osprey_archer: (books)
osprey_archer ([personal profile] osprey_archer) wrote2013-02-07 09:46 pm

Girl Books for Girls

Yesterday, after I completed my list of favorite child characters, I realized that all the characters I’d listed were girls. It’s not that I avoided male protagonists as a child - I read pretty much everything - but clearly I imprinted on the girls.

Every so often I’ll stumble on someone bemoaning the fact that there’s nothing for girls to read that has good role models, and, okay, have you looked at children’s literature recently? And by recently I mean “within the last two decades.” Because for most of my childhood I did nothing but read and I never had a problem finding books with heroines I enjoyed.

If you’re looking specifically for books about Girls Who Fight, then yes, the pickings are rather slim. There’s all of Tamora Pierce’s books. And Crown Duel. And The Hunger Games and Graceling and, oh, the Narnia books, and the Fearless series which is admittedly a bit out of date, and the Gallagher Girls series - they spy, I’m assuming they fight? - and the Samurai Girl books and, oh wait, I lied, there are PILES of books about girls who can probably beat you into the floor.

Which is great! But frankly, if Girl with Sword is the only kind of character who falls under your “good role model” rubric, then you - and I say this as someone who loves Girls Who Kick Ass books! - are doing this wrong.

There’s a huge selection of awesome girl characters, and moreover, there has been basically since Jo March in Little Women proved that awesomeness sold. Early twentieth century fiction teems with amazing heroines! I am an expert in the field. Brave girls (with swords and without!), smart girls, funny girls, artsy girls, imaginative dreamy shy girls, and any one of these characters can be a good role model.

Which is not to say that girls’ fiction is totally perfect in every way and we ought to stop fretting about it; but we should fret about things that are actually problems. Sheer quantity is not an issue in Anglophone fiction and hasn’t been for over a century.

[identity profile] carmarthen.livejournal.com 2013-02-08 04:16 am (UTC)(link)
Yeah, I don't really get that complaint, either. I mean, when people say "I could never find any female characters I identified with," okay, that's their experience, but it kind of baffles me because as you say, it's not like the quantity and variety aren't there.

[identity profile] osprey-archer.livejournal.com 2013-02-08 04:41 am (UTC)(link)
When people who were born in, say, the fifties say that, I can kind of see it, because there was a dip in awesome female character production in midcentury. (Although there were still Lucy & Jill in Narnia and Eowyn in LotR so...maybe not so much?)

But when people our age say it, I tend to assume the problem is them: in my experience there's a high correlation between statements like that and having Issues about female characters.

In a sense it's unfair to blame people for picking up this cultural baggage when they were but lasses...but at the same time, there are some kinds of baggage I just don't want to deal with, so it's useful to know the warning signs.