![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
I come bearing links! Links of hilarity!
First, WTF Bad Romance Covers, a hilarious tumblr of, well, bad romance covers. I found this last night, and some of the entries made me laugh so hard that I couldn't breathe. Objectified Scotsman Thursday is particularly hilarious. (What is it with romance writers and the Scots?)
Second, Flaws Only a Protagonist Could Have, which is a delicious send-up of the non-flaw flaws that writers often give their protagonists. For instance:
She wasn’t perfect. She had two different colored eyes, which is definitely a flaw and not a magnetic, compelling, unusual form of beauty.
Or this one:
I’ve always been different. I like books and animals better than people. Why, I don’t know. Maybe because books and animals are physically incapable of talking to me or having needs that supersede my own, so I can be in total control of them. Books can’t judge you or hurt you. They also can’t talk or eat or build a life with you, but whatever.
Or this one, which may be my favorite:
“I just want to be normal,” she said, even though she had amazing powers and a super-family and was mega-gorgeous and better than normal in every way and the entire book would be terrible if she were normal and she had no conception of what normal was to begin with.
First, WTF Bad Romance Covers, a hilarious tumblr of, well, bad romance covers. I found this last night, and some of the entries made me laugh so hard that I couldn't breathe. Objectified Scotsman Thursday is particularly hilarious. (What is it with romance writers and the Scots?)
Second, Flaws Only a Protagonist Could Have, which is a delicious send-up of the non-flaw flaws that writers often give their protagonists. For instance:
She wasn’t perfect. She had two different colored eyes, which is definitely a flaw and not a magnetic, compelling, unusual form of beauty.
Or this one:
I’ve always been different. I like books and animals better than people. Why, I don’t know. Maybe because books and animals are physically incapable of talking to me or having needs that supersede my own, so I can be in total control of them. Books can’t judge you or hurt you. They also can’t talk or eat or build a life with you, but whatever.
Or this one, which may be my favorite:
“I just want to be normal,” she said, even though she had amazing powers and a super-family and was mega-gorgeous and better than normal in every way and the entire book would be terrible if she were normal and she had no conception of what normal was to begin with.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 05:51 pm (UTC)(Edited because I threw an extra word in that title, oops.)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 09:05 pm (UTC)I wonder what it is with romance novelists and Scots. Is it the tartan? The haggis? What makes Scotsmen such irresistible romance heroes? (I mean, the accent, obviously, but it's not like you can hear that in a novel.)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 11:17 pm (UTC)(No, literally. All the stupid racist tricks the British used on PoC in their colonies, they first perfected at home on other white people.)
Irishmen do get somewhat the same treatment, Welshmen less so. That's because the Welsh have been subjugated to England for years on years, while Ireland and Scotland still resist hegemony. So they're constructed in English language literature as strange, foreign places full of wild men and weird customs, but potentially they have resources that can be exploited. It also lets white people identify with an underclass and get to feel oppressed.
(My Feels about my Anglo-Celtic heritage, I allude to them.)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-12 02:36 pm (UTC)I've realized that, while I will totally swoon over a real, live Scot (Ewan McGregor, David Tennant, etc., etc.), Highland romances are a really big turn-off--maybe because of that exploitative factor.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 08:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 09:04 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 09:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 01:36 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 09:43 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 01:37 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-09 10:52 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 01:39 am (UTC)Her Tom, Her Lover is a pretty terrible title, but I could see werecats working as a concept. Weretortoises, however, just seem totally unsexy.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 03:45 am (UTC)Seriously, though, can you imagine your career being to make covers like this?
no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 04:20 am (UTC)I'm sure I could think of something less sexy than a hedgehog, but it might take me a minute.
no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 07:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 10:26 pm (UTC)She had two different colored eyes, which is definitely a flaw and not a magnetic, compelling, unusual form of beauty.
Haahahaha, totally.
I do hate virtues reported as problems. "I have this problem where I have to finish everything I start" or "I have this problem where I have to drop everything if a friend needs my help." Queue the eye rolling….
no subject
Date: 2014-05-10 11:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2014-05-12 01:17 pm (UTC)But no. Usually the author just knows that complex characters are supposed to have flaws, but can't stand to give their baby an actual flaw (which I have some sympathy for, actually; when I give a character a really big flaw, I often feel terribly sorry for them afterward. I'm sure you're a lovely person, X! It's not your fault I made you this way!)
no subject
Date: 2014-05-13 09:19 pm (UTC)Maybe it's the bagpipes...
no subject
Date: 2014-05-14 12:19 am (UTC)