SFF in the Newberies
Sep. 4th, 2025 08:03 am![[personal profile]](https://www.dreamwidth.org/img/silk/identity/user.png){kind=small}
osprey_archerI was all set to write a post about how there aren’t that many SFF books that won Newbery honors or awards, but then I actually totted them up and realized that this is a classic case of a sampling error. The problem is not that few SFF children’s books won awards, but that I didn’t read most of those books specially for this project. I read a bunch of them just as part of my general reading as a child, because the Newbery SFF books, it turns out, include an extremely high percentage of absolute bangers.
(For the purposes of this post, I’ve excluded nonsense books (which after all had their own post) and also most books about talking animals, just because I tend to see those as their own genre with its own concerns. There are a couple that in my opinion stray over into more general SFF territory, and I have included them here.)
It’s also true that the SFF Newberies tend to cluster in the more recent years, so as I’ve been working backward there have been fewer and fewer, in part perhaps because nonsense books and folktales were more heavily represented in the earlier years. The first indisputably fantasy book to win a Newbery Honor is Dorothy Lathrop’s delightful The Fairy Circus in 1932. There are just a few in the 1940s, but these include Julia Sauer’s Fog Magic (which I read and adored as a reprint in fourth grade), as well as Ruth S. Gannett’s still popular and beloved My Father’s Dragon.
But in the 1960s and 70s, the Newbery Award got on a fantasy roll, and honored classic after classic. Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time, Lloyd Alexander’s The Black Cauldron and The High King, Sylvia Louise Engdahl’s Enchantress from the Stars (another reprint I loved in my early teens), Robert O’Brien’s Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH (my mom read this to my brother and me), Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Tombs of Atuan (I read this within the last couple of years and it 110% holds up if you come to it for the first time as an adult), Susan Cooper’s The Dark is Rising and The Grey King, and Elizabeth Marie Pope’s The Perilous Gard (another beloved favorite of my youth! I just couldn’t get enough of the 1970s books apparently).
This amazing streak continues in the 1980s and 90s with Robin McKinley’s The Blue Sword and The Hero and the Crown, Nancy Farmer’s The Ear, the Eye, and the Arm and The House of the Scorpion, Eloise Jarvis McGraw’s The Moorchild and Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Megan Whalen Turner’s The Thief and Gail Carson Levine’s Ella Enchanted...
If someone asked for a reading list to introduce them to American children’s SFF from the latter half of the twentieth century, I think you could quite legitimately just hand them this list as a starting point. It hits many of the best authors and most famous and beloved books.
This winning streak continued into the 2000s with Kate DiCamillo’s The Tale of Despereaux (which I personally didn’t care for, but clearly many others do), Shannon Hale’s Princess Academy (also not a personal favorite) and Grace Lin Where the Mountain Meets the Moon (which I loved).
Where the Mountain Meets the Moon won an honor in 2010. In the fifteen years since then, the Newbery has gone a bit SFF mad (including three SFF honorees in 2024), but perhaps at the expense of its earlier all but unerring judgment. I’ve liked some of the work that has won in recent years (particularly Christina Soontornvat’s books), but I don’t think it’s as strong as the books from 1960 to 2010.
Now a skeptical reader might point out that I read many of the earlier books at an impressionable age, so perhaps the root of the problem is simply that I’ve aged out of the target audience. This is of course possible but also incorrect, as my taste is impeccable and my judgment 100% objective, but I think it also reflects changes in publishing.
First, the years around 2010 were the years of the explosion in YA publishing, which siphoned off a lot of books that would earlier have been published as children’s books. And the great YA explosion also changed the kind of YA books that were published: publishers were looking for the next Twilight, which (with all due respect to Twilight) is not likely to result in books as complex and meaty and uninterested in romance as, let’s say, The Tombs of Atuan.
At the same time, there was a wider swing back toward moralism in literature, the belief that the point of a story is to be a vehicle for good values. The values that modern-day moralists are different from the values of their Victorian forebears (very few people today are het up about the importance of keeping the Sabbath), but the basic instinct is the same, and it has the same deforming effect on literature. Not every book needs to be an expose of social injustice. Some people just want to write about fairies putting on a circus.
(For the purposes of this post, I’ve excluded nonsense books (which after all had their own post) and also most books about talking animals, just because I tend to see those as their own genre with its own concerns. There are a couple that in my opinion stray over into more general SFF territory, and I have included them here.)
It’s also true that the SFF Newberies tend to cluster in the more recent years, so as I’ve been working backward there have been fewer and fewer, in part perhaps because nonsense books and folktales were more heavily represented in the earlier years. The first indisputably fantasy book to win a Newbery Honor is Dorothy Lathrop’s delightful The Fairy Circus in 1932. There are just a few in the 1940s, but these include Julia Sauer’s Fog Magic (which I read and adored as a reprint in fourth grade), as well as Ruth S. Gannett’s still popular and beloved My Father’s Dragon.
But in the 1960s and 70s, the Newbery Award got on a fantasy roll, and honored classic after classic. Madeleine L’Engle’s A Wrinkle in Time, Lloyd Alexander’s The Black Cauldron and The High King, Sylvia Louise Engdahl’s Enchantress from the Stars (another reprint I loved in my early teens), Robert O’Brien’s Mrs. Frisby and the Rats of NIMH (my mom read this to my brother and me), Ursula K. Le Guin’s The Tombs of Atuan (I read this within the last couple of years and it 110% holds up if you come to it for the first time as an adult), Susan Cooper’s The Dark is Rising and The Grey King, and Elizabeth Marie Pope’s The Perilous Gard (another beloved favorite of my youth! I just couldn’t get enough of the 1970s books apparently).
This amazing streak continues in the 1980s and 90s with Robin McKinley’s The Blue Sword and The Hero and the Crown, Nancy Farmer’s The Ear, the Eye, and the Arm and The House of the Scorpion, Eloise Jarvis McGraw’s The Moorchild and Lois Lowry’s The Giver and Megan Whalen Turner’s The Thief and Gail Carson Levine’s Ella Enchanted...
If someone asked for a reading list to introduce them to American children’s SFF from the latter half of the twentieth century, I think you could quite legitimately just hand them this list as a starting point. It hits many of the best authors and most famous and beloved books.
This winning streak continued into the 2000s with Kate DiCamillo’s The Tale of Despereaux (which I personally didn’t care for, but clearly many others do), Shannon Hale’s Princess Academy (also not a personal favorite) and Grace Lin Where the Mountain Meets the Moon (which I loved).
Where the Mountain Meets the Moon won an honor in 2010. In the fifteen years since then, the Newbery has gone a bit SFF mad (including three SFF honorees in 2024), but perhaps at the expense of its earlier all but unerring judgment. I’ve liked some of the work that has won in recent years (particularly Christina Soontornvat’s books), but I don’t think it’s as strong as the books from 1960 to 2010.
Now a skeptical reader might point out that I read many of the earlier books at an impressionable age, so perhaps the root of the problem is simply that I’ve aged out of the target audience. This is of course possible but also incorrect, as my taste is impeccable and my judgment 100% objective, but I think it also reflects changes in publishing.
First, the years around 2010 were the years of the explosion in YA publishing, which siphoned off a lot of books that would earlier have been published as children’s books. And the great YA explosion also changed the kind of YA books that were published: publishers were looking for the next Twilight, which (with all due respect to Twilight) is not likely to result in books as complex and meaty and uninterested in romance as, let’s say, The Tombs of Atuan.
At the same time, there was a wider swing back toward moralism in literature, the belief that the point of a story is to be a vehicle for good values. The values that modern-day moralists are different from the values of their Victorian forebears (very few people today are het up about the importance of keeping the Sabbath), but the basic instinct is the same, and it has the same deforming effect on literature. Not every book needs to be an expose of social injustice. Some people just want to write about fairies putting on a circus.
no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 12:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:21 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 01:14 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:05 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:13 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:26 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:15 pm (UTC)It looks like Engdahl has published some more books in the past twenty years, none of which I've read. Maybe I'll have to look into that a bit.
no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 03:58 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 06:45 pm (UTC)Oh, that very nicely puts the finger on something that has been irking me for some while -- you're right, the pendulum has swung back to demanding a moral message before books can be seen as fit for publication. (And it's not even the publishers doing the demanding, but the readers...)
no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 08:45 pm (UTC)If you look at the sort of stuff that Philip Turner was writing in the 1960s, for example, it's way more demanding on the readership (in my opinion, after revisiting the novels as an adult) than "Twilight" and its ilk.
no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 08:33 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-04 08:48 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-05 12:18 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-06 02:12 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-06 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-06 02:41 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-06 11:01 pm (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-11 04:42 am (UTC)no subject
Date: 2025-09-11 06:55 pm (UTC)