” project.

Jane Austen hasn’t any intention of reconciling Lydia with her despairing elder sisters. She has no more sentimental investment in sisterhood than she has in marriage, or friendship, or parent-child relationships, or indeed any other human relationship that you can name. None of these relationships are either good or bad by nature: they are good or bad entirely as the individuals within them make them so. And from that point of view, there's no reason for Jane and Elizabeth to try to reconcile with Lydia: she is what she is and they are what they are, and the mere fact that they are sisters will not make them mix.
osprey_archer: (Default)
A wild edition of Books I Quit Partway Through appears. I got about halfway through Montague Glass’s Potash & Perlmutter: Their Copartnership Ventures and Adventures, a series of comic vignettes about two Jewish men who co-own a cloak and garment business in New York City in the early twentieth century. (Glass himself was Jewish, and although he wasn’t in the cloak and garment trade he must have done a ton of research, because there’s loads of interesting detail.) But after the halfway mark I realized I still couldn’t reliably tell our two heroes apart, and decided that life was too short for books that are merely okay.

There are some funny lines. When they first meet, Abe bites into a dill pickle that squirts in Morris’s eye; Morris replies, “S'all right…I seen what you was doing and I should of ordered an umbrella instead of a glass of water already.” But basically it’s a humorous book where a lot of the humor has been lost to the sands of time.

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Naomi Mitchison’s The Big House, which has a lovely Scottish flavor not only to the dialogue but the narrative, and the way that the sentences are constructed. I’ve seen the book described as a Tam Lin retelling, but it’s not so much a retelling as a fractal remix, and the story gets retold, and retold again, and then again, and each time it’s further from the original but also nonetheless referring back to it.

In traveling in and out of fairyland to help their friend the piper Donald Ferguson, Su and Winkie also travel back and forth through time, so the book is also a meditation on the history of Scotland (not so much the Jacobites as the enclosures), and on the class system of the British Isles, and on the wheel of fortune in the medieval sense: the fact that fortunes rise and fall and a family that is on top of the world one century may be nothing much in another.

The book is a bit of a mess: the pacing is choppy and it doesn’t really all come together. But I admire it for its ambitions even though it doesn’t quite fulfill them.

What I’m Reading Now

D. K. Broster’s The Wounded Name. I started reading this the other day while accompanying a friend shoe-shopping, and she asked what I was reading, and I explained, well, it’s this book from the 1920s… set near the end of the Napoleonic Wars… and our heroes have just met for the very first time, and one of them slipped into the flood-swollen river and the other leaped in after him to save him from drowning…

Kayla considered the matter. “So 1920s Boys Love,” she concluded.

In Dracula, Van Helsing has at long last dropped the V word! You know, now that Lucy is dead and it won’t help her at all. Don’t mind me! Just gonna die mad about it!

What I Plan to Read Next

At war with the interlibrary loan office yet again, this time over Mary Renault’s North Face. Wikipedia lists it (inaccurately, as it turns out) as The North Face and I foolishly requested it under that title. Apparently the interlibrary loan office copy-pasted the title into Worldcat and then promptly gave up when it didn’t work, rather than, say, searching “Mary Renault” and making the obvious inference about the titles.

Now I realize that I did give them the wrong title, but also it took me, an untrained amateur, about two minutes to google my way to an answer, so I really feel that they could have managed it!
osprey_archer: (cheers)
Hail the conquering hero! For I have finished the last four Newbery Honor books of the 1970s.

Janet Gaylord Moore’s The Many Ways of Seeing: An Introduction to the Pleasures of Art is a delightful book about not only the pleasures of art, but about the fact that learning to see art more clearly and thoughtfully can lead, in turn, to a richer vision of life, and vice versa. “For not everything that is thought and felt by human beings will fit into verbal patterns; music and art are other languages, capable of shades of feeling, of nuances that may slip through the web of words.”

Allan W. Eckert’s Incident at Hawk’s Hill has a great premise: lost on the Canadian prairie in the late nineteenth century, six-year-old Ben gets adopted by a badger and spends six weeks living in a badger sett. Isn’t that delightful?

Unfortunately, the execution is pretty dry. There are a number of passages about geological history and badger habits that read like they’ve been ripped directly from a dull natural history text. Spoilers )

Miska Miles’ Annie and the Old One is a picture book (with spare, gorgeous illustrations by Peter Parnall) about a Navajo girl coming to terms with her grandmother’s approaching death. Clearly in the category of “Newbery books about dead relatives” but a gentle, restrained variation on the theme.

And finally, Jamake Highwater’s Anpao: An American Indian Odyssey, one of those books where the story behind the story is more interesting than the book itself. Highwater presented himself as Cherokee, but in fact he was of Eastern European Jewish ancestry, a fact exposed in an article in the Washington Post a few years after Anpao won the Newbery Honor. Despite this high profile exposé, however, Highwater continued to work as a consultant on Native American issues, most notably for the character of Chakotay on Star Trek: Voyager.

But how is the book, you ask? Well, it reminded me of Mary Q. Steele's Journey Outside, which also features a hero drifting through a series of disconnected episodes in countryside peopled by characters so flat one can only assume they're meant to be allegorical, only Anpao is almost twice as long. There must have been something in the water in the 1970s that made this sort of thing appealing to the Newbery committee.
osprey_archer: (books)
Years ago my friend Rachel and I watched the delightful movie Fried Green Tomatoes, and I vowed to read the book that it was based on, Fannie Flagg’s Fried Green Tomatoes at the Whistle Stop Cafe. Finally I’ve fulfilled that vow, and I’m happy to say that the book was worth the wait!

The story spans most of twentieth century, starting in the 1910s when young Idgie Threadgoode declares on the eve of her sister’s wedding that she’ll never wear a dress again (and attends the wedding in a cute little suit), and ending in the 1980s (when the book was written), when Idgie’s sister-in-law Ninnie Threadgoode reminisces about the old days that Whistle Stop Cafe to Evelyn Couch, a miserable housewife whose unexpected friendship with Ninnie gives her the strength to change her unhappy life.

It also spans much of the country, as the characters include railway men, men-about-town, and tramps on the road during the Great Depression. But the action always circles back to Whistle Stop, a town that sprang up to serve the railway lines and died as the train lines died after World War II.

And the narrative style is just as lively and wide-ranging, dancing back and forth across the time span of the story, switching easily from regular narration to reminiscence to newspaper clippings. I particularly enjoyed the amateur Whistle Stop newsheet, completed by Dot Weems and including a lot of blog-style updates on her life, not least the doings of her beloved but somewhat feckless husband.

Unexpectedly, Evelyn’s story was my second favorite part of the book: I loved her slow shift from lethargic depression to an overpowering rage at the world that treats women so shabbily, leading first to the invention of an imaginary superheroine alter ego Towanda and then to Evelyn’s own emancipation, in becoming a Mary Kaye saleswoman so successful that she wins herself a pink Cadillac, in which of course she goes to visit her beloved Whistle Stop. (Her journey to empowerment also includes a trip to weight-loss camp, a peak 80s moment that is my least favorite part of the book, but it’s fairly short.)

My favorite part of the book was of course Ruth and Idgie’s love affair, which begins in the 1920s when Ruth comes to stay with the Threadgoode family while she teaches at the local Sunday school. “Idgie has a little crush,” mother Threadgoode tells all the Threadgoode children, but Idgie’s “little crush” is so massive that it’s visible from space, and all the other kids have to flee the breakfast table to have a good laugh after they see Idgie attempting to have table manners to impress Ruth.

Ruth loves Idgie too, but she’s engaged, and she has to provide a home for her sick mother, so she goes back and marries the man… But he’s an abusive asshole, and as soon as Ruth’s mother dies Ruth sends a note to Idgie, consisting only of a passage from the Book of Ruth, the bit about “whither thou goest I will go.” Idgie and her brothers (accompanied by Big George, the Black man who will later make the barbecue at the Whistle Stop Cafe) zoom right on over to pick Ruth up, carrying out her trunk right in front of her furious but helpless husband Frank.

(Frank later disappears in suspicious circumstances. His death is never pinned on anybody.)

The Threadgoodes are so delighted to have Ruth back that they come running out of the house to greet her - right after admonishing each other that they mustn’t be too enthusiastic or they might scare the poor girl away! And when it turns out Ruth is pregnant, the Threadgoode clan gives Idgie the money to start the Whistle Stop Cafe, as she has a family to provide for now. Ruth and Idgie’s Whistle Stop Cafe becomes a fixture of the town, remembered fondly by Ninnie Threadgoode and referred to often in Dot Weems’ newsletter.

This is a fascinating picture of a community that is so totally accepting of Ruth and Idgie that accepting almost feels like the wrong word: it implies that there might be an alternative state of non-acceptance, which no one in the town of Whistle Stop appears to even consider feeling with regard to Ruth & Idgie’s romance. (In contrast, many locals definitely feel unaccepting of Ruth and Idgie’s decision to sell food from their cafe to the local Black population. Black customers have to take their food for carryout, and they get it at the back door, and the local Klan still protests.)

Is the town’s attitude toward Ruth and Idgie historically accurate for a small southern town in the mid-twentieth-century? I have no idea. Whatever else it may be, it certainly is adorable.
osprey_archer: (books)
[personal profile] skygiants’ reviews are always great, and her review of Cherith Baldry’s Exiled from Camelot is one of the most hilarious of many amazing reviews.

ARTHUR: I want to officially make Loholt my heir. Kay, draw up the legal papers. I know you don't like him --
KAY: Yes, well, he did try to kill me that one time, for no reason.
ARTHUR: -- but otherwise he's a good kid and I love him more than I love you and you need to get over it.
KAY: :(

(Arthur in this fic, by the way, will be playing the role of The Asshole Who Doesn't Love Kay The Way He Deserves And Must Be Proven Wrong Through Kay's Absence And Extensive Suffering.)


Well, I finally read the book, and I am DELIGHTED to inform you that it is exactly the kind of OTT tragic woobie fic that the review led me to expect, only somehow even moreso. I strongly suspect that Baldry read Phyllis Ann Karr’s The Idylls of the Queen and said “what if exactly like this but also WAY more focus on how Kay is UNDERAPPRECIATED and MISTREATED” (also a much softer focus on Kay’s own flaws).

This suspicion is fostered by the fact that Baldry seems to have borrowed Kay’s crush on Guenevere wholesale from Karr, right down to their habit of playing chess together (unless that’s just a general Kay & Guenevere thing?). Also, Baldry thanks Karr in the acknowledgements.

Our hero is Kay, King Arthur’s Tragically Underappreciated Seneschal, a top notch organizer in a culture that values military prowess highly and organizational ability not at all. Arthur himself is the Underappreciater-in-Chief. Although they grew up as foster brothers, Arthur has come to take Kay for granted - so much for granted that when Arthur’s newly-discovered illegitimate son Loholt tries to kill Kay, Arthur doesn’t care. In fact, the whole court, including Kay’s BFF Gawain, seem to be on Team “Haven’t you gotten over Loholt’s attempt to murder you yet, Kay?”

After a battle goes south, Arthur orders Kay to escort Loholt to safety through the lines. Loholt takes advantage of this opportunity to kidnap and torture Kay. When Kay escapes, he accidentally kills Loholt, then makes his battered, bleeding, traumatized way back to Arthur’s temporary court at Carlisle. Concerned that Arthur won’t believe that his beloved son Loholt is a kidnapper and a torturer (or, worse, that he just won’t care, any more than he cared about the whole attempted murder thing), Kay only tells Arthur that Loholt is dead. Enraged, Arthur orders Kay out of his sight, and Kay faints at his feet.

Kay accepts all of this with the adoring misery of an unloved puppy. He loves Arthur so much! And Arthur has long since ceased to love him at all. “I don’t think he holds me in his heart,” Kay whispers to Gawain, who is tenderly bathing Kay’s wounds in his rooms.

But worse is in store! A prioress shows up at court, holding a box that can only be opened by the knight who murdered the man whose head lies inside. The head is, of course, Loholt’s, and Kay’s touch opens the box, at which point Kay is… EXILED FROM CAMELOT!

Etc. etc., if you want the summary of the rest of the book you can read [personal profile] skygiants review. SUFFICE IT TO SAY that Kay suffers a GREAT DEAL MORE, not least when a foul enchantress mocks him with an illusion of Arthur saying, “Kay, I need you!” Meanwhile Arthur’s court, deprived of its seneschal, is at sixes and sevens, and Kay’s fanclub (chiefly Gawain and his little brother Gareth) often meet to wistfully discuss how much they miss Kay. At one point Gareth claims that working for a year in Kay’s kitchen taught him more about knighthood than all of Lancelot’s lessons.

After nearly dying yet again, Kay heroically saves them all, faints at Arthur’s feet for a second time, and wakes up in Arthur’s room, where Arthur tells Kay that everything that has happened was Arthur’s fault for failing to appreciate Kay, but now Arthur has realized how much he loves and needs Kay. Would Kay please come back to fill the position of seneschal, as the kingdom is falling apart without him?

Only a stone could remain unmoved by such a thorough grovel. Kay, deeply moved, agrees. Kay and Arthur reconcile, and Kay plans a feast. Happy end!

***

After I finished Exiled from Camelot, [personal profile] littlerhymes let slip that Cherith Baldry is one of the ghostwriters behind the Warrior Cats series, which are about rival clans of feral cats who war ceaselessly over territory!

So, basically, Arthuriana where the knights are feral cats. This finally tipped me over the edge into trying Warrior Cats, which I have long meant to do, but alas the vast cast of warrior cats defeated me: I’m just too old to make that kind of upfront investment in the lore. However, I feel that “feral cat Arthuriana” is exactly where Cherith Baldry wanted and deserved to end up, and I hope she got to write wounded woobie cat h/c to her heart’s content.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Dorothy Gilman’s Mrs. Pollifax Unveiled. I really meant to save this final Mrs. Pollifax book for a rainy day… but I felt an overwhelming urge to read it now, and who am I to resist an overwhelming urge? Gilman brought back John Sebastian Farrell to team up with Mrs. Pollifax for the denouement, thus bringing the series full circle from Mrs. Pollifax’s first adventure with Farrell. A satisfying end.

As this is the last Mrs. Pollifax book, I figured it was now or never on Mrs. Pollifax - Spy, the Mrs. Pollifax movie starring Rosalind Russell as Mrs. Pollifax. Russell is a goddamn delight, but I was sorry Spoilers )

Last January I bombed out of Mary Stewart’s The Crystal Cave, but I gave it another try with [personal profile] littlerhymes and we powered through! It helped perhaps that I went into it knowing that this is going to be the book where Everyone Is Mean to Merlin, and not in a tragic woobie way either: that’s just how the bannock crumbles in the harsh world of Dark Ages Britain.

What I’m Reading Now

Elizabeth Brooks’ The Orphan of Salt Winds, a delicious novel which has performed the difficult feat of making both its historical and its modern-day plotlines equally gothic. On the eve of World War II, orphan Virginia is adopted by the young couple who own the seaside house Salt Winds, in what the reader quickly senses is a doomed attempt to save their rickety marriage. In the modern day, Virginia in her old age finds a curlew skull on the doorstep of Salt Winds, which she believes is a sign that tomorrow night she must walk into the marsh to drown… No idea where this is headed, but loving every minute of it.

In Dracula, Lucy has DIED. Could this all have been avoided if Van Helsing had been a literal more liberal in sharing information so that everyone was on the same page about the necessity of the garlic flowers and keeping a constant watch over her at night? MAYBE. [personal profile] littlerhymes and I also agreed that PERHAPS if Mina had been summoned, her blood might have saved Lucy: the love of a good woman etc. Lucy Westenra, killed by heteronormativity…

What I Plan to Read Next

Onward in the Merlin Chronicles!
osprey_archer: (books)
As a capstone of my Once and Future King project, I have always intended to read Sylvia Townsend Warner’s T. H. White: A Biography, which turns out to be a wonderful biography, sensitive and thoughtful to its subject, with an insight into his psyche which is all the more remarkable given that White and Townsend Warner apparently never met.

In Townsend Warner’s telling White was a divided and self-tormenting character, a man whose craving for connection and affection was only slightly less enormous than his terror of those self-same things. He was the only child of a wretchedly unhappy marriage: evidently his parents on multiple occasions stood above White’s crib wrestling over a gun, each determined to shoot the child and then commit suicide. (White was too little to remember these events consciously, but they must have left a mark.) White’s mother, a possessive and jealous woman, dismissed White’s ayah because she couldn’t stand that little White seemed to prefer the ayah to her.

After a divorce only slightly less acrimonious than the marriage that had preceded it, White never saw his father again. His mother turned to her son for emotional support, creating an emotional dynamic that White later channeled into his depiction of Morgause and her adoring but oft-neglected sons: she demanded to be the center of White’s emotional life, but paid attention to him only when it suited her. (And unlike the Orkney boys, White had no brothers to turn to for support.)

Then, as a cherry on top of this emotional dysfunction sundae, White realized that he had both homosexual and sadistic urges. Both troubled him, but the sadism perhaps moreso: Townsend Warner retails a conversation late in life with a friend when White explained that when he acted instinctually in love, that is by inflicting pain, he drove his beloveds away, whereas when he acted against his instincts his beloveds could sense his insincerity and that drove them away… A double bind that he never solved.

Given the givens White clearly would have had a lot of problems with human relationships anyway, but this final turn of the screw seems to have locked him in an emotional paralysis that lasted all his adult life. He yearned for close friendships and love, yearned contradictorily to be a hermit who didn’t need anyone, and ended up splitting the difference by becoming desperately attached to his dog Brownie.

Brownie was a red setter who chose White for her person, following him around until the breeder basically informed White that he had a dog now. White accepted Brownie with indifference at first, devoting most of his time to his goshawk, until Brownie began to pine away from a broken heart. She sickened with distemper and nearly died, at which point White, horror-stricken, realized that he loved her too, nursed her day and night, promised never to cheat on her again with hawks of any kind… and she recovered! And White remained devoted to her till she died, at which point he grieved like a father for his only child. He marked the date of her death in his diary for the rest of his life, often with musings about how he still loved his dear deceased Brownie better than anyone else in the whole world, including his current dog.

One is glad that he had this source of emotional succor, but also damn.

For the most part the biography focuses on White’s life, discussing White’s writing mainly as it affected everything else. (The one exception is Townsend Warner’s discussion of The Book of Merlyn, White’s proposed conclusion to The Once and Future King: she can’t get over how bad it is, which is fair enough.) This is fortunate, as it means that the book left my mental TBR list undisturbed... except maaaaaaybe for Mistress Masham’s Repose, just because I’m a sucker for books about tiny people.

And it did redouble my intention of reading more of Sylvia Townsend Warner’s books, just to experience more of her clear, graceful, evocative writing. But I already meant to do that anyway.
osprey_archer: (books)
Sayaka Murata’s Life Ceremony: Stories (translated by Ginny Tapley Takemori) is a mind-bending experience and with certain caveats I highly recommend it. Many of the stories are built around the question “What if this really weird thing was just a totally normal custom that almost everyone takes for granted?”, and by “really weird” I mean that in the first story, “A First-Rate Material,” the custom in question is “what if after people died we took their hair and skin and bones and nails and made them into fashionable high-end clothing and furniture?”

A lot of stories of this ilk are designed to leave the reader thinking “thank God we don’t do that,” but Murata plays her premises totally straight. The title story, “Life Ceremony,” refers to a custom where the mourners at a funeral gather to eat the deceased. The mourners are supposed to try to find a partner for the night, and they go outside and have some nookie right there in the hopes of getting inseminated to increase the falling birthrate.

The above-mentioned caveat arises from the fact that I realize not everyone wants to read a story where mourners enthusiastically inform a widow, “Your husband is really tasty!”, or the heroine muses tenderly over seeing her work friend’s body transformed into meatballs. What could be a greater act of love than eating the dead? Well, uh, that’s certainly a culturally specific way to look at things. “It really is a good custom,” muses a mourner. “We partake of life, we create life…”

“I feel like it’s human instinct to want to eat human flesh,” someone else comments.

Maho, our narrator, recalls an incident when she was a child, when cannibalism was still taboo: as a joke, she said she wanted to eat human flesh, and the teacher scolded her as the other kids in the class cried. “Instinct doesn’t exist. Morals don’t exist. They were just fake sensibilities that came from a world that was constantly transforming,” she grumps.

But her coworker (the one who will later be meatballs) tries to help her see this in a new perspective: “Everyone always says that things like common sense or instinct or morals are carved in stone. But that’s not true - actually, they’re always changing… And this isn’t something that happened all of a sudden, like you seem to think. It’s always been that way. Things keep transforming.”

This is the theory that animates many of these stories: most people, most of the time, consider the customs of their society natural, instinctual, right. Of course there are outliers. In both “A First-Rate Material” and “Life Ceremony,” there are people who oppose these customs on principle, and also people who don’t partake for personal reasons. One of Maho’s friends got food poisoning at a life ceremony and therefore can’t stand the taste of human flesh - a fact that he apologetically explains at the ceremony, so that no one thinks he’s one of those killjoy weirdos who think it’s wrong to eat the dead.

Some of the stories explore this idea with less cannibalism. In “Two’s Family,” Yoshiko and Kikue bought a house and raised children and grew old together - and people assume they are a lesbian couple, and grow very uncomfortable upon learning that they’re best friends who have never had sex with each other. (Yoshiko has never had sex at all; Kikue has lots of lovers.) It’s not that these people necessarily approve of lesbianism, even, but at least then Yoshiko and Kikue’s relationship would fit the established pattern of “life partners are supposed to have sex with each other.”

One of my favorite stories, “Body Magic,” has a very interesting take on the contrast between knowledge about sex as a social construct and expectation, and knowledge of sex as an internally experienced thing. “It’s not that you don’t want to know, Ruri, it’s that you want to be free, isn’t it?”

We are controlled by these social expectations; not just controlled but created. “We kept responding back and forth in our community, turned ourselves into a character, and started behaving according to that character. I began to think that maybe nobody had such a thing as a real self.”
osprey_archer: (Default)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Dorothy Gilman’s Mrs. Pollifax, Innocent Tourist. In my review of the previous Mrs. Pollifax book I commented wistfully that the series seemed to be going downhill, but this book provides a rebound! It helps that Mrs. Pollifax once again partners with John Sebastian Farrell, who worked with her on her first CIA mission lo these many books ago and remains my favorite of the many friends she has gathered along the way. They go to Jordan! They visit Petra! Farrell gets whipped again! A good time is had by all. (Well, by all the readers. Maybe not Farrell while he is getting whipped.)

Also Ursula K. Le Guin’s A Wizard of Earthsea. Impressed by the sheer range of islands that Le Guin invented for Earthsea! Also chuffed because spoilers )

I missed Tenar though.

I also read Emi Yagi’s Diary of a Void (translated by David Boyd and Lucy North). On a whim, a woman falsely informs her coworkers that she’s pregnant: the smell of coffee activates my morning sickness, so someone else will have to clean up the coffee cups from now on! And then she just rolls with the deception: cooks herself luxurious meals suitable for a mother-to-be, downloads a pregnancy app, joins a maternity aerobics class. She rolls with it so hard that she actually starts to experience psychosomatic pregnancy symptoms. Spoilers )

I found this book surprisingly stressful, because I kept waiting for the deception to be exposed, but it’s also a fascinating glimpse into, hmmm. The pregnancy experience? Pregnancy culture, if you can call it that?

Human experience is so fractal. There are so many different facets to it and each facet is so infinitely complicated.

What I’m Reading Now

[personal profile] littlerhymes sent me Cherith Baldry’s Exiled from Camelot, a professionally published whump-heavy hurt/comfort fic about Kay, the woobiest woobie in Camelot, and I am having a WONDERFUL time. Is it of high literary quality? Ehhhh. Does it feature Kay being kidnapped! tortured! and then returning to Arthur’s side only to SWOON at Arthur’s FEET when Arthur, enraged that Kay lost Arthur’s beloved (but secretly evil) illegitimate son Loholt, banishes Kay from his sight? It absolutely does! I have simple needs and sometimes that is all I want from a book.

In Dracula, Lucy is on her third blood transfusion this week, because people keep failing to take Van Helsing’s counter-vampire measures seriously. Now I realize that convincing a bunch of Englishmen all hyped up on their own rationality that the girl is being attacked by a mythical creature might be difficult, but Van Helsing’s current method of telling them NOTHING is clearly not working so perhaps he should try another tack.

What I Plan to Read Next

“I’m going to focus on the books on my TBR shelf,” I said. “No more new books till I finish the ones I have already accrued,” I said. Well, then I bought Pat Barker’s Regeneration and now, of course, I have to read the rest of the trilogy.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
I truly intended not to buy any more books till I finished the items on my to-read shelf, but I was in Bloomington on Saturday and when I stopped by Caveat Emptor, Pat Barker’s Regeneration was on display, and it demanded to be read.

Regeneration is the first book of the Regeneration trilogy. (I have already put the other two on hold at the library.) Siegfried Sassoon has just sent a declaration denouncing the war to the newspapers, and his friend Robert Graves, desperate to keep Sassoon from being court-martialed (also perhaps desperate to avoid facing the reasons why he has not made a similar declaration when he agrees with Sassoon), has arranged for Sassoon to face a Medical Board that can pronounce him mentally incompetent and send him to Craiglockheart, the premier hospital for shell-shock cases.

Here Sassoon meets Rivers, the competent, compassionate doctor in charge, a sensitive and empathetic man who sees the damage the war has wrought to the young men in his care. And yet it’s his job to convince Sassoon to go back.

They develop a thorny and ethically complicated friendship: a sort of ongoing cat-and-mouse conversation where both are the cat and both are the mouse and both half-want to be caught. Sassoon wants to go back, so he can stop living in this hellish safety while his friends fight. Rivers wants to believe the war isn’t worth it, so he can stop sending young men back to die. And yet with equal force they also both believe the opposite thing: Sassoon that he must stay out of the war to complete his protest, Rivers that the war has to be fought.

This friendship forms the backbone of the book, but threaded throughout are other subplots involving Rivers’ other patients, as well as the developing theories of shell-shock and the treatment thereof. There is a hellish chapter where Rivers witnesses another doctor treating a man’s psychologically-induced mutism with hours of electroshock. I would put “treating” in quotation marks, except that the method does in fact work… but at what cost?

(There is one chapter where Rivers visits a released patient who is now living in a seaside cottage, where said patient suffers a brief but comprehensive nervous breakdown during a storm. Glad I didn’t read this book while I was writing The Larks Still Bravely Singing or the comparison might have robbed me of the strength to go on.)

It’s just really good, so well-done. So many of the characters have complicated, contradictory feelings, which they often barely understand (or sometimes can’t bear to confront), and Barker sketches them in with a light deft hand so they’re always comprehensible to the readers.

And I just love books that are structured in part as a conversation between two characters. I’ve seen this done really well in stories featuring an interrogation (Sylvia Louise Engdahl’s The Far Side of Evil; the movie Sophie Scholl - The Final Days) and there is something of that quality here, as well, even though Rivers is a doctor and he is, technically, supposed to help Sassoon get well - where “well” is defined as “ready and willing to go back to battle.” And Rivers is painfully aware that this is a definition of wellness that makes him in a sense Sassoon’s antagonist, indeed the enemy of all his patients, because he is getting them well enough to go off and die.
osprey_archer: (books)
T. H. White’s The Book of Merlyn stands as a monument to the skill and sagacity of editors. White intended the book as the capstone of his Once and Future King cycle, but, as Sylvia Townsend Warner explains in the introduction to the posthumously released book, because of wartime paper shortages and also, presumably, the fact that large portions of the book involve Merlin monologuing at Arthur, it was never published as such.

Thank God. As it stands, the ending of The Once and Future King is beautiful and tragic and all the more soul-crushing because White clutches at just a bit of hope that retelling the story might help. The Book of Merlyn (which might have gotten better in revision! Warner assures us, loyal to White as a good friend should be) is mostly a bunch of talking heads: Merlin and his counsel of animals discuss what is wrong with Man (just about everything) and how it might be solved, with occasional pauses when the animals note to Merlin that Arthur looks sad.

As well he might! This is all taking place on the eve of Arthur’s final battle with his recreant son Mordred, and he must be afflicted with a strong feeling of “Too little, too late.” What’s the point of telling him all this now, when he’s no longer in a position to use any of it? Surely it would have made more sense for Merlin to transform Arthur to visit an ant colony and a gaggle of wild geese before he started his reign, so he would have years to use the lessons that he learned about governance?

And, indeed, when White learned that The Book of Merlyn wouldn’t be included in The Once and Future King, he deposited those scenes in Book One. And the scenes really work much better there: they make so much more sense as lessons for young Wart who will be king, than as a final lesson the night before the battle that will end Arthur’s reign.

[personal profile] skygiants commented that it seems like a classic case of the themes of the story only crystalizing at the end of the writing process. Near the end you write a scene that actually needs to go close to the beginning, because you’ve finally figured out what the book is about and need to thread the themes throughout.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Melody Warnick’s This Is Where You Belong: The Art and Science of Loving the Place You Live, a self-help memoir of the little exercises that Warnick did to help herself feel more rooted in her local community. Most of these exercises are low-key, visit-a-local-attraction sort of things, which is useful from a self-help perspective (a small task is much more likely to get done) but not exciting as a memoir.

A while ago, [personal profile] evelyn_b sent me Helen Perry Curtis’s Jean and Company, Unlimited, a 1937 novel based loosely on Curtis’s travels through Europe with her daughters (here telescoped into one daughter, Jean). Curtis was a museum curator as well as a freelance writer (most of the chapters in this book were initially serialized in a magazine) who went to Europe to purchase folk costumes, so we get a LOT of folk costume detail, plus delicious food and fascinating historical tidbits. Absolutely charming. Now I want to go on a European tour too…

What I’m Reading Now

I’ve begun A Wizard of Earthsea! Attempting to impress his hated rival Jasper, Ged attempted a spell to summon the spirit of a dead person and accidentally also summoned a nameless shadow creature, which is now lurking somewhere in Earthsea waiting to possess Ged so as to use him as a puppet of evil. Well, Ged, maybe you should’ve just stayed with your first master Ogion instead of going to mage school, huh?

(Also relieved that I went into this knowing that Tehanu is going to unpack some of the patriarchal assumptions undergirding Earthsea, because WOW. “Weak as women’s magic, wicked as women’s magic,” huh? Strong words from a story about a boy who summoned a nameless horror from the deep!)

In Dracula, Lucy briefly regained her health… only to take a turn for the worse! Dr. Seward has summoned his mentor Van Helsing from the continent, but Van Helsing seems devastatingly averse to telling anyone what is actually wrong. VAN HELSING, MAYBE IF YOU WERE MORE FORTHCOMING IT MIGHT SAVE HER.

What I Plan to Read Next

Once I’m done with the Newbery Honor books of the 1970s (three left!!!) I’m going to devote myself to the books on my TBR shelf, with the intention of finishing them by November. Then on my Massachusetts trip I can splurge in the used bookstores guilt-free!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

May 2025

S M T W T F S
    123
4 5 6 7 8910
111213 14151617
18 19 20 21 222324
25262728293031

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated May. 22nd, 2025 04:31 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios