![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png)
Rochester is such an asshole. This was my main takeaway from my recent rewatch of the 2006 Jane Eyre miniseries: Rochester is such an asshole, and this is true even if you leave aside the whole mad wife in the attic thing. He’s an asshole to Adele (always running the child down to her face: “All she cares about is presents” and so forth) and to Jane. The way that he grinds his fake courtship of Blanche Ingram in her face is just cruel (and cruel to Blanche, as well!) and seems designed to grind down Jane’s sense of self-worth, not just to corner her into saying yes to marrying him, but also as a failsafe that will soften her up for the whole “let’s live together unmarried in the south of France!” fall-back plan should someone expose Bertha’s existence.
It’s not that I thought Rochester was such a wonderful person before; I had a lively sense of his limitations as a human being when I first watched and loved this miniseries a decade ago. But upon rewatching it, I found that my feelings about him have tipped over from “flawed but compelling romantic hero” to “oh God Jane run.”
It’s not that I thought Rochester was such a wonderful person before; I had a lively sense of his limitations as a human being when I first watched and loved this miniseries a decade ago. But upon rewatching it, I found that my feelings about him have tipped over from “flawed but compelling romantic hero” to “oh God Jane run.”
no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 02:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 02:57 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 03:16 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 04:06 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 06:37 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 06:47 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 02:32 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 08:09 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 02:31 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 08:08 pm (UTC)sisterscousins, you got your snug little house, you got your lack of toxic masculinity....no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 03:59 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 05:53 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 06:21 pm (UTC)(Bertha appears to Jane at night, appeals for her help, they burn down Thornfield with Rochester in it and leave for Europe with Adele??)
no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 07:04 pm (UTC)Mary Rivers.
no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 02:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 06:44 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 06:52 pm (UTC)YESSSSS
If they're not in the story the symmetry with the Reeds is gone! Jane is an independent woman, with money and family, before she goes back to Rochester. (I still can barely read about how St John messes with her. I just couldn't take it as a kid.) (St John is also the marble white pillar, in contrast to the "sable pillar" of Brocklehurst who early demands Jane's obedience. Ucch.)
no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 06:24 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 08:07 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 09:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-29 10:28 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-06-30 02:35 pm (UTC)I can't say that Rochester is THE WORST when St John is there being, somehow, even more awful, but Rochester is nonetheless pretty awful himself. Stop negging Jane, man! She's suffered enough in her life!!
no subject
Date: 2020-07-01 11:52 am (UTC)There is this suggestion at the end of the book that Rochester is dependent on Anne, physically and emotionally, and I think that could be interesting if you're into, like femme dom dynamic. But really I would prefer Jane to run away and live an interesting life. And Adele too! FREE ADELE
no subject
Date: 2020-07-01 03:03 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-07-02 02:22 am (UTC)Also, if you haven't already seen it, google the comic "Dude watching with the Brontes".
no subject
Date: 2020-07-02 11:40 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-07-07 01:25 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-07-07 04:20 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2020-07-09 11:44 am (UTC)I feel like a lot of classic 'romances' in lit are about...picking the least fucking awful dude of the options, which I find incredibly depressing although probably not inaccurate in many cases.