osprey_archer: (cheers)
2025-04-06 06:21 pm
Entry tags:

100 movies

I enjoyed doing the 100 books list so much (and doing everyone else's, too) that I decided to do one for movies, as well. Here it is!
osprey_archer: (Default)
2024-12-30 06:13 pm

Wicked and Wish

This has been a very movie-ful weekend! On Saturday I went to see Wicked and on Sunday I watched Wish, both of which I enjoyed as visual spectacles but didn’t love.

Wicked is in fact the first two-thirds of the musical Wicked. (How are they going to make another complete movie out of a third of the musical, you ask? Who can say.) It’s visually lush and enticing, many of the songs are bangers, and I loved Galinda instantly. The MOST annoying person in the world but also somehow the most delightful? An absolute triumph for Ariana Grande. I also loved the Kristin Chenoweth and Idina Menzel (the original Galinda and Elphaba) got cameos doing a stage show together in the Emerald City. Lots of fun!

However. The movie really really really wanted me to like Elphaba, to the point of making people point and scream when they see her (because she’s green!), and because I am basically a contrary person I therefore spent most of the movie looking for a reason to dislike her. Eventually the movie broke me and I liked her despite myself but I assure you I fought hard.

But also I’m really just the wrong audience for “What if the villain was actually the good guy and just MISUNDERSTOOD?” Like. Of course you can construct a story where the villain had good reasons for their seeming villainy, which was actually just their attempt to restore justice to this cruel world. But I rarely feel that these stories engage with the original text in an interesting way, and if it fails to do that then I just don’t care.

***

Wish I thought was a visual delight. I loved the floating dreams and the pretty island and the crooked tree hanging over the water where Asha used to sit with her father gazing up at the stars, and I liked Asha and her friends and her goat sidekick, until he started talking. Disney should just stop it with the talking animal sidekicks. They’re always so much cuter when they can only bleat.

And I enjoyed all the little visual nods to other Disney movies. The references are fun if you catch them, but don’t detract from the movie if you don’t, which I think is an important quality in the Easter egg. No one should need to be encyclopedically knowledgeable about all the entries in a franchise in order to appreciate a movie. (Looking at you, Marvel!)

The songs were fine, but not catchy; nothing on the level of “Let It Go” from Frozen or “We Know the Way” from Moana. The songs in Wish are just too wordy, I think. It’s hard to imagine belting them out at karaoke.

Also, since Frozen 2, Disney has attempted a number of “let’s overthrow the Establishment” stories, and they’re just not that good at it, possibly because they are in fact the Establishment. In Wish, the inhabitants of the island overthrow the evil sorcerer king Magnifico by wishing real hard all at the same time. Then Magnifico’s wife takes over as the benevolent monarch and everything is solved.

I am not expecting Disney to go all Battleship Potemkin, but since they’re not going to go all Battleship Potemkin, maybe they should accept that stories about revolutionary structural change are not their forte.
osprey_archer: (art)
2024-08-12 01:04 pm
Entry tags:

The Lost Films of A. G. Gray

In my youth, I directed a few films starring my friends. The films have since been lost, but I have a few stills, and I thought it would be fun to put them in my scrapbook… and then I thought it would be fun to write up my filmmaking career in the form of an academic article… and, well, here it is.

“The Lost Films of A. G. Gray” is a perfectly cromulent subtitle, but I’m trying to think of a title to go with it. Some poetry quote, perhaps?

***

In the early 21st century, a new star appeared in the directorial firmament. But like all too many female film directors, A. G. Gray faded into obscurity after only a brief career. All four of her films have been lost.

Of the first two, there is no record even of the titles. Only the synopses remain. Gray’s debut was a black and white silent melodrama about a young girl (Emma M.) slowly driven mad by her quest to pursue fifty-five majors. As she sinks deeper into her obsession with a can of Spaghetti-Os, her desperate friends (Caitlin A. and Sarah T.) take her to an asylum, knocking the Spaghetti-Os from her grip. (In a dramatic close-up, the Spaghetti-Os roll from her hand, like the baby carriage rolling down the steps in Battleship Potemkin.) But the Spaghetti-Os catch A. in their wicked net. The film closes on a close-up of her face as she holds the Spaghetti-Os to her cheek and strokes it. “My precious,” proclaims the closing intertitle.

Before Gray began her next film, the era of sound dawned, and her use of music shows that she was swift to grasp its possibility. In this psychological drama, two friends (Micaela C. and Monika F.) find themselves trapped in a ski lodge by a blizzard. F. passes the time by singing Christmas carols, until C., driven mad by the incessant singing, locks F. outside in the storm. F., frantic, bangs on the door. But soon her knocking falls into a rhythm, and her irrepressible spirit triumphs as she bursts into song again.

Gray’s third and most experimental film, Fans in Three Modes, has left the most complete record. The film begins with a young girl (M. again) in a black dress, attempting to pick a fan to complete her outfit for the evening. As she considers various fans, different scenarios appear. In one, a girl in an orange shawl (A., another reappearance) peers over a black fan at a tempting plate of strawberries. In another, A. does battle with an adversary (Myra A.) armed with a red fan. The red fan triumphs. We return to M., who selects the red fan and sets out to conquer.

Questions, however, remain. Though the title alludes to three modes, we only see two. What was the second mode? (One feels instinctively that the fan battle is the climax of the film.) And what is the deeper meaning of this fan-tasy?

Gray ended her career with a more conventional offering, The Trojan Horse. Long-time collaborator M. is joined by newcomer Rebecca W. (visible in the only extant still), who is attempting to infiltrate Purdue gear onto the IU campus, prompting a battle of wits with M. There are unsubstantiated rumors that the director herself played a cameo as the evil mastermind behind the scheme. No record of the ending remains.

There is no record, either, to explain the abrupt termination of Gray’s career. She had the experimental verve of Maya Deren, the unflinching eye of Agnes Varda, and the highly aestheticized interest in the female experience of Sofia Coppola. The loss of the films that she made is hard enough to bear, but the loss of the films that might have been is incalculable.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
2023-12-10 12:36 pm

Recent Movies

Another round of recent movies! Quite like this format; I often don’t have a whole post in me about movies, but if you’re writing about three or four you don’t need more than a paragraph or two a piece.

My yearly rewatch of The Muppet Christmas Carol, a delight as always. I’ve seen this so many times that I can sing many of the songs, including “The Love Is Gone,” which was cut from the theatrical release then restored in the home video, a choice that baffles me since the last song in the film is a callback to this earlier moment… ah well!

This time I saw The Muppet Christmas Carol on the big screen at the Artcraft, and the increased size drew my attention to how much work the filmmakers put into the backgrounds. Not only are the sets beautifully made and detailed, they’re filled with extras (human and puppet both), so Muppet Victorian London feels so bustling and delightful and lived in. (Also, wouldn’t this be the best movie to be an extra in? Truly a once-in-a-lifetime experience.)

I’ve mostly stopped watching MCU movies, but The Marvels had a female director (Nia DaCosta) and an all-female lead trio, so I gave it a go. Kamala Khan is a delight, but like so many recent Marvel movies, this one didn’t give the emotional beats any time to breathe.

Also, let me be real with you, the Marvel movie I now REALLY want to see is the space opera rom-com of Captain Marvel and her husband-of-convenience, the Prince of the water planet where everyone sings and dances all the time. How did they meet! What political circumstances made a marriage of convenience necessary! Do they fall in love! The answer is “obviously yes, probably while facing silly peril, with many extras singing and dancing in the background.”

Last but certainly not least! I saw Miyazaki’s most recent film The Boy and the Heron in theaters on Friday. (I think this is the first time I’ve seen a Studio Ghibli film in theaters on release. Can this be accurate? Did I really miss Arrietty, when The Borrowers was one of the great obsessions of my childhood?)

ANYWAY. This movie is set (the real-world portion, that is) in Japan during World War II, evoked with all the rich attention to detail common to any Studio Ghibli film. But soon enough Mahito finds himself summoned into another world, a strange dream-like place full of floating phantom ships, little round white creatures that float up into the sky, and militaristic parakeets.

I don’t know that this one will reach my personal top tier of Studio Ghibli movies, but it’s a fascinating film, clearly one that will reveal new facets every time that you watch it. (Beyond all else, I want more time to take in the stunning visual detail!) I’d love to see it again before it leaves theaters, not least because the brunch gang and I saw the dub, so of course it would be fun to watch the sub and compare.
osprey_archer: (art)
2023-11-21 09:32 am

Recent Movie Round-Up

I’ve been watching a lot of movies lately, so I thought I’d write up some quick reviews.

Steel Magnolias. Years ago I watched this on my own, and thought it was so-so. This time I watched it at the Artcraft Theater, where I discovered that this is perhaps the Legally Blonde of the Boomers, because the theater was packed with women of a certain age and their friends. The management clearly hadn’t expected this level of response, and the show started nearly an hour late because of a big back-up in the concession line, but everyone was so hyped to be there it didn’t matter much.

Naturally I enjoyed it a lot more this time around! I find that I usually do enjoy movies more when I see them with other people, whether in a theater or with a friend. And I think it also helped that I’m older now: having seen some of the shit life throws at people, I’m willing to accept a higher level of drama before I start to scoff, “Melodrama.”

I’ve heard the stage play takes place entirely in the beauty shop, and I’d love to see it sometime to see how that shapes the story.

Oh Brother Where Art Thou. My first Coen brothers film. Really enjoyed it! You know I love a Great Depression story, and young George Clooney is fantastic as a vain escaped convict (but can you blame him for vanity when he looks like that?) smooth-talking his way across the southern landscape.

Priscilla. Of course I had to see the latest Sofia Coppola film! (Still haven’t seen On the Rocks, though.) Difficult to review, as Coppola’s films tend to be: aimless, drifting, powered by aesthetics rather than plot (the one exception is The Beguiled, which is powered by both aesthetics and plot; it remains my favorite Coppola film), and yet so absorbing that it’s startling to realize you’ve arrived at the end.

My favorite Coppola aesthetic is “blonde girls in white dresses,” and this one is definitely more “celebrity glam” - of a different decade than The Bling Ring, but the same aesthetic of excess. But no matter which aesthetic she selects, Coppola always commits, and I love that about her. In fact, I’ve realized that commitment to an aesthetic is something I appreciate in film or TV in general, even if the aesthetic is not one that I particularly like (like the Barbie pink aesthetic in the recent Barbie movie): it takes a certain sincerity to commit so hard to anything.

Addams Family Values. Didn’t like this one, because I am an old fuddy-duddy who no longer enjoys murder jokes. Did the original show have this many murder jokes? (Did I ever actually watch the original show? I must have seen a few episodes, because I know the theme song.) I did like the scene where Morticia and Gomez tango their way around a restaurant in a cavern.

Rocky. Another classic that I’d never seen, although we did watch the famous scene where he runs up the steps of the Philadelphia Museum of Art in my high school film lit class. (That was probably one of the most influential classes of my life. I’m still chasing down movies from it.)

Didn’t expect to enjoy this one, but actually I mostly did, although the scene where Rocky takes Adrian out on their first date is super uncomfortable. Have you heard of a boundary, Rocky! (It is 1975. He has not.) But actually they’re pretty cute once they’re together. And I really dug the grungy 1970s aesthetic - it’s so characteristic, and so different from movies in the decades before and after.
osprey_archer: (shoes)
2023-10-08 10:20 pm

Boston Tidbits

My last evening in Boston! The last few days with [personal profile] genarti and [personal profile] skygiants have been jam-packed. We went canoeing on the Charles, and saw geese and ducks and two blue herons and a cormorant and a kingfisher. Then apple-picking, at a hillside apple orchard girt round with forest, where they not only allow but all but demand that you climb the apple trees: there are ladders provided, and spreading branches which all but cry out to be climbed.

We suspect that the place is under the protection of the fae - a suspicion that rose to a near certainty when we found a grassy lane of dotted with golden apples like will-o-the-wisps leading you up the hill toward the dark hopeful trees - but the fae were merciful, or sated, and took none of us, but let us go away with a golden apple plucked from the top bough of a tree.

Also we returned to the Boston Public Library to make use of their Reading Room, a beautiful vaulted space with classic green-shaded reading lamps, where I worked a bit on Sage and also a bit on titles that might be a bit more likely to bring readers to the yard. My favorite right now is Diary of a Cranky Bookworm.

And we had an afternoon tea in Lexington, a three-tiered plate bearing little sandwiches, and scones with strawberry jam and clotted cream, and tiny pastries: eclairs and macarons and the littlest fruit tarts, and tart little lemon squares. Afterward we walked two blocks to the Lexington battlefield, where we had the good luck to catch a tour that had just begun, and the tour guide showed us where the militia gathered on the green, and how close the redcoats stood, shouting for the militia to disperse, when an errant shot started the shooting war.

(I think I've mentioned before my hazy childhood vision of battles as something akin to a soccer match? This is very off-base for the Civil War, and probably for any number of Revolutionary War battles too, but this actually is about the size of the battlefield at Lexington, although the British team unsportingly brought about a hundred players to the militia's forty or so.)

We also very much enjoyed a commemorative plaque erected in 1799 and written in the full glory of 18th century prose. It begins, and I reproduce the capitalization and punctuation verbatim, “Sacred to Liberty & the Rights of mankind!!!”

This is not the only place on the plaque featuring multiple exclamation points. I love it. If you tried to punctuate a plaque like this today, everyone would think you had run mad.

***

A couple of mini-reviews of things that we watched:

A Spy Among Friends, a six-episode miniseries based on Ben Macintyre's A Spy Among Friends: Kim Philby and the Great Betrayal. I believe someone read the book and said "What if we really lean into the bad break-up vibes of this story?", and the mini-series focuses tightly on Nicholas Elliot's friendship with Kim Philby, which is of course shattered by the realization that his dear friend and long-time spy colleague has in fact been a Soviet double agent ever since the day they met. (Here is an excellent in-depth review by [personal profile] skygiants.)

Also Night Witches in the Sky, a 1981 Soviet film directed by Yevgeniya Zhigulenko. In her youth, Zhigulenko was one of these "night witches" who flew fighter planes for the Soviet Union in World War II; I don't know if the film is based directly on her own experiences, but it surely draws on them for, say, the hijinks of the young pilots as they skylark like schoolgirls, sneaking out of hospitals, stealing goats, frolicking in the water when they're sent to a plum landing field near the beach.

None of us have watched many Soviet war movies, but if this is at all representative, they must be built on a very different set of rules than American ones, which usually signal clearly if this is a boys' own frolic or Very Serious war movie where any character foolish enough to show off a photo of a sweetheart will certainly be gunned down soon.

And possibly Night Witches did indeed have those signals, in a Soviet context. But we don't know how to read them, and were fascinated to realize that it's a little bit of both. The film doesn't have a plot exactly, it's a series of vignettes, and some of them are beach frolics and some of them are "these pilots have left behind their parachutes so they could fit in more bombs, and now their plane is going down in flames and they cannot jump."

***

Tomorrow will be a long driving day, ending on Prince Edward Island, where I will spend a week basking in the land of Anne of Green Gables. I am hoping to buy many L. M. Montgomery novels in the various Anne-themed museums, but just in case my quest proves futile, I've loaded my Kindle with a stack of Montgomery's novels.

Obviously I have to reread Anne of Green Gables, but otherwise I'll follow my whims. Will they lead to a complete Anne reread? A return visit to the Emily Trilogy or Pat duology? Might I branch out in new directions, and finally read Kilmeny of the Orchard and A Tangled Web? Heck, I might even read a non-LMM book! Ah, well, we shall see.
osprey_archer: (Default)
2023-08-08 06:51 pm

Triumph of the Will

This week, my assignment for my History of Fascism class was to watch Leni Riefenstahl's Triumph of the Will, which I attempted to watch a few years ago when it was shown in the IU Cinema, but about half an hour in, I got so bored that I left.

This time I made it the whole way through, but the film remains intensely tedious. There are a few iconic shots, notably the blocks of SA and SS troops which later inspired certain shots of the Imperial troops in Star Wars, but there is also a fifteen-minute segment (how I wish I was exaggerating) which is just guys marching. They march with flags, they march with shovels, they march with swords, they march with drums, they march and march and march.

This time around I went in forewarned by that first attempt, but the first time round I left the theater feeling let down. I had gone in under the impression that the film was (to quote Roger Ebert) "great but evil." But it's not! It's just dull! Riefenstahl is fantastic at setting up a shot, and I strongly suspect that the years when many people experienced this film in the form of a few iconic still images really raised its reputation. The stills are tremendous, and when you look at them you can extrapolate a propaganda film of artistic genius and almost hypnotic power.

But the film itself, again quoting Ebert, is "paralyzingly dull, simpleminded, overlong and not even 'manipulative', because it is too clumsy to manipulate anyone but a true believer."

Now it may have been less dull in 1935: indeed, it might be quite riveting if you were watching it in an uneasy attempt to gauge Germany's resurgent military power. God, so many guys marching! But riveting for utterly non-artistic reasons.

Pace Wikipedia, there was apparently little attempt to promote the film internationally. I suspect the real intended audience was your average Nazi-in-the-street pining for some way to experience the Nuremberg Rally vicariously. It might perhaps be enjoyable if you were imagining yourself taking part in the interminable marching.
osprey_archer: (Default)
2023-07-25 09:55 am

Barbie

I’ve been a Greta Gerwig fan since I saw her in Frances Ha, so it’s been thrilling to see the rest of the world catch up, first in the critical acclaim of Lady Bird, then in the popular success of Little Women, and now in the crescendo of frenzy surrounding Barbie. I went on Saturday and found the theater a mass of pink and abuzz with excitement. I don’t think I’ve seen an audience with this kind of energy for a new release since The Return of the King.

And it was a lot of fun! Gerwig leaned hard into the Barbie aesthetic, everything bright bright BRIGHT colors, the water painted rather than actually wet, a world ruled by women where almost everyone is named Barbie: the air hums with the chirp of “Hi Barbie!” as the Barbies move around their paradise, where every day is a great day… unless you’re a Ken, when it’s only a great day if Barbie notices you.

All the actors are having a blast with their over-the-top characters. Margot Robie is fantastic as Stereotypical Barbie. (There’s a moment when she thinks she’s not pretty anymore, and the narrator, voiced by Helen Mirren, is like, “Don’t cast Margot Robie if you want this beat to land,” which brought down the house.) Ryan Gosling is a perfect foil as Ken. (“Who’s that guy?” I asked my friends, and they said, “That’s Ryan Gosling! But it’s so perfect for this movie that you don’t know…”). Kate McKinnon is gnawing on the scenery as Weird Barbie and clearly having the time of her life, and Michael Cera was born to play lonely Allan, the only Allan in a world otherwise populated with Barbies and Kens.

But something is going wrong with Stereotypical Barbie. Her toast burns! Her feet have gone flat! And she’s started to feel existential angst about death… Clearly, there’s only one thing to do: she has to go to the Real World to figure out what’s going wrong out there. Ken tags along for the ride… Spoilers )
osprey_archer: (cheers)
2023-07-08 08:41 am
Entry tags:

Midsommar

I waffled about seeing Midsommar, because I’m a wimp about scary movies, but I love Florence Pugh and I love stories about cults, and the Kan-Kan was showing it on the big screen, so who was I to resist? So I dragged along my friend Becky and it blew out tiny minds so hard that we stood in the parking lot for half an hour discussing the movie, even though the movie ended at 11:30 and we both had work the next day.

Florence Pugh plays Dani, a psychology grad student grief stricken in the aftermath of a family tragedy. Her boyfriend Christian is her only remaining source of support, so she clings to him even though he’s barely emotionally present in the relationship. He was thinking about breaking up with Dani when the tragedy struck, and what kind of asshole breaks up right after a tragedy? The kind of asshole who realizes that a clean break might be kinder than remaining in the relationship in a completely half-hearted way, which is what Christian does.

Like Christian, Christian’s friends offer Dani half-hearted support, while really wishing she would just go away. (Aster’s evocation of modern-day conflict-averse we-all-speak-therapy-but-we-don’t-actually-care social dynamics are pitch perfect and pitch black.) The one exception is Pelle, a Swedish student who always treats Dani with genuine understated warmth.

Pelle grew up on an isolated commune in Sweden, and he invites the whole gang to visit for the annual Midsommar celebrations. As Christian and his friends are all anthropology students, they jump at the chance, and soon they arrive in a bucolic village full of people in soft white clothes frolicking in the endless midsummer sun. (Indeed, in the background of many of the shots, you see the villagers clasping hands, dancing in circles, etc., an eerie yet attractive density of ritual.)

Spoilers )
osprey_archer: (books)
2023-07-04 08:41 am
Entry tags:

Recent Movies

As another piece of my plan to Make Life More Interesting 2023, my friends and I have trooped to many movies. Upon sitting down to write reviews I realized that almost all these cinema trips were rewatches of beloved favorites: The Princess Bride, Spirited Away, Arsenic and Old Lace, etc. etc. Which was lots of fun! But I don’t have much to say about most of them.

However, we did see a couple new movies, including Everything Everywhere All at Once. I appear to be the only person on the entire internet who felt that this movie was merely fine. It’s just a little too zany for me, I guess. (I also found the people with the hotdog hands exceedingly gross, which really undermined the love story between hotdog hands Evelyn and Deirdre.) I did laugh when Alpha Waymond explains to Evelyn that she can access a huge number of powers from her alternate universe selves because she is currently living the worst possible version of her life. What a reason to be a superhero!

Also Labyrinth! Somehow I made it through my entire childhood and adolescence without ever seeing this movie, and since they were showing it at the Artcraft OF COURSE I had to see it on the big screen. There were at least three Jareths in attendance, and the audience SCREAMED when Jareth first came on screen.

Now I think one has to see this movie at more or less the onset of puberty to get the full effect, but I did very much enjoy it. Magic! Muppets! The amazing visuals: the rotating pyramids of crystal balls, the ballroom dream sequence with Sarah in that amazing dress with the tremendous cloud of hair, Sarah’s bedroom (WHAT a fantastic bedroom), the Escher staircase sequence where Sarah runs up stairs that turn into upside-down stairs as she tries to reach her baby brother…

Long before I ever saw this movie, I peripherally glimpsed some fandom wank about whether Sarah is a brat for not wanting to babysit her little brother. Now that I have seen it, (1) who among us was never a brat at the age of sixteen?, and (2) complaining that the characters are not moral paragons seems like the most boring possible way to engage with this movie. Indeed, with almost any movie, and I hate that this has become such a common form of fandom engagement, although let’s be real, there have always been people whose preferred mode of fandom engagement is “everyone but my fave is so morally compromised.”
osprey_archer: (art)
2023-06-27 05:58 pm

Soviet Movies

For a variety of reasons my progress in Karl Schlogel’s The Soviet Century: Archaeology of a Lost World has been slow, and one of them is that I keep pausing to watch the movies he mentions. A surprising number of Soviet movies are available on Youtube with English subtitles! (And a few, tantalizingly, are available only without subtitles, like Three Plus Two. Someday maybe a subtitled version will appear…)

Tractor Drivers is a 1939 musical extravaganza, the classic “a boy, a girl, and a tractor” Soviet film. It features Marina Ladynina as Maryana, a tractor driver who swaggers around in overalls, driving her motorcycle at top speed down the darkened roads. She’s a new Soviet Woman, ready, willing, and able to work alongside the men, but still one of the girls even though all the other girls on the kolkhoz still wear their traditional kerchiefs and skirts. You might imagine there would be a little tension, but no! Everyone loves and admires Maryana, the wave of the future, their very own Stakhanovite tractor driver.

(Schlogel thinks Maryana is not attractive enough, but he is objectively wrong. Her soft butch aesthetic is adorable, and she also shows a softer appeal when she takes off her motorcycle cap to reveal the soft waves of her cute golden bob.)

The only drawback of Maryana’s fame as a Stakhanovite is that she keeps getting unwanted marriage proposals. Therefore, she creates a fake engagement with a fellow worker, who is not in fact her love interest: instead, the fake engagement is an impediment to the true love interest, a tank driver whom she meets after she crashes her motorcycle and injures her ankle… a gender-swapped Jane Eyre moment!

The tank drive has recently demobbed from uhhhhh I don’t actually remember, but the important thing is not where he comes from but what he brings with him: the doctrine of military preparedness! Soon all the lads in the kolkhoz are learning about tanks, and Maryana leads a delegation of girls who want to learn tank tactics too.

Ten years later, Marina Ladynina reappears in Cossacks of the Kuban, in which she plays a collective farm manager who is secretly in love with the Cossack who runs the next collective farm over, although she keeps refusing his entreaties to wed. The film gives her a much more feminine look, all skirts and soft hair. It’s not only in America that the post-war years featured a feverish return to traditional values.

However, the main theses of this film is “Cossacks are hot” - an abrupt swerve from my previous experience with film Cossacks, who are usually setting villages on fire! - and “There is plenty of food in the Soviet Union!” Stalin, infamously, referred to this film when his advisors tried to explain that famine was threatening yet again: what food shortages?, he demanded. Look at the mountains of melons in Cossacks on the Kuban!

Schlogel notes the almost fairy-tale plenty of the agricultural fair where most of the film takes place. The characters ride in carts on massive piles of food; the stalls overflow; and not just with food, but with cloth, books, records, guitars, horse collars - shoddy horse collars, though! And the horse collar dealer gets called out for his poor wares in the fair entertainment later that night.

Said entertainment also features a song in which Marina Ladynina and her Cossack are singled out by name and basically informed “Everyone ships you! Get on with it!” Oh my God. Marina has refused her Cossack for all these years because he keeps doing un-Soviet things like “attempt to form a cabal with the other growers to charge high prices for his produce”; he is forced to drop prices when Marina drops prices on her farm’s produce, but he never actually seems to grow or change, so it’s a little weird that they get together.

But then we have a heroic montage of tractors plowing the black Ukrainian earth as the characters sing, reminding us that the true hero of any Soviet film is the collective might of the laborers. Happy end!
osprey_archer: (art)
2023-06-22 10:06 am

Je Tu Il Elle

The director Chantal Akerman once said, “When people are enjoying a film they say “I didn’t see the time go by”... but I think that when time flies and you don’t see time passing by you are robbed of an hour or two hours of your life… With my films you’re aware of every second passing through your body.”

Earlier this week at the Kan-Kan, I saw Chantal Akerman’s Je Tu Il Elle, and Akerman would be pleased to hear that you do indeed feel every. single. second. of the 80-minute film as it crawls past.

This is less boring than it sounds. It becomes meditative to watch our protagonist as she loafs around in her white room, having removed all the furniture except the mattress. Then she writes a letter, and then she writes another letter, and meanwhile she eats sugar directly out of a paper bag with a spoon, and then she writes… well maybe it’s also a letter, but she ends up laying it over the floor like a script or a novel… and then she takes off her clothes and lies on the mattress naked, with her clothes draped over her, as the snow falls outside her windows, and by “windows” I mean an entire wall of French doors, without curtains, which open directly onto a sidewalk.

Then she leaves the room! (She gets dressed first.) She hitchhikes with a truck driver, and gives him a handjob, and in return he tells her more about his sex life than anyone ever wanted to know (his eleven-year-old daughter turns him on, apparently), but at last she reaches her destination, which is the apartment of… an ex-girlfriend?... and they have sex. The sex scene is as interminably long as the writing/eating sugar/stripping naked scene earlier. The next morning, protag leaves as girlfriend sleeps. THE END.

Purposefully forcing your audience to experience every second of your film is a bold aesthetic choice, and certainly some of the images have lingered in my mind. But the aesthetic is definitely more thought-provoking than enjoyable, which I’m sure Akerman would say is the point.
osprey_archer: (art)
2023-06-15 11:38 am

2023 Films by Women Film Directors

For a while I was writing reviews of all the movies I’d seen by women film directors, but at the beginning of 2023 I fell out of the habit, and since I’m now quite a bit in arrears, I’ve decided to clear the decks with a bunch of micro-reviews.

Dava Whisenant’s Bathtubs Over Broadway is a documentary about corporate musicals - that is, musicals commissioned by corporations to show to their sales teams at the big annual meeting, most common from the 1950s to 1970s. Fascinating. Highly highly recommend if you’re at all interested in musicals as an art form or in the business of making a living as an artist, as these corporate musicals kept a lot of singers and dancers afloat in between Broadway productions!

I recall that Patty Jenkins’ Wonder Woman 1984 got panned when it came out, but perhaps since I went in with low expectations, I thought it was fine. It’s not as good as the first Wonder Woman, but it’s a solid popcorn flick, and Gal Gadot is a wonderful presence as ever.

Sara Dosa’s Fire of Love is another documentary (I’ve been on a bit of a documentary kick) about two rogue French volcanologists, a married couple who built their entire life around spending as much time on and around volcanoes as possible, following their passions until it ended about how you’d expect a life built around volcanoes to end. The film uses a lot of their gorgeous volcano footage, which is so wonderful and strange to watch.

Emma Holly Jones’ Mr. Malcolm’s List, another one that I thought was fine. I enjoyed the sumptuous settings and costumes but I thought the story dragged a bit.

A story that did not drag at all: Schmigadoon!. Only season 2 has a female film director, Alice Mathias, but of course I watched both seasons. I perhaps liked season 1 a little more, because like Melissa I prefer the cheerful Music Man style musicals to the darker Chicago style, but they’re both fantastic, so much fun and so visually striking. I haven’t seen a show go so all out to build an ~aesthetic since Pushing Daisies, and I love it. Very funny, great songs, highly recommended.

Elaine May’s Ishtar famously flopped when it came out - there was in fact a Far Side cartoon depicting a video store in Hell that loaned out nothing but Ishtar - only to receive a later critical reassessment, so of course I would like to say that I loved it. Unfortunately, I felt it kind of dragged, although its depiction of American masculinity is interesting and I can see why critics went for it later on. Plus it stars the luminously beautiful Isabelle Adjani: a definite bonus.

The Kan-Kan was apparently doing an Elaine May retrospective, because they also showed A New Leaf, which I missed! Devastated. Probably I would have felt it dragged too (as I also felt this about the other May film that I’ve seen, Mikey and Nicky), but nonetheless… the one that got away.

Haifaa al-Mansour’s Mary Shelley is another one that’s been on the list for a while! I love al-Mansour’s Wadjda and I love Elle Fanning, who plays Mary, so it’s shocking really how long I let this languish. Well worth seeing if you’re into dirtbag romantic poets. Percy Shelley is styled like Edward Cullen from Twilight, for reasons of emotional vampirism, while also being just thrilling and sexy enough that you can see why Mary falls so hard for him. Mary’s friendship with her stepsister Claire Clairmont is also a standout: they are sometimes seemingly rivals for Percy’s affection, but whenever one of them is in trouble, their own affection for each other comes to the fore.

Up the Women is a delightful BBC comedy series, two seasons amounting to a mere nine total episodes, in which the Banbury Intricate Craft Circle Politely Requests Women’s Suffrage. One of those wonderful British comedy series where the writers create a cast of eccentrics and then simply allow them to play off each other, to create comic effect. The members of the BICCPRWS vary widely in their attitude toward suffrage, ranging from the anti-suffrage Helen (who rules her husband with an iron fist) to Helen’s trampled but militant daughter Emily, a renegade E. M. Forster heroine who at one point writes KILL THE KING on a banner for a suffrage march.

Finally, Suzanne Raes’ Close to Vermeer, a documentary about putting together a Vermeer exhibition at the Rijksmuseum in Amsterdam. Loved the chance to see the paintings “in person,” as it were - of course a film is still a reproduction, but unlike a still reproduction, you can at least tell the size of the piece, something about the experience of being in its presence. An illuminating discussion about Vermeer’s use of the camera obscura, with new insight into how he might have gotten access to what was then a high-tech instrument: he lived next door to some Jesuits who are known to have had one.

There was also a very mannered disagreement between some American curators who think that Girl with a Flute is not a true Vermeer, from which conclusion the Dutch curators politely demure… until the story erupts in the international press, when one of the Dutch curators comments (I am paraphrasing), “The American National Gallery may not be lending Girl with a Flute as a Vermeer, but the Rijksmuseum will display it as one. All doubts will evaporate over the Atlantic.” SHOTS FIRED. No controversy like art world controversy.

And now I’m all caught up! Will I be able to stay on top of my reviews from now on? We shall see…
osprey_archer: (books)
2023-04-26 07:35 am

Wednesday Reading Meme

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Arna Bontemps’s Story of the Negro, one of the 1949 Newbery Honor books, dedicated to Bontemps’s friend Langston Hughes. The book begins with a short discussion about the great variety of peoples in Africa (the short pygmies, the tall Watussi) and the history of great African civilizations (most especially Ethiopia, and yes I did yell “Like Elizabeth Wein’s Lion Hunters!” when the Axumite Empire made a cameo), then segues into a clear, concise history of slavery in the United States, starting in 1619 in Jamestown and expanding outward from there. It ends with a then-current reference to the United States’s newly self-appointed role as global standard-bearer for freedom and democracy: Many decided to keep their eyes on the Negro people of the United States. This would be their test of democracy’s promises.

Reading the book in 2023, it seems fair and even-handed, but I was curious if it sparked controversy when it came out. (This was, after all, the era when Garth Williams got in hot water for The Rabbits’ Wedding, in which a black rabbit married a white rabbit.) However, there’s no mention of controversy on Wikipedia. Possibly tempests in teapots have always been descended with the capricious arbitrariness that they often show on Twitter.

Another entry in the Newbery sweepstakes: Eloise Jarvis McGraw’s Moccasin Trail, in which young Jim Keath runs away from home to go trapping with his uncle, nearly gets killed by a bear, is afterward nursed back to health by the Crow, with whom he lives for six years before taking up trapping again… at which point he hears that his siblings have moved to Oregon, and rejoins them, and the rest of the book is about his struggle to reintegrate into white society.

This is a lively and dramatic premise, and the book is full of adventure, and it was published in 1952 so it’s very much Read At Your Own Risk for, you know, everything about that entire premise.

What I’m Reading Now

Someone ([personal profile] skygiants?) posted about Karl Schlogel’s The Soviet Century: Archaeology of a Lost World, and of course I had to read it. The book is enormous, so I’ll probably be reading it for a while; so far we have taken a stroll through the Arbat (the most famous open-air flea market in Moscow) and discussed Soviet museum culture. Schlogel notes that during Soviet times, there were almost no books published around regional towns (the history, culture, geology, etc.) so often the local museum was the only source to learn about the place.

Schlogel also mentioned a 1929 Soviet movie, Fragments of Empire, in which a White Army soldier who has suffered from total amnesia for the last decade suddenly begins to remember and rushes into St. Petersburg… only to find that the city has totally changed! Statues of Lenin everywhere… hammers and sickles on the coins… so much new construction! I watched it on Youtube and it was an Experience.

Also delighted with this Soviet joke: “There is nothing so unpredictable as the past.”

What I Plan to Read Next

Next week I’m going on a four-day camping trip at the Indiana Dunes! I’m still pondering which books to bring, but I’ve definitely decided that Elizabeth Enright’s The Four-Story Mistake will be one of them.
osprey_archer: (Default)
2022-12-17 08:35 am

A Castle for Christmas

A Castle for Christmas features Brooke Shields as a world-famous writer who, after her divorce, decides to buy a castle in Scotland from its owner Cary Elwes, the cranky laird with a heart of gold.

This movie is exactly the kind of movie that you would expect from that description, and if that’s the kind of movie you liked you’ll like it, and if it isn’t you won’t. A good watch for when you want to turn off your brain and enjoy crumbling (yet still sumptuous) castles, festive Christmas feasts, the inevitable romance, and Cary Elwes having a wonderful time with his Scottish accent.
osprey_archer: (Default)
2022-11-17 01:23 pm

Book Review: Drawing the Iron Curtain: Jews and the Golden Age of Soviet Animation

While I was in Boston I forced [personal profile] skygiants and [personal profile] genarti to watch the first episode of Cheburashka, which led to a discussion of Soviet animation, which led to an admission that I’ve been meaning to read more about the topic for years and never have… which ended in putting a hold on Maya Balakirsky Katz’s Drawing the Iron Curtain: Jews and the Golden Age of Soviet Animation, as it’s the only Soviet animation book my library owns.

The prose is very readable (not always a given in film or literary criticism), although when I was familiar with the animation in question I often had doubts about Katz’s interpretations. For instance, in discussing the Cheburashka series (produced by a mostly Jewish creative team), Katz suggests that Cheburashka’s best friend Crocodile Gena “is a sell-out: an old Party Jew who walks around with a pipe dangling from his mouth but without a pair of pants to show for all his compromises.”

I mean, sure, MAYBE Gena’s red coat is a sign that he’s an old Bolshevik, and MAYBE “Crocodile Gena’s African roots speak to his status as a member of the ancient Hebrew race,” and MAYBE when Gena offers to make of list of all the lonely people who want to make friends this is a reference to KGB references making up lists of all the people who visit Jewish gathering places…

Or MAYBE Crocodile Gena is simply Cheburashka’s best friend, a kind-hearted crocodile who works at a zoo! Just perhaps.

However, the book did furnish an excellent list of films to watch, many of which are available on Youtube. I watched:

Dziga Vertov’s Soviet Toys, the first Soviet animated film, from 1924. (Vertov is best known for the documentary Man with a Movie Camera.) It really feels like a Soviet political cartoon brought to life: a worker and a farmer meld together into one terrifying Janus-faced creature and defeat a bourgeois capitalist who looks like the Monopoly man!

Ivan Ivanov-Vano’s Black and White, a 1932 animated short that was the only remnant of a larger project to make a film about American race relations. There were so few Black actors in the Soviet Union that a delegation of twenty-two Harlem Renaissance intellectuals crossed the sea to star in the film, including Langston Hughes, who cried when he read the script, because “the writer meant well, but knew so little about his subject, and the result was a pathetic hodgepodge of good intentions and faulty facts…”

Hughes informed the Soviets they would need to start over and write a new script, which scuppered the project, except for this animated short. Most of Hughes’ criticisms of the full-length film script seem to apply to the short, too.

Boris Stepantsev’s The Pioneer’s Violin, a wordless seven-minute short in which a grinning Nazi tank driver demands that a Young Pioneer play a German folksong on his violin… and the Young Pioneer responds by playing the Internationale, for which he is gunned down. The film is inspired by a true story of a Jewish boy, Avram “Musya” Pinkenzon, who really was a Pioneer and whose defiance was celebrated as a Pioneer story. (Pioneer Heroes were a whole Soviet genre.) The screenwriter was Jewish, and Katz argues that Stepantsev (although probably not Jewish) directed the short in ways that suggest the nameless Pioneer’s Jewish identity. This is a stronger argument than Crocodile Gena, Old Bolshevik, although it may be one of those things that you only see if you are looking for it?

The film is stunning: an incredible depiction of the shift from abject terror to enraged defiance. I’ve included a link in case anyone wants to watch it.
osprey_archer: (friends)
2022-11-12 08:34 am

Massachusetts Trip

As I commented in yesterday’s post, I am returned from Massachusetts! An excellent trip! Extra shout-out to [personal profile] skygiants and [personal profile] genarti for letting me show up a day early when my initial plan to stop in Ithaca fell through when my hostess’s son took ill. (This resulted in a fourteen-hour drive and PERHAPS the course of wisdom would have been to stop at a hotel, but no regrets.)

Highlights of the trip, in roughly chronological order:

Two days in Concord! On the first day, I recreated (backward) Georgie’s walk in The Fledgling from her house to Walden Pond. (Did not meet a Goose Prince who could teach me how to fly. Perhaps if I had started at Georgie’s house and walked to Walden Pond rather than the other way around.) Also waded in Walden Pond as it was very warm.

Second day: visited Louisa May Alcott’s house, which featured a video of an LMA reenactor warmly welcoming us into the house, when we all know that the real LMA would have been climbing out the back windows to avoid annoying literary fans. Particularly enjoyed the paintings that May (Amy in Little Women) sketched directly on the wall.

In the evening we watched the Biggles movie, in which a perfectly good Biggles movie has been inexplicably chopped up to introduce a time-traveling TV dinner salesman, who is somehow the main character, even though the movie is called Biggles and also the time-traveling TV dinner salesman actor can’t act. Baffling.

(However it did later on contribute to a conversation about plotting, action sequences, World War I pilots etc. which may have finally cracked the story of the World War I princess fighter pilot and her communist BFF who overthrew the monarchy and is now trying to have the princess executed by firing squad! “It’s not personal, Fritzi.” “If it’s so impersonal, then why don’t you shoot me yourself? Or are you too good to complete the same tasks as common soldiers?”)

On Saturday, [personal profile] skygiants and [personal profile] genarti and I visited the Athenaeum! If I lived in Boston I would be DEEPLY tempted to get a membership. If only I could split in two and the second me could make it her life’s work to read in the Athenaeum all day long… Told them the v. important story about how Josephine Preston Peabody and her BFF Abbie Farwell Brown used to use a specific book in the Athenaeum as a post office to leave notes to each other. Doesn’t that sound like the beginning of a novel in itself?

Then the second leg of my journey began! I went to western Massachusetts to visit [personal profile] asakiyume, and we went to the Eric Carle Museum of Picture Book Art, where I would happily leave yet another, third self simple to read through the entire picture book library… However, I suspect this third self would eventually finish the holdings (it is a small library, and picture books are quick to read; I zoomed through Christopher Denise’s adorable Knight Owl about an owl who becomes a knight and befriend a dragon), at which point perhaps it would pop over to the Yiddish Book Center (literally right across the street! [personal profile] asakiyume and I went on a tour with a wonderfully knowledgeable guide) and teach itself Yiddish, because if you can subdivide like an amoeba and have infinite selves then why not?

…Curiously enough [personal profile] asakiyume and I also watched Severance, which is about a different and darker kind of subdivision of selves. Amazing. Can’t believe it ended on a cliffhanger like that. Fascinating to see the different ways that these characters have adjusted (or refuse to adjust) to life in this totalizing workplace that their subdivided selves never get to leave.

Oh, and we made an apple pie! I made the crust and it turned out pretty nicely if I do say so myself.

And then back on the road, with a stop in Ithaca after all, as my friend’s son had recovered from his indisposition and it was safe for me to come! I took along the picture books Chicka Chicka Boom Boom and Anatole as presents and said son (two years old; obsessed with trains; “Can’t he get to his dinosaur phase yet?” my friend sighed) requested each one read at least twice, so overall successful presents.

And then home again! And then right back to work yesterday, and now I am weary. Today perhaps will be a quiet day to rest, but I do want to get back to writing soon… I rattled off the first chapter of The Princess and the Communist (working title; had to set aside The Flying Princess) while on the road but of course one needs all the subsequent chapters too!
osprey_archer: (cheers)
2022-10-20 12:48 pm

Butterfly in the Sky

My Heartland Film Festival ended on a high note with Butterfly in the Sky, a documentary about the making of Reading Rainbow! The moment I saw it on the schedule I knew it was the perfect way to end the festival, and it did not disappoint.

With the typical solipsism of youth, I assumed Reading Rainbow began around the time I started watching it and faded away soon thereafter, but actually the show lasted twenty-five years, from 1981 to 2006. The documentary features interviews with almost all the most important players: LeVar Burton himself, of course, as well as show creator and the producers, plus a sprinkling of people who worked on the show over the years, including some of the kids who gave mini-reviews of their favorite books in the end segments.

(At the end of the show there was a Q&A with one of the producers, and he commented that the one person they couldn’t get was the woman who sang the Reading Rainbow theme song.)

It sounds like making Reading Rainbow was just exactly as delightful as you might expect from watching the show. The show did so many cool things! They visited a volcano - learned how to fly a plane… climbed into a bat cave (okay, that one might best be experienced on the other side of a television screen). And it seems like it was overall a warm, supportive working environment.

This is clearest when the documentary focuses on one major tension point during the early years of the show. The producers wanted Burton to have a set look, as other children’s television hosts did at the time, like Mr. Rogers. But Burton (who was after all much younger than Mr. Rogers) was still exploring his identity as a Black man, and showed up to each season with a new look, which made the producers gnash their teeth - but perforce they accepted it.

It’s clear in the way that everyone discussed this tension point that, despite the disagreement, everyone involved respected and liked each other. And, looking back, the producers commented that Burton was right. For many Black viewers in particular it was meaningful and important to see Burton experimenting with his look in this way.

And that’s a wrap on the Heartland Film Festival for this year! I have a few regrets: absolutely kicking myself for seeing Corsage instead of Hidden Letters, a documentary about Nushu writing. But in general the documentaries I did see were absolute standouts this year. As well as Butterfly in the Sky, I loved Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game and Cat Daddies.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
2022-10-18 05:50 pm

Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game

Pinball: The Man Who Saved the Game tells the story of Roger Sharpe, an avid pinball player in his college years at a large Midwestern university, who moved to New York City in the 1970s and discovered that it was almost impossible to find a pinball machine in the city. He eventually finds three pinball machines in the foyer of a porn store, and when he gets divorced and loses his job in short order, he spends hours playing pinball there… until the police raid the store and bust up the pinball machines.

The police came, it turns out, specifically for the pinball machines. Pinball had been illegal in New York ever since Fiorello La Guardia banned the game in the 1930s. Why? “Gambling,” he called it. “A game of chance.” “A way for the Mob to steal children’s lunch money.” Cities across the country followed suit.

Thus, Sharpe gets drawn into an attempt to overturn the city council’s pinball ban, which ends with Sharpe playing a demonstration pinball game in court to show that pinball is a game of skill, not chance. He makes a particularly difficult shot, and everyone cheers! People throw their hats in the air! The cranky anti-pinball councilman hugs Sharpe…

“Wait, wait, wait,” protests Roger Sharpe, the reenactment cutting back to a shot of modern-day Roger Sharpe, whose interviews have been interspersed throughout. “It wasn’t like that! Nobody acts like that!”

Back to the city council chamber, where the cranky anti-pinball councilman snaps, “I’ve seen enough.” He lumbers off, chats with the other council members, and - votes to overturn the pinball ban.

Pinball is one-quarter documentary, three-quarters biopic, and 100% delightful. I wasn’t sure at first about the ratio of love-story-to-pinball, but it actually really won me over, not least because it’s a somewhat unusual love story: divorced Roger Sharpe fell for a divorced woman six years his senior who already had an eleven-year-old son from her first marriage. The age difference is a non-issue, but Roger is understandably concerned about the emotional challenges of dating someone who has a kid. What happens if he gets sufficiently involved with the mother that he becomes a part of the son’s life, and the son gets attached to him, and then things don’t work out? “Would that make me a bad guy?” he muses to his coworkers.

“Oh, you’d be a bad guy,” says his coworker (the very gay art director at Gentleman’s Quarterly; a delight), “But what’s life without risk?”

Delighted to inform you that this movie won the Audience Choice award at the Heartland Film Festival. Nothing makes you feel like your vote counted like seeing your favorite movie of the festival win.
osprey_archer: (kitty)
2022-10-17 08:25 am

Corsage

At Heartland Film Festival, it’s become something of a tradition that the audience claps at the end of each feature. I’m not sure how this started - maybe as a courtesy because the filmmakers show up at so many of the features? - but it’s a nice tradition, and I always clap too, even at movies like The Country Club that I didn’t like so much.

It is therefore meaningful that at the end of Corsage, no one in the theater clapped. Possibly we were all shell-shocked.

Corsage is loosely based on the life of the Empress Elizabeth of Austria, also known as Sisi, famously one of the most beautiful women in 19th century Europe. She was obsessed with her appearance and practiced an extensive diet and exercise regime long before that was common. She was also accused of tight-lacing her corset; corsage is corset in German, and no, I don’t know why they didn’t translate the title. I personally am not wild about movies that are about women obsessed with the ~horror of growing older~ but at least this part is based on fact.

In the movie, the year is 1878, and Sisi has just turned forty. She fears losing her beauty, she’s bored of court life, and about halfway through she decides that the way out is to kill herself. She jumps out the window of her fencing salon, contemplates how to hang herself, and ultimately trains one of her ladies-in-waiting to impersonate her, while Sisi herself jumps off a ship to her death.

Also, at some point a random guy shows up with a movie camera (ten years before movie cameras were invented) and films Sisi.

In real life, Sisi lived till 1898 and died when she was assassinated by an Italian anarchist. I’m absolutely baffled why the filmmakers had her jump off a boat twenty years early. Why not have her live out her full life span, in which case you could bring in a no-longer-anachronistic movie camera? Or focus the movie on the year Sisi turned forty and just not have her die at the end?

Also absolutely baffled that this movie is apparently getting awards buzz. That’s why I decided to see it, in fact: “I’ll get in on the ground floor, like with Portrait of a Lady on Fire!” Well, I got what I deserved for seeing a movie for such an ignominious reason.