Some short review things
Mar. 3rd, 2009 05:08 pm1. Dollhouse, episode three. Again, all right; again, not top quality; I'm still watching the show to see if it improves. My favorite scene was the one with Ballard and the Russian mobster on the roof, where Ballard is explaining why he's sure Dollhouse exists - "Because the first thing people do with any technology is destroy." A hackneyed thing to say, but said with conviction, and the mobster's (who is, I think, an active?) response is good.
I think the Dollhouse could have been a really cool Macguffin, but it would have been better to make the show's main character either the FBI guy who is trying to bring them down, or one of Dollhouse's leaders, or really anyone who doesn't get her mind wiped at the end of everyone show. As this cogent discussion of the show points out, a main character who gets reset at the end of every week is death to character development.
2. Shadow Unit, episode 2.1. Not as harrowing as many of the first season episodes, but still solid, and it does feature the squirm-worthy spectacle of Reyes apologizing. Twice.
I must confess that Daphne's Wiccan-ness threw me for a loop. I didn't expect it, and it somehow didn't fit the image I had of the character, and I'm not sure why.
3. This is apropos of nothing, but I love this review of Eichmann in Jerusalem, which I blew my mind when I read it last year (the book, I mean, not the review). If you've never read it and you have any interest in Nazis at all, it's a fascinating book and I urge you to give it a try.
I think the Dollhouse could have been a really cool Macguffin, but it would have been better to make the show's main character either the FBI guy who is trying to bring them down, or one of Dollhouse's leaders, or really anyone who doesn't get her mind wiped at the end of everyone show. As this cogent discussion of the show points out, a main character who gets reset at the end of every week is death to character development.
2. Shadow Unit, episode 2.1. Not as harrowing as many of the first season episodes, but still solid, and it does feature the squirm-worthy spectacle of Reyes apologizing. Twice.
I must confess that Daphne's Wiccan-ness threw me for a loop. I didn't expect it, and it somehow didn't fit the image I had of the character, and I'm not sure why.
3. This is apropos of nothing, but I love this review of Eichmann in Jerusalem, which I blew my mind when I read it last year (the book, I mean, not the review). If you've never read it and you have any interest in Nazis at all, it's a fascinating book and I urge you to give it a try.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 04:19 am (UTC)ETA: Of course, I like Eliza Dushku a lot more than most people do, so...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 05:34 pm (UTC)And honestly, I think the fact that this is a Whedon show will work against it in some ways. People expect a lot of Whedon; they're going to complain if Dollhouse is about Echo's interesting new situation this week and nothing deeper.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 06:26 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 01:39 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 08:26 pm (UTC)And it might not necessarily be her "true" personality that emerges, but some sort of deeper consciousness that will eventually merge her different imprints, etc.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 09:11 pm (UTC)Now that is an interesting thought. You have a shiny brain.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 07:49 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 05:25 am (UTC)I missed Brady and Lau a little, but I was glad Sol got so much screen time. It's the curse of the ensemble show.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 09:20 am (UTC)I'm really warming to Sol. I want to hear his stories, true and otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 10:04 pm (UTC)2. I liked the end, but... I feel like sometimes the authors need an editor to step back and say, I don't know, something like, "you're readers aren't stupid" and cut out an average of two scenes per episode. I was surprised by the Wicca thing, but I did appreciate the continuation of the personal mythology limiting each gamma's powers.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 02:31 am (UTC)2. Which scenes would you have cut? It did feel a little off-kilter, although I'm not sure quite where or why.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 03:52 am (UTC)2. My response turned out a little long, even for me (http://exuberantself.livejournal.com/64221.html#cutid1)
no subject
Date: 2009-03-04 10:23 pm (UTC)and yeah, i love victor (or whatever his mobster name is)'s response.
at the same time, though, i doubt echo will be completely wiped for long- she's already showing signs of retaining her thoughts, and i imagine when she meets paul (which is bound to happen) it will become much harder to retain them entirely. but the concept of the show from paul's point of view is very interesting... on the other hand, the characters in his world would need a lot more development, and we would miss out on the dollhouse staff- who have been my favorite part of the show thus far.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 02:23 am (UTC)It's nice to know that he has redeeming qualities to people who do not go "Russian accent!!!11!! yay Russianness!"
You know what might be really cool? A show with Topher as the main character. Because the nerd guys never get their own shows. And then we could keep the Dollhouse staff interaction and solve the main-character-who-always-has-a-different-personality problem.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 02:50 am (UTC)well, i mean, the russian accent is pretty excellent too. but, yes, he's interesting for more than just his cool voice. ; )
this is true about the nerd guys, but i don't know if i could handle a show full of topher. maybe a topher-centric episode, that might be really excellent. and i guess the other dollhouse staff members (i'm thinking about boyd and dr. saunders) are too busy being mysterious to warrant the star role...
no subject
Date: 2009-03-05 06:17 pm (UTC)I also don't think that Eliza's acting is carrying the show very well. The whole point of this show for her as an actress was to display her versatility, but she's actually not that versatile. I wish she and the 'Sierra' actress would stop playing their 'dolls' as fake-children, or whatever it is that they think brain-wiped people would act like. They are not convincing.
Um. I do like Topher, who is happily amoral but not mean-spirited. Amy Acker's character scares me: she looks one baby-step away from a massive breakdown. Ballard makes me miss Helo. The lone wolf thing doesn't suit him-- he needs more people to play off of in his scenes; relationships, not empty action. I wish Boyd was given more than one note to play, because his actor is interesting. The one plot-thread in the show that has interested me was the last 30 seconds of the last episode, where Echo and Sierra communicated secretly in front of their guards. That has potential. So does the male doll/Lubov.
I don't know.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 01:27 pm (UTC)That said, I also think it was questionable to base an entire show on such an exploitable premise. It's particularly upsetting given the show is by Joss Whedon, who's supposed to be a feminist - and that is part of why I keep watching, because I don't want to believe he screwed up this badly.
And I agree with you, the A-plots of the episodes have been terrible, both in conception and execution.
I'm not sure how I think the dolls should act in their wiped state. I think real amnesiacs are upset about their lack of memory, which would be inconvenient for the Dollhouse so of course they program that out. But the fact that the dolls appear to have cotton candy for brains when they're wiped is annoying (although I would say they seem more zombie-like than child-like).
Maybe if the dolls kept a default personality when they were wiped, like a pared-down version of their own past? That could have been interesting, and it would have been the dolls at least some rudimentary character development to help viewers connect.
no subject
Date: 2009-03-06 06:00 pm (UTC)Yes. I am not the audience this show is looking for. (Then again, who is?)
The mind-wiped dolls seem to me to be acting too obviously-- the 'big googly eyes=innocence' kind of approach. If you are really a blank slate, then wouldn't you act, well, blank?
Maybe if the dolls kept a default personality when they were wiped, like a pared-down version of their own past?
That is a truly fantastic idea. I wish they had done this. So interesting!
Thanks for the link to the Dollhouse meta you posted. I read it and it made me feel a lot better. The author articulated so well a lot of the things I was thinking and feeling, and pointed out many things I hadn't considered. And she called a spade a spade: "A show in which the heroine is brainwashed, mindwiped, has no volition beyond her programming, and is regularly raped (because she is sold for sex that she cannot meaningfully consent to)..."
no subject
Date: 2009-03-07 04:17 am (UTC)Given the amount of time the female dolls spend half-naked and sweaty, I'd say oversexed teenage boys. Given how little overlap that group has with Whedon's fanbase, I can't help but think that was a poor decision.