Reds and other movies
Mar. 8th, 2013 11:45 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
It is spring break! And you know what that means: it is time to watch ALL THE MOVIES!
Today I watched Reds, which has all the stigmata of a labor of love, not least of which being the flaw common to labors of love: the writer/director/editor/whoever clearly could not bear to cut anything, which means that the first, uh, hour and a half could probably have been chopped down to fifteen minutes. That would be more than sufficient to establish Louise Bryant and Jack Reed's basic dysfunction: they can't reconcile their belief that they should be independent free lovers with the fact that, actually, what they really want is to be monogamous adventurers who write books.
Doesn't that seem revolutionary enough for anyone? But no, they refuse to admit to themselves what they really want and therefore just keep hurting each other.
Honestly, I think structuring a movie about Greenwich village in the 1910s and the Russian revolution as a historical romance focused on Louise Bryant and Jack Reed's romance is probably a mistake. Also, making one movie about both of them and wasting half of it on Louise and Jack means that neither gets very fully explored. There ought to be two miniseries, ensemble pieces exploring the politics and personalities of both: the political and artistic ferment of Greenwich Village and the assault on it after World War I, the heady enthusiasm of the early Russian revolution and its devolution thereafter.
Both would be tragedies, but the giddy wonderfulness of it - all these characters who think they're remaking the world - would be worth it. (Plus, I would looooove to see the fic. Politburo fic, everyone! Like Founding Fathers fic, except more murder-y!)
***
I keep changing my mind about which movies to see this week. Right now in my queue I have The Green Hornet, Amazing Grace (18th century English politics movie! PLEASE BE AMAZING), As You Like It, and The Road to El Dorado, but I keep changing it. Like, maybe I should finally get around to Rozema's Mansfield Park? Or Gone with the Wind?
Today I watched Reds, which has all the stigmata of a labor of love, not least of which being the flaw common to labors of love: the writer/director/editor/whoever clearly could not bear to cut anything, which means that the first, uh, hour and a half could probably have been chopped down to fifteen minutes. That would be more than sufficient to establish Louise Bryant and Jack Reed's basic dysfunction: they can't reconcile their belief that they should be independent free lovers with the fact that, actually, what they really want is to be monogamous adventurers who write books.
Doesn't that seem revolutionary enough for anyone? But no, they refuse to admit to themselves what they really want and therefore just keep hurting each other.
Honestly, I think structuring a movie about Greenwich village in the 1910s and the Russian revolution as a historical romance focused on Louise Bryant and Jack Reed's romance is probably a mistake. Also, making one movie about both of them and wasting half of it on Louise and Jack means that neither gets very fully explored. There ought to be two miniseries, ensemble pieces exploring the politics and personalities of both: the political and artistic ferment of Greenwich Village and the assault on it after World War I, the heady enthusiasm of the early Russian revolution and its devolution thereafter.
Both would be tragedies, but the giddy wonderfulness of it - all these characters who think they're remaking the world - would be worth it. (Plus, I would looooove to see the fic. Politburo fic, everyone! Like Founding Fathers fic, except more murder-y!)
***
I keep changing my mind about which movies to see this week. Right now in my queue I have The Green Hornet, Amazing Grace (18th century English politics movie! PLEASE BE AMAZING), As You Like It, and The Road to El Dorado, but I keep changing it. Like, maybe I should finally get around to Rozema's Mansfield Park? Or Gone with the Wind?
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 04:49 pm (UTC)Haha--this line made me laugh :D
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 07:03 pm (UTC)But the Federalists never set up gulags for the Jeffersonian democrats or anything like that. Man, everyone else got way more excitingly bloodthirsty revolutions than us.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 11:40 pm (UTC)TRUTH
no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 06:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-08 07:01 pm (UTC)And they had The Perks of Being a Wallflower in the cinema on campus, but it was a busy weekend so I couldn't go. It was sad. :(
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 12:42 am (UTC)The Road to El Dorado is great fun, too!
I'm about to watch Mongol, plus we've been guilty-pleasure-watching The Tudors.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:48 am (UTC)I liked Lady Sarah and Garrow fine in Garrow's Law...but after season 1, they really toned down the slashy nemesis thing that Garrow and Silvester had going (the duel. THE DUEL!) and I kind of missed that.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:25 am (UTC)It was pretty good, from what I remember.
maybe I should finally get around to Rozema's Mansfield Park?
I don't know which version this is, but there's really not a Mansfield Park movie I like.
Go for Amazing Grace, lol.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:30 am (UTC)Amazing Grace is definitely higher on the list than any version of Mansfield Park.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:36 am (UTC)Ah. Then I didn't think anyone on either production understood MP, lol. This version doesn't have a come hither Fanny, but it has some other quirks of its own.
I have methodically watched all Austen adaptations (except NA, which I haven't read yet) and have Opinions on all of them, lol.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:46 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 04:50 am (UTC)And then there's the fact I read way too much fanfic. I wonder how many real books I could read if I wasn't reading fanfic.
no subject
Date: 2013-03-09 02:51 pm (UTC)And I agree 110% about Reds...
Date: 2013-03-09 07:39 am (UTC)The theater version of Reds had the first half much shortened, and I thought, much better.
We rented it recently from the library, and I barely made it through the first half. By time they got to Russia, I had run out of time, maybe interest, and we had to return it...
Re: And I agree 110% about Reds...
Date: 2013-03-09 02:27 pm (UTC)I'm glad someone had the sense to tell the producers of Reds to shorten the first half! Even if they did eventually release the whole darn thing, on the mistaken belief that the movie was better with endless Greenwich Village. The Russian Revolution bits are a lot of fun, but by the time we finally got there I was like, 'Shouldn't this have been happening an hour ago?"