Well my big preamble is that I read it when I was like 16. I liked a lot of things at 16 that I like much less now. And I haven't reread it in a while. However, I did reread it once as an adult --I read it to my kids--and I still did love it a lot at that point.
I think the world set-up--the different zones, the times of day and the way the light worked, the relationship of this with the bottles and the bottles to the goblets--all that appealed to me. And some of what I recognize to be didactic elements--like in the Shophosian (sp? I'm doing this from memory) Mists--appealed to me in the way that some of the didacticism in Narnia does. And I guess I liked the overall prophecy, and I was interested how the prophecy-conflicts were going to resolve in the current generation. And I liked the end-of-the-world place. And I think I liked the weirdness of it? And some of the details, like the harp strings seeming to extend up through the ceiling of the curiosity shop.
no subject
I think the world set-up--the different zones, the times of day and the way the light worked, the relationship of this with the bottles and the bottles to the goblets--all that appealed to me. And some of what I recognize to be didactic elements--like in the Shophosian (sp? I'm doing this from memory) Mists--appealed to me in the way that some of the didacticism in Narnia does. And I guess I liked the overall prophecy, and I was interested how the prophecy-conflicts were going to resolve in the current generation. And I liked the end-of-the-world place. And I think I liked the weirdness of it? And some of the details, like the harp strings seeming to extend up through the ceiling of the curiosity shop.