Jan. 27th, 2013

osprey_archer: (Default)
Frank Capra’s It’s a Wonderful Life - indeed, Frank Capra’s entire oeuvre - is often snidely described as “heart-warming.” Presumably these are the same people who deride Disney movies as sweet, fluffy tales, never mind all the manifoldly scarring moments in Disney movies: the deaths of Bambi’s mother and Simba’s father, the dragon in Sleeping Beauty and the forest in Snow White, Hell at the end of Fantasia, the entirety of Alice in Wonderland and Pinocchio...

I found Disney terrifying as a child. Oh, sure, it ends happily. But the suffering you endure on the way!

Frank Capra, similarly, is much darker than his critics seem to notice. Sure, It’s a Wonderful Life ends on a note of mutual cooperation, in which the townsfolk band together to help George Bailey as Bailey has helped them, but poor Bailey goes through the mill first. All he wants is to get out of his Bedford Falls: he scrimps and saves and every time he’s about to go anywhere or do anything Fate intervenes, trapping him in a job he hates (important though he thinks it is) in a two-bit town he yearns to leave.

It would be really hard being married to George Bailey. His wife must sometimes wonder if he includes her in the list of things trapping him.

My favorite Capra movie remains Mr. Smith Goes to Washington (another film starring Jimmy Stewart, though his Mr. Smith has fewer sharp edges than George Bailey). But It’s a Wonderful Life is worth seeing.
osprey_archer: (kitty)
My friend Micky shared this with me, and I must pass it on to you because if I do not share the pain, my head may explode.

Is Jane Austen So Popular Because Her Books Are Kinda Just Highbrow Twlight?

This is a troll, right? This article has to be in bad faith. Baker is insulting Austen fans (because Austen fans clearly don't get insulted enough) by comparing their beloved books to Twilight, which is even more socially despised - Austen fans may be a little weird, but Twilight fans are positively derided.

Of course being lumped in with literary pariahs will infuriate Austen fans! The article is designed lure us into reiterating the misogyny which is inherent in so much Twilight criticism in an attempt to distance ourselves from it. "Darcy is not like Edward Cullen at all! He differs in X, Y, and Z respects! I may be into girly things, but not I'm not that kind of girl!"

It has lines like "Stephenie Meyer produced a movie about 'about a lonely Jane Austen fan who falls in love at an Austen theme park.' Triple gag."

Because ew, Stephanie Meyer! She has girl cooties! As do lonely Jane Austen fans and Austen resorts, because it is a clear and obvious fact that all things Austen are girl-cootie-ful and therefore gag-worthy. Because girly things are ipso facto gagtastic. Because REASONS.

Baker also comments that her favorite classic novels are Wharton's, because "Wharton's novels are actually cynical (read: realistic) and the opposite of romantic" - read: completely devoid of girl cooties.

Wharton books are not only unromantic, but aggressively anti-romantic - romance pretty much requires characters who are capable of loving someone other than themselves, which Wharton characters generally are not (except Gertie Farish. I love you, Gertie Farish!).

Why did Jezebel publish this? Is it a cynic ploy for hits? Or do they intend to sit back and feel superior in the face of the frothing Twilight hate? (So far, most of the commenters are refraining from froth. Is it a bad sign when the commenters are more thoughtful than the original article?)

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

January 2026

S M T W T F S
     123
45678910
11121314151617
18192021222324
25262728293031

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jan. 6th, 2026 11:07 am
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios