Sense & Sensibility
Jul. 1st, 2008 02:07 amI saw Sense & Sensibility today (the 1995 version; I have been informed that the more recent variation is subpar). Minor spoilers for both below.
I may have liked the movie more than the book, which is embarrassing. Sense & Sensibility is one of my least favorite Austen novels (I don’t much like Persuasion either); there are large tracts of the book that involve waiting around in a misery of anticipation, desperate for a smattering of information that could be gained by the expedient of actually communicating with the other characters.
I’m being unfair, I realize; there are good reasons why no one in Sense & Sensibility talks to anyone else; but that doesn’t make it feel less grimly oppressive. The movie skates over the great waiting sequences, which is a plus.
All the Dashwood girls are wonderful. Kate Winslet is brilliant and very lovely as Marianne (I should get more of her movies; she’s wonderful in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Heavenly Creatures too, so it can’t be a fluke). Emma Thompson seems a bit old to be Elinor, who’s supposed to be nineteen, not thirty, but her acting is good. The girl who plays Margaret (imdb.com tells me she’s Emelie Francois) is excellent too. And she has a tree house.
Speaking of Margaret: I really like the scene where Elinor and Edward Ferrars lure her out from under the table by speaking geographical nonsense. It’s a charming scene and it shows why they fall in love. I always felt a bit cheated because it happened off-stage in the book.
Willoughby is marvelous. I love the part where he spins Marianne around while explaining all the reasons he dislikes Colonel Brandon; he’s charming and lively and handsome (no wonder she’s in love) and just unkind enough that his perfidies seem entirely in character when they’re revealed.
The costumes and cinematography are beautiful, too. There are a smattering of shots where the camera seems to be peering down from the chandelier, which is odd yet works, and the landscape shots are lovely and short. (I've never liked long, lingering landscape shots. I recall film reviews of Brokeback Mountain, all eerily parroting each other about how Ang Lee had made the Wyoming landscape a character in the film with his incredible mountain shots, when in fact he had just bulked the thing up with boring useless footage.)
I’m also reading Mansfield Park, which seems good so far. It’s the last Austen book I haven’t read (the unfinished novels don’t count) so I feel very pleased and complete.
I may have liked the movie more than the book, which is embarrassing. Sense & Sensibility is one of my least favorite Austen novels (I don’t much like Persuasion either); there are large tracts of the book that involve waiting around in a misery of anticipation, desperate for a smattering of information that could be gained by the expedient of actually communicating with the other characters.
I’m being unfair, I realize; there are good reasons why no one in Sense & Sensibility talks to anyone else; but that doesn’t make it feel less grimly oppressive. The movie skates over the great waiting sequences, which is a plus.
All the Dashwood girls are wonderful. Kate Winslet is brilliant and very lovely as Marianne (I should get more of her movies; she’s wonderful in Eternal Sunshine of the Spotless Mind and Heavenly Creatures too, so it can’t be a fluke). Emma Thompson seems a bit old to be Elinor, who’s supposed to be nineteen, not thirty, but her acting is good. The girl who plays Margaret (imdb.com tells me she’s Emelie Francois) is excellent too. And she has a tree house.
Speaking of Margaret: I really like the scene where Elinor and Edward Ferrars lure her out from under the table by speaking geographical nonsense. It’s a charming scene and it shows why they fall in love. I always felt a bit cheated because it happened off-stage in the book.
Willoughby is marvelous. I love the part where he spins Marianne around while explaining all the reasons he dislikes Colonel Brandon; he’s charming and lively and handsome (no wonder she’s in love) and just unkind enough that his perfidies seem entirely in character when they’re revealed.
The costumes and cinematography are beautiful, too. There are a smattering of shots where the camera seems to be peering down from the chandelier, which is odd yet works, and the landscape shots are lovely and short. (I've never liked long, lingering landscape shots. I recall film reviews of Brokeback Mountain, all eerily parroting each other about how Ang Lee had made the Wyoming landscape a character in the film with his incredible mountain shots, when in fact he had just bulked the thing up with boring useless footage.)
I’m also reading Mansfield Park, which seems good so far. It’s the last Austen book I haven’t read (the unfinished novels don’t count) so I feel very pleased and complete.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 12:48 pm (UTC)Have you seen the newish film version of Mansfield Park? I was watching it on Sunday and I forgot how good it is. It's not as good as Sense and Sensibility, but it's very well done.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 01:42 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 03:32 pm (UTC)Incidentally, Emma Thompson's long-term partner is Greg Wise (Willoughby)--they met during S&S!
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 09:07 pm (UTC)I thought the crying made sense--she has just had her entire world overturned--but it did seem over-hysterical, given how calm she always was before. In the book she ran out of the room before she lost it, which makes more sense than her breaking down in front of everyone, although I can see why the filmmakers staged it that way.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 09:17 pm (UTC)Are any of the other movies adapting Austen novels any good? I've watched the recent P&P (and the miniseries of the same) but I haven't seen any of the others and I'm always a bit leery of adaptations of books because sometimes horrible things happen, like Ella Enchanted.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 09:27 pm (UTC)I always feel like saying "Colonel Brandon, I'm sure if you work at it you can find a girl just as vivacious, clever, and pretty as Marianne who adores you." Because he deserves that.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 09:35 pm (UTC)Yeah, running out of the room makes more sense-- it sort of felt like the actress was told that this was THE moment in the film to show she could emote, but I can't watch it without laughing to be honest!
This version of Mansfield Park: http://www.imdb.com/title/tt0178737/
(I got it in a box set along with Emma, so I didn't know what to expect.)
Fanny (Frances O Conner) isn't as outgoing and forceful as other people have played her. There's a lot of emphasis on her silence rather than her actions- the film *really* explores the ludicrous actions of the people around her rather than Fanny herself, which is refreshing. And it's playful enough that the controversial elements aren't as shocking as they would be otherwise.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-01 09:36 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 12:17 am (UTC)Mansfield Park is probably my least favorite Austen, honestly, but Fanny is a really sweet character. One word of advice- if you haven't yet, don't see the movie adaption with Billie Piper. Not worth your time.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 03:30 am (UTC)The thing about that last moment being Elinor's emotive moment--she had one earlier in the film, the one where Marianne realizes that Edward is engaged to Lucy and is all, how could you not tell me?, and Elinor (with just a touch of bitterness and tears) says that if she hadn't been bound by her promise she could have cried enough even to make Marianne see the depth of her feelings.
It's subtle and gracefully done and I wish the filmmakers would have taken a similarly light touch to the end scene instead of having her bawl.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 03:36 am (UTC)....she played quiet, mousy Fanny Price of Mansfield Park?
That sounds like a bad idea from the get-go. I will steer very, very clear.
Colonel Brandon/Marianne is a problem pairing, given that it starts so late in the game. I think the filmmakers were banking on the fact that many people think Rickman is very, very attractive to help them get over the difficulties.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 04:02 am (UTC)Ahem. Yes! There are other excellent Austen adaptations! The newest Northanger Abbey is a must-see. The 1995 Persuasion is also quite good. And I find the Gwyneth Paltrow version of Emma to be very fun.
no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 04:11 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-02 10:27 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2008-07-03 12:35 am (UTC)(the other movie version, though, is very good, just not at all the same thing as the book. i have to see them as two different fanny prices...)
you know that makes a lot of sense...