Reign

Nov. 6th, 2014 04:45 am
osprey_archer: (downton abbey)
[personal profile] osprey_archer
I'm still watching Reign (I've gotten to episode 10), but I'm slowly losing interest as it becomes clearer the show is all flashy outsides and no soul. Aside from Queen Catherine (ably played by Megan Fellows, who was Anne in the 1985 Anne of Green Gables, a juxtaposition that I find ceaselessly amusing), most of the characters don't really have characterization, if you will. Mary's ladies-in-waiting are all but interchangeable, which I knew from the beginning but hoped would be a transitory state, and I have no idea what drives the king.

No, scratch that: the king is clearly driven by the exigencies of plot. He doesn't really have an in-story motivation.

Reign also has weird continuity problems, where characters will simply disappear without any of the characters noticing. The most egregious example being Francis's mistress Olivia, who is an enormous plot complication - until she gets dragged away into the passages in the bowels of the castle, where she is apparently not merely murdered but erased from everyone's memory, as well. Given how heavily the show leans on its plot, the fact that the plot doesn't hold water at even the most cursory inspection is a problem.

And finally, I am getting more and more irritated at the fact that they've decided that their main religious conflict should be between Christians and pagans (a sect of whom lives in the Blood Wood and offers up regular human sacrifices). I get that Catholic/Protestant differences are still a touchy subject and the show runners might not want to deal with it in what is basically a soap opera with unusually ridiculous costumes, but then maybe they shouldn't have chosen sixteenth-century France as their setting.

Yeah. Apparently their total disinterest in actual history is getting to me after all. Why would you choose a historical setting if you have no interest in any part of it, not even the costumes?

Date: 2014-11-06 03:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] asakiyume.livejournal.com
Lady Mary's astonished face is perfect for this entry.

I get that Catholic/Protestant differences are still a touchy subject and the show runners might not want to deal with it in what is basically a soap opera with unusually ridiculous costumes, but then maybe they shouldn't have chosen sixteenth-century France as their setting.

Laughing :D

Date: 2014-11-06 03:57 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com
Lady Mary is just like WHAT IS HAPPENING HERE. Wouldn't we all like to know!

I probably could have ignored the fact that the show basically ignores the Catholic/Protestant conflict if the show-runners hadn't thrown in the Catholic/human-sacrificing pagan conflict instead. I mean REALLY, that is simply not an acceptable substitute.

I found it especially irritating when the prince starts lecturing Mary about the importance of religious tolerance right after they almost got sacrificed in the woods. Maybe if he had led off with "Actually most pagans don't sacrifice people and strongly disapprove of those who do!" but nooooo, he's all "Why are you being so judgmental, Mary?" MAYBE BECAUSE SHE JUST ALMOST DIED. I FEEL LIKE NEARLY BEING MURDERED IS A REASONABLE THING TO BE JUDGMENTAL ABOUT.

Date: 2014-11-06 05:40 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] evelyn-b.livejournal.com
Every new thing I am hearing about this show makes me more likely to check it out. It sounds like it could be the fun kind of terrible. Also, I love Megan Follows!

Date: 2014-11-06 06:26 pm (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com
It's addictive in all the worst ways.

And Megan Fellows is totally the best thing on the show. I mean, she is also awful and keeps trying to kill everyone, but she's the only person who has a clear and consistent agenda and also clearly has a backbone made of pure steel.

I cannot wait for the king to die, probably at her hand. She probably won't allow herself to dance on his grave (so gauche!), but I imagine that her little smirk of self-satisfaction will be a thing of beauty.

Date: 2014-11-06 11:21 pm (UTC)
silverusagi: (Default)
From: [personal profile] silverusagi
Sounds like exactly what I thought it would be, lol.

Date: 2014-11-07 12:51 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com
At least they're honest and up front about the fact that they're ridiculous, I guess?

Date: 2014-11-06 11:32 pm (UTC)
ext_1611: Isis statue (sharpe)
From: [identity profile] isiscolo.livejournal.com
Yeah, I put up with some of the ahistoricalness of The Tudors because they generally tried, but this sounds like too much WTF for me.

Date: 2014-11-07 12:50 am (UTC)
From: [identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com
I'm sure the feeling of Reign is that historical shows that actually try are rank amateurs. Attempting to stay within the confines of history, pah!

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
67 8 9101112
13 1415 16 17 1819
20 21 22 23242526
27 28 29 30 31  

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Aug. 3rd, 2025 02:54 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios