osprey_archer: (books)
osprey_archer ([personal profile] osprey_archer) wrote2013-08-28 07:57 am

Wednesday Reading Meme

What I’ve Just Finished Reading

Will James’ Smoky the Cowhorse, the only Western ever to win a Newbery Medal. I now have just three books left for the Newbery project, and all of them are on CD!

What I’m Reading Now

Clare Vanderpool’s Moon over Manifest, which is ostensibly the story of Abilene, but in fact is mostly the story of Jinx and Ned. (I am pretty sure that Jinx is going to turn out to be Abilene’s daddy, but we’ll see.)

So until recently, Abilene’s been riding the rails through the Depression Era Midwest with her daddy Gideon, but after she cut up her leg he sent her to the town of Manifest, where he spent some time as a boy. Abilene is our narrator, but most of the story concerns her digging up her daddy’s story, as he and his friend Ned dodge the Klan, learn how to make fireworks, and get caught up in the Great War fever.

It’s not precisely that I mind this, but it does feel a bit like Vanderpool made up a heroine then couldn’t think of an adventure to give her, so ended up writing mostly about her dad instead.

Last week, [livejournal.com profile] enemyfrigate asked whether there was any correlation between time period and gender of protagonist - if, that is, historical fiction books were more likely to have a male protagonists than contemporary fiction. The answer is “Not particularly” - I have the numbers below the cut, if you’re interested.

But there is a definite correlation between gender of protagonists and type of plot. The historical fiction books about boys tend to be adventure stories, descended loosely from Treasure Island, while the ones about girls are coming of age stories in the mode of Anne of Green Gables. Many of the boys come of age too, but they usually do so through the medium of adventure.

Here’s how the numbers stacked up:

Historical fiction
Male: 26
Female: 18
Co-protagonists: 1 (Moon Over Manifest)

Contemporary fiction
Male: 11
Female: 7
Co-protagonists/Multiple Protagonists: 6

And then I went ahead and broke down the whole list of Newbery winners by genre, just to see what type of books won most often.

Genre
Historical fiction: 45
Contemporary fiction: 24 (and these are clustered heavily in recent years; until the 1950s, only one contemporary fiction book won)
Fantasy/SF: 12 (including talking animals stories like Rabbit Hill and Miss Hickory, although I don’t normally think of those as being part of the fantasy genre.)
Non-fiction: 6 (there are also a number of novelized biographies, which I’ve counted among the historical fiction)
Poetry and short story collections: 5 (and I suppose you could include Out of the Dust, but I really think that’s more of a historical novel that happens to be written in verse)
Western: 1 (Smoky the Cowhorse)

I think it is fairly clear that the Newbery judges, at least in the early days, subscribed to the classical theory of art criticism, that historical works are clearly of more merit than genre - “genre” in this instance meaning, confusingly, contemporary realistic works. Until the 1950s, the award slanted heavily, heavily toward historical fiction; until the 1950s only one contemporary fiction book won, and as that focused on a Navajo boy whose family still mostly followed the old ways, the judges may not have noticed how contemporary it was.



What I Plan to Read Next

School has started, so mostly I’m reading books for class. However, once I finish listening to Moon Over Manifest, I’m moving on to Criss Cross.

[identity profile] asakiyume.livejournal.com 2013-08-28 09:21 pm (UTC)(link)
This whole Newbery reading project has been fascinating, and your analysis of the types of books and the protagonists is fascinating. You should really consider writing it up (I know, in all your free time/--not) and publishing it somewhere, or at least see if you can parlay it into a paper for a course or something. It's too much good, useful information to not share with more people.

[identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com 2013-08-29 01:08 pm (UTC)(link)
It's on my list, along with the American Girl project. I'm not sure where I would send either, but I suspect that if I can find a home for one, the same place might be interested in the other.

[identity profile] avidrosette.livejournal.com 2013-08-28 10:27 pm (UTC)(link)
I really enjoy your reviews! I've friended you to keep up. :-)

[identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com 2013-08-29 03:34 am (UTC)(link)
I'm glad you enjoy them! I am sort of winding down the Newbery project, but I still have a few parts of it knocking around to finish up, so there will be a few more posts.
ext_189645: (Default)

[identity profile] bunn.livejournal.com 2013-08-29 07:41 am (UTC)(link)
I am interested to hear any further conclusions from the Newbery project: I've enjoyed reading your comments.

If the historical fiction seems to be considered particularly of merit up to the 50's, is there any grouping to the distribution of SF?

Now I am thinking about historical adventures for girls...

[identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com 2013-08-29 01:07 pm (UTC)(link)
IIRC A Wrinkle in Time, which won in 1963, is the first clearly SF book to win the Newbery Medal. The deluge, such as it is, starts in the 1970s, and since then SF books have won regularly.

Historical fiction still dominates the recent lists, though. It's just not quite as overwhelmingly dominant as it used to be.