osprey_archer: (Default)
Mary Norton’s Are All the Giants Dead? is a delight and a half, as you would expect from the author of The Borrowers. It’s a sort of fairy tale mash-up, which can be a hit or miss genre to me, and this one is an absolute bullseye.

The book begins when young James goes on an outing with amiably forgetful Mildred. Exactly how James and Mildred met, and when they began going on outings, is never made clear; but James is clearly well familiar with the routine when Mildred shows up and the two of them float out of the house to visit a fairy tale castle, where Mildred shows copies of the articles she wrote to Boofy and Beau (Beauty and the Beast, now a middle-aged couple with a daughter named Dulcibel).

The names are very characteristic of the book, which is poking fun at fairy tales in the most affectionate way. You can tell Mary Norton loves these stories and is just having the most delightful time tossing them all together in her own splendid fairy tale melange.

When James and Mildred press onward to have supper at the pub owned by the two Jacks (Jack-the-Giant-Killer and Jack-of-the-Beanstalk, now old men), Mildred hears tell of a fairy tale wedding in the neighboring kingdom. Well, of course any self-respecting reporter has to go to that! So off she goes, leaving James in care of the Jacks… and that is when James’s adventures really begin; for it turns out, as you may have guessed from the title, that all the giants are not dead. Jack-the-Giant-Killer missed one…

Just a delightful read all around. My only complaint is that I didn’t particularly care for the illustrations, which look like a grotesque version of Trina Schart Hyman’s work; Hyman herself would have been a better choice, or better yet if the publishers could have gotten Beth and Joe Krush, who illustrated Norton’s Borrowers books. But ultimately this is a minor quibble. The illustrations don’t add anything to the book, but they also don’t detract from it.

Actually, my real complaint is that now I’ve read ALL of Mary Norton’s books! Alas, alas… All good things must come to an end.
osprey_archer: (books)
My very first fandom - before I was aware of fandom as a social phenomenon, or indeed knew the alphabet well enough to write stories down - was Mary Norton’s The Borrowers, a series of five books about tiny people who live in the walls of old houses and get their sustenance by borrowing from the humans who live there. (Later on, they leave the house and live out in the fields, which is also enchanting.)

I LOVED the idea of Borrowers and beguiled many happy hours of kindergarten imagining tiny people living in the walls of the school, and of course moving into nearby Happy Hollow Park during the summer months when there were no schoolchildren from whom to borrow food.

So you can imagine that I was delighted to discover a hitherto unsuspected Borrower book! In the mid-sixties Mary Norton wrote Poor Stainless, which is really a short story and not a novel, but nonetheless I gobbled it right up. Arrietty and her mother Homily are sitting by the grating picking some sequins off some chiffon, and to pass the time as they do chores Homily tells Arrietty a story of the old days, when many Borrowers still lived in the house - and Stainless, a young boy from the Knife-block family, went missing for a week. (The title is ironic; Stainless is a cheerful little monster.) The nostalgic joy of reading a new Borrowers story, and enjoying a new set of beautifully detailed Borrowers illustrations by the incomparable Joe and Beth Krush…

Naturally I popped over to Mary Norton’s Wikipedia page to see if there are any OTHER Borrowers books that I may have missed. Sadly there are not, but there is one last Mary Norton book I haven’t read, Are All the Giants Dead?, which naturally I intend to correct at once.
osprey_archer: (books)
What I’ve Just Finished Reading

When I was about five The Borrowers was pretty much my very favorite book in the whole WORLD, so I am aghast and astonished that I didn’t realize that Mary Norton wrote non-Borrower books until the Year of Our Lord 2020, when the Disney adaptation Bedknobs and Broomsticks clued me in.

As is the way with Disney adaptations, the movie and the book don’t have much in common: Bed-knob and Broomstick is set after World War II, not during it, and therefore contains no climactic battle of suits of armor vs. Nazis (although there is a delightful sequence where an uninhabited suit of clothes commits a different act of heroism). The book also - sigh - contains a visit to a cannibal island, cannibal islands being all the rage in 1950s children fantasies; there’s a similar sequence in an Edward Eager novel.

Over the course of the book, the children only go on three adventures, which is not enough to fully explore the premise of a bed that can fly not only through space but also time. Still, that premise is amazing imagination fodder: what child wouldn’t like to lie in bed and imagine being able to fly it away somewhere for a night of adventure?

I liked Richard Peck’s A Long Way from Chicago so much that I ended up rereading the sequel, A Year Down Yonder. Both are set during the Great Depression, and they center on Grandma Dowdel, a trickster figure with a dab hand at piecrust, as told through the admiring memories of her grandchildren. She takes a dim view of cops and bankers, and when she’s not making gooseberry pies she foils evictions, catches catfish out of the country club’s stream to feed the needy, and undermines the social pretensions of the DAR.

I also read Naomi Tamura’s The Japanese Bride, a nonfiction book published in America in 1893, mostly because I was tickled pink to find a book published by a Japanese author in America so early - and completely by accident, too, it was just sitting there on a book list in William Dean Howells’ My Year in a Log Cabin. (In general, I’ve found publishers’ “Here are some other books we sell” lists in the front and end matter to be an AMAZING resource for learning about old books, because they give you such a wide view of what was out there.)

Anyway, in The Japanese Bride, Tamura explains Japanese marriage customs for an American audience, which - because American courting customs have changed so much, starting with the fact that we no longer call it “courting” - also yields interesting information about American courting customs in the 1890s for the modern reader.

Finding this book required a bit of googling, during which I discovered (1) there is a female Japanese pop star also named Naomi Tamura, but the author of this book is in fact a man, and (2) after he returned to Japan as a minister after studying at the Auburn Theological Seminary, The Japanese Bride landed him in hot water, because many people weren’t pleased that he had written so openly about private life in Japan for outsiders in a way that might invite censure.

AND FINALLY I read Susan Campbell Bartoletti’s Hitler Youth: Growing Up in Hitler’s Shadow, partly because it’s on my Newbery Honor list but also on the theory that maybe it would offer some insight into why people join up with fascists today. This theory was incorrect; the answer to “Why did people join up with Hitler Youth?” is “Because all their friends joined and there was camping and singing and it was the only path to economic and educational advancement and also at a certain point it became compulsory to all quote-unquote ‘ethnic Germans’ and parents could have their children taken away if they tried to stop them from joining,” much of which is not really analogous to why young people go for alt-right groups today, although probably the “all their friends have joined” bit is sometimes a factor.

(Are we still calling it the alt-right? I feel that it has, at this point, simply become “the right.”)

What I’m Reading Now

I put off reading Christopher Paul Curtis’s The Watsons Go to Birmingham, 1963 for years, because I figured it was going to be harrowing, and it is, but so far not for the reasons you might suspect from the title. We haven’t gotten to Birmingham yet; we’re still up in Detroit, stuck in the middle of a bully-o-rama. The new kid gets bullied, the main character gets bullied, his older brother bullies the bully (there’s sticking up for your younger brother, and then there’s chucking a smaller kid repeatedly against a wire fence just because you can, you know?), it is in short A Lot.

What I Plan to Read Next

I want to be the first to call this: thirty to forty years from now, someone’s going to win the hell out of the Newbery with a book set during 2020. Let’s hope that book is called Black Lives Matter and not The Year Democracy Died.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
Shockingly, before last night I had never seen Bedknobs and Broomsticks. How did I miss it? Not only does it take place during World War II, one of my childhood obsessions (also one of my adulthood obsessions; a constant obsession over the course of my life), but it's based on a book (actually two books) by Mary Norton, who wrote The Borrowers, ALSO a beloved childhood obsession, ever since my mother read them to me.

But then again, at that tender age I had not yet realized that it was possible to see if an author you liked had written other books. And also, knowing Disney's adaptation proclivities, I am 99% sure that if I had read Bed-knob and Broomstick at a tender age and then seen the adaptation, I would have been OUTRAGED! by the way they warped the book in the adaptation process, just as I was OUTRAGED! by the 1997 adaptation of The Borrowers (in fact, I wasn't even completely happy with the Studio Ghibli version. I may just love the book too much to be pleased with any movie adaptation), so perhaps it was better all around this way, because I found the movie delightful.

The story goes like this: during the Blitz, three children sent out of London discover that they are staying with an apprentice witch (Angela Lansbury, delightful). Unfortunately, her witchcraft correspondence course is canceled before she gets the final spell - the spell that she thinks might be useful to help defeat a potential German invasion. So she enchants a bed-knob so that the whole bed will magically travel when the bedknob is turned, and she and the children set off for London to find the final spell.

It's a jolly magical adventure - sort of like a wartime Mary Poppins (Mr. Banks is in it! As a most un-Mr. Banksian character, a mountebank who started the witchcraft school of correspondence as a con and is most surprised to learn that his spells work). I found the scene where Miss Price animates an army of suits of armor (conveniently resident in the local museum) to rout a German landing party deeply satisfying.
osprey_archer: (books)
Lo these many years ago, back in… 2012… I signed up for a 100 posts challenge, on the topic “100 Books that Influenced Me,” and then petered out in the early forties.

But it’s occurred to me that if I wrote a post a week, I could finish the challenge in a little over a year, and after all I love writing about my favorite books, so why not? Mostly I write about books that I’m reading now; it will be nice to give myself the opportunity to talk about old favorites.

This week: Mary Norton’s The Borrowers, which was my very favorite thing when I was small. The book (actually a sequence of five books) is about a family of tiny people, less than a foot high, who live in the walls of human houses and support themselves by borrowing (well, stealing) from their human hosts.

The heroine is Arrietty Clock, who at fourteen (which seemed to me a most impressive age) has never left her family’s home under the clock in the kitchen of a quiet Victorian country home. But that’s about to change: in the absence of a son, Arrietty’s mother insists that Arrietty needs to learn to borrow, just in case something happens to her father. Because, after all, something has happened to her father: he’s been Seen, seen by a full-size human being, a boy (recuperating from an illness he contracted in India - the most classic Victorian backstory) whom the Clocks didn’t know was in the house until too late.

I loved the adventurous aspect (leaving her home for the first time to experience the wide world!), the setting (this book might be the genesis of my love of Victorian England), the details about tiny people living in a big world: Arrietty rolling an onion down the corridor from the storeroom so her mother can cut a single ring off of it to put in their soup. And of course Arrietty herself: she’s a thoroughly satisfactory heroine.

The US edition is beautifully illustrated by Joe and Beth Krush, who also illustrated Elizabeth Enright’s Gone-Away Lake. I poured over the pictures of Arrietty’s overstuffed Victorian parlor, all built up of bits and pieces repurposed for the use of tiny people: spools of thread used as stools, postage stamp pictures of Queen Victoria hung on the wall as portraits.

I was so taken with the idea of tiny people that I beguiled many hours in kindergarten envisioning the adventures of tiny people living in the school walls. I spent some time worrying what they ate during summer vacation, when we weren’t around to provide half-eaten rice krispie treats for their delectation, before deciding that they probably migrated to the park up the hill behind the school and lived in bucolic bliss till we all trundled back to school.
osprey_archer: (cheers)
Julie owns a box set of classic Universal Monsters films, so we attempted to crammed as many of them into October as we could, although in the end we only managed two: the 1932 The Mummy and the 1931 Dracula, both of which feature women mind-controlled by the eponymous monstrous man into some sort of romantic relationship. I guess that’s just the most terrifying thing in the world in the 1930s? From the perspective of 2017 neither of these movies seemed particularly frightening (which is good, because I’m a total baby about horror movies).

I also saw a bunch of movies in theaters this month! Going to theaters by myself is my new favorite thing. Two of them I have already posted about, but I didn’t manage to get to Professor Marston and the Wonder Women, which is about the creator of Wonder Woman and the two women who were the loves of his life and also in love with each other (at least according to the movie; there’s apparently some debate about how they felt about each other IRL) and all lived together in a love triangle in suburbia after the whole thing got the Marstons fired, on account of how the young lady was one of their students when they were both psychology professors.

...Frankly this sounds super unethical but hey, they seem to have been happy together, so I guess that worked out in the end. The sex scenes were hot like burning (there is one scene where Elizabeth Marston is wrapping a rope around Olive - not even tying her up, just wrapping it around - and Olive makes this sound - ) and I thought it was just really well done, overall.

Also, my mother and I went to see Ponyo on the big screen at the ArtCraft. (She’s never seen a Studio Ghibli film before! I may be able to entice her into watching Arrietty with me: she read The Borrowers to me in my youth.) I do like it, but it’s never been my favorite Ghibli film: I just can’t get over the essential weirdness of the fact that the sea sorcerer and the sea goddess decide that it’s a good idea to let the fate of the earth hinge on the faithful trueness of Sosuke’s love for Ponyo. Sosuke’s great, but - he’s five! How many people are forever faithful and true to the person they loved when they were five? Is Ponyo going to turn back into a fish if Sosuke’s attentions wander?

Other movies I saw this month: Steel Magnolias! Which has been on my radar forever as one of the famous movies about female friendship - I’m always seeing it “Movies about Female Friendship” lists like the one where I found Ghost World - and, unlike Ghost World, the female friendships here are actually strong and positive and really the main point of the movie, so that has restored some of my trust in those lists.

Having said that, it’s not really my kind of movie - I think you could classify it as a weepy and that’s just not my thing - but nonetheless I’m glad I’ve seen it and finally have it off my Netflix queue.

Also How to Steal a Million, an Audrey Hepburn movie that I first saw in high school and adored, and watched again this month and… did not adore as much. Not that I disliked it, but it did not cause the same enormous upwelling of delight that I remembered and I am concerned that this means that my sense of joy has gone into a state of hopeless atrophy.

Profile

osprey_archer: (Default)
osprey_archer

July 2025

S M T W T F S
   1 2 345
67 8 9101112
13 1415 16 17 1819
20212223242526
2728293031  

Syndicate

RSS Atom

Most Popular Tags

Style Credit

Expand Cut Tags

No cut tags
Page generated Jul. 20th, 2025 07:30 pm
Powered by Dreamwidth Studios