I've been reading Barbara Rosenwein's Emotional Communities in the Early Middle Ages, which is fun, even though I can't keep track of the various Merovingians.
The book is built around the idea of social constructionism: the idea that emotions are shaped by the social norms of society. Rosenwein comments that "In Japan there is a feeling, amae, of contented dependence on another; but in English there is nothing comparable and presumably no feeling that corresponds to it." (15)
I disagree. Or rather, I think Rosenwein is correct that most English-speaking adults would be embarrassed to say "I feel contentedly dependent on you!" given the cultural importance of independence. But the feeling of (or at least yearning for) amae exists, subterranean and furtive, and it comes out over and over again in stories.
There's a whole subset of hurt/comfort fic which wallows in amae: Character A is injured or sick, and thus is forced into dependence on Character B - and because that loss of independence is the result of fate, not something they asked for or wanted, it's all right that they rest content in their dependence.
It crops up in professional fiction, too; there's also a whole sequence in The Virginian, the first Western, wherein the Virginian - who has hitherto been a prototype of laconic manliness - gets shot and is utterly dependent on the ministrations of his lady love.
I suspect stories bear the stigmata of all the things we aren't supposed to feel, or can't admit to feeling.
The book is built around the idea of social constructionism: the idea that emotions are shaped by the social norms of society. Rosenwein comments that "In Japan there is a feeling, amae, of contented dependence on another; but in English there is nothing comparable and presumably no feeling that corresponds to it." (15)
I disagree. Or rather, I think Rosenwein is correct that most English-speaking adults would be embarrassed to say "I feel contentedly dependent on you!" given the cultural importance of independence. But the feeling of (or at least yearning for) amae exists, subterranean and furtive, and it comes out over and over again in stories.
There's a whole subset of hurt/comfort fic which wallows in amae: Character A is injured or sick, and thus is forced into dependence on Character B - and because that loss of independence is the result of fate, not something they asked for or wanted, it's all right that they rest content in their dependence.
It crops up in professional fiction, too; there's also a whole sequence in The Virginian, the first Western, wherein the Virginian - who has hitherto been a prototype of laconic manliness - gets shot and is utterly dependent on the ministrations of his lady love.
I suspect stories bear the stigmata of all the things we aren't supposed to feel, or can't admit to feeling.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-12 05:41 pm (UTC)I think our language suffers from a lack of amae, and from the truly unfortunate construction of the idea, "independent adult".
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 01:57 pm (UTC)Or not. It would probably be quite an essay.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 05:03 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 01:39 pm (UTC)It's not an acceptable feeling in America - and not unacceptable in the same way that something like jealousy is, where we know what it is and often think poorly of it, but unacceptable in that most people can't even articulate it well.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 02:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 03:49 pm (UTC)The idea reminded me of the phenomonon of deference voting - I assume though that although presumably if someone votes based on 'this person is a social/educational better and therefore should be in charge' it's not quite the same - inspired by a similar emotion perhaps, but the emotion itself is not named.
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 04:02 pm (UTC)You might be able to make an argument that in certain parts of the middle ages, amae was an exalted emotion!
no subject
Date: 2013-02-13 04:30 pm (UTC)